Long-term Pegvisomant Therapy of Acromegaly: Effects on Bone Density, Turnover and Microstructure Using HRpQCT

Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is due in almost all cases to a GH-secreting pituitary tumor. GH and IGF-1 excesses lead to its multi-system clinical manifestations and comorbidities. Acromegaly is under-diagnosed and typically presents with advanced disease. When early or mild, clinical recognition and biochemical confirmation are especially challenging. Individualized treatment may optimize patient outcome.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers challenges to diagnosing acromegaly and reviews therapies for acromegaly with a focus on those aspects that can be individualized.

EXPERT OPINION

The first step in diagnosing acromegaly is recognizing it clinically. To improve this, increase awareness and education of the general population and healthcare professionals about the acromegaly phenotype is needed. Once suspected clinically, IGF-1 measurement is the initial step in making the biochemical diagnosis. GH may be < 1.0 µg/L after oral glucose suppression in early/mild cases. GH and IGF-1 should be considered in concert. Providers should be aware of conditions that can alter GH and IGF-1 levels and each assay's performance. An individualized treatment approach is best employed. Surgery is preferred as initial treatment and medical therapy as initial adjuvant therapy. In individualizing therapy, the advantages and disadvantages of each option and predictors of response to them should be considered.

Impact of medical therapy for hormone-secreting Pituitary tumors on bone

PURPOSE

Bone health is often impaired in patients with hormone-secreting pituitary tumors. Since medical therapy is central to their care, understanding how its use impacts on this is highly important.

METHODS

This review summarizes a systemmatic review of the literature on the effects of medical therapies for hormone-secreting pituitary tumors on bone.

RESULTS

In acromegaly, medical therapy lowers bone turnover marker (BTM) levels, consistent with correction of the high bone turnover of active disease, and overall, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) does not change or increases. Somatostatin-receptor ligand (SRL) and pegvisomant-treated acromegaly patients have persistently reduced volumetric BMD and microarchitectural abnormalities of the peripheral skeleton, deficits that are similar to those in surgically-treated patients. Fracture risk remains elevated in medically-treated acromegaly patients but in conjunction with biochemical control the risk is lessened. Treatment of prolactin-secreting tumors with dopamine agonists is associated with improvements in aBMD, but this does not always fully normalize despite effective medical treatment of the prolactinoma. In one cross-sectional study, prolactinoma patients had lower total volumetric BMD and impaired microarchitecture suggesting that bone microstructure does not fully normalize despite dopamine agonist therapy. Cross-sectional studies show a high rate of VF in patients with prolactin-secreting tumors that is lowered on cabergoline therapy, but still the fracture rate of men and postmenopausal women is higher than that of controls in some studies. Studies on the effects of modern-day medical therapy for Cushing's disease on bone are lacking.

CONCLUSION

More research is needed on the effectsof medical therapies for hormone secreting pituitary tumors on bone health.