1
|
Zang M, Hu X, Yuan G, Li R, Li W, Pang H, Li Q, Chen J. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 125:111019. [PMID: 37879230 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising benefits in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In China, the most frequently used HAIC regimen is oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). However, arterial infusion of fluorouracil over 46 h was not convenient. Raltitrexed, another antimetabolic agent with a long plasma half-life, allows for shorter infusion durations. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with HAIC with raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (RALOX) or FOLFOX in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 82 eligible patients from February 2019 to December 2021. Forty patients were treated with FOLFOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 administered on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 infusion for 46 h, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. Forty-two patients received RALOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. RESULTS ORR was similar between the FOLFOX HAIC and RALOX HAIC groups (42.5% vs 42.5%, P = 0.974). DCR also showed no significant difference between the two groups (87.5% vs 85.7%, P = 0.813). Median PFS was 10.7 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group versus 10.2 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.41). Median OS was 20.3 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group, compared to 17.7 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.50). Both groups had similar profiles of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, and leukocytopenia. CONCLUSION The effectiveness and safety of HAIC with RALOX were comparable to HAIC with FOLFOX in intermediate and advanced HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengya Zang
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China
| | - Xiaoyun Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China
| | - Guosheng Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China
| | - Rong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China
| | - Wenli Li
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China
| | - Huajin Pang
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China
| | - Qi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China.
| | - Jinzhang Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Storandt MH, Mahipal A, Tella SH, Kommalapati A, Jin Z. Systemic Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patient Selection and Key Considerations. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2022; 9:1187-1200. [PMID: 36471742 PMCID: PMC9719284 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s365002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Most patients with HCC have advanced disease at initial diagnosis, and sorafenib has been the only systemic treatment option for more than a decade in patients with advanced, unresectable HCC. However, there has been a dramatic change in the treatment algorithm in the last several years, given new drug approvals in the field. Most importantly, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits in terms of response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to sorafenib in the first-line setting. Recently a phase III trial showed that the combination of durvalumab with a single dose of tremelimumab improved overall survival compared to sorafenib, while durvalumab monotherapy was found to be noninferior to sorafenib, making it an attractive alternative single agent in selected patient populations. As immunotherapy makes its way into the therapeutic landscape of HCC, other novel targeted therapies, such as lenvatinib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and regorafenib, have also been approved by regulatory authorities for treatment of advanced, unresectable HCC. This review article focuses on the first-line systemic treatment options for HCC while addressing some of the most important questions aimed at optimization of HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Zhaohui Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Med 2022:10.1007/s10238-022-00874-5. [PMID: 36001163 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-022-00874-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a primary malignancy of the liver, is a threat to the health of all humans as a prevalent malignancy and is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. It is difficult to diagnose because symptoms do not show up until late in the disease, and patients often progress to the point where transplantation, resection, or even local treatment cannot be performed. The progression of HCC is regulated by the immune system, and immunotherapy enables the body's immune system's defenses to target liver cancer cells; therefore, immunotherapy has brought a new hope for the treatment of HCC. Currently, the main types of immunotherapies for liver cancer are: immune checkpoint inhibitors, liver cancer vaccines and cellular therapies. In this review, the progress of immunotherapy for the treatment of HCC is summarized.
Collapse
|
4
|
Advances in novel systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Med Chem 2022; 14:1455-1470. [PMID: 35997677 DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2022-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the most frequent type of primary liver tumor. Most HCC patients present with advanced disease at diagnosis and the recurrence rate after surgery remains high. Treatment options for advanced HCC are limited, with sorafenib representing the only systemic agent approved for treatment of advanced HCC in more than a decade. However, in recent years new molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced HCC. In particular, combinations of ICIs with antiangiogenic drugs, or with other ICIs, represent one of the most promising strategies. Herein we provide a comprehensive overview of the main therapeutic advances in the systemic treatment of HCC, focusing on the most relevant ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng MY, Chan LL, Chan SL. Drug Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: First-Line and Beyond. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5489-5507. [PMID: 36005172 PMCID: PMC9406660 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has high mortality. The option of systemic therapy has increased significantly over the past five years. Sorafenib was the first multikinase inhibitor, introduced in 2007, as a treatment option for HCC, and it was the only effective systemic treatment for more than ten years. It was not until 2017 that several breakthroughs were made in the development of systemic strategies. Lenvatinib, another multikinase inhibitor, stood out successfully after sorafenib, and has been applied to clinical use in the first-line setting. Other multikinase inhibitors such as regorafenib, ramucirumab and cabozantinib, were approved in quick succession as second-line therapies. Concurrently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have readily become established treatments for many solid tumors, including HCC. The most studied ICIs to date, target programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). These ICIs have demonstrated efficacy in treating advanced HCC. More recently, combination of bevacizumab and atezolizumab (ICI targeting PD-L1) was approved as the gold-standard first-line therapy. Combination of ICIs with nivolumab and ipilimumab was also approved in the second-line setting for those who failed sorafenib. At the moment, numerous clinical trials in advanced HCC are underway, which will bring continuous change to the management, and increase the survival, for patients with advanced HCC. Our review article: (1) summarizes United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved systemic therapies in advanced HCC, (2) reports the evidence of currently approved treatments, (3) discusses potential drugs/drug combinations being currently tested in phase III clinical trials, and (4) proposes possible future directions in drug development for advanced HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maple Ye Feng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Landon L. Chan
- Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Stephen Lam Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu Y, Lin H, You X, Guo T, Sun T, Xu H, Fu X. Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Chinese Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Characteristics and Particularity. Front Oncol 2022; 12:764923. [PMID: 35356200 PMCID: PMC8960046 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.764923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
More than half of new cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and associated deaths occurring annually worldwide are recorded in China. Chinese patients with HCC exhibit special characteristics in terms of etiology, leading to differences in prognosis versus Western patients. In recent years, several angiogenesis inhibitors were approved, and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) were recommended as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. In addition, the recent success of a combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab signals resulted in an essential change in the first-line treatment of HCC. We investigated the characteristics of patients with HCC in China and summarized the rapidly emerging relevant clinical data, which relate to the prospects and challenges associated with the use of ICBs in this setting. We further evaluated the efficacy of ICBs in Chinese patients with HCC based on data obtained from global trials, and discussed possible factors influencing the effectiveness of ICBs in patients with HCC in China. Immunotherapy offers new options for the treatment of advanced HCC, though responses varied between patients. Currently, there is a need to discover specific biomarkers for the accurate identification of patients who would more likely benefit from immunotherapy. Furthermore, investigation of patient characteristics in different countries is necessary to provide a clinical practice basis and reference value for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaoqiang Wu
- General Surgery, Dangdong First Hospital, Dandong, China
| | - Han Lin
- Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, Department of Hepatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xia You
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Taiyan Guo
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Tingting Sun
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal/Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Hao Xu, ; Xibo Fu,
| | - Xibo Fu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Hao Xu, ; Xibo Fu,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martini G, Ciardiello D, Paragliola F, Nacca V, Santaniello W, Urraro F, Stanzione M, Niosi M, Dallio M, Federico A, Selvaggi F, Della Corte CM, Napolitano S, Ciardiello F, Martinelli E. How Immunotherapy Has Changed the Continuum of Care in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184719. [PMID: 34572944 PMCID: PMC8466991 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The use of local treatment, such as surgical resection, liver transplant, and local ablation, has improved the survival of patients with HCC detected at an early stage. Until recently, the treatment of patients with metastatic disease was limited to the use of the multikinase inhibitor (MKI) sorafenib with a marginal effect on survival outcome. New target approaches, such as the oral MKI lenvatinib in first-line treatment and regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib in later lines of therapy, have demonstrated efficacy in patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A) and good performance status. On the other hand, the implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors directed against PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab), and anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) in the management of advanced HCC has strongly changed the continuum of care of HCC. Future research should include the evaluation of molecular biomarkers that can help patient selection and provide new insight on potential combined approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HCC, and discuss how immunotherapy has been implemented into the continuum of HCC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Martini
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Davide Ciardiello
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Fernando Paragliola
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Valeria Nacca
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Walter Santaniello
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianto di Fegato, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, 80100 Naples, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Urraro
- Radiologia, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy;
| | - Maria Stanzione
- Malattie Infettive, Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e Fisica e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy;
| | - Marco Niosi
- Epato-Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (M.N.); (M.D.); (A.F.)
| | - Marcello Dallio
- Epato-Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (M.N.); (M.D.); (A.F.)
| | - Alessandro Federico
- Epato-Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (M.N.); (M.D.); (A.F.)
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Avanzate, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy;
| | - Carminia Maria Della Corte
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Stefania Napolitano
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Erika Martinelli
- Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy; (G.M.); (D.C.); (F.P.); (V.N.); (C.M.D.C.); (S.N.); (F.C.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|