Antral Follicle Priming Before Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Previously Diagnosed Low Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FOLLPRIM)

Androgens and diminished ovarian reserve: the long road from basic science to clinical implementation. A comprehensive and systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present a narrative review regarding androgen production, androgens' role in folliculogenesis, and the available therapeutic approaches for androgen supplementation, and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the impact of androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone/testosterone) compared with placebo or no treatment on ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or poor ovarian responders.

DATA SOURCES

An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, was conducted for studies published until September 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that compared ovarian response and/or pregnancy outcomes between the different in vitro fertilization protocols using androgens (ie, dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone) and conventional in vitro fertilization stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or poor ovarian responders were included.

METHODS

The quality of each study was evaluated with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The meta-analysis used random-effects models. All results were interpreted on the basis of intention-to-treat analysis (defined as the inclusion of all randomized patients in the denominator). Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used and combined for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, -0.35 to 1.88), mature oocytes retrieved (mean difference, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, -0.27 to 0.76), clinical pregnancy rate (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.57), live-birth rate (risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-2.01), or miscarriage rate (risk ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-2.22) when dehydroepiandrosterone priming was compared with placebo or no treatment. Testosterone pretreatment yielded a higher number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.42), a higher clinical pregnancy rate (risk ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.20), and higher live-birth rate (risk ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.95).

CONCLUSION

Although dehydroepiandrosterone did not present a clear effect on outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques, we found a potentially beneficial effect of testosterone priming on ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes. However, results should be interpreted with caution, taking into account the low to moderate quality of the available evidence.

The Role of Androgen Supplementation in Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: Time to Randomize, Not Meta-Analyze

The management of patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) remains one of the most challenging tasks in IVF clinical practice. Despite the promising results obtained from animal studies regarding the importance of androgens on folliculogenesis, the evidence obtained from clinical studies remains inconclusive. This is mainly due to the lack of an evidence-based methodology applied in the available trials and to the heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria and IVF treatment protocols. In this review, we analyze the available evidence obtained from animal studies and highlight the pitfalls from the clinical studies that prevent us from closing the chapter of this line of research.

Ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG in patients at risk of poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of two ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF in patients at risk of poor ovarian response: corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG versus daily administration of hp-hMG. We intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the protocol with corifollitropin alfa.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled study. We compared two ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF in 234 patients, under 40 years of age and at risk of poor ovarian response. First protocol was a single injection of 150 μg corifollitropin alfa and the second, a daily injection of 300 IU of hp-hMG during the first week of ovarian stimulation. In both groups, if necessary, a daily injection of 300 IU of hp-hMG was dispensed until the criteria for hCG administration are met. For the primary and secondary outcomes, results were analysed by using a one-sided chi-square test or a Fisher exact test, as appropriate, with a level of significance of 0.05. For continuous variables, parametric (independent t-test) or non-parametric (Mann-Whitney test) tests were used depending on the normality of the distribution. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate (15.2 vs 20.2) (P = 0.33), and the cumulative live birth rate (15.2 vs 22.0) (P = 0.19) per started cycle did not show significant differences between the corifollitropin alfa and hp-hMG groups, and the difference estimated between treatments was -5% [95% CI: (-15.1, 5.0)].

CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to probe non-inferiority of the protocol with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG in patients at risk of poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.

Conventional versus minimal ovarian stimulation: an intra-patient comparison of ovarian response in poor-responder women according to Bologna Criteria

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is minimal ovarian stimulation (MOS) as effective as conventional ovarian stimulation (COS) in ovarian response and embryo quality in the same 46 poor-responder patients according to the Bologna criteria?

DESIGN

An intra-patient comparison of patients undergoing both protocols. Ovaries were stimulated with either a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and a combination of recombinant FSH and highly purified human menotrophin (HP-HMG) daily (COS), or with the use of clomiphene citrate 50 mg daily and 150 IU of HP-HMG or recombinant FSH every other day from simulation day 4 (MOS).

RESULTS

After MOS, significantly more good-quality embryos (1.0 ± 1.2 versus 0.3 ± 0.6) (P = 0.002), oocytes (3.2 ± 1.9 versus 2.0 ± 1.8) (P = 0.002), and mature (metaphase II) oocytes (2.6 ± 1.7 versus 1.6 ± 1.7) (P = 0.001) were obtained. In COS cycles, a significantly higher total gonadotrophin dose was needed per good-quality embryo (+2194 IU; 95% CI 618 to 3170).

CONCLUSIONS

In poor responder patients, MOS is a good alternative when COS has failed, or even as a first-line treatment. It offered a significantly greater number of good-quality embryos as well as a higher number of oocytes, using significantly lower doses of gonadotrophins per oocyte and embryo obtained.