Establishing oncofertility care in limited resource settings: a narrative review

PURPOSE

While the literature has addressed the implementation of oncofertility care at developed institutions, minimal advice exists for those seeking to build oncofertility programs in limited resource settings (LRS). Our research offers a promising conversation on establishing oncofertility care in such settings from the perspective of a practitioner working to establish care in Latin America. We propose practices that have the potential to significantly improve access to and quality of care in these challenging settings.

METHODS

PubMed was used to identify articles on fertility preservation (FP) in LRS for this narrative review. Eligible articles were published between January 2010 and May 2023, available in English and include two or more key phrases: "oncofertility care," "limited resources," "low-income settings," "limiting access," and "fertility preservation."

RESULTS

As each institution faces a unique profile of medical, financial, geographical, cultural, and legal considerations, it is difficult to generalize an approach to optimizing care. However, the success of many programs is underpinned by collaborative efforts to educate and support healthcare specialists across the globe. National and international clinical guidelines, an unparalleled opportunity to promote the maintenance of a high level of care, do not exist for many Oncofertility practices. It is necessary that future guidelines consider barriers unique to implementing care in LRS as historically, guidelines have not done so, leaving LRS practitioners to deviate from the standard of care without consensus on how to best do so.

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to consider the unique challenges in low-resource settings when strategizing the expansion of oncofertility efforts, optimizing care, and developing clinical guidelines. Addressing the diverse barriers to care requires multifaceted initiatives at local, national, and international levels.

Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of fertility preservation

RESEARCH QUESTION

The study examines the ethical, legal, and social implications of fertility preservation, highlighting its importance across oncofertility, elective egg freezing, and posthumous assisted reproduction, as well as its impact on transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming surgeries.

DESIGN

A comprehensive analysis of 600 articles, focusing on a diverse range of disciplines, including bioethics, psychology, and sociology, to explore public and healthcare professionals' knowledge, patient experiences, and regulatory constraints.

RESULTS

The body of literature is growing, indicating increasing recognition of FP's significance. Key themes included the centrality of counseling and informed decision-making, especially in oncofertility and EEF, and ethical debates surrounding informed consent and the autonomy of involved individuals. The analysis underscored a western-centric bias in current research, emphasizing the need for more inclusive and culturally sensitive studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The study calls for a nuanced understanding of FP, advocating for policies that consider ethical, cultural, and social dimensions. It suggests the necessity for interdisciplinary research to address identified gaps, particularly in understanding non-Western perspectives and ensuring equitable access to FP services globally. Moreover, the review emphasizes the importance of integrating patient-centric approaches and ethical frameworks to guide FP practices and policies, ensuring they respect diverse values and meet individuals' needs.

Filling the Gaps in Oncofertility Care by Addressing Challenges Faced by Patients and Providers

With enhanced technology and upcoming treatment strategies in the cancer field, the survival rates of patients have increased. We have now reached a stage in the treatment of cancer where we not only address the disease but also address complications that arise due to the disease and the side effects that present in the post-survival population due to its treatment. One of the primary consequences after oncotherapy is infertility, which is a major reason for distress for patients' post-survival, as they are afraid they may be deemed as less desirable, be rejected by their existing partner, or cannot grapple with the fact that they cannot have children of their own. This can be avoided by the implementation of proper oncofertility practices. The subject of oncofertility involves interactions between experts in the domains of cancer diagnosis, therapy, fertility preservation, and reproductive health. It attempts to investigate and broaden the possibilities for cancer survivors' reproductive future in order to suit their needs according to their ethical religious and sociocultural beliefs. However, these practices are often not implemented effectively due to ineffective doctor-patient communication, lack of knowledge, or partial knowledge of clinicians themselves regarding fertility care. This leads to a feeling of insecurity among clinicians hence resulting in them not referring patients. Lack of awareness among doctors of different oncofertility procedures available especially for patient groups like women and younger patients, hence leading to reduced referral in these groups. Improper coordination across health departments, patient ignorance regarding procedures, financial instability especially in a country with a lower sociodemographic index like India, and neglect or less importance given to the related ethical, social, and legal issues. In this article, we cover the effects of cancer and cancer treatment on fertility, the options available to adult and pediatric cancer patients to preserve their fertility like oocyte/ovarian tissue cryopreservation in females and sperm cryopreservation in males, techniques undergoing experimental studies that could be implemented in the future like spermatogonial stem culture and transplantation of testicular tissue, the obstacles that we face that hinder the proper implementation of such practices and what measures can we take to overcome these obstacles to improve patient care and be better healthcare providers.

Fertility preservation in female cancer sufferers: (only) a moral obligation?

PURPOSE

Advances in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics have thankfully led to high numbers of young cancer survivors, although some interventions may sometimes threaten fertility. The authors aimed to assess how evidence-based oncofertility counselling can be adequately fulfilled for the sake of female cancer patients, in light of its complexities and multidisciplinary nature, which require thorough counselling and consent pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search has been conducted in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE and Google Scholar via search strings such as fertility preservation, reproductive counselling, oncofertility, cancer survivors, in order to identify relevant meaningful sources spanning the 2010-2021 period.

RESULTS

Counselling needs to be implemented in compliance with international guidelines, so as to avoid medicolegal repercussions. Albeit fertility preservation is supported by most health care institutions, actual conditions at health care facilities often reflect several lingering difficulties in the oncofertility process. Oncofertility counselling should foster access to fertility preservation procedures. To best serve that purpose, it should be implemented in a manner consistent with ethical and legal standards, so that patients can make an informed decision based on comprehensive and relevant data.

CONCLUSIONS

Counselling needs to be rooted in a close cooperation of oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, mental health counsellors and clinical researchers. The provision of oncofertility services is grounded in the moral obligation to uphold individual autonomy, which is essential in a free society, unless the exercise thereof could pose a risk to the children conceived or to others.

Navigating the Challenges of Fertility and Reproductive Planning for Terminal Cancer Patients

Among the many disruptive effects of a terminal cancer diagnosis in young people is its ability to affect reproductive planning and the opportunity for parenthood. While many reproductive-aged cancer patients receive fertility counseling at diagnosis, ongoing guidance often does not occur during the illness course and associated distress may go unrecognized. Using a case-based framework, this palliative care rounds explores the existential, spiritual, ethical, and logistical challenges that complicate reproductive planning for patients and families as they face a terminal cancer diagnosis. We advocate that palliative care providers should seize currently underrecognized opportunities to screen for distress associated with fertility and reproduction at end of life and utilize an interdisciplinary team approach to provide appropriate support and counseling throughout the illness and bereavement experience.

Oncofertility in Islam: The Malaysian Perspective

The implementation of oncofertility services is of great importance among cancer survivors of reproductive age to ensure a good quality of life. However, the uptake of this service among Muslim patients is very challenging because of inconclusive laws or evidence based on the Islamic perspective. Hence, we summarized the limited evidence available to consolidate current recommendations for oncofertility practices in the Muslim population in Malaysia. The available “fatwa” and “muzakarah” regarding reproductive procedures and gamete cryopreservation in Islam was searched from the recommendations of local and international bodies, including published and unpublished sources. The relevant information was then extracted according to the current understanding of dilemmas in oncofertility practices in Malaysia, tabulated, and consolidated. Most of the available “fatwa” has been revised by recent “muzakarah” to suit current oncofertility practices. Most Islamic organizations support the practice of oncofertility in Muslim hence indicates that oncofertility services are permissible. Therefore, proper recommendations and counseling are paramount to ensure understanding among Muslim patients.

Communication and ethical considerations for fertility preservation for patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group

Patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who will be treated with gonadotoxic therapies are at increased risk for infertility. Many patients and their families desire biological children but effective communication about treatment-related infertility risk and procedures for fertility preservation does not always happen. The PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group reviewed the literature and developed a clinical practice guideline that provides recommendations for ongoing communication methods for fertility preservation for patients who were diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger and their families. Moreover, the guideline panel formulated considerations of the ethical implications that are associated with these procedures. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the evidence and recommendations. In this clinical practice guideline, existing evidence and international expertise are combined to develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate ongoing communication between health-care providers and patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who might be at high risk for fertility impairment and their families.

Development of a Pediatric Fertility Preservation Program: A Report From the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium

Infertility is known to decrease quality of life among adults. In some cases, infertility is caused by medical conditions and/or treatments prescribed in childhood, and using methods to protect or preserve fertility may expand future reproductive possibilities. Structured programs to offer counseling about infertility risk and fertility preservation options are essential in the care of pediatric patients facing fertility-threatening conditions or treatments, yet multiple barriers to program development exist. This report was developed from the institutional experiences of members of the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium, with the intent of providing guidance for health care providers aiming to establish programs at institutions lacking pediatric fertility preservation services. The mechanics of building a fertility preservation program are discussed, including essential team members, target populations, fertility preservation options (both established and experimental), survivorship issues, research opportunities, and ethical considerations. Common barriers to program development and utilization, including low referral rates and financial concerns, are also discussed, and recommendations made for overcoming such barriers.