Low Gestational Weight Gain in Women With Gestational Diabetes Is Safe With Better Metabolic Profile Postpartum

Reconsideration of lowering gestational weight gain guidelines in pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes: evidence from a Belgian study

BACKGROUND

The suitability of the United States National Academy of Medicine guidelines for gestational weight gain in women with gestational diabetes remains uncertain, raising global concerns. This study aimed to evaluate the association of gestational weight gain with pregnancy and birth outcomes and to determine optimal ranges for gestational weight gain per pre-pregnancy body mass index category in women with gestational diabetes.

METHODS

An epidemiological analysis between 2009-2018 analyzed a large Belgian cohort of singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes and gestational age 38-40 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations between gestational weight gain and relevant pregnancy and birth outcomes, with and without adjustment for confounding variables, including maternal age, origin, education, mode of conception, parity, gestational age at delivery, social deprivation, and year of delivery. Potential optimal weight gain ranges were calculated by minimizing the combined risk of small- and large-for-gestational-age infants (SGA, LGA).

RESULTS

A total of 13,060 women with gestational diabetes were included. Compared to recommended weight gain, gestational weight gain above guidelines occurred in 26.9% and was associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20-1.66, p < 0.001), emergency caesarean section (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.25-1.69, p < 0.001), LGA infants (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.63-2.08, p < 0.001), and macrosomia (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.55-2.04, p < 0.001). Weight gain less than recommended (40.2%) was associated with a decreased risk of gestational hypertension (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.96, p = 0.015), LGA infants (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.66, p < 0.001), and macrosomia (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.65, p < 0.001), but at the expense of an increased risk of SGA infants (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.45-1.96, p < 0.001) and low birth weight (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.57-3.32, p < 0.001). Based on current analysis, the optimal ranges for gestational weight gain would be 9 to 14 kg for women with a normal weight, 1 to 9 kg for women with overweight, and -7 to 1 kg for women with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This Belgian study suggests that optimal gestational weight gain for singleton at-term pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes should be lower than current recommendations, highlighting the need to reevaluate gestational weight gain guidelines in this context.

Fetal size monitoring in women with gestational diabetes and normal glucose tolerance

AIMS

To monitor fetal size and identify predictors for birthweight in women with gestational diabetes (GDM) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT).

METHODS

Cohort study of 1843 women universally screened for GDM, with routine ultrasounds each trimester. Women with GDM and NGT were categorized in subgroups by birthweight centile.

RESULTS

Of the total cohort, 231 (12.5%) women were diagnosed with GDM. Fetal size, incidence of large-for-gestational age (LGA: 12.3% of GDM vs. 12.9% of NGT, p = 0.822) and small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates (4.8% of GDM vs. 5.1% of NGT, p = 0.886) were similar between GDM and NGT. GDM women with LGA neonates were more insulin resistant at baseline and had more often estimated fetal weight (EFW) ≥ P90 on the 28-33 weeks ultrasound (p = 0.033) than those with AGA (appropriate-for-gestational age) neonates. Compared to NGT women with AGA neonates, those with LGA neonates were more often obese and multiparous, had higher fasting glycemia, a worse lipid profile, and higher insulin resistance between 24 -28 weeks, with more often excessive gestational weight gain. On the 28-33 weeks ultrasound, abdominal circumference ≥ P95 had a high positive predictive value for LGA neonates in GDM (100%), whereas, in both GDM and NGT, EFW ≥ P90 and ≤ P10 had a high negative predictive value for LGA and SGA neonates (> 88%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in fetal size throughout pregnancy nor in LGA incidence between GDM and NGT women. EFW centile at 28-33 weeks correlated well with birthweight. This indicates that GDM treatment is effective and targeted ultrasound follow-up is useful. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02036619. Registration date: January 15, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02036619 .

A prospective observational study on maternal diet pre- and post-GDM diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes in individuals with/without GDM

AIMS

To investigate (1) the association between maternal dietary choices during the first and second trimesters and the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), (2) the association between a GDM diagnosis and dietary choices during pregnancy, and (3) the differences in pregnancy outcomes between individuals with and without GDM.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study. Pregnant individuals with singleton pregnancy aged 19 ∼ 44 years, without severe pregnancy complications were enrolled in the study. Dietary data were collected at three time points during routine antenatal appointments: 8 ∼ 12 weeks gestation(n = 993), 20 ∼ 24 weeks gestation(n = 732), and 32 ∼ 36 weeks gestation(n = 536). GDM diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes were collected during follow-up from the electronic medical record (EMR).

RESULTS

A total of 93 participants (12.9%) were diagnosed with GDM. Livestock and poultry meat intake during the second trimester were associated with an increased risk of developing GDM (aOR 1.371, 95%CI 1.070-1.756, P = 0.013), and a GDM diagnosis may lead to decreased intake of cereals and its products (P = 0.001), potatoes and its products (P < 0.001), and fruit (P = 0.002) and increased intake of fish, shrimp and shellfish (P = 0.001), eggs (P = 0.015), and milk and milk products (P = 0.011) in the third trimester. Individuals with GDM related to lower risk of excessive gestational weight gain (aOR 0.384, 95%CI 0.188-0.646, P = 0.001) but may increase the risk of fetal macrosomia (aOR 3.873, 95%CI 1.364-10.996, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding maternal dietary choices around GDM diagnosis is crucial for accurate nutritional assessment and effective education programs. While our findings suggest dietary changes may occur post-diagnosis, further research is needed to confirm these patterns and the potential benefits of early dietary counseling for individuals with GDM.

Optimal gestational weight change associated with improved perinatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a population-based study in the United States

BACKGROUND

Optimal gestational weight change (GWC) is little known among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the optimal GWC ranges for women with GDM and validate these ranges compared with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines.

METHODS

A population-based cohort study using natality data from the National Center for Health Statistics in the United States included 1,338,460 mother-infant pairs with GDM from 2014 to 2020. Poisson regression models were performed to identify GWC ranges (GDM targets) associated with acceptable risks (<10% increase) for a severity-weighted composite outcome including preterm birth (PTB) <37 wk, large for gestational age (LGA, birthweight >90th percentile) and small for gestational age (SGA, birthweight <10th percentile). These targets were validated in individual outcomes including PTB, LGA, SGA, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory morbidity, and compared with the IOM guidelines using logistic regression models with population-attributable fractions (PAFs) calculated.

RESULTS

The severity-weighted composite outcome had a U-shaped or a J-shaped relationship with GWC across body mass index categories. The GDM targets were 14.1 to 20.3 kg, 9.0 to 17.0 kg, 4.8 to 13.8 kg, -0.8 to 10.8 kg, -2.4 to 8.2 kg, and -8.3 to 6.0 kg for underweight, normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity, respectively. GWC outside the GDM or the IOM targets was associated with increased adverse perinatal outcomes in validation analyses. PAFs indicated that the IOM guidelines reduced a similar or higher proportion of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with the GDM targets for women with GDM, except for those with class 2 and 3 obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

The IOM guidelines are generally applicable for women with GDM, except for women with moderate and severe obesity. The optimal GWC ranges for women with GDM and moderate to severe obesity may be lower than the IOM guidelines.

One-year postpartum weight retention and glucose intolerance in women with prediabetes after gestational diabetes

AIMS

To determine risk factors for 1-year postpartum weight retention (PPWR) and glucose intolerance (prediabetes + diabetes) in women with a previous history of gestational diabetes (GDM) and prediabetes in early postpartum.

METHODS

In this exploratory analysis of the MELINDA randomized controlled trial, we report data of 167 women with prediabetes at the 6-16 weeks (early) postpartum oral glucose tolerance test after a recent history of GDM.

RESULTS

Of all participants, 45% (75) had PPWR >0 kg at 1-year postpartum. Compared to women without PPWR, women with PPWR had higher gestational weight gain [10.5 ± 6.4 vs. 6.5 ± 4.5 kg, p < 0.001], higher BMI (p < 0.01) and a worse metabolic profile (higher waist circumference, worse lipid profile and more insulin resistance) (all p < 0.05) both in early and late postpartum. Of all women with PPWR, 40.0% developed metabolic syndrome, compared to 18.9% of women without late PPWR (p = 0.003). The only independent predictor for late PPWR was weight retention in early postpartum (p < 0.001). Of all participants, 55.1% (92) had glucose intolerance (84 prediabetes, 8 diabetes) 1-year postpartum. Independent predictors for late postpartum glucose intolerance were lower gestational age at start insulin therapy in pregnancy and delivery by caesarean section (resp. p = 0.044 and 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with a previous history of GDM and prediabetes in early postpartum, PPWR in early postpartum was a strong independent predictor for late PPWR, while earlier start of insulin therapy during pregnancy and delivery by caesarean section were independent predictors of glucose intolerance in late postpartum.

Weight Categories, Trajectories, Eating Behavior, and Metabolic Consequences during Pregnancy and Postpartum in Women with GDM

Pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity are associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study investigated weight trajectories, eating behaviors, and metabolic consequences in women with GDM during pregnancy and postpartum according to pre-pregnancy BMI. We prospectively included 464 women with GDM. Intuitive eating (Intuitive Eating Scale-2 questionnaire), gestational weight gain (GWG), postpartum weight retention (PPWR) at 6-8 weeks and 1-year postpartum, and glucose intolerance (prediabetes and diabetes) at 1-year were assessed. Women with obesity (WOB) had lower GWG but gained more weight in the postpartum (p < 0.0001). PPWR at 1-year did not differ across BMI categories (p = 0.63), whereas postpartum weight loss was most pronounced in women with normal weight (p < 0.0001), and within this category, in their lowest tertile (p < 0.05). Intuitive eating was not linked to perinatal weight changes but differed among BMI categories. PPWR predicted a 2.5-fold increased risk of glucose intolerance at 1-year independent of pre-pregnancy BMI (p < 0.001), and the adverse metabolic impact of PPWR was most pronounced in WOB with odds of increased risk of glucose intolerance 8.9 times higher (95% CI 2.956;26.968). These findings suggest an adaptive capacity to relatively rapid weight changes in the perinatal period that is less present with higher BMI.

Effects of women with gestational diabetes mellitus related weight gain on pregnancy outcomes and its experiences in weight management programs: a mixed-methods systematic review

Introduction

Proper controlling gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-related gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy can optimize pregnancy outcomes and improve postpartum glucose homeostasis. This study aimed to explore the existing intervention programs, the effects on pregnancy outcomes, and the experiences of weight management for GDM-related GWG in women with GDM.

Methods

This mixed-methods systematic review was retrieved from nine databases. The retrieval time was from the database construction to September 20, 2023, and all studies were published in English and Chinese. The included records used quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods and reported original studies of weight-related intervention regimens, effects on pregnancy outcomes, and women's experiences and perceptions. This review used a convergent segregated approach to synthesize and integrate research findings from Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) mixed-methods systematic reviews.

Results

There were 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria, and the articles came from seven different countries and included 23,997 women with GDM. The meta-analysis pooled outcomes for the incidence of weight gain exceeding the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations after GDM diagnosis to delivery was 0.31% (95% CI 0.21-0.42). The effectiveness of GDM-related weight interventions in reducing weight gain after GDM diagnosis was supported by quantitative evidence. The GDM-related GWG below the IOM recommendations is a protective factor (OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.48-0.97) for large for gestational Age (LGA), and above the IOM recommendations is a risk factor (OR=1.62, 95%CI 1.15-2.27) for LGA. In addition, no significant statistical significance was found in the pooled outcomes of small for gestational age (SGA). Avoiding excessive weight gain helps to optimize neonatal birth weight, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal blood glucose levels. According to qualitative survey results, some women with GDM experienced weight stigma, and a positive relationship between healthcare providers and GDM women helped in weight management.

Conclusion

Following a diagnosis of GDM, weight management interventions positively affected GWG and pregnancy outcomes. In order to improve compliance and safety of weight management in women with GDM, criteria and interventions for weight gain associated with GDM need to be further explored and improved.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=404492, identifier CRD42023404492.

Dose-Response Relationship between Gestational Weight Gain and Neonatal Birthweight in Chinese Women with Excess Weight/Obesity and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Total gestational weight gain (GWG) is identified as a strong and potentially controllable predictor of long-term health outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and infants. When the total GWG of women with excess weight/obesity and GDM does not exceed the Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggested range, neonatal birthweight outcomes may be favorable, but the evidence is limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship between increased total GWG and the risk of neonatal birthweight in Chinese women with excess weight/obesity and GDM. This study obtained electronic medical records (EMR) from the hospital information system (HIS) of the Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children between July 2017, and June 2020. A retrospective study analyzed the effect of the total GWG of women with excess weight/obesity and GDM on neonatal birthweight. The dose-response relationship between total GWG and neonatal birthweight was studied using a generalized linear model and embedded restricted cubic splines (RCS). The average age of all women with GDM was 31.99 ± 4.47 years, and 27.61% were advanced maternal age (≥35 years). The total GWG among women with excess weight and obesity and GDM greater than the IOM recommendations were found in 42.96% and 58.62% of cases, respectively. Total GWG in women with excess weight and excessing the IOM recommended range is a risk factor for large gestational age (LGA) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.1.47, 1.08-2.01] and macrosomia (aOR 1.55, 1.04-2.31). In the obesity above group, excessive weight gain increased the risk of LGA (aOR 2.92, 1.33-6.41) and macrosomia (aOR 2.83, 1.03-7.72). We used an RCS to examine pregnant women with excess weight and GDM and discovered a linear dose-response relationship between total GWG and LGA/macrosomia. In women with excess weight and obesity, increases in total GWG above the lowest end of the IOM recommendations range (7 kg and 5 kg) were associated with an increased risk of LGA and macrosomia. Therefore, research is urgently needed to support maternal and newborn health to provide recommendations for the ideal weight increase in women with excess weight/obesity and GDM.

Weight progression and adherence to weight gain target in women with vs. without gestational diabetes: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Weight management has been an important component of the service in obstetric care offered to pregnant women. Current gestational weight gain recommendations were primarily for the general obstetric population, raising concern about the applicability to women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to assess the difference in weight progression and adherence to the recommended gestational weight gain targets between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT).

METHODS

This was a hospital-based retrospective study of 56,616 pregnant women (9,430 GDM women and 47,186 NGT women) from Guangzhou between 2017 and 2021. The average change in weight progression was estimated based on serial weight measurements throughout pregnancy, using a mixed effects model with a random intercept to account for repeated measures of the same individual.

RESULTS

Women with GDM gained less weight (12.07 [SD 5.20] kg) than women with NGT (14.04 [SD 5.04] kg) throughout pregnancy. Before OGTT, a small difference was observed in the average change in weight progression between the two groups (GDM, 0.44 kg/week vs. NGT, 0.45 kg/week, p < 0.001), however, this gap widened significantly after the test (0.34 vs. 0.50 kg/week, p < 0.001). GDM individuals were identified with an approximately 4-fold increased proportion of insufficient weight gain (41.1% vs. 10.4%) and a 2-fold decreased proportion of excessive weight gain (22.6% vs. 54.2%) compared to NGT individuals. These results were consistently observed across different BMI categories, including underweight (insufficient: 52.7% vs. 19.9%; excessive: 15.6% vs. 35.3%), normal weight (insufficient 38.2% vs. 7.4%; excessive: 22.2% vs. 57.3%), and overweight/obese (insufficient: 43.1% vs. 9.8%; excessive: 30.1% vs. 68.8%).

CONCLUSION

Weight progression varied significantly between GDM and NGT individuals, resulting in a substantial difference in identifying insufficient and excessive weight gain between the two groups under current gestational weight gain guidelines.