Changes in GAD65Ab-specific antiidiotypic antibody levels correlate with changes in C-peptide levels and progression to islet cell autoimmunity

Clinical Characteristics of 261 Cases of Hospitalized Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of 261 cases of hospitalized patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH).Methods Clinical data of 261 cases of hospitalized patients diagnosed with T1DM in the Department of Endocrinology at PUMCH from January 2007 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into the T1DM antibodies positive group (n=180) and negative group (n=81) according to the results of immunohistochemistry, in which 123 newly diagnosed T1DM patients were divided into the adult onset group (>18 years, n=58) and non-adult onset group (≤18 years, n=65) according to the onset age of T1DM, respectively. The clinical characteristics from different groups were compared.Results In 261 patients, the average age was 26.6±15.4 years, the average disease duration was 49 (1-480) months, the positive rate of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody was 58.8% (153/260). The level of 2-hour postprandial C peptide and the positive rate of T1DM antibodies in the non-adult onset group were higher than those in the adult onset group (0.98 vs. 0.52 ng/ml, P=0.002 and 80.4% vs. 62.5%, P=0.048). The age of onset in the T1DM antibodies positive group was smaller than that in the T1DM antibodies negative group (19.7±11.4 vs. 24.7±15.6 years, P=0.04), while the incidence of ketosis in the T1DM antibodies positive group was higher than that in the T1DM antibodies negative group (48.3% vs. 34.2%, P=0.035). With the progress of the disease, the fasting C peptide level of the T1DM antibodies positive group decreased more rapidly. Compared with the single time hospitalized patients, multiple hospitalized patients had a lower incidence of diabetic retinopathy (8.2% vs. 22.4%, P=0.032), a lower hemoglobin A1_c level (8.04%±2.10% vs. 9.56%±2.64%, P<0.001) and fasting blood glucose level (8.7±3.1 vs. 10.9±4.2 mmol/L, P<0.001).Conclusions Compared with the non-adult onset T1DM patients, the islet function of adult onset patients was even worse. In the T1DM antibodies positive patients, the islet β cell function decreased more rapidly, so the antibodies could not only clarify the diagnosis of T1DM and also predict prognosis of the islet β cell function. In the management of T1DM patients, regular hospital revisits contributed to get better glycemic control and reduced the occurrence of diabetic complications.

Masked and overt autoantibodies specific to the DPD epitope of 65-kDa glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65-DPD) are associated with preserved β-cell functional reserve in ketosis-prone diabetes

CONTEXT

Ketosis-prone diabetes (KPD), defined by presentation with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), comprises 4 subgroups based on the presence or absence of islet cell autoantibodies (A(-) or A(+)) and β-cell functional reserve (β(-) or β(+)). Among A(+) KPD, autoantibody epitope reactivity to 65-kDa glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65), defined by monoclonal GAD65Ab(DPD), was associated with greater β-cell functional reserve. In a majority of healthy individuals, GAD65Ab are present in the sera but are masked by anti-idiotypic antibodies; in contrast, overtly GAD65Ab-positive patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes patients lack these anti-idiotypic antibodies.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the presence of masked and overt GAD65Ab(DPD) in relation to β-cell function and genetic risk factors in KPD patients.

DESIGN

We investigated the associations of masked and overt GAD65Ab(DPD) with β-cell functional reserve, and their relationship with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II haplotypes linked to autoimmune diabetes susceptibility or resistance, in a large KPD cohort.

PATIENTS

Adult KPD patients (n = 384) were followed longitudinally in a research clinic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

β-Cell function, autoantibody status, GAD65Ab epitopes, and HLA class II haplotypes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, KPD patients with β-cell functional reserve (β(+) subgroups) showed significantly higher frequency of masked GAD65Ab(DPD) than patients without β-cell functional reserve (β(-) subgroups): 112 of 144 (79%) compared with 59 of 100 (59%), respectively (P = .002). Masked or overt GAD65Ab(DPD) were also more frequent among autoantibody-positive patients with preserved β-cell functional reserve (A(+)β(+) KPD) than those lacking β-cell function (A(+)β(-) KPD): 77% compared with 55% (P = .01). The susceptibility HLA haplotypes DQA1*0301/DQB1*0302 and DQA1*0301/DQB1*0201 were associated with absence of overt or masked GAD65Ab(DPD) (odds Ratios 2.3 and 2.2, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Masked GAD65Ab(DPD) are strongly associated with preserved β-cell functional reserve among patients with KPD. Absence of GAD65Ab(DPD) reactivity is associated with 2 HLA class II susceptibility haplotypes for autoimmune type 1 diabetes.

Failure to detect anti-idiotypic antibodies in the autoimmune response to IA-2 in Type 1 diabetes

The concept that immune responses to self antigens are regulated by anti-idiotypic networks has attracted renewed interest following reports of circulating factors within IgG fractions of serum that impair detection of autoantibodies with autoantigen. Thus, preclearance of sera with bead-immobilised monoclonal autoantibodies to the Type 1 diabetes autoantigen GAD65, or prebinding of serum antibodies to protein A Sepharose prior to addition of antigen, increases immunoreactivity detected in serum samples consistent with the trapping on the beads of anti-idiotypic antibodies that block antibody binding to the autoantigen. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of anti-idiotypic antibodies to another major target of autoantibodies in Type 1 diabetes, IA-2. As previously observed for GAD65, preadsorption of serum samples with immobilised monoclonal IA-2 autoantibody, or prebinding to protein A Sepharose, resulted in substantial increases in subsequent immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled IA-2 in a proportion of samples. However, control experiments indicated that the increases seen on pre-incubation with immobilized autoantibodies were caused by displacement of the antibody by serum IgG, whereas impaired detection of immunoreactivity in liquid-phase radiobinding assays was the result of formation of insoluble complexes that bind poorly to protein A. The results emphasise the importance of direct demonstration of specific binding of antibodies to the idiotype in the study of idiotypic networks in autoimmunity. Variability between patients in formation of insoluble immune complexes has implications for the design and standardization of autoantibody assays for diabetes prediction.

Decline in titers of anti-idiotypic antibodies specific to autoantibodies to GAD65 (GAD65Ab) precedes development of GAD65Ab and type 1 diabetes

The humoral Idiotypic Network consisting of antibodies and their anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-Id) can be temporarily upset by antigen exposure. In the healthy immune response the original equilibrium is eventually restored through counter-regulatory mechanisms. In certain autoimmune diseases however, autoantibody levels exceed those of their respective anti-Id, indicating a permanent disturbance in the respective humoral Idiotypic Network. We investigated anti-Id directed to a major Type 1 diabetes (T1D)-associated autoantibody (GAD65Ab) in two independent cohorts during progression to disease. Samples taken from participants of the Natural History Study showed significantly lower anti-Id levels in individuals that later progressed to T1D compared to non-progressors (anti-Id antibody index of 0.06 vs. 0.08, respectively, p = 0.02). We also observed a significant inverse correlation between anti-Id levels and age at sampling, but only in progressors (p = 0.014). Finally, anti-Id levels in progressors showed a significant decline during progression as compared to longitudinal anti-Id levels in non-progressors (median rate of change: -0.0004 vs. +0.0004, respectively, p = 0.003), suggesting a loss of anti-Id during progression. Our analysis of the Diabetes Prediction in Skåne cohort showed that early in life (age 2) individuals at risk have anti-Id levels indistinguishable from those in healthy controls, indicating that low anti-Id levels are not an innate characteristic of the immune response in individuals at risk. Notably, anti-Id levels declined significantly in individuals that later developed GAD65Ab suggesting that the decline in anti-Id levels precedes the emergence of GAD65Ab (median rate of change: -0.005) compared to matched controls (median rate of change: +0.001) (p = 0.0016). We conclude that while anti-Id are present early in life, their levels decrease prior to the appearance of GAD65Ab and to the development of T1D.

Immunobiology of beta-cell destruction

Type 1 diabetes is a chronic disease characterized by severe insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia, due to autoimmune destruction of pancreatic islets of Langerhans. A susceptible genetic background is necessary, but not sufficient, for the development of the disease. Epidemiological and clinical observations underscore the importance of environmental factors as triggers of type 1 diabetes, currently under investigation. Islet-specific autoantibodies precede clinical onset by months to years and are established tools for risk prediction, yet minor players in the pathogenesis of the disease. Many efforts have been made to elucidate disease-relevant defects in the key immune effectors of islet destruction, from the early failure of specific tolerance to the vicious circle of destructive insulitis. However, the events triggering islet autoimmunity as well as the transition to overt diabetes are still largely unknown, making prevention and treatment strategies still a challenge.

Protective role of anti-idiotypic antibodies in autoimmunity--lessons for type 1 diabetes

Circulating autoantibodies to beta cell antigens are present in the majority of patients with Type 1 diabetes. These autoantibodies can be detected before and at time of clinical diagnosis of disease. Although the role of autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of the disease is debated, their presence indicates a dysregulation of the humoral immune response. Mechanisms regulating autoantibodies in Type 1 diabetes are not well understood. In contrast, in other autoimmune diseases there is acceptance that autoantibodies are regulated not only by antigen but also by other antibodies that bind to the antigen-binding site of these autoantibodies (anti-idiotypic antibodies). The proposed purpose of this network is to maintain an equilibrium between autoantibodies and their anti-idiotypic antibodies, preventing autoimmunity, while allowing a robust response to exogenous antigen. Anti-idiotypic antibodies regulate both autoantibody binding and their levels by a) neutralizing autoantibodies, and b) inhibiting the secretion of autoantibodies. Because it has been proposed that the B lymphocytes that produce autoantibodies function as autoantigen presenting cells, inhibiting their binding to autoantigen by anti-idiotypic antibodies may prevent development of autoimmune disease. This hypothesis is supported by the presence of anti-idiotypic antibodies in healthy individuals and in patients in remission from autoimmune diseases, and by the lack of anti-idiotypic antibodies during active disease. We recently reported the presence of autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase in the majority of healthy individuals, where their binding to autoantigen is prevented by anti-idiotypic antibodies. These anti-idiotypic antibodies are absent at clinical diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes, revealing the presence of autoantibodies. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the dysfunction and destruction of insulin-producing beta cells by autoreactive T cells. Although much progress has been made towards understanding the respective roles of effector and regulatory T cells in this beta cell destruction, the development of autoantibodies to beta cell proteins is widely considered simply a by-product of the autoimmune destruction of the beta cells, rather than having an active role in the pathogenesis. This view is starting to change based on increasing recognition that autoantibodies can have defined roles in other autoimmune diseases, and the emergence of new data on their role in T1D. This exploration of the role of autoantibodies in autoimmune disease has been spurred, in part, by increasing recognition that development of autoimmune diseases is influenced by regulatory antibodies (anti-idiotypic antibodies) directed against the unique binding site of autoantibodies. This review provides an overview of the development and function of these anti-idiotypic antibodies, and present evidence supporting their role in the development of autoimmune diseases. Finally, we conclude this review with a model of the events that may cause loss of anti-idiotypic antibodies and the implications for the development of T1D.

Vaccination against type 1 diabetes

The clinical onset of type 1 diabetes or autoimmune diabetes occurs after a prodrome of islet autoimmunity. The warning signals for the ensuing loss of pancreatic islet beta cells are autoantibodies against insulin, GAD65, IA-2 and ZnT8, alone or in combinations. Autoantibodies against, for example, insulin alone have only a minor risk of type 1 diabetes. However, progression to clinical onset is increased by the induction of multiple islet autoantibodies. At the time of clinical onset, insulitis may be manifest, which seems to reduce the efficacy of immunosuppression. Autoantigen-specific immunotherapy with alum-formulated GAD65 (Diamyd(®)) shows promise to reduce the loss of beta-cell function after the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes. The mechanisms are unclear but may involve the induction of T regulatory cells, which may suppress islet autoantigen reactivity. Past and ongoing clinical trials have been safe. Future clinical trials, perhaps as combination autoantigen-specific immunotherapy, may increase the efficacy in preventing the clinical onset in subjects with islet autoantibodies or preserve residual beta-cell function in patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.