A Case of Hashimoto's Thyroiditis with Multiple Drug Resistance and High Expression of Efflux Transporters

Blood levels of zearalenone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and thyroid hormones in patients with colorectal cancer

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by various species of mold fungi commonly found in plant materials. Zearalenone (ZEN) adversely affects the endocrine system. This study aimed to determine whether thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), procalcitonin (PCT), free triiodothyronine (fT3), and free thyroxine (fT4) levels are altered during natural zearalenone mycotoxicosis in patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) or colorectal cancer (CRC). A study was conducted on women and men diagnosed with SCC or CRC accompanied by the presence or absence (Patients Without ZEN - PWZ group) of ZEN in the blood. The PWZ group consisted of 17 patients with symptoms of SCC and CRC in whom ZEN and its metabolites were not detected in peripheral blood. The experimental (empirical) groups included a total of 16 SCC and CRC patients who tested positive for ZEN, but not its metabolites. TSH values in both sexes were within the upper limit of the reference range (0.27-4.2 μIU/mL) adopted by the hospital laboratory and corresponded to the upper second tertile and the lower third tertile. PCT values demonstrated that SCC and CRC were accompanied by a systemic or local bacterial infection. All mean values of fT3 were in the middle of the reference range, and the mean values of fT4 were within the upper reference limit. The fT3/fT4 prognostic marker was somewhat above the cut-off point of 0.22. These results indicate that in postmenopausal women and andropausal men who were diagnosed with SCC and CRC and were exposed to food-borne ZEN, higher values of the prognostic marker (fT3/fT4) were associated with an unfavorable prognosis. The study also revealed that the more distal the neoplastic lesions in the colon, the higher the percentage of both thyroid hormones, regardless of the patient's sex. The presence of ZEN in the diet alters thyroid activity in patients diagnosed with SCC and CRC.

Lansoprazole (LPZ) reverses multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer through impeding ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-mediated chemotherapeutic drug efflux and lysosomal sequestration

AIMS

Lansoprazole is one of the many proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) that acts more strongly with ABCB1 and ABCG2. The present study is to investigate the potential of lansoprazole on reversal of ABCB1/G2-mediated MDR in cancer, in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Reversal studies and combination evaluation were conducted to determine the synergistic anti-MDR effects on lansoprazole. Lysosomal staining was used to determination of lansoprazole on ABCB1-mediated lysosomal sequestration. Substrate accumulation and efflux assays, ATPase activity, and molecular docking were conducted to evaluate lansoprazole on ABCB1/G2 functions. Western blot and immunofluorescence were used to detect lansoprazole on ABCB1/G2 expression and subcellular localization. MDR nude mice models were established to evaluate the effects of lansoprazole on MDR in vivo.

RESULTS

Lansoprazole attenuated ABCB1/G2-mediated MDR and exhibited synergistic effects with substrate drugs in MDR cells. In vivo experiments demonstrated that lansoprazole attenuated ABCB1/G2-mediated MDR and exhibited synergistic effects that augmented the sensitivity of substrate anticancer drugs in ABCB1/G2-mediated settings without obvious toxicity. Lansoprazole impeded lysosomal sequestration mediated by ABCB1, leading to a substantial increase in intracellular accumulation of substrate drugs. The effects of lansoprazole were not attributable to downregulation or alterations in subcellular localization of ABCB1/G2. Lansoprazole promoted the ATPase activity of ABCB1/G2 and competitively bound to the substrate-binding region of ABCB1/G2.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings present novel therapeutic avenues whereby the combination of lansoprazole and chemotherapeutic agents mitigates MDR mediated by ABCB1/G2 overexpression.

The Use of Levothyroxine Absorption Tests in Clinical Practice

Although levothyroxine (LT4) is a widely prescribed drug, more than 30% of LT4-treated patients fail to achieve the recommended serum level of thyrotropin with a body weight-based dose of LT4. An LT4 absorption test (LT4AT) is part of the workup for confirming normal LT4 absorption or diagnosing malabsorption. We searched PubMed with the terms levothyrox*, L-T4, LT4, TT4, FT4, FT3, TT3, test, loading, uptake, absorp*, "absorb*, bioavailab*, bioequiv* malabsorb*, and pseudomalabsorb*. A total of 43 full-text publications were analyzed. The published procedures for LT4AT differ markedly in the test dose, formulation, test duration, frequency of blood collection, analyte (total thyroxine [TT4] or free thyroxine [FT4]), metric (absolute or relative peak or increment, or area under the curve) and the threshold for normal absorption. In a standardized LT4AT for routine use, the physician could advise the patient to not consume food, beverages, or medications the morning of the test; administer 1000 µg of LT4 in the patient's usual formulation as the test dose; ensure that the patient is supervised throughout the LT4AT; perform a 4-hour test, with hourly blood samples; assay FT4; and consider that normal LT4 absorption corresponds to an FT4 increment of more than 0.40 ng/dL (5.14 pmol/L) or a TT4 increment of more than 6 μg/dL (77.23 nmol/L) for a test dose of at least 300 µg, or a percentage TT4 absorption of more than 60%. If the test indicates abnormal LT4 absorption, the physician can increase the LT4 dose, change the formulation or administration route, and/or refer the patient to a gastroenterologist.

Alternative routes of levothyroxine administration for hypothyroidism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of the article is to present the basics of oral levothyroxine (LT4) absorption, reasons why patients may have persistently elevated serum thyroid stimulation hormone (TSH) levels, and alternative strategies for LT4 dosing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although oral LT4 tablets are most commonly used for thyroid hormone replacement in patients with hypothyroidism, case studies report that liquid oral LT4, intravenous, intramuscular, and rectal administration of LT4 can successfully treat refractory hypothyroidism.

SUMMARY

Hypothyroidism is one of the most common endocrine disorders encountered by primary care physicians and endocrinologists. LT4 is one of the most widely prescribed medications in the world and it is the standard of care treatment for hypothyroidism. Generally, hypothyroid patients will be treated with LT4 tablets to be taken orally, and monitoring will occur with routine serum thyroid tests, including TSH concentrations. However, many patients fail to maintain serum TSH levels in the target range while managed on oral LT4 tablets. A subset of these patients would be considered to have poorly controlled hypothyroidism, sometimes termed refractory hypothyroidism. For these patients, optimization of ingestion routines and alternative formulations and routes of administration of LT4 can be considered, including oral liquid, intravenous, intramuscular, and even rectal formulations.

Adequate timing and constant supervision are the keys for successful implementation of levothyroxine or levothyroxine/paracetamol absorption test

Background

Levothyroxine (LT₄) pseudomalabsorption due to medication non-adherence results in significant costs for Health Service. High dose LT₄ or LT₄/paracetamol absorption test is used in such cases. Hence, establishment of an optimal test protocol and timing of sample collection is of utmost importance.

Case presentation

A 34-year old woman was admitted to our Department because of severe hypothyroidism [on admission thyrotropin (TSH) > 100 μIU/ml, free thyroxine (FT₄) 0.13 ng/dl (ref. range 0.93–1.7)] despite apparently taking 1000 μg of LT₄ a day. Autoimmune hypothyroidism had been diagnosed 4 years before during post-partum thyroiditis. Subsequently, it was not possible to control her hypothyroidism despite several admissions to two University Hospitals and despite vehement denial of compliance problems. There was no evidence of coeliac disease or other malabsorption problems, though gluten-free and lactose-free diet was empirically instigated without success. A combined paracetamol (1000 mg)/LT₄ (1000 μg) absorption test was performed in one of these Hospitals. This showed good paracetamol absorption (from < 2 μg/ml to 14.11 μg/ml at 120 min), with inadequate LT₄ absorption (FT₄ increase from 5.95 pmol/l to 9.92 pmol/l at 0 and 120 min respectively). About 2 years prior to admission to our Department the patient was treated with escalating doses of levothyroxine [up to 3000 μg of T₄ and 40 μg of triiodothyronine (T₃) daily] without significant impact on TSH (still > 75 μIU/ml, and FT₄ still below reference range).

After admission to our Department we performed a 2500 μg LT₄ absorption test with controlled ingestion of crushed tablets, strict patient monitoring and sampling at 30 min intervals. We observed a quick and striking increase in FT₄ from 0.13 to 0.46, 1.78, 3.05 and 3.81 ng/dl, at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min, respectively. Her TSH concentration decreased to 13.77 μIU/ml within 4 days. When informed, that we had managed to “overcome” her absorption problems, she discharged herself against medical advice and declined psychiatric consultation.

Conclusions

Adequate patient supervision and frequent sampling (e.g. every 30 min for 210 min) is the key for successful implementation of LT₄ absorption test. Paracetamol coadministration appears superfluous in such cases.