Pembrolizumab plus either epacadostat or placebo for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma: results from the ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 study

BACKGROUND

Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive enzyme that has been correlated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 may counteract the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In the phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 study, epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a preliminary objective response rate (ORR) of 35% in a cohort of patients with advanced UC.

METHODS

ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 was a double-blinded, randomized, phase III study. Eligible adults had confirmed locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC of the urinary tract and were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive epacadostat (100 mg twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus pembrolizumab for up to 35 pembrolizumab infusions. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1).

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were randomized (epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, n = 44; placebo plus pembrolizumab, n = 49). Enrollment was stopped early due to emerging data from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study. The median duration of follow-up was 64 days in both arms. Based on all available data at cutoff, ORR (unconfirmed) was 31.8% (95% CI, 22.46-55.24%) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 24.5% (95% CI, 15.33-43.67%) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Circulating kynurenine levels numerically increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab combination treatment was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to the placebo arm. Treatment discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with epacadostat (11.6% vs. 4.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a similar ORR and safety profile as placebo plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, epacadostat did not appear to completely normalize circulating kynurenine levels when administered with pembrolizumab. Larger studies with longer follow-up and possibly testing higher doses of epacadostat, potentially in different therapy settings, may be warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03361865, retrospectively registered December 5, 2017.

Immune mechanisms and molecular therapeutic strategies to enhance immunotherapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Invited review for special issue "Seminar: Treatment Advances and Molecular Biology Insights in Urothelial Carcinoma"

Intravesical immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been the standard of care for patients with high-risk non non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for over four decades. Despite its success as a cancer immunotherapy, disease recurrence and progression remain common. Current efforts are focused on developing effective and well-tolerated alternatives to BCG and salvage bladder preservation therapies after BCG has failed. The focus of this review is to synthesize our current understanding of the molecular biology and tumor immune microenvironment of NMIBC to provide rationale for existing and emerging therapeutic targets. We highlight recent and ongoing clinical trials and define the current treatment landscape, challenges, and future directions of salvage treatment. Combination regimens that are rationally designed will be needed to make meaningful therapeutic advancements. Investigations into the molecular underpinnings of NMIBC are leading to the emergence of predictive molecular biomarkers that provide greater insight into the clinical heterogeneity of NMIBC and enable us to identify drivers of treatment resistance and new therapeutic targets.

Novel Therapies for High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment options for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), particularly following BCG, remain limited. We highlight recent, promising therapies for high-risk NMIBC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several therapies utilizing different mechanisms of action have demonstrated favorable results in the BCG-naïve and BCG-unresponsive settings. These treatments include intravenous and intravesical immunotherapy, viral- and bacterial-based intravesical therapies, combination intravesical chemotherapy regimens, and novel intravesical chemotherapy administration. Overall, the efficacy and tolerability of emerging treatments for NMIBC appear promising and provide potential alternatives to radical cystectomy. As the landscape of managing BCG-unresponsive disease evolves, clinical trials will explore future options and determine effective alternatives.

Evolution of immunotherapy in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been the gold standard treatment for intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for nearly half a century. Yet, many patients with high-risk disease will experience recurrence, including those who progress and eventually become unresponsive to BCG. For decades, apart from radical cystectomy, few therapeutic options existed for this at-risk population. However, the advent of novel immunotherapeutic agents has transformed treatment in a range of tumour types, including urothelial carcinoma. These immunotherapies have yielded promising results in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and, as such, are also being investigated for use in NIMIBC.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of the evolution of immunotherapy for NMIBC, beginning from the original immunotherapy- BCG - to current agents including checkpoint inhibitors, IL-15 agonists, viral gene therapies and therapeutic cancer vaccines.

EXPERT OPINION

The KEYNOTE-057 trial represented a pivotal moment for immunotherapy in NMIBC, but patient selection and the development of biomarkers to guide the identification of patients who will benefit most from a particular immunotherapy remains critical. As research efforts come to fruition, novel immunotherapies may become integrated into the standard treatment paradigm for intermediate- and high-risk NMBIC.