Multifactorial control of the elimination kinetics of unbound (free) growth hormone (GH) in the human: regulation by age, adiposity, renal function, and steady state concentrations of GH in plasma

Renal effects of growth hormone in health and in kidney disease

Growth hormone (GH) and its mediator insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) have manifold effects on the kidneys. GH and IGF receptors are abundantly expressed in the kidney, including the glomerular and tubular cells. GH can act either directly on the kidneys or via circulating or paracrine-synthesized IGF-1. The GH/IGF-1 system regulates glomerular hemodynamics, renal gluconeogenesis, tubular sodium and water, phosphate, and calcium handling, as well as renal synthesis of 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D3 and the antiaging hormone Klotho. The latter also acts as a coreceptor of the phosphaturic hormone fibroblast-growth factor 23 in the proximal tubule. Recombinant human GH (rhGH) is widely used in the treatment of short stature in children, including those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Animal studies and observations in acromegalic patients demonstrate that GH-excess can have deleterious effects on kidney health, including glomerular hyperfiltration, renal hypertrophy, and glomerulosclerosis. In addition, elevated GH in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus was thought to induce podocyte injury and thereby contribute to the development of diabetic nephropathy. This manuscript gives an overview of the physiological actions of GH/IGF-1 on the kidneys and the multiple alterations of the GH/IGF-1 system and its consequences in patients with acromegaly, CKD, nephrotic syndrome, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Finally, the impact of short- and long-term treatment with rhGH/rhIGF-1 on kidney function in patients with kidney diseases will be discussed.

Comparison of body surface area versus weight-based growth hormone dosing for girls with Turner syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Growth Hormone (GH) dosage in childhood is adjusted for body size, but there is no consensus whether body weight (BW) or body surface area (BSA) should be used. We aimed at comparing the biological effect and cost-effectiveness of GH treatment dosed per m2 BSA in comparison with dosing per kg BW in girls with Turner syndrome (TS).

METHODS

Serum IGF-I, GH dose, and adult height gain (AHG) from girls participating in two Dutch and five Swedish studies on the efficacy of GH were analyzed, and the cumulative GH dose and costs were calculated for both dose adjustment methods. Additional medication included estrogens (if no spontaneous puberty occurred) and oxandrolone in some studies.

RESULTS

At each GH dose, the serum IGF-I standard deviation score remained stable over time after an initial increase after the start of treatment. On a high dose (at 1 m2 equivalent to 0.056-0.067 mg/kg/day), AHG was at least equal on GH dosed per m2 BSA compared with dosing per kg BW. The cumulative dose and cost were significantly lower if the GH dose was adjusted for m2 BSA.

CONCLUSION

Dosing GH per m2 BSA is at least as efficacious as dosing per kg BW, and is more cost-effective.

Pharmacokinetic predictions for patients with renal impairment: focus on peptides and protein drugs

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• Renal impairment may affect the pharmacokinetics of peptide and protein drugs. • Molecular size is a predictor. Small molecules are eliminated by the kidneys, whereas large molecules (>67 kDa) are not. • Urinary recovery of peptide and protein drugs in healthy volunteers is not predictive for pharmacokinetic changes in patients with renal impairment.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• An apparently continuous non-linear relationship between molecular weight and pharmacokinetic alterations as observed in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease is described. • Potentially relevant pharmacokinetic changes were found for drugs with a molecular weight below 50 kDa. • Analysis of observed pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment may be a useful approach, especially when urinary recovery in healthy volunteers is not predictive.

AIM

Drug dosage adjustments in renal impairment are usually based on estimated individual pharmacokinetics. The extent of pharmacokinetic changes in patients with renal impairment must be known for this estimation. If measured data are not available, an estimate based on drug elimination in urine of healthy subjects or patients with normal renal function is commonly made. This is not reliable, however, if renal drug metabolism is involved, as is presumably the case for many peptide and protein drugs. In the present study a new method to predict pharmacokinetic changes for such drugs based on molecular weight was derived.

METHODS

Articles reporting measured pharmacokinetics of peptide and protein drugs in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease were identified from the scientific literature, the pharmacokinetic parameter values were extracted and a statistical data synthesis was performed. A sigmoid E(max) model was applied and fitted to the data and the prediction error was analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 98 peptide and protein drugs were identified. Relevant pharmacokinetic data in patients with renal impairment were found for 21 of these drugs. The average drug clearance was 30% and the average prolongation in half-life was 3.1-fold for low molecular weight peptides or proteins. The median root squared percentage of the prediction error was 18% (drug clearance) and 12% (half-life).

CONCLUSION

An apparently continuous non-linear relationship between molecular weight and pharmacokinetic alterations in patients with severe renal impairment was found. The derived equations could be used as a rough guide for decisions on drug dosage adjustments in such patients.

Motivations and methods for analyzing pulsatile hormone secretion

Endocrine glands communicate with remote target cells via a mixture of continuous and intermittent signal exchange. Continuous signaling allows slowly varying control, whereas intermittency permits large rapid adjustments. The control systems that mediate such homeostatic corrections operate in a species-, gender-, age-, and context-selective fashion. Significant progress has been made in understanding mechanisms of adaptive interglandular signaling in vivo. Principal goals are to understand the physiological origins, significance, and mechanisms of pulsatile hormone secretion. Key analytical issues are: 1) to quantify the number, size, shape, and uniformity of pulses, nonpulsatile (basal) secretion, and elimination kinetics; 2) to evaluate regulation of the axis as a whole; and 3) to reconstruct dose-response interactions without disrupting hormone connections. This review will focus on the motivations driving and the methodologies used for such analyses.

Diurnal secretion of growth hormone, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone in pre- and perimenopausal women with active rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot case-control study

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with neuroendocrine and immunologic dysfunction leading to rheumatoid cachexia. Although excess proinflammatory cytokines can decrease somatotropic axis activity, little is known about the effects of RA on growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 (GH/IGF-I) axis function. We tested the hypothesis that patients with active RA exhibit decreased GH/IGF-I axis activity. To do so, we conducted a pilot case-control study at a clinical research center in 7 pre- and perimenopausal women with active RA and 10 age- and body mass index-matched healthy women. Participants underwent blood sampling every 20 minutes for 24 hours (8 a.m. to 8 a.m.), and sera were assayed for GH, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Sera obtained after overnight fasting were assayed for IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1, IGFBP-3, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), glucose, insulin, and lipids. Body composition and bone mineral density were evaluated by DEXA (dual emission x-ray absorptiometry) scans. In patients with RA, mean disease duration was 7.6 ± 6.8 years, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and IL-6 were elevated. GH half-life was shorter than in control subjects (p = 0.0037), with no other significant group differences in GH deconvolution parameters or approximate entropy scores. IGF-I (p = 0.05) and IGFBP-3 (p = 0.058) were lower, whereas IGFBP-1 tended to be higher (p = 0.066), in patients with RA, with nonsignificantly increased 24-hour total GH production rates. There were no significant group differences in cortisol or DHEA secretion. Lean body mass was lower in patients with RA (p = 0.019), particularly in the legs (p = 0.01). Women with active RA exhibit a trend toward GH insensitivity and relatively diminished diurnal cortisol and DHEA secretion for their state of inflammation. Whether these changes contribute to rheumatoid cachexia remains to be determined.

NCT00034060.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of growth hormone in patients on chronic haemodialysis compared with matched healthy subjects: an open, nonrandomized, parallel-group trial

BACKGROUND

GH may be beneficial in treating patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the efficacy and safety of GH could be compromised by the potential for accumulation in the circulation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of GH treatment in ESRD patients.

DESIGN

This was an open, nonrandomized, single-centre parallel-group study lasting 8-9 days.

SUBJECTS

Eleven adult ESRD patients and 10 matched healthy individuals received recombinant human GH (50 microg/kg/day for 7 days) by subcutaneous injection; there were two dose reductions (25%) from Day 5/7. ESRD patients underwent dialysis four times.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum concentrations of GH, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), insulin-like growth factor binding protein-I (IGFBP-I), IGFBP-III and GHBP were measured. The primary end-point was GH exposure [area-under-the-curve (AUC) calculated from the 24-h profile] on Days 7-8.

RESULTS

GH AUC(0-24 h) was greater for patients (387.91 +/- 134.13 microg h/l) than healthy subjects (225.35 +/- 59.63 microg h/l) and the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the estimated patient : healthy subject ratio (1.40-2.07) was not within the acceptance interval (0.67-1.50). GH AUC(18-24 h) for patients and healthy subjects (3.03 +/- 2.71 microg h/l and 6.37 +/- 4.21 microg h/l) returned approximately to baseline (2.86 +/- 3.91 microg h/l and 1.09 +/- 1.43 microg h/l); terminal half-life (t(1/2,z)) was shorter for patients (2.28 +/- 00.43 h vs. 3.23 +/- 00.75 h). No major safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate a difference between patients and healthy subjects regarding GH AUC(0-24 h). However, GH concentrations for both groups were comparable to baseline by 20-22 h, thus GH was not retained in the circulation of ESRD patients.

Testosterone and estradiol regulate free insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1), and dimeric IGF-I/IGFBP-1 concentrations

The present study tests the clinical postulate that elevated testosterone (Te) and estradiol (E2) concentrations modulate the effects of constant iv infusion of saline vs. recombinant human IGF-I on free IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1, and dimeric IGF-I/IGFBP-1 concentrations in healthy aging adults. To this end, comparisons were made after administration of placebo (Pl) vs. Te in eight older men (aged 61 +/- 4 yr) and after Pl vs. E2 in eight postmenopausal women (62 +/- 3 yr). In the saline session, E2 lowered and Te increased total IGF-I; E2 specifically elevated IGFBP-1 by 1.5-fold and suppressed free IGF-I by 34%; and E2 increased binary IGF-I/IGFBP-1 by 5-fold more than Te. During IGF-I infusion, the following were found: 1) total and free IGF-I rose 1.4- to 2.0-fold (Pl) and 2.1-2.5-fold (Te) more rapidly in men than women; 2) binary IGF-I/IGFBP-1 increased 3.4-fold more rapidly in men (Te) than women (E2); and 3) end-infusion free IGF-I was 1.6-fold higher in men than women. In summary, E2, compared with Te supplementation, lowers concentrations of total and ultrafiltratably free IGF-I and elevates those of IGFBP-1 and binary IGF-I/IGFBP-1, thus putatively limiting IGF-I bioavailability. If free IGF-I mediates certain biological actions, then exogenous Te and E2 may modulate the tissue effects of total IGF-I concentrations unequally.

Sex-steroid modulation of growth hormone (GH) secretory control: three-peptide ensemble regulation under dual feedback restraint by GH and IGF-I

Technical, genetic, and clinical developments have unveiled a burgeoning array of novel effectors of GH secretion. The present appraisal of central neuroregulatory components of the somatotropic axis highlights a simplifying concept of ensemble control by the final common peptides, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GH-releasing peptide(s) (GHRP, ghrelin), and somatostatin. These potent signals act individually, antagonistically, and synergistically to direct pulsatile GH secretion. GHRH, GHRP/ghrelin, and somatostatin further adapt to autonegative feedback by GH and IGF-I. Estradiol modulates the impact of each of the primary peptidyl inputs; viz.: (i) enhances submaximally effective feedforward by discrete pulses of (injected) recombinant human GHRH-1,44-amide (as defined by increased agonistic potency and pituitary sensitivity); (ii) potentiates the submaximally stimulatory effects of GHRP-2, a hexapeptidyl mimetic of ghrelin; (iii) blunts dose-dependent inhibition of fasting GH secretion by somatostatin- 14; and (iv) relieves rhGH-enforced negative feedback on GHRP-2 (but not on basal, exercise, or GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion. The foregoing estrogenic activities collectively augment GH secretory burst mass by amplifying feedforward (via both GHRH and GHRP) and attenuating feedback (imposed by somatostatin and GH). Whether testosterone fully mimics the foregoing mechanistic actions of estradiol is not known. In conclusion, the present conceptual platform of tri-peptide-directed feedforward and GH/IGF-I-mediated feedback should aid in unraveling some of the complex regulatory dynamics targeted by sex-steroid hormones.

Neuroendocrine adaptations in renal disease

Chronic renal failure (CRF) disrupts the time-dependent secretion of multiple hormones. The present review focuses on altered pulsatile release of peptide hormones. CRF is marked by impaired tissue actions, disorderly release patterns, and relative [growth hormone (GH)] or absolute [luteinizing hormone (LH)] deficiency of secretion. At the hypothalamo-pituitary level, experimental evidence suggests that CRF reduces the synthesis and/or release of the cognate hypothalamic releasing factors, GHRH and LHRH, and enforces excessive inhibition by somatostatin. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and insulin are secreted in both basal and pulsatile modes, wherein the latter is putatively coordinated by autonomic innervation. Amplitude and frequency-dependent adaptations of PTH and insulin outflow fail in CRF, as assessed under steady-state conditions and during metabolic drive (i.e., calcium for PTH and glucose for insulin). A common feature in CRF is a diminished mass of hormone released per burst, due in principle to attenuation of feedforward signals and/or accentuation of (unknown) feedback signals. Damping of neuronal control and/or prolonged network response times may contribute to aberrant pulse frequency, disproportionate basal (nonpulsatile) hormone release, and consistent erosion of secretory process regularity in the uremic state. The homeostatic consequences of distorted secretory dynamics, tissue resistance, impaired hormone clearance, and altered mean agonist concentrations are evident in certain therapeutic interventions, such as GH supplementation in CRF.

Growth hormone binding protein and free growth hormone in chronic renal failure

Chronic renal failure in children is associated with growth failure. While the pathogenesis of uremic growth failure is multifactorial, an abnormal growth hormone/ insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF) axis is an important contributory element. Patients with uremia exhibit insensitivity to the action of GH, as exemplified by high plasma GH levels, low IGF-I activity, and poor somatic growth. This insensitivity can be overcome by supraphysiological doses of exogenous GH. Plasma GH binding protein (GHBP, the circulating ectodomain of the GH receptor) levels are decreased in patients with renal failure, as are hepatic GH receptor levels in animal models. Since GHBP levels are thought to reflect GH receptor levels in tissues, it is likely that the uremic GH insensitivity in humans is mediated by a decreased number of GH receptors. Another implication of the low plasma GHBP is a disproportionate elevation of free plasma GH (the biologically active moiety) relative to total GH, lending additional support to the concept of GH insensitivity in uremia. GH kinetics are altered in renal failure because of: (1) inability to excrete GH and (2) changes in the bound fraction of GH in the circulation.