|
1
|
Hofland J, Refardt JC, Feelders RA, Christ E, de Herder WW. Approach to the Patient: Insulinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024; 109:1109-1118. [PMID: 37925662 PMCID: PMC10940262 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Insulinomas are hormone-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with an estimated incidence of 1 to 4 cases per million per year. Extrapancreatic insulinomas are extremely rare. Most insulinomas present with the Whipple triad: (1) symptoms, signs, or both consistent with hypoglycemia; (2) a low plasma glucose measured at the time of the symptoms and signs; and (3) relief of symptoms and signs when the glucose is raised to normal. Nonmetastatic insulinomas are nowadays referred to as "indolent" and metastatic insulinomas as "aggressive." The 5-year survival of patients with an indolent insulinoma has been reported to be 94% to 100%; for patients with an aggressive insulinoma, this amounts to 24% to 67%. Five percent to 10% of insulinomas are associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Localization of the insulinoma and exclusion or confirmation of metastatic disease by computed tomography is followed by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for indolent, localized insulinomas. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is a highly sensitive localization technique for seemingly occult, indolent, localized insulinomas. Supportive measures and somatostatin receptor ligands can be used for to control hypoglycemia. For single solitary insulinomas, curative surgical excision remains the treatment of choice. In aggressive malignant cases, debulking procedures, somatostatin receptor ligands, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus, sunitinib, and cytotoxic chemotherapy can be valuable options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hofland
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie C Refardt
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard A Feelders
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuel Christ
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Timmer FEF, Geboers B, Nieuwenhuizen S, Schouten EAC, Dijkstra M, de Vries JJJ, van den Tol MP, Meijerink MR, Scheffer HJ. Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071608. [PMID: 33807220 PMCID: PMC8036519 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a dismal prognosis. In selected patients with limited metastatic disease, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. This systematic review sought to examine current evidence on the value of additional locoregional treatment, including resection, ablation and embolization, in patients with hepatic or pulmonary mPDAC. The results, although liable to substantial bias, demonstrated superior survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment in a subset of patients after radical-intent local primary and metastatic treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). However, as a consequence of the bias, definitive conclusions regarding the seemingly beneficial effect of locoregional treatment cannot be endorsed. Randomized controlled trials with strictly selected oligometastatic PDAC patients are required to deduce final recommendations on this notion. Abstract The prognosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remains universally poor, requiring new and innovative treatment approaches. In a subset of oligometastatic PDAC patients, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. The aim of this systematic review was to explore and evaluate the current evidence on locoregional treatments for mPDAC. A systematic literature search was conducted on locoregional techniques, including resection, ablation and embolization, for mPDAC with a focus on hepatic and pulmonary metastases. A total of 59 studies were identified, including 63,453 patients. Although subject to significant bias, radical-intent local therapy for both the primary and metastatic sites was associated with a superior median overall survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to control groups receiving chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). To recruit patients that may benefit from these local treatments, selection appears essential. Most significant is the upfront possibility of local radical pancreatic and metastatic treatment. In addition, a patient’s response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, performance status, metastatic disease load and, to a lesser degree, histological differentiation grade and tumor marker CA19-9 serum levels, are powerful prognostic factors that help identify eligible subjects. Although the exact additive value of locoregional treatments for mPDAC patients cannot be distillated from the results, locoregional primary pancreatic and metastatic treatment seems beneficial for a highly selected group of oligometastatic PDAC patients. For definite recommendations, well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials with strict in- and exclusion criteria are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florentine E. F. Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-4571
| | - Bart Geboers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| | - Evelien A. C. Schouten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| | - Jan J. J. de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| | - M. Petrousjka van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Martijn R. Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| | - Hester J. Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.); (S.N.); (E.A.C.S.); (M.D.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.); (H.J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|