Validation of ctDNA Quality Control Materials Through a Precompetitive Collaboration of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

What the Clinician Needs to Know About Laboratory Analyses of Circulating Tumor DNA

Liquid biopsies offer the possibility to evaluate cancer patients using noninvasive approaches. Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is 1 of the most used and promising sources. Detecting tumor DNA among ccfDNA (ctDNA) can be used for early cancer detection, treatment response assessment, prognosis, and predictive evaluations. Providing analyses that can increase the quality of patient treatment is very much a joint effort between laboratory scientists and clinicians. With its use approaching clinical practice, it is important for clinicians to be familiar with the basic concepts and analyses behind ctDNA results in a similar way as laboratory scientists should have knowledge of the clinical needs to provide relevant analyses. In this Perspective, we describe the whole process of ctDNA analyses, from the preanalytical standards to reporting/analyzing results, and highlight some important factors that need to be addressed in the process of implementing them to clinical practice.

The role of circulating tumor DNA in melanomas of the uveal tract

Melanoma of the uveal tract or uveal melanoma (UM) originates from melanocytes of the eye and is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults. Despite considerable advances in diagnostic procedures and treatments, prognosis remains poor in those with advanced disease. Accordingly, although current treatments have an excellent local disease control rate, approximately 50% of patients develop metastatic relapse within 10 years. The high risk for metastatic disease with a variable and often long latency period is thought to be due to early spread of cancer cells disseminating into organs such as the liver, followed by a period of dormancy, before the eventual emergence of radiologically measurable disease. Early detection of disease relapse or metastasis is therefore crucial to allow timely treatment and ultimately improve patient outcome. Recently, advances in minimally-invasive liquid biopsy techniques and biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have demonstrated potential to transform the field of cancer care by aiding diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of various cancer types. UM is particularly suitable for ctDNA-based approaches due to the relatively well-characterized spectrum of genetic mutations, along with the inherent difficulties and risks associated with getting sufficient tumor samples via traditional biopsy methods. Key potential advantage of ctDNA are the detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) in patients post definitive treatment, and in the early identification of metastasis. This is particularly relevant contemporarily with the recent demonstration of tebentafusp improving survival in metastatic UM patients, and opens avenues for further research to investigate the potential utilization of tebentafusp combined with ctDNA-based strategies in adjuvant settings and early intervention for MRD. The present review illustrates the current understanding of ctDNA-based strategies in UM, discusses the potential clinical applications, explores the potential of utilizing ctDNA in UM MRD in the context of an ongoing clinical trial, and highlights the challenges that need to be overcome prior to routine clinical implementation.

Pre-analytical conditions and implementation of quality control steps in liquid biopsy analysis

Over the last decade, great advancements have been made in the field of liquid biopsy through extensive research and the development of new technologies that facilitate the use of liquid biopsy for cancer patients. This is shown by the numerous liquid biopsy tests that gained clearance by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in recent years. Liquid biopsy has significantly altered cancer treatment by providing clinicians with powerful and immediate information about therapeutic decisions. However, the clinical integration of liquid biopsy is still challenging and there are many critical factors to consider prior to its implementation into routine clinical practice. Lack of standardization due to technical challenges and the definition of the clinical utility of specific assays further complicates the establishment of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in liquid biopsy. Harmonization of laboratories to established guidelines is of major importance to overcome inter-lab variabilities observed. Quality control assessment in diagnostic laboratories that offer liquid biopsy testing will ensure that clinicians can base their therapeutic decisions on robust results. The regular participation of laboratories in external quality assessment schemes for liquid biopsy testing aims to promptly pinpoint deficiencies and efficiently educate laboratories to improve their quality of services. Accreditation of liquid biopsy diagnostic laboratories based on the ISO15189 standard in Europe or by CLIA/CAP accreditation procedures in the US is the best way to achieve the adaptation of liquid biopsy into the clinical setting by assuring reliable results for the clinicians and their cancer patients. Nowadays, various organizations from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies collaborate to set a framework that will include all procedures from the pre-analytical phase and the analytical process to the final interpretation of results. In this review, we underline several challenges in the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) concerning standardization of protocols, quality control assessment, harmonization of laboratories, and compliance to specific guidelines that need to be thoroughly considered before liquid biopsy enters the clinic.

Validation of a Molecular Diagnostic Test for Circulating Tumor DNA by Next-Gen Sequencing

A modified version of the PGDx elioTM Plasma Resolve assay was validated as a laboratory-developed test (LDT) for clinical use in the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The test detects single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) in 33 target genes using fragmented genomic DNA extracted from plasma. The analytical performance of this assay was assessed with reference standard DNA and 29 samples from cancer patients and detected 66 SNVs and 23 indels. Using 50 ng of input DNA, the sensitivity was 95.5% to detect SNVs at 0.5% allele frequency, and the specificity was 92.3%. The sensitivity to detect indels at 1% allele frequency was 70.4%. A cutoff of 0.25% variant allele frequency (VAF) was set up for diagnostic reporting. An inter-laboratory study of concordance with an orthologous test resulted in a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.7%.

Circulating tumor DNA in clinical trials for solid tumors: Challenges and current applications

Tumor derived biomarkers including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and/or circulating tumors cells (CTCs) may be detected and quantified through liquid biopsy (LB). ctDNA analysis through LB is a validated tool for monitoring response to systemic treatment and detecting molecular mechanisms of resistance at the time of progression of advanced stage malignancies. Several applications of ctDNA have been investigated in the diagnostic phase of cancer or in the post-curative treatment surveillance phase (e.g., minimal residual disease assessment after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy). Recently, the improvement of ctDNA technology and its implementation have affected early phase trials design, with significant changes in the inclusion and randomization phases. Implementation of LB has resulted in large-scale development of academic programs aimed at exploiting all the potential applications of ctDNA, such as patients extended molecular screening, molecular oriented treatment decision making, monitoring of anti-cancer treatments response. In this rapid evolving field, the challenge is no longer the technique, but the evaluation of the results and the interpretation of their impact on diagnosis, prognosis, or therapeutic decision. Leading research cancer centers may favor education for scientific community, by capturing data on this evolving technology and sharing knowledge. In this review we summarize the main applications and challenges of ctDNA genotyping in clinical trials, with special focus on ongoing studies. We finally describe the most important next generation academic and industry-sponsored programs addressing early cancer detection and prevention in high-risk populations through ctDNA genotyping.

Circulating tumor DNA: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors - can we RECIST? Focus on colorectal cancer

Interest in the measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased during the past decade. The analysis of quantitative ctDNA changes as a general response evaluation criterion during systemic treatment is a scientific approach with high clinical potential, and results can be transferred to a pan-cancer concept if relevantly investigated. The purpose of this overview is to discuss the current evidence for ctDNA as a marker of response in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and to propose criteria for definitions of response to systemic therapies applicable in prospective clinical trials. We discuss the literature, which supports a new definition of ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Finally, we discuss the challenges in preparations of the optimal trial design to establish the true clinical utility of ctDNA.

Circulating HPV DNA in HPV-associated cancers

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the primary cause of almost all cervical cancers, anal cancers, and a variable proportion of other anogenital tumors, as well as head and neck cancers. Circulating HPV DNA (cHPV-DNA) is emerging as a biomarker with extensive potential in the management of HPV-driven malignancies. There has been a rapid advancement in the development of techniques for analyzing cHPV-DNA for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of HPV-associated cancers. As clinical evidence accumulates, it is becoming evident that cHPV-DNA can be used as a diagnostic tool. By conducting clinical trials assessing the clinical utility of cHPV-DNA, the full potential of cHPV-DNA for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of HPV-related malignancies can be corroborated. In this review, we examine the current landscape of applications for cHPV-DNA liquid biopsies throughout the cancer care continuum, highlighting future opportunities for research and integration into clinical practice.

Liquid biopsy approaches to capture tumor evolution and clinical outcomes during cancer immunotherapy

Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) can serve as a real-time biomarker of tumor burden and provide unique insights into the evolving molecular landscape of cancers under the selective pressure of immunotherapy. Tracking the landscape of genomic alterations detected in ctDNA may reveal the clonal architecture of the metastatic cascade and thus improve our understanding of the molecular wiring of therapeutic responses. While liquid biopsies may provide a rapid and accurate evaluation of tumor burden dynamics during immunotherapy, the complexity of antitumor immune responses is not fully captured through single-feature ctDNA analyses. This underscores a need for integrative studies modeling the tumor and the immune compartment to understand the kinetics of tumor clearance in association with the quality of antitumor immune responses. Clinical applications of ctDNA testing in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown both predictive and prognostic value through the detection of genomic biomarkers, such as tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability, as well as allowing for real-time monitoring of circulating tumor burden and the assessment of early on-therapy responses. These efforts highlight the emerging role of liquid biopsies in selecting patients for cancer immunotherapy, monitoring therapeutic efficacy, determining the optimal duration of treatment and ultimately guiding treatment selection and sequencing. The clinical translation of liquid biopsies is propelled by the increasing number of ctDNA-directed interventional clinical trials in the immuno-oncology space, signifying a critical step towards implementation of liquid biopsies in precision immuno-oncology.

A standardised methodology for the extraction and quantification of cell-free DNA in cerebrospinal fluid and application to evaluation of Alzheimer's disease and brain cancers

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a source of diagnostic biomarkers for a range of neurological conditions. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is detected in CSF and differences in the concentration of cell-free mitochondrial DNA have been reported in studies of neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the influence of pre-analytical steps has not been investigated for cfDNA in CSF and there is no standardised approach for quantification of total cfDNA (copies of nuclear genome or mitochondria-derived gene targets). In this study, the suitability of four extraction methods was evaluated: QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid (Qiagen), Quick-cfDNA Serum & Plasma (Zymo), NucleoSnap® DNA Plasma (Macherey-Nagel) and Plasma/Serum Circulating DNA Purification Mini (Norgen) kits, for cfDNA extraction from CSF of controls and AD dementia patients, utilising a spike-in control for extraction efficiency and fragment size. One of the optimal extraction methods was applied to a comparison of cfDNA concentrations in CSF from control subjects, AD dementia and primary and secondary brain tumour patients. Extraction efficiency based on spike-in recovery was similar in all three groups whilst both endogenous mitochondrial and nucleus-derived cfDNA was significantly higher in CSF from cancer patients compared to control and AD groups, which typically contained < 100 genome copies/mL. This study shows that it is feasible to measure low concentration nuclear and mitochondrial gene targets in CSF and that normalisation of extraction yield can help control pre-analytical variability influencing biomarker measurements.

Recommendations related to the analytical equivalence assessment of gene panel testing

Advances in cancer genome care over the past few years have included the development of gene panel testing for various biomarkers. This article summarizes issues and provides recommendations related to analytical performance evaluations for new oncology gene panels. The scope of these recommendations includes comprehensive genomic profiling assays related to gene panel testing that uses histological or serum specimens to detect gene mutations. As a research project of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Research on Regulatory Science of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, we convened the working group committee that consisted of more than 30 experts from academia, industry, and government. We have discussed the points that should be considered to allow maximal simplification of assessments using clinical specimens in evaluating accuracy and limit of detection in equivalence and analytical performance for three years. We provide recommendations specific to each type of gene mutation as well as to reference standards or specimens used for evaluations. In addition, in order to facilitate the discussion on the analytical performance of gene panel tests by multidisciplinary tumor boards of hospitals, the present recommendations also describe the items that companies are expected to provide information on in their packaging inserts and reports, and the items that are expected to be discussed by multidisciplinary tumor boards. Our working group document will be important for participants in multidisciplinary tumor boards including medical oncologists and genome scientists, and developers of gene panels not only in Japan but also in other countries.

PARP Inhibitor Applicability: Detailed Assays for Homologous Recombination Repair Pathway Components

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have been in clinical use since 2014 for certain patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations, but as evidence and approvals for their use in a wider range of patients grow, the question of how best to identify patients who would benefit from PARPi becomes ever more complex. Here, we discuss the development and current state of approved selection testing for PARPi therapy and the ongoing efforts to define a broader range of homologous recombination repair deficiencies that are susceptible to PARP inhibition.

Molecular Mechanism of EGFR-TKI Resistance in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Application to Biological Diagnostic and Monitoring

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are a positive predictive factor for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For common EGFR mutations (Del19, L858R), the standard first-line treatment is actually third-generation TKI, osimertinib. In the case of first-line treatment by first (erlotinib, gefitinib)- or second-generation (afatinib) TKIs, osimertinib is approved in second-line treatment for patients with T790M EGFR mutation. Despite the excellent disease control results with EGFR TKIs, acquired resistance inevitably occurs and remains a biological challenge. This leads to the discovery of novel biomarkers and possible drug targets, which vary among the generation/line of EGFR TKIs. Besides EGFR second/third mutations, alternative mechanisms could be involved, such as gene amplification or gene fusion, which could be detected by different molecular techniques on different types of biological samples. Histological transformation is another mechanism of resistance with some biological predictive factors that needs tumor biopsy. The place of liquid biopsy also depends on the generation/line of EGFR TKIs and should be a good candidate for molecular monitoring. This article is based on the literature and proposes actual and future directions in clinical and translational research.