1
|
Zhou L, Wan Y, Zhang L, Meng H, Yuan L, Zhou S, Cheng W, Jiang Y. Beyond monotherapy: An era ushering in combinations of PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid tumors. Biomed Pharmacother 2024; 175:116733. [PMID: 38754267 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The introduction of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has marked a significant shift in the treatment landscape for solid tumors. Emerging preclinical evidence and initial clinical trials have indicated that the synergistic application of PARPis and ICIs may enhance treatment efficacy and potentially improve long-term patient outcomes. Nonetheless, how to identify specific tumor types and molecular subgroups most likely to benefit from this combination remains an area of ongoing research. This review thoroughly examines current studies on the co-administration of PARPis and ICIs across various solid tumors. It explores the underlying mechanisms of action, evaluates clinical efficacy, identifies potential responder populations, and delineates common adverse events alongside strategic management approaches. The aim is to offer a detailed understanding of this combination therapy, potentially guiding future therapeutic strategies for solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Yicong Wan
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Huangyang Meng
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Lin Yuan
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Shulin Zhou
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Wenjun Cheng
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
| | - Yi Jiang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lorusso D, Mouret-Reynier MA, Harter P, Cropet C, Caballero C, Wolfrum-Ristau P, Satoh T, Vergote I, Parma G, Nøttrup TJ, Lebreton C, Fasching PA, Pisano C, Manso L, Bourgeois H, Runnebaum I, Zamagni C, Hardy-Bessard AC, Schnelzer A, Fabbro M, Schmalfeldt B, Berton D, Belau A, Lotz JP, Gropp-Meier M, Gladieff L, Lück HJ, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Pujade-Lauraine E, Ray-Coquard I. Updated progression-free survival and final overall survival with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab according to clinical risk in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:550-558. [PMID: 38129136 PMCID: PMC10982633 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644), adding maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab provided a substantial progression-free survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumors, irrespective of clinical risk. Subsequently, a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival was reported with olaparib plus bevacizumab in the HRD-positive subgroup. We report updated progression-free survival and overall survival by clinical risk and HRD status. METHODS Patients in clinical response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab received maintenance olaparib (up to 24 months) plus bevacizumab (up to 15 months in total) or placebo plus bevacizumab. This post hoc analysis evaluated 5-year progression-free survival and mature overall survival in patients classified by clinical risk and HRD status. RESULTS Of 806 randomized patients, 74% were higher-risk and 26% were lower-risk. In higher-risk HRD-positive patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival was 0.46 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.34 to 0.61), with 5-year progression-free survival of 35% with olaparib plus bevacizumab versus 15% with bevacizumab alone; and the HR for overall survival was 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.00), with 5-year overall survival of 55% versus 42%, respectively. In lower-risk HRD-positive patients, the HR for progression-free survival was 0.26 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.45), with 5-year progression-free survival of 72% with olaparib plus bevacizumab versus 28% with bevacizumab alone; and the HR for overall survival was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.66), with 5-year overall survival of 88% versus 61%, respectively. No benefit was seen in HRD-negative patients regardless of clinical risk. CONCLUSION This post hoc analysis indicates that in patients with newly diagnosed advanced HRD-positive ovarian cancer, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab should not be limited to those considered at higher risk of disease progression. Five-year progression-free survival rates support long-term remission and suggest an increased potential for cure with particular benefit suggested in lower-risk HRD-positive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Lorusso
- Istituto Tumori Milano + Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies, (MITO), Italy
| | - Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynaecology & Gynaecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
| | - Claire Cropet
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Cristina Caballero
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario, (GEICO), Spain
| | - Pia Wolfrum-Ristau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Study Group, (AGO-Austria), Austria
| | - Toyomi Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
- Gynecologic Oncology Trial and Investigation Consortium, (GOTIC), Japan
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium, European Union
- Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Belgium, European Union
| | - Gabriella Parma
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, (MANGO), Italy
| | - Trine J Nøttrup
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology, (NSGO), Denmark
| | - Coriolan Lebreton
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Translational Medicine, Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carmela Pisano
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies, (MITO), Italy
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luis Manso
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario, (GEICO), Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hugues Bourgeois
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Bernard - Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - Ingo Runnebaum
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies, (MITO), Italy
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Oncologie Médicale, Centre CARIO - HPCA, Plérin Sur Mer, Plérin, France
| | - Andreas Schnelzer
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michel Fabbro
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dominique Berton
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- L'Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Centre René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Antje Belau
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Frauenklinik & Frauenarztpraxis, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jean-Pierre Lotz
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Martina Gropp-Meier
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Laurence Gladieff
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Oncopole CLAUDIUS REGAUD IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Hans-Joachim Lück
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe, (AGO), Germany
- Gynäkologisch-Onkologische Praxis, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- ICO Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Eric Pujade-Lauraine
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Medical Oncology Department, ARCAGY Research, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, (GINECO), France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Veneziani AC, Gonzalez-Ochoa E, Alqaisi H, Madariaga A, Bhat G, Rouzbahman M, Sneha S, Oza AM. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:820-842. [PMID: 37783747 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00819-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma is characterized by heterogeneity at the molecular, cellular and anatomical levels, both spatially and temporally. This heterogeneity affects response to surgery and/or systemic therapy, and also facilitates inherent and acquired drug resistance. As a consequence, this tumour type is often aggressive and frequently lethal. Ovarian carcinoma is not a single disease entity and comprises various subtypes, each with distinct complex molecular landscapes that change during progression and therapy. The interactions of cancer and stromal cells within the tumour microenvironment further affects disease evolution and response to therapy. In past decades, researchers have characterized the cellular, molecular, microenvironmental and immunological heterogeneity of ovarian carcinoma. Traditional treatment approaches have considered ovarian carcinoma as a single entity. This landscape is slowly changing with the increasing appreciation of heterogeneity and the recognition that delivering ineffective therapies can delay the development of effective personalized approaches as well as potentially change the molecular and cellular characteristics of the tumour, which might lead to additional resistance to subsequent therapy. In this Review we discuss the heterogeneity of ovarian carcinoma, outline the current treatment landscape for this malignancy and highlight potentially effective therapeutic strategies in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C Veneziani
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eduardo Gonzalez-Ochoa
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Husam Alqaisi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ainhoa Madariaga
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 De Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gita Bhat
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marjan Rouzbahman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suku Sneha
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cordani N, Bianchi T, Ammoni LC, Cortinovis DL, Cazzaniga ME, Lissoni AA, Landoni F, Canova S. An Overview of PARP Resistance in Ovarian Cancer from a Molecular and Clinical Perspective. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11890. [PMID: 37569269 PMCID: PMC10418869 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241511890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), a primarily high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), is one of the major causes of high death-to-incidence ratios of all gynecological cancers. Cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy represent the main treatments for this aggressive disease. Molecular characterization of HGSOC has revealed that up to 50% of cases have a deficiency in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) system, which makes these tumors sensitive to poly ADP-ribose inhibitors (PARP-is). However, drug resistance often occurs and overcoming it represents a big challenge. A number of strategies are under investigation, with the most promising being combinations of PARP-is with antiangiogenetic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, new drugs targeting different pathways, including the ATR-CHK1-WEE1, the PI3K-AKT and the RAS/RAF/MEK, are under development both in phase I and II-III clinical trials. Nevertheless, there is still a long way to go, and the next few years promise to be exciting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Cordani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
| | - Tommaso Bianchi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Carlofrancesco Ammoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
| | | | - Marina Elena Cazzaniga
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Phase 1 Research Centre, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Alberto Lissoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Stefania Canova
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caruso G, Tomao F, Parma G, Lapresa M, Multinu F, Palaia I, Aletti G, Colombo N. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer: lessons learned and future directions. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:431-443. [PMID: 36928097 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent a new standard of care in the upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer to the point that the vast majority of patients now receive a PARPi, alone or in combination with the anti-angiogenic bevacizumab, as part of their first-line maintenance therapy. The clinical benefit of PARPi is well established; however, much has changed since their introduction and several relevant questions have been raised and remain unresolved in the post-PARPi era. The decision-making process regarding the most appropriate first-line maintenance therapy could be challenging in clinical practice, especially in the homologous recombination-proficient setting, and several other factors need to be considered apart from the mutational status. Concerns regarding post-PARPi progression treatment have emerged, highlighting an unmet need to define a valid algorithm strategy. PARPi may not only compromise the response to further platinum due to cross-resistance mechanisms but the impact on subsequent non-platinum chemotherapy and surgery also remains unclear. Definitive results on the role of PARPi rechallenge are awaited, especially in the case of oligoprogression managed with locoregional treatment. Moreover, the updated overall survival data from the recurrent setting warrant caution in using PARPi as single agents for unselected patients. Several PARPi combination regimens are emerging for overcoming PARPi resistance and may become our new therapeutic armamentarium. This review discusses a set of clinically relevant issues in the PARPi era and provides a glimpse of future challenges and opportunities in ovarian cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy .,Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Parma
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Lapresa
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aletti
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Role of PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Immunotherapy: Potential Friends to Immune Activating Molecules and Foes to Immune Checkpoints. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225633. [PMID: 36428727 PMCID: PMC9688455 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) induce cytotoxic effects as single agents in tumors characterized by defective repair of DNA double-strand breaks deriving from BRCA1/2 mutations or other abnormalities in genes associated with homologous recombination. Preclinical studies have shown that PARPi-induced DNA damage may affect the tumor immune microenvironment and immune-mediated anti-tumor response through several mechanisms. In particular, increased DNA damage has been shown to induce the activation of type I interferon pathway and up-regulation of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, which can both enhance sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Despite the recent approval of ICIs for a number of advanced cancer types based on their ability to reinvigorate T-cell-mediated antitumor immune responses, a consistent percentage of treated patients fail to respond, strongly encouraging the identification of combination therapies to overcome resistance. In the present review, we analyzed both established and unexplored mechanisms that may be elicited by PARPi, supporting immune reactivation and their potential synergism with currently used ICIs. This analysis may indicate novel and possibly patient-specific immune features that might represent new pharmacological targets of PARPi, potentially leading to the identification of predictive biomarkers of response to their combination with ICIs.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yap TA, Bessudo A, Hamilton E, Sachdev J, Patel MR, Rodon J, Evilevitch L, Duncan M, Guo W, Kumar S, Lu S, Dezube BJ, Gabrail N. IOLite: phase 1b trial of doublet/triplet combinations of dostarlimab with niraparib, carboplatin-paclitaxel, with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-003924. [PMID: 35332062 PMCID: PMC8948406 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Doublet combination therapies targeting immune checkpoints have shown promising efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors, but it is unknown if rational triplet combinations will be well tolerated and associated with improved antitumor activity. The objective of this trial was to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) and to assess the safety and efficacy of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor dostarlimab in combination with (1) the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib with or without vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab or (2) carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS IOLite is a multicenter, open-label, multi-arm clinical trial. Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. Patients received dostarlimab in combination with niraparib with or without bevacizumab or in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Prespecified endpoints in all parts were to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), RP2Ds, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and preliminary efficacy for each combination. RESULTS A total of 55 patients were enrolled; patients received dostarlimab and: (1) niraparib in part A (n=22); (2) carboplatin-paclitaxel in part B (n=14); (3) niraparib plus bevacizumab in part C (n=13); (4) carboplatin-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in part D (n=6). The RP2Ds of all combinations were determined. All combinations were safe and tolerable, with no new safety signals observed. DLTs were reported in 2, 1, 2, and 0 patients, in parts A-D, respectively. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed, with confirmed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 complete/partial responses reported in 4 of 22 patients (18.2%), 6 of 14 patients (42.9%), 4 of 13 patients (30.8%), and 3 of 6 (50.0%) patients, in parts A-D, respectively. Disease control rates were 40.9%, 57.1%, 84.6%, and 83.3%, in parts A-D, respectively. Dostarlimab PK was unaffected by any combinations tested. Coadministration of bevacizumab showed no impact on niraparib PKs. The overall mean PD-1 receptor occupancy was 99.0%. CONCLUSIONS Dostarlimab was well tolerated in both doublet and triplet regimens tested, with promising antitumor activity observed with all combinations. We observed higher disease control rates in the triplet regimens than in doublet regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03307785.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alberto Bessudo
- California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Erika Hamilton
- Sara Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jasgit Sachdev
- HonorHealth Research Institute/TGen, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Manish R Patel
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, Florida, USA
| | - Jordi Rodon
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Wei Guo
- GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Sharon Lu
- GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Nashat Gabrail
- Department of Oncology, Gabrail Cancer Center, Canton, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park JY, Lee JY, Lee YY, Shim SH, Suh DH, Kim JW. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2021. J Gynecol Oncol 2022; 33:e43. [PMID: 35245004 PMCID: PMC8899869 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In the 2021 series, we not only summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology but also added discussions to every part, based on communications at the conference. A review of cervical cancer included adjuvant treatments such as radiation and chemoradiation (concurrent or sequential) after radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease. Ovarian cancer research included studies of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, and various trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and conventional chemotherapy. The rechallenge of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer were also addressed. For uterine corpus cancer, dostarlimab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody) alone, or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in combination with pembrolizumab for advanced, metastatic, or recurrent endometrial cancer were reviewed. The survival differences between the intensive and minimalist follow-up protocols were also described. In this review, we compared salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in terms of quality of life in BRCA 1 and 2 pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Yeol Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Young Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Shim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Suh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harter P, Mouret-Reynier MA, Pignata S, Cropet C, González-Martín A, Bogner G, Fujiwara K, Vergote I, Colombo N, Nøttrup TJ, Floquet A, El-Balat A, Scambia G, Guerra Alia EM, Fabbro M, Schmalfeldt B, Hardy-Bessard AC, Runnebaum I, Pujade-Lauraine E, Ray-Coquard I. Efficacy of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab according to clinical risk in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:254-264. [PMID: 34952708 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adding maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab provided a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the randomized, double-blind PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644). We analyzed PFS by clinical risk and biomarker status. METHODS Patients received olaparib 300 mg twice daily for up to 24 months plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 15 months in total, or placebo plus bevacizumab. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated PFS in patients classified as higher risk (stage III with upfront surgery and residual disease or neoadjuvant chemotherapy; stage IV) or lower risk (stage III with upfront surgery and no residual disease), and by biomarker status. RESULTS Of 806 randomized patients, 74% were higher risk and 26% were lower risk. After a median 22.9 months of follow-up, PFS favored olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in higher-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.74) and lower-risk patients (0.46; 0.30-0.72). Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided a substantial PFS benefit versus bevacizumab alone in the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive subgroup (higher risk: HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.28-0.54 and lower risk: 0.15; 0.07-0.30), with 24-month PFS rates in lower-risk patients of 90% versus 43%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier estimates). CONCLUSIONS In PAOLA-1, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab provided a substantial PFS benefit in HRD-positive patients with a reduction of risk of progression or death of 61% in the higher-risk group and of 85% in the lower-risk group compared with bevacizumab alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Harter
- Ev. Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Studiengruppe, Germany.
| | - Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), France
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, and Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Italy
| | | | - Antonio González-Martín
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Spain
| | - Gerhard Bogner
- Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO Austria), Austria
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, and Gynecologic Oncology Trial and Investigation Consortium (GOTIC), Japan
| | - Ignace Vergote
- University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, and Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Belgium
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- University of Milan-Bicocca and IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, and Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group (MANGO), Italy
| | - Trine Jakobi Nøttrup
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, and Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO), Denmark
| | - Anne Floquet
- Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, and GINECO, France
| | - Ahmed El-Balat
- Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, and AGO, Germany
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Università Cattolica, Rome, and MITO, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Pujade-Lauraine
- Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY), Paris, and GINECO, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon BERARD and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, and GINECO, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xie H, Wang W, Qi W, Jin W, Xia B. Targeting DNA Repair Response Promotes Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Rationale and Clinical Application. Front Immunol 2021; 12:661115. [PMID: 34712221 PMCID: PMC8546337 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.661115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as a powerful oncologic treatment modality for patients with different solid tumors. Unfortunately, the efficacy of ICI monotherapy in ovarian cancer is limited, and combination therapy provides a new opportunity for immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways play central roles in the maintenance of genomic integrity and promote the progression of cancer. A deficiency in DDR genes can cause different degrees of DNA damage that enhance local antigen release, resulting in systemic antitumor immune responses. Thus, the combination of DDR inhibitors with ICI represents an attractive therapeutic strategy with the potential to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the interconnectivity between DDR pathway deficiency and immune response, summarize available clinical trials on the combination therapy in ovarian cancer, and discuss the potential predictive biomarkers that can be utilized to guide the use of combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyu Xie
- Clinical Research Center, Women’s Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Wenjie Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Wencai Qi
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology, Hefei, China
| | - Weilin Jin
- Institute of Cancer Neuroscience, Medical Frontier Innovation Research Center, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Bairong Xia
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ovarian cancer (OC) is a heterogeneous disease and a mounting body of evidence shows that a 'one-size-fits-all' approach is obsolete. Differences in epidemiology, tumor biology, genetic profiles and treatment responses of these different types necessitate a tumor and patient-specific approach. Ninety percentage consists of epithelial OC with 70% being high-grade serous OC. The other rarer subtypes are low-grade serous (5%), clear cell (12%), endometrioid (11%) and mucinous carcinoma (3%). The remaining 10% are nonepithelial rare OCs: germ cell (3%) and sex-cord stromal tumors (7%). RECENT FINDINGS Over the past few decades, the 5-year survival rates have only improved modestly, therefore novel therapies are urgently needed. Recently, immunotherapy has been introduced into clinical practice in a number of solid tumors. Although preclinical data confirm the presence of an immunogenic microenvironment in a number of ovarian tumor types, no single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor has been approved hitherto. Identifying suitable treatment combinations, adequate patient selection and thus correct implementation of immunotherapy remain major challenges. SUMMARY In this review, we focus on the rationale of incorporating immune therapy in rare OC, we summarize the recent developments with preclinical data and results of clinical trials, with particular focus on rare ovarian histological subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Laga
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lorusso D, Ceni V, Daniele G, Pietragalla A, Salutari V, Muratore M, Nero C, Ciccarone F, Scambia G. Immunotherapy in gynecological cancers. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2021; 2:48-64. [PMID: 36046088 PMCID: PMC9400773 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2021.00033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has changed the natural history of several malignancies that, a decade ago, had a very poor prognosis, such as lung cancer and melanoma. Consequently, many attempts have been done to expand the indications of immunotherapy agents, predominantly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), in other cancers, including gynecological malignancies. Alongside promising results in cervical and endometrial neoplasms, there are not clear data on the benefit of ICIs as single agent or in combination with antiangiogenic agents in ovarian cancer (OC) and ongoing trials are focusing on combining ICIs with standard chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors. This chapter summarized the evidences of ICIs in gynecological malignancies and report the ongoing trials in cervical, endometrial and OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy 2Department of Life Science and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Ceni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Gennaro Daniele
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Pietragalla
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vanda Salutari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Nero
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Development of synthetic lethality in cancer: molecular and cellular classification. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020; 5:241. [PMID: 33077733 PMCID: PMC7573576 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-00358-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, genetically targeted cancer therapies have been a topic of great interest. Synthetic lethality provides a new approach for the treatment of mutated genes that were previously considered unable to be targeted in traditional genotype-targeted treatments. The increasing researches and applications in the clinical setting made synthetic lethality a promising anticancer treatment option. However, the current understandings on different conditions of synthetic lethality have not been systematically assessed and the application of synthetic lethality in clinical practice still faces many challenges. Here, we propose a novel and systematic classification of synthetic lethality divided into gene level, pathway level, organelle level, and conditional synthetic lethality, according to the degree of specificity into its biological mechanism. Multiple preclinical findings of synthetic lethality in recent years will be reviewed and classified under these different categories. Moreover, synthetic lethality targeted drugs in clinical practice will be briefly discussed. Finally, we will explore the essential implications of this classification as well as its prospects in eliminating existing challenges and the future directions of synthetic lethality.
Collapse
|
14
|
Reverdy T, Sajous C, Péron J, Glehen O, Bakrin N, Gertych W, Lopez J, You B, Freyer G. Front-Line Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer-Current Advances and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2414. [PMID: 32854393 PMCID: PMC7564452 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian tumor is the gynecological cancer associated with the highest mortality. Most diseases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, which impairs the chances of prolonged complete remission. The standard front-line treatment of advanced stages combines surgery in an expert center with platinum-based chemotherapy. Most patients experience a relapse in the years following the initial treatment. During the last decade, anti-angiogenic agents used in the maintenance setting improved progression free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone. More recently, PARP inhibitors demonstrated substantial efficacy, mainly in patients with germinal or somatic BRCA mutations or other homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD), all involved in double strand DNA Damage Repair (DDR). Other therapeutic paradigms are currently being explored, including combinations of immune-checkpoints inhibitors, chemotherapy, bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors. In addition to these clinical advances, molecular characterization of the tumors and their correlations with drugs efficacy are needed to better understand which patient will benefit the most from the various treatments available to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibaut Reverdy
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL) and Université de Lyon, 69310 Lyon, France; (C.S.); (J.P.); (B.Y.); (G.F.)
| | - Christophe Sajous
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL) and Université de Lyon, 69310 Lyon, France; (C.S.); (J.P.); (B.Y.); (G.F.)
| | - Julien Péron
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL) and Université de Lyon, 69310 Lyon, France; (C.S.); (J.P.); (B.Y.); (G.F.)
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Departement of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69310 Lyon, France; (O.G.); (N.B.)
- EA CICLY, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Lyon, France;
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Departement of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69310 Lyon, France; (O.G.); (N.B.)
- EA CICLY, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Lyon, France;
| | - Witold Gertych
- EA CICLY, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Lyon, France;
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69310 Lyon, France
| | - Jonathan Lopez
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Hopital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69310 Lyon, France;
| | - Benoit You
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL) and Université de Lyon, 69310 Lyon, France; (C.S.); (J.P.); (B.Y.); (G.F.)
- EA CICLY, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Lyon, France;
| | - Gilles Freyer
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL) and Université de Lyon, 69310 Lyon, France; (C.S.); (J.P.); (B.Y.); (G.F.)
- EA CICLY, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Lyon, France;
| |
Collapse
|