1
|
Salgia NJ, Zengin ZB, Pal SK, Dizman N. Renal Cell Carcinoma of Variant Histology: New Biologic Understanding Leads to Therapeutic Advances. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e438642. [PMID: 38776514 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_438642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the 10 most commonly diagnosed solid tumors. Most RCCs are histologically defined as clear cell, comprising approximately 75% of diagnoses. However, the remaining RCC cases are composed of a heterogeneous combination of diverse histopathologic subtypes, each with unique pathogeneses and clinical features. Although the therapeutic approach to both localized and metastatic RCCs has dramatically changed, first with the advent of antiangiogenic targeted therapies and more recently with the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations, these advances have primarily benefited the clear cell RCC patient population. As such, there remains critical gaps in the optimization of treatment regimens for patients with non-clear cell, or variant, RCC histologies. Herein, we detail recent advances in understanding the biology of RCC with variant histology and how such findings have guided novel clinical studies investigating precision oncology approaches for these rare subtypes. Among the most common variant histology RCCs are papillary RCC, comprising approximately 15%-20% of all diagnoses. Although a histopathologically diverse subset of tumors, papillary RCC is canonically associated with amplification of the MET protooncogene; recently completed and ongoing trials have investigated MET-directed therapies for this patient population. Finally, we discuss the unique biology of RCC with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation and the recent clinical findings detailing its paradoxical sensitivity to ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Salgia
- Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - Zeynep B Zengin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Nazli Dizman
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zschäbitz S, Mikuteit M, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Duensing S, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Erlmeier F, Steffens S. Expression of nectin-4 in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:90. [PMID: 36136143 PMCID: PMC9500133 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00558-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nectin-4 contributes to tumor proliferation, lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in malignant tumors and is an emerging target in tumor therapy. In renal cell carcinoma (RCC) VEGF-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors are currently treatments of choice. Enfortumab vedotin-ejf (EV) is an antibody drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4. The aim of our study was to investigate the expression of Nectin-4 in a large cohort of papillary RCC specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Specimens were derived from the PANZAR consortium (Erlangen, Heidelberg, Herne, Homburg, Mainz, Mannheim, Marburg, Muenster, LMU Munich, TU Munich, and Regensburg). Clinical data and tissue samples from n = 190 and n = 107 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively, were available. Expression of Nectin-4 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS In total, Nectin-4 staining was moderately or strongly positive in of 92 (48.4%) of type 1 and 39 (36.4%) type 2 of pRCC cases. No associations between Nectin-4 expression and age at diagnosis, gender, grading, and TNM stage was found. 5 year overall survival rate was not statistically different in patients with Nectin-4 negative versus Nectin-4 positive tumors for the overall cohort and the pRCC type 2 subgroup, but higher in patient with Nectin-4 positive pRCC type 1 tumors compared to Nectin-4 negative tumors (81.3% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION Nectin-4 could not be confirmed as a prognostic marker in pRCC in general. Due to its high abundance on pRCC specimens Nectin-4 is an interesting target for therapeutical approaches e.g. with EV. Clinical trials are warranted to elucidate its role in the pRCC treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office – Curriculum Development, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Institute of Urology, Prosper-Hospital GmbH, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421 Homburg, Germany
- Present Address: Urological Group and Clinic Derouet/Pönicke/Becker, Boxberg Centre, 66538 Neunkirchen, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinics Altona, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany
- Present Address: Institute of Pathology/Gerhard-Domagk Institute, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Gynecology, University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik C. Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology, Kreiskliniken Altötting-Burghausen, 84489 Burghausen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef and University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef and University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andres Jan Schrader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office – Curriculum Development, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown JR, Calaway A, Castle E, Garcia J, Barata PC. Systematic Review of Treatment of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. KIDNEY CANCER 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-210005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: Metastatic and unresectable non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma comprises more than a quarter of kidney cancers but does not have standardized treatment. Non-clear renal carcinoma consists of a variety of diverse histologic subtypes, including papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct, translocation, and medullary histologies, many of which carry a poor prognosis. Many prospective clinical trials exclude these kidney cancers, and for most clinical trials of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, only a small number of patients are enrolled. Objective: To perform a systematic review of recently published and currently enrolling prospective clinical trials for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Methods: A systematic search of Pubmed and MEDLINE (Ovid) was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines to identify recent prospective clinical trials in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. To ensure a thorough search, terms not only included non-clear cell renal carcinoma but also molecular subtypes. A review of currently enrolling clinical trials was conducted on Clinicaltrials.gov and the EU Clinical Trials Register as well. Results: A total of 33 prospective clinical trials with published results and 10 currently enrolling clinicals trials were identified. About half (48.5%) of these studies were reported in 2020 or 2021, and 36.4% were in the first-line setting. Treatments investigated in these trials included mTOR inhibitors, VEGF- and MET-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combinatorial strategies. Outcomes from these data revealed a wide range of response rate and progression free survival, favoring TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors -based combination regimens. Conclusions: Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the landscape of treatment for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Combination regimens may provide even further clinical benefit and warrant further investigation in larger, randomized prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R. Brown
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam Calaway
- Department of Urology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erik Castle
- Department of Urology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Jorge Garcia
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pedro C. Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergmann L, Weber S, Hartmann A, Ahrens M. Pathology and systemic therapy of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an overview. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:1273-1286. [PMID: 34291700 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1959319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a highly heterogenous group of kidney cancer entities. As most clinical trials predominantly include patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), nccRCC treatment guidelines are mainly extrapolated from recommendations in ccRCC. Here, we review and elucidate current data on the pathologic classification and treatment of nccRCC.Areas covered: This article gives an overview of the WHO classification of RCC, showing the histological diversity of nccRCC and focusing particularly on entities first characterized since 2016, their specific molecular behavior and their role as indicators for hereditary cancer syndromes. In this context, we discuss the available data on nccRCC treatment oprtions such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Expert opinion: Although nccRCCs are relatively uncommon, entities of this type account for a subgroup of up to 20-25% of all RCCs. Advances in histopathology and molecular genetics, together with evidence gained from retrospective and prospective clinical data, have improved understanding of these tumors in recent years. Nevertheless, selective trials of current and novel therapies including new targeted agents in patients with nccRCC are urgently needed to further improve treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lothar Bergmann
- Medical Clinic II, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,Private Praxis for Hematology/Oncology, Schifferstrasse, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sarah Weber
- Medical Clinic II, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital, Erlangen, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Marit Ahrens
- Medical Clinic II, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miller K, Bergmann L, Doehn C, Grünwald V, Gschwend JE, Ivanyi P, Keilholz U, Kuczyk MA. [Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma]. Aktuelle Urol 2020; 51:572-581. [PMID: 33027832 DOI: 10.1055/a-1252-1780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Due to novel therapies, the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved. A median overall survival of more than two years is a realistic goal. Immunotherapy combinations with checkpoint inhibitors or checkpoint inhibitors and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib are new first-line options.Sunitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib and the combination of bevacizumab + interferon alpha are approved for first-line therapy regardless of the progression risk score. The use of both the combination of nivolumab + ipilimumab and cabozantinib is restricted to intermediate and high-risk patients. In this subgroup, the immunotherapy combination was more effective in terms of overall survival compared with sunitinib. Temsirolimus is only approved for high-risk patients.Sunitinib and pazopanib can also be applied as second-line options - for pazopanib the use is restricted to the event of cytokine failure. Nivolumab and cabozantinib demonstrated superior overall survival compared with everolimus. Furthermore, the combination of lenvatinib + everolimus and axitinib are approved treatment options in the second-line and further settings. Everolimus has been replaced in the second-line setting by these new options.The question regarding the optimal sequence is still unanswered.The purpose of an interdisciplinary expert meeting was to debate which criteria should influence treatment. The members discussed several aspects of treating patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. As in previous years, the experts intended to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The results are presented in this publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Miller
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Urologie, Berlin
| | | | | | | | - Jürgen E. Gschwend
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Urology, München
| | | | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin
| | | |
Collapse
|