Approach to the Patient With Treatment-resistant Acromegaly

Assessment of multimodal treatment options in recurrent and persistent acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In patients with acromegaly, secondary treatment options in cases of hormonal non-remission or tumor progression include repeat transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), radiation-based treatment (RT), or medical therapy (MT). In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of various second-line treatment options for acromegaly.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guideline, a systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases from conception to the end of 2022. Outcomes of interest included hormonal remission rate, complications, and mortality associated with each treatment modality for refractory acromegaly.

RESULTS

A total of 79 studies including 3,208 refractory acromegaly patients (44.90% males) were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 43.89 years. There was a statistically significant difference between various therapeutic modalities in terms of remission rate, with MT offering the highest remission rate (62.55%), followed by RT (50.15%) and TSS (37.39%). Subgroup analysis of radiotherapeutic and medical modalities did not show a significant difference in remission rate between different kinds of sub-modalities in each treatment approach. Recurrence following secondary treatment was not different in patients treated with reoperation TSS compared to other modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of persistent and recurrent acromegaly optimally requires a multimodal approach. In different scenarios of refractory acromegaly based on previous treatment, secondary treatments may vary in terms of remission rate and complications. Medical agents provide considerable effectiveness as a second-line therapy for recurrent or persistent disease. In selected cases, however, reoperation still provides an opportunity for cure or freedom from medications. The findings of this study may help clinicians to prioritize varying options involved in this multifaceted decision-making process.

Targeting the SPHK1/S1P/S1PR2 axis ameliorates GH-secreted pituitary adenoma progression

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone-secreted pituitary adenoma (GHPA) is a prominent subtype of pituitary adenoma (PA) associated with progressive somatic disfigurement, various complications, and elevated mortality rates. Existing treatment options have limited efficacy, highlighting the urgent need for novel pharmacological interventions. Previous studies have revealed that sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1)/sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptors (S1PRs) signalling have critical roles in the tumour microenvironment, but their role in GHPA remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed integrative analyses including bioinformatics analyses, functional studies, and clinical validation to investigate the pathological roles of SPHK1/S1P and evaluated the effectiveness of the S1P receptor 2 (S1PR2) inhibitor JTE-013 in GHPA treatment.

RESULTS

SPHK1/S1P signalling is abnormally expressed in patients with GHPA. Knockdown of SPHK1 suppresses S1P-mediated cell proliferation in GH3 Cells. Mechanistically, S1P inhibits apoptosis and autophagy while promoting the secretion of Growth Hormone (GH) by binding to the S1P receptor subtype 2 (S1PR2) in GH3 cells. Moreover, the function of S1PR2 in GH3 cells is mediated by the downstream Akt-Creb pathway. We then identify the S1PR2 as a novel target for therapeutic intervention in GHPA. Systemic administration of the potent and selective S1PR2 antagonist, JTE-013, significantly reduces both tumour size and GH secretion. Importantly, we identify preoperative serum S1P levels as a biomarker predicting poor prognosis in GHPA patients at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that blocking SPHK1/S1P/S1PR2 axis can ameliorate the progression of GHPA, providing evidence of a promising therapeutic target for GHPA.

Recurrent acromegaly: a systematic review on therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Management of recurrent acromegaly is challenging for both neurosurgeons and endocrinologists. Several treatment options including repeat surgery, medical therapy, and radiation are offered for such patients. The efficacy of these modalities for the treatment of recurrence has not been studied previously in the literature. In this study, we aim to systematically review the existing cases of recurrence and come to a conclusion regarding the appropriate treatment in such cases.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane database to identify studies reporting the treatment outcome of recurrent acromegaly patients. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the included studies were reviewed for primary and secondary treatment, complications, and outcomes of the secondary treatment.

RESULTS

The systematic review retrieved 23 records with 95 cases of recurrent acromegaly. The mean time of recurrence was 4.16 years after the initial treatment. The most common primary treatment was surgery followed by radiotherapy. The remission rate was significantly higher in medical and radiotherapy compared to surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

In cases of recurrent acromegaly, the patient may benefit more from radiotherapy and medical therapy compared to surgery. As the quality of evidence is low on this matter feature studies specifically designed for recurrent patients are needed.

Aggressive and Metastatic Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Therapeutic Management and Off-Label Drug Use

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the most common pituitary tumors and the second most common brain tumors. Although the vast majority (>90%) are benign, a small percentage (<2%) are aggressive. These aggressive PitNETs (AgPitNETs) are defined by the presence of radiological invasion, a high rate of cell proliferation, resistance to conventional treatments, and/or a high propensity for recurrence. Lastly, there are the rare pituitary carcinomas, also known as metastatic PitNETs (MetPitNETs), which account for only 0.2% of cases and are defined by the presence of craniospinal or distant metastases. At present, there are no definitive factors that allow us to predict with certainty the aggressive behavior of PitNETs, making the therapeutic management of AgPitNETs a real challenge. Surgery is considered the first-line treatment for AgPitNETs and MetPitNETs. Radiation therapy can be effective in controlling tumor growth and regulating hormone hypersecretion. Currently, there are no approved non-endocrine medical therapies for the management of AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs, mainly due to the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. As a result, many of the medical therapies used are off-label drugs, and several are under investigation. Temozolomide (TMZ) is now recognized as the primary medical treatment following the failure of standard therapy (medical treatment, surgery, and radiotherapy) in AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs due to its ability to improve overall and progression-free survival rates in responding patients over 5 years. Other therapeutic options include pituitary-targeted therapies (dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs), hormonal antisecretory drugs, non-hormonal targeted therapies, radionuclide treatments, and immunotherapy. However, the number of patients who have undergone these treatments is limited, and the results obtained to date have been inconsistent. As a result, it is imperative to expand the cohort of patients undergoing treatment to better determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of these drugs for individuals with AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs.

Treatment Patterns, Adherence, Persistence, and Health Care Resource Utilization in Acromegaly: A Real-World Analysis

Context

Treatment of acromegaly is multimodal for many patients, and medical treatments include somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), dopamine agonists (DAs), and growth hormone receptor antagonists (GHRAs). However, recent real-world evidence on treatment patterns for patients with acromegaly is limited.

Objective

This study evaluated medication usage, treatment changes, adherence, persistence, comorbidities, and health care resource utilization using deidentified data from MarketScan, a US claims database.

Methods

Eligible patients (n = 882) were those receiving monotherapy or combination therapy for ≥90 days without treatment gaps.

Results

Mean age at diagnosis was 48.6 years; 50.1% of patients were female. Over half (59.4%) had 1 line of treatment (LOT); 23.1% had 2 LOTs; 17.5% had at least 3 LOTs. Most patients (94.6%) initiated treatment with monotherapies. The most common first-line monotherapy treatments were cabergoline (DA, 36.8%), octreotide long-acting release (first-generation SRL, 29.5%), and lanreotide depot (first-generation SRL, 22.5%). Adherence for first-line treatments (proportion of days covered) was higher for first-generation SRLs (lanreotide depot: 0.8) compared with DAs (0.7). Treatment persistence (time between the first treatment record and a change in LOT/censoring) in LOT 1 was higher for GHRAs (24.8 months) and first-generation SRLs (20.0 months) compared with DAs (14.4 months). Female patients and those diagnosed at a younger age were more likely to have shorter treatment persistence. The most prevalent comorbidities were hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, and sleep apnea.

Conclusion

Patients with more comorbidities had more health care visits during the first year after diagnosis, suggesting increased disease burden. Real-world evidence on treatment patterns provides insights into recommendations for individualized therapy.

[Treatment of acromegaly - data from the German Acromegaly Register]

Acromegaly is a rare disease in which chronic growth hormone overproduction (usually from an anterior pituitary adenoma) leads to various systemic complications. The management of acromegaly and the comorbidities of the disease is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Early diagnosis is extremely important, as then the chances of a complete cure are significantly higher. The operation is the therapy of first choice and should be performed at a specialized center with an experienced neurosurgeon. With good patient information and guidance, the drug therapy of acromegaly patients in specialized practices and clinics can usually lead to biochemical control and thereby normalization of mortality risk. As with numerous rare diseases, care in specialized centers and recording and evaluation in registry studies can contribute to better patient care and the optimization of therapy and diagnostic guidelines. We assume that with the help of the German Acromegaly Registry, which currently includes more than 2500 patients with acromegaly, we will be able to present a realistic picture of the care situation in Germany in the coming years.

Efficiency and Safety of CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery in the Multimodal Management of Patients with Acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To analyze, in a cohort of acromegalic patients, the results of the efficiency and safety of radiosurgery (CyberKnife), as well as the prognostic factors associated with disease remission.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational, retrospective, longitudinal, and analytical study that included acromegalic patients with persistent biochemical activity after initial medical-surgical treatment, who received treatment with CyberKnife radiosurgery. GH and IGF-1 levels at baseline after one year and at the end of follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

57 patients were included, with a median follow-up of four years (IQR, 2-7.2 years). The biochemical remission rate was 45.6%, 33.33% achieved biochemical control, and 12.28% attained biochemical cure at the end of follow-up. A progressive and statistically significant decrease was observed in the comparison of the concentrations of IGF-1, IFG-1 x ULN, and baseline GH at one year and at the end of follow-up. Both cavernous sinus invasion and elevated baseline IGF-1 x ULN concentrations were associated with an increased risk of biochemical non-remission.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery (CyberKnife) is a safe and effective technique in the adjuvant treatment of GH-producing tumors. Elevated levels of IGF x ULN before radiosurgery and invasion of the cavernous sinus by the tumor could be predictors of biochemical non-remission of acromegaly.

Acromegaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas that cause acromegaly arise as monoclonal expansions of differentiated somatotroph cells and are usually sporadic. They are almost invariably benign, yet they can be locally invasive and show progressive growth despite treatment. Persistent excess of both growth hormone and its target hormone insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) results in a wide array of cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, musculoskeletal, neurological, and neoplastic comorbidities that might not be reversible with disease control. Normalisation of IGF-1 and growth hormone are the primary therapeutic aims; additional treatment goals include tumour shrinkage, relieving symptoms, managing complications, reducing excess morbidity, and improving quality of life. A multimodal approach with surgery, medical therapy, and (more rarely) radiation therapy is required to achieve these goals. In this Review, we examine the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, complications, and treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on the importance of tailoring management strategies to each patient to optimise outcomes.

Temozolomide and Capecitabine Treatment for an Aggressive Somatotroph Pituitary Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review

Aggressive somatotroph pituitary tumor that causes acromegaly is extremely rare and resists conventional treatments such as multiple surgeries, radiotherapies, and various types of somatostatin analogs. Here, we propose a novel treatment option for these rare cases by discussing our case and reviewing the literature. We experienced an aggressive somatotroph tumor in a 52-year-old woman with acromegaly. Not only could a complete remission of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) not be obtained, but the tumor continued to grow and eventually recurred around the brainstem despite multidisciplinary treatments. We employed immunohistochemistry and a three-dimensional (3D) spheroid ex vivo assay to determine the best treatment option for this case. Although histology showed strong O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase expression and high Ki-67 labeling index (22%), temozolomide (TMZ) combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) treatment was performed based on the results of the patient-derived 3D spheroid ex vivo assay, which predicted more effective treatment with CAPTEM than with TMZ alone. Consequently, GH and IGF-1 levels were restored to normal range with remarkable tumor shrinkage after CAPTEM treatment. To the best of our knowledge, there have been even very few reports describing successful treatment for such aggressive and refractory somatotroph tumors and this is the first report showing the effectiveness of CAPTEM on refractory somatotroph tumor both ex vivo and in vivo.