The Molecular Landscape of Pancreatobiliary Cancers for Novel Targeted Therapies From Real-World Genomic Profiling

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapies have limited efficacy in pancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC), underscoring the need for new regimens. Recently, tumor-agnostic approaches have been developed for some targeted therapies in advanced solid tumors; however, the frequency of alterations by clinical and genomic background is unclear in PC and BTC.

METHODS

To assess the frequencies of druggable gene alterations and investigate new potential therapeutic targetable genomic alterations, advanced PC and BTC patients were tested with comprehensive genomic profiling at Foundation Medicine during the course of clinical care.

RESULTS

A total of 16 913 PC patients and 3031 BTC patients were available for analyses, and frequencies of genomic alterations were stratified by age (≥40 years or <40 years), microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden status (high ≥10 or low <10 Muts/Mb), and select genomic alterations. Alterations in BRCA2, BRAF, ERBB2, CDK12, PIK3CA, FGFR2, EGFR, and other potential targets were seen across cohorts, with enrichment observed within particular subsets such as in PC patients lacking a KRAS mutation. In BTC patients, the rate of ERBB2 amplification was statistically significantly higher in the tumor mutational burden-high population (23.3% vs 13.7%). Interestingly, CDK12 rearrangement was observed in BTC patients with ERBB2 amplification tumors. In patients younger than 40 years, FGFR2 rearrangement (4%) was observed in PC: GATA6 amplification (11.1%) and rearrangement of BRAF (2.8%)FGFR2 (5.6%) was observed in BTC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified an appreciable frequency of immunotherapy biomarkers and targetable gene alterations in both PC and BTC, with notable frequencies in PC samples lacking KRAS mutations and children or adolescent and young adult populations, that should encourage comprehensive genomic profiling testing.

Early-onset pancreatic cancer: a review of molecular mechanisms, management, and survival

OBJECTIVES

Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) - defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years - is associated with a poor prognosis as compared to later-onset pancreatic cancer (LOPC). Emerging evidence suggests that EOPC may exhibit a genetic signature and tumor biology that is distinct from that of LOPC. We review genetic mutations that are more prevalent in EOPC relative to LOPC and discuss the potential impact of these mutations on treatment and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using PubMed and Medline, the following terms were searched and relevant citations assessed: "early onset pancreatic cancer," "late onset pancreatic cancer," "pancreatic cancer," "pancreatic cancer genes," and "pancreatic cancer targeted therapy."

RESULTS

Mutations in CDKN2, FOXC2, and SMAD4 are significantly more common in EOPC as compared to LOPC. In addition, limited data suggest that PI3KCA mutations are more frequently observed in EOPC as compared to LOPC. KRAS mutations are relatively rare in EOPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic mutations associated with EOPC are distinct from those of LOPC. The preponderance of the evidence suggest that poor outcomes in EOPC are related both to advanced stage of presentation and unique tumor biology. The molecular and genetic features of EOPC warrant further investigation in order to optimize management.

The potential targeted drugs for fusion genes including NRG1 in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains an incurable disease with few treatment options Recently, promising targets have been identified and novel therapeutic drugs are currently under development in KRAS wild-type PC. It has been reported that KRAS wild-type PC has the genomic alterations such as oncogenic derivers and kinase fusions. NRG1 fusion, which encodes the neuregulin 1 and is the main ligands for ERRB3, has been identified in approximately half of younger patients with PC with KRAS wild-type tumors by RNA sequencing. There are several promising targeted therapies for NRG1 fusion-positive tumors, such as EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, HER3, HER2 antibodies. BRAF, NTRK, and ALK fusion are also potentially actionable alterations in KRAS wild-type PC and novel therapies targeting certain aberrations have shown activity in clinical trials.

Treatment patterns and survival in patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is uncommon in patients younger than 50 years, although its incidence is increasing. This study characterizes treatment utilization for early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) versus average-age-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC) and identifies factors associated with failure to receive treatment.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with EOPC (age < 50 years) or AOPC (age ≥ 50 years) from 2004 to 2016. Multinomial regression was used to compare utilization (single modality vs multimodal treatment with or without surgery vs no treatment) between EOPC and AOPC. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 248,634 patients, 15,710 (6.3%) had EOPC. There were more male patients (56% vs 50%), non-White patients, and privately insured patients (61% vs 30%) with EOPC versus AOPC, without notable differences in clinical stage distribution. Patients with EOPC received more chemotherapy (38% vs 29%), surgery (9% vs 6.9%), chemoradiation (12% vs 9.2%), and multimodal treatment (21% vs 15%). The odds of receiving multimodal curative therapy were significantly higher for patients with EOPC versus patients with AOPC after adjustments for confounders (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.66-4.15; P < .001). Nineteen percent of patients with EOPC, in contrast to 39% of patients with AOPC, received no treatment. Patients with AOPC more frequently declined chemotherapy (15% vs 9.5%). One-year OS was higher for EOPC versus AOPC across each stage (0/I/II, 72% [95% CI, 71%-74%] vs 53% [95% CI, 53%-54%]; III, 48% [95% CI, 45%-50%] vs 38% [95% CI, 37%-38%]; IV, 25% [95% CI, 24%-26%] vs 15% [95% CI, 15%-15%]) and treated patients (0/I/II, 75% [95% CI, 74%-77%] vs 64% [95% CI, 63%-64%]; III, 51% [95% CI, 49%-54%] vs 47% [95% CI, 47%-48%]; IV, 29% [95% CI, 28%-31%] vs 23% [95% CI, 23%-24%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EOPC receive more oncologic therapy than patients with AOPC, although the intensity, type, and duration of chemotherapy are not available in the NCDB; however, 19% and 39%, respectively, receive no therapy. Underutilization may explain suboptimal oncologic outcomes. Efforts to improve access and treatment utilization in all age groups are warranted.

Pancreas cancer: Therapeutic trials in metastatic disease

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality in 2021. Cytotoxic therapies are the therapeutic mainstay for PDAC. The recent approval of olaparib as maintenance therapy for germline BRCA1/2-mutated PDAC and pembrolizumab for mismatch repair deficient PDAC represent molecularly targeted approaches for this disease. Investigational therapeutic strategies include targeting the stroma, metabolism, tumor microenvironment, and the immune system, and selected approaches are reviewed herein.