First-line chemotherapy or in combination with programmed cell death protein-1 antibody in patients with metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint blockade therapy has achieved great success in various types of cancers, studies on biliary tract cancer are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in Chinese patients with BTC.

METHODS

We collected medical records of 130 pathologically diagnosed metastatic or recurrent BTC patients who had not received chemotherapy in the advanced stage. Eligible patients who received first-line chemotherapy ± ICIs were enrolled in the efficacy and safety analysis. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR) between the ICI plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy alone group.

RESULTS

Of 90 enrolled patients, 45 received ICIs plus chemotherapy and 45 received chemotherapy. The median follow-up times were 18.7 and 19.6 months, respectively. The median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.3-7.5) with ICIs plus chemotherapy, which was significantly longer than the 4.2 months (95% CI: 2.1-6.5) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94; P = 0.0306). The median OS was 14.7 months (95% CI: 11.4-18.0) compared with 14.2 months (95% CI: 12.5-15.9) (HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.57-1.50; P = 0.765). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were similar between these two groups (71.1% and 64.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although first-line ICI therapy plus chemotherapy showed a significant improvement in the median PFS compared with chemotherapy in metastatic or recurrent BTC, the benefit did not translate into a statistically significant OS prolongation. The safety profile for ICIs plus chemotherapy was similar to chemotherapy alone.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemotherapies for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

At present, chemotherapy is still the primary treatment for advanced biliary tract carcinoma, but it is challenging to balance the efficacy and side effects. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a better way to identify the protocol, and the advantage is that it can be combined with direct and indirect evidence to judge the best treatment regimens. Therefore, we conducted NMA on the searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

NMA was conducted regarding the searched RCTs by comparing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective remission rates (ORRs), and adverse events (AEs) of different chemotherapy protocols.

RESULTS

We screened 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Compared with other regimens, the best supportive care (BSC) or FUFA protocol has a worse OS. Folfox4, GEMOX+erlotinib, and C+GEMOX can improve patients' PFS compared with BSC. Patients receiving GP+cediranib protocol have higher ORRs. There was reduced neutropenia grade ≥3 when adopting GP+cediranib, GS, C+GEMOX, RAM+GP, and MER+GP than when using FUFA protocol. The probability of vomiting of XELOX is lower than that of GEM+XELOX. There is a lower diarrhea incidence of XELOX than that of GEMOX+erlotinib. The results of cluster grade analysis illustrated that GEMOX+erlotinib owned a higher ORR and a higher surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) of neutropenia and vomiting but also had a lower SUCRA of diarrhea and fatigue. Meanwhile, both GEMOX and C+GEMOX have a better ORR and a higher AE SUCRA.

CONCLUSION

The NMA demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy has better efficacy and lower incidence of AEs than chemotherapy alone.

Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer in 2021

Biliary tract cancer refers to a group of malignancies including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. While surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, postoperative recurrence can sometimes occur. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used to prolong prognosis in some cases. Many unresectable cases are also treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy is widely introduced for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Evidence on chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer is recently on the increase. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is currently the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy in advanced cases. Recently, FOLFOX also demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment. In addition, efficacies of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors have been shown. In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine monotherapy has become the standard of care in Western countries. In addition to conventional cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. Genetic testing is used to check for genetic alterations and molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy are introduced based on tumor characteristics. In this article, we review the latest evidence of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer.