Atypical speech is rare in individuals with normal developmental histories

Variation in homotopic areas' activity and inter-hemispheric intrinsic connectivity with type of language lateralization: an FMRI study of covert sentence generation in 297 healthy volunteers

We investigated the regional correlates of differences in hemispheric lateralization in 297 healthy volunteers [including 153 left-handers (LH)] previously classified into three types of language lateralization according to their hemispheric functional lateralization index measured with fMRI during covert sentence production versus word list production (PRODSENT-LIST): 250 leftward asymmetrical Typicals, 10 rightward asymmetrical Strong-atypicals (only LH), and 37 Ambilaterals with weak lateralization. Using a functionally driven homotopic atlas (AICHA), we compared patterns of regional asymmetry during PRODSENT-LIST in these three groups. Among the 192 homotopic regions of interest (hROIs) of the AICHA atlas, 58 exhibited a significant effect of the type of lateralization on their BOLD signal variation during PRODSENT-LIST. The analyses of patterns of asymmetry of these 58 hROIs showed that (1) hROIs asymmetries in Strong-atypicals were significantly negatively correlated with those observed in Typicals, which indicates that their regional pattern of rightward asymmetries was comparable to the regional pattern of leftward language asymmetries of Typicals; (2) right- and left-handed Typicals had identical profiles, whereas left-handed Ambilaterals exhibited reduced leftward asymmetry as compared either to right-handed Ambilaterals or to Typicals. Moreover, left-handed Ambilaterals pattern of hROIs asymmetries significantly positively correlated with those of both Typicals and Strong-atypicals. In 291 of the participants, we tested the hypothesis that differences in language lateralization were associated with differences in inter-hemispheric connectivity during resting state by measuring their regional homotopic inter-hemispheric intrinsic connectivity coefficient (rHIICC) in 36 of the 58 hROIs known to be connected via the corpus callosum. Mean rHIICCs were negatively correlated with task-induced functional asymmetries, suggesting that enhanced inter-hemispheric cooperation at rest translates into increased inter-hemispheric cooperation during language production. In addition, the left-handed Ambilaterals exhibited a significantly larger rHIICC compared with right-handed Ambilaterals and Typicals, confirming a difference in inter-hemispheric organization in this group.

Cortical stimulation mapping and Wada results demonstrate a normal variant of right hemisphere language organization

PURPOSE

Exclusive right hemisphere language lateralization is rarely observed in the Wada angiography results of epilepsy surgery patients. Cortical stimulation mapping (CSM) is infrequently performed in such patients, as most undergo nondominant left hemisphere resections, which are presumed not to pose any risk to language. Early language reorganization is typically assumed in such individuals, taking left hemisphere epileptiform activity as confirmation of change resulting from a pathologic process. We present data from CSM and Wada studies demonstrating that right hemisphere language occurs in the absence of left hemisphere pathology, suggesting it can exist as a normal, but rare variant, in some individuals. Furthermore, these data confirm the Wada test findings of atypical dominance.

METHODS

Cortical stimulation mapping data were examined for all right hemisphere surgical patients with right hemisphere speech at our center between 1974 and 2006. Of 1,209 interpretable Wada procedures, 89 patients (7.4%) had exclusive right hemisphere speech, and 21 (1.7%) of these patients underwent surgery involving the right hemisphere. Language site location was determined by examining intraoperative photographs, and site distribution was statistically compared to published findings from left hemisphere language dominant patients.

KEY FINDINGS

Language cortex was identified in the right hemisphere during CSM for all patients with available data. All sites could be classified in superior or middle temporal gyri, inferior parietal lobe, or inferior frontal gyrus, all of which were common zones where language was identified in the left hemisphere dominant comparison sample.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results suggest that the Wada procedure is a valid measure for identifying right hemisphere language processing without any false lateralization found in the patients mapped with CSM (i.e., a positive Wada is 100% sensitive for finding right hemisphere language sites), and that the distribution of language sites is consistent across right hemisphere and left hemisphere language dominant patients, supporting the theory that right hemisphere language can occur as a normal variant of language lateralization.

Increased Frequency of Left-Handedness in Patients with Unilateral Coronal Synostosis

Objective:

Left-handedness reportedly has been more common in persons with neurological afflictions (e.g., stroke) and malformations (e.g., cleft lip with or without cleft palate) that demonstrate marked unilateral involvement. Coronal synostosis is also more frequently unilateral, affecting the right side more commonly than the left. We sought to compare left-handedness in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis versus healthy controls.

Subjects:

All patients aged 3 years or older with nonsyndromic unilateral coronal synostosis and healthy controls recruited by pediatricians blinded to the study.

Main Outcome Measures:

Prospective data obtained for all participants included age, gender, and handedness. In patients with unilateral coronal synostosis, the side of synostosis and age at surgery were documented. Left-handedness in the study and control groups was compared using chi-square analysis. Left-handedness also was analyzed in the study group according to side of fusion.

Results:

Eighty-six patients with nonsyndromic unilateral coronal synostosis comprised the study group; there were 96 controls. The mean ages of the study (8.8 years) and control groups (9.8 years) were not statistically different (p > .05). There were more girls in the study group (67%) than in the control group (56%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p > .05). Left-handedness was documented in 30.2% of the study group and 11.4% of the control group (p < .005). Left-handedness was twice as common in patients with left versus right unilateral coronal synostosis (44.4% versus 20.4%; p < .05).

Conclusions:

Left-handedness is nearly three times more common in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis than in controls and four times more likely in patients with left-sided fusion.

Pediatric functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): issues and applications

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) represents a useful tool for studying brain functions and the neural basis of cognition in healthy children and in those in disease states. Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a relatively new use of existing magnetic resonance imaging technology that allows scientists and practitioners to observe the brain at work. It is based on the observation that local increases in blood flow are related to neural activity. This review considers principles of functional magnetic resonance imaging, issues relevant to imaging children, and research using functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine cognitive processing in pediatric populations. The focus is specifically on language studies to review strengths, limitations, and practical applications of this technology with children. Future directions for functional magnetic resonance imaging are presented.

Unexpected right hemisphere language representation identified by the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in right-handed epilepsy surgery candidates

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) is used for language lateralization in the presurgical evaluation for intractable epilepsy. Some epilepsy surgical centers forgo IAP for right temporal lobectomies in right-handed patients with no personal/family history of left-handedness, implying that right hemisphere language representation does not occur in these patients. To test this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis was performed on 156 consecutive epilepsy surgery candidates who underwent IAP. Of the 156 candidates, 122 were right-handed, and 55 of the 122 demonstrated right hemisphere seizure focus. Right hemisphere language representation was found in 22 of 55 patients, with two demonstrating significant right hemisphere language despite a right hemisphere seizure focus and no family history of left-handedness. Only 1 of 156 patients undergoing IAP experienced permanent neurological complications. Although relatively uncommon, right hemisphere language representation may occur more frequently than complications from cerebral angiography and, therefore, presurgical IAP is recommended for all epilepsy surgery candidates regardless of handedness to minimize the risk of severe language decline.

Language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between fMRI and the Wada Test

PURPOSE

Recent studies have claimed that language functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can identify language lateralization in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and that fMRI-based findings are highly concordant with the conventional assessment procedure of speech dominance, the intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT).

METHODS

To establish the power of language fMRI to detect language lateralization during presurgical assessment, we compared the findings of a semantic decision paradigm with the results of a standard IAT in 68 patients with chronic intractable right and left temporal lobe epilepsy (rTLE, n=28; lTLE, n=40) who consecutively underwent a presurgical evaluation program. The patient group also included 14 (20.6%) subjects with atypical (bilateral or right hemisphere) speech. Four raters used a visual analysis procedure to determine the laterality of speech-related activation individually for each patient.

RESULTS

Overall congruence between fMRI-based laterality and the laterality quotient of the IAT was 89.3% in rTLE and 72.5% in lTLE patients. Concordance was best in rTLE patients with left speech. In lTLE patients, language fMRI identified atypical, right hemisphere speech dominance in every case, but missed left hemisphere speech dominance in 17.2%. Frontal activations had higher concordance with the IAT than did activations in temporoparietal or combined regions of interest (ROIs). Because of methodologic problems, recognition of bilateral speech was difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide evidence that language fMRI as used in the present study has limited correlation with the IAT, especially in patients with lTLE and with mixed speech dominance. Further refinements regarding the paradigms and analysis procedures will be needed to improve the contribution of language fMRI for presurgical assessment.