Effect of inhibin on activators of protein kinase-C and calcium-mobilizing agents which stimulate secretion of gonadotropins in vitro: implication of a postgonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor effect of inhibin on gonadotropin release

Gonadotropin surge-inhibiting/attenuating factors: a review of current evidence, potential applications, and future directions for research

Animal studies in the 1980s suggested the existence of an ovarian hormone, termed gonadotropin surge-inhibiting/attenuating factor (GnSIF/AF), that modulates pituitary secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH). Given the importance of identifying regulatory factors of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and the accumulating data suggesting its existence, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase to identify articles related to GnSIF/AF. The search generated 161 publications, of which 97 were included in this study. Several attempts have been made to identify and characterize this hormone and several candidates have been identified, but the protein sequences of these putative GnSIF/AF factors differ widely from one study to another. In addition, while the RF-amide RFRP-3 is known foremost as a neuropeptide, some research supports an ovarian origin for this non-steroidal hormone, thereby suggesting a role for RFRP-3 either as a co-modulator of GnSIF/AF or as a gonadotropin-inhibiting factor in the hypothalamus (GnIH). Discovery of the KNDy neurons that modulate GnRH secretion, on the other hand, further encourages the search for substance(s) that modulate their activity and that indirectly affect LH secretion and the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. While it has remained an elusive hormone, GnSIF/AF holds many potential applications for contraception, in vitro fertilization, and/or cancer as well as for understanding polycystic ovary syndrome, metabolic diseases, and/or pubertal development. In this review, we rigorously examine the available evidence regarding the existence of GnSIF/AF, previous attempts at its identification, limitations to its discovery, future directions of research, and potential clinical applications.

Inhibin

Inhibin is a glycoprotein hormone, consisting of two dissimilar, disulphide-linked subunits, termed α (MW 20kD) and β (MW 3-15kD), which inhibits the production and/or secretion of pituitary gonadotrophins, preferentially follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). The most widely studied inhibin molecule has a molecular weight of 31-32kD, as purified and cloned from bovine, porcine, ovine, rat and human sources. Higher molecular weight forms have been identified in ovarian follicular fluids and in culture media of granulosa and Sertoli cells, and generally differ from the 31kD form in having larger α-subunits, designated by their molecular weights, e.g. α44 in 58kD inhibin. There are two forms of the β-subunit, named βA and βB and the corresponding inhibin dimers have been named inhibin A and inhibin B. Dimers of the β-subunit, which have been shown to have FSH stimulating activity, are termed activins and are designated activin A, B or AB depending on whether the dimer is a homodimer of βA or βB or a heterodimer of βA and βB (Figure 1). The major gonadal source of inhibin is the granulosa cell in the female and the Sertoli cell in the male. Other potential cellular sites of origin will be discussed below.

Gene expression and secretion of LH and FSH in relation to gene expression of GnRH receptors in the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) demonstrates highly conserved mechanisms

In eutherian mammals, the gonadotrophins (LH and FSH) are synthesized and stored in gonadotroph cells under the regulation of multiple mechanisms including GnRH. Very little is known about the regulation of gonadotrophin secretion and storage in pituitary glands of marsupials. This study revealed, using quantitative PCR and heterologous RIA techniques, thatLHBmRNA expression levels remained constant over the oestrous cycle, regardless of the presence of a preovulatory LH surge, which is characteristic of a hormone secreted under regulation. Our sampling regime was unable to detect pulses of LH during the follicular phase, althoughGNRHRmRNA levels had increased at this time. Pulses of LH were, however, detected in the luteal phase of cycling females, in anoestrus females and in males. There was a positive correlation between gene expression ofFSHBand plasma levels of FSH at different stages of the oestrous cycle and no pulses of FSH were detected at any time; all characteristics of a hormone secreted via the constitutive pathway. Usingin situhybridisation and immunohistochemistry methods, we determined that mRNA expression ofLHBandFSHB, and protein storage of gonadotrophins exhibited a similar pattern of localisation within the pituitary gland. Additionally, sexual dimorphism of gonadotroph populations was evident. In summary, these findings are similar to that reported in eutherians and considering that marsupial evolution diverged from eutherians over 100 million years ago suggests that the regulation of gonadotrophins is highly conserved indeed.

Cytochemical studies of multifunctional gonadotropes

Studies have focused on the roles of the gonadotrope subsets defined by cytochemical and morphological tools. The evidence points to groups of gonadotropes that may be stimulated to mature and secrete to support surge activity. We postulate that these gonadotropes stem from the medium-sized subset. Other gonadotropes may more involved with maintenance functions. Perhaps these come from the larger cell pools. Monohormonal gonadotropes may play unique roles, such as FSH secretion early in estrus. Some may be immature, others may be regulatory and play both paracrine or autocrine roles in the pituitary cell population. We also recognize that one of the limitations of the current-day cytochemical techniques is that it does not define the entire gonadotrope population in any given two-label protocol. Nevertheless, based on past cytochemical studies, assumptions are made about the extent to which the cells express both hormones or behave in a uniform manner. These assumptions have led researchers to focus on one subset of the gonadotrope population. In their attempts to simplify the population to be studied, they may have eliminated important regulatory, secretory, or monohormonal gonadotropes from the pool. The approach is valid, as long as they recognize that they are studying a subset of a complex and dynamic population.

Division of labor among gonadotropes

This chapter has presented a somewhat complex view of the gonadotrope population, indicating that it consists of independent subsets. There may be regulatory cells that influence development and other ancillary processes needed for normal reproduction. For example, normal differentiation of PRL cells requires a functioning population of gonadotropes (Kendall et al., 1991). In addition, gonadotropes appear to be autoregulatory; subsets may produce inhibin or activin (in rats) and follistatin. Production of GnRH itself may serve as another regulatory tool. The gonadotrope population appears to be quite dynamic and convertible in the female rat. Cytological and cytochemical changes with the stage of the cycle are obvious. Increases in the numbers of immunoreactive gonadotropes parallel increases in GnRH target cells and culminate in peak expression of LH and FSH beta subunit mRNAs. The immunoreactive gonadotropes are greatly reduced after the surge activity, as though the cells had disappeared from the population. However, gonadotropes can still be detected by their content of gonadotropin mRNAs. This finding has led to the hypothesis that the gonadotropes recycle themselves. However, do they go through a resting phase? Is there a normal cycle of cell death and turnover? These are basic questions that must be answered in order to understand how the population is organized and renewed. Finally, we have returned to one of our original problems. Whereas it is clear that nonparallel release can be brought about by granules or cells with only one gonadotropin, the exact mechanisms that sort the gonadotropin molecules or turn off bihormonal expression are not known. A combination of autoregulatory events involving follistatin, activin, inhibin, and possibly steroids may play a role in modulating expression by a given subset. Delays in maturation may also prevent secretion of FSH and, hence, effect the delayed rise seen during late proestrus. The nonsecretory FSH cells seen in the studies by Lloyd and Childs (1988a) may be delayed maturers, requiring additional receptor types or changes in the calcium flux pattern to secrete their product. We also have a new question to address. What is the significance of the presence of GH in proestrous gonadotropes? Is GH a regulatory hormone, bound to receptors inside gonadotropes, or do subsets of somatotropes augment the population, producing a cocktail of GH and gonadotropins to aid ovulation? Either hypothesis is intriguing. Co-storage of GH and gonadotropins would be an efficient way of providing the hormones needed by the ovary. However, further work with in situ hybridization is needed to detect GH mRNA in such cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Bioactive peptides in anterior pituitary cells

The anterior pituitary (AP) has been shown to contain a wide variety of bioactive peptides: brain-gut peptides, growth factors, hypothalamic releasing factors, posterior lobe peptides, opioids, and various other peptides. The localization of most of these peptides was first established by immunocytochemical methods and some of the peptides were localized in identified cell types. Although intracellular localization of a peptide may be the consequence of internalization from the plasma compartment, there is evidence for local synthesis of most of these peptides in the AP based on the identification of their messenger-RNA (mRNA). In several cases the release of the peptide from the AP cell has been shown and regulation of synthesis, storage and release have also been described. Because the amount of most of the AP peptides is very low (except for POMC peptides and galanin), endocrine functions are not expected. There is more evidence for paracrine, autocrine, or intracrine roles in growth, differentiation, and regeneration, or in the control of hormone release. To demonstrate such functions, in vitro AP experiments have been designed to avoid the interference of hypothalamic or peripheral hormones. The strategy is first to show a direct effect of the peptide after adding it to the in vitro system and, secondly, to explore if the endogenous AP peptide has a similar action by using blockers of peptide receptors or antisera immunoneutralizing the peptide.