"Paradoxical" transtentorial herniation due to CSF drainage in the presence of a hemicraniectomy

Midline Shift Induced by the Drainage of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Three Patients With External Decompression

It is not rare that progressive hydrocephalus worsens clinical conditions in a patient with external decompression and drainage or shunt surgery is required. However, spinal drainage or shunt surgeries potentially carry a risk of causing paradoxical herniation in a patient with decompressive craniectomy, particularly in a comatose case with wide craniectomy. Careful and strict observations are necessary for such patients. In our three comatose cases with craniectomy, paradoxical herniation occurred due to excessive drainage after 5-7 days of shunt surgery and lumbar drainage, although the drainage pressure was set at more than 10 cmH2O. Fortunately, in the three cases, the herniation improved within a few days after the drain was clamped and the bed was flattened. However, the Trendelenburg position and epidural blood patch might be necessary if paradoxical herniation occurs acutely after lumbar puncture or drainage because delayed resolution can be fatal in the herniation.

Complications Following Decompressive Craniectomy

BACKGROUND

 Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has become the definitive surgical procedure to manage a medically intractable rise in intracranial pressure. DC is a life-saving procedure resulting in lower mortality but also higher rates of severe disability. Although technically straightforward, DC is accompanied by many complications. It has been reported that complications are associated with worse outcome. We reviewed a series of patients who underwent DC at our department to establish the incidence and types of complications.

METHODS

 We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of complications after DC performed in 135 patients during the time period from January 2013 to December 2018. Postoperative complications were evaluated using clinical status and CT during 6 months of follow-up. In addition, the impact of potential risk factors on the incidence of complications and the impact of complications on outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

 DC was performed in 135 patients, 93 of these for trauma, 22 for subarachnoid hemorrhage, 13 for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction, and 7 for intracerebral hemorrhage. Primary DC was performed in 120 patients and secondary DC in 15 patients. At least 1 complication occurred in each of 100 patients (74%), of which 22 patients (22%) were treated surgically. The following complications were found: edema or hematoma of the temporal muscle (34 times), extracerebral hematoma (33 times), extra-axial fluid collection (31 times), hemorrhagic progression of contusions (19 times), hydrocephalus (12 times), intraoperative malignant brain edema (10 times), temporal muscle atrophy (7 times), significant intraoperative blood loss (6 times), epileptic seizures (5 times), and skin necrosis (4 times). Trauma (p = 0.0006), coagulopathy (p = 0.0099), and primary DC (p = 0.0252) were identified as risk factors for complications. There was no significant impact of complications on outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

 The incidence of complications following DC is high. However, we did not confirm a significant impact of complications on outcome. We emphasize that some phenomena are so frequent that they can be considered a consequence of primary injury or natural sequelae of the DC rather than its direct complication.

Acute paradoxical brain herniation after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: A case report

Background:

Sinking skin flap syndrome or paradoxical brain herniation is an uncommon neurosurgical complication, which usually occurs in the chronic phase after decompressive craniectomy. We report a unique case presenting with these complications immediately after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury.

Case Description:

A 65-year-old man had a right acute subdural hematoma (SDH), contusion of the right temporal lobe, and diffuse traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with midline shift to the left side. He underwent an emergency evacuation of the right SDH with a right decompressive frontotemporal craniectomy. Immediately after the operation, his neurological and computed tomography (CT) findings had improved. However, within 1 h after the surgery, his neurological signs deteriorated. An additional follow-up CT showed a marked midline shift to the left, i.e., paradoxical brain herniation, and his skin flap overlying the decompressive site was markedly sunken. We immediately performed an urgent cranioplasty with the right temporal lobectomy. He responded well to the procedure. We suspected that a cerebrospinal fluid leak had caused this phenomenon.

Conclusion:

Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury can lead to sinking skin flap syndrome and/or paradoxical brain herniation even in the acute phase. We believe that immediate cranioplasty allows the reversal of such neurosurgical complications.

Complications of Decompressive Craniectomy

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has become the definitive surgical procedure to manage medically intractable rise in intracranial pressure due to stroke and traumatic brain injury. With incoming evidence from recent multi-centric randomized controlled trials to support its use, we could expect a significant rise in the number of patients who undergo this procedure. Although one would argue that the procedure reduces mortality only at the expense of increasing the proportion of the severely disabled, what is not contested is that patients face the risk of a large number of complications after the operation and that can further compromise the quality of life. Decompressive craniectomy (DC), which is designed to overcome the space constraints of the Monro Kellie doctrine, perturbs the cerebral blood, and CSF flow dynamics. Resultant complications occur days to months after the surgical procedure in a time pattern that can be anticipated with advantage in managing them. New or expanding hematomas that occur within the first few days can be life-threatening and we recommend CT scans at 24 and 48 h postoperatively to detect them. Surgeons should also be mindful of the myriad manifestations of peculiar complications like the syndrome of the trephined and neurological deterioration due to paradoxical herniation which may occur many months after the decompression. A sufficiently large frontotemporoparietal craniectomy, 15 cm in diameter, increases the effectiveness of the procedure and reduces chances of external cerebral herniation. An early cranioplasty, as soon as the brain is lax, appears to be a reasonable choice to mitigate many of the late complications. Complications, their causes, consequences, and measures to manage them are described in this chapter.

Lumbar puncture as possible cause of sudden paradoxical herniation in patient with previous decompressive craniectomy: report of two cases

Background

Lumbar puncture is often used for the diagnosis and treatment of subarchnoid hemorrhage, infection of Cerebro-spinal Fluid (CSF), hydrocephalus in neurosurgery department patients. It is general that paradoxical herniation followed by lumbar puncture is quite rare in decompressive craniectomy cases; the related reports are very few. Moreover, most of the paradoxical herniation cases are chronic, which often occur weeks or even months after the lumbar puncture, to date, barely no reports on the acute onset paradoxical herniation have been found.

Case presentation

Two traumatic brain injury patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC) and hydrocephalus suffered from a sudden paradoxical herniation after lumbar puncture. The symptoms of herniation were improved by treated with Trendelenburg position and rapid intravenous infusion.

Conclusions

Lumbar puncture may have a potential risk of inducing sudden paradoxical herniation in patients with DC. CSF drainage during lumbar puncture should be in small volume for patients with DC. Once a paradoxical herniation occurs after lumbar puncture, an immediate Trendelenburg position and rapid intravenous infusion treatment may be effective.

Paradoxical Herniation following Decompressive Craniectomy in the Subacute Setting

Decompressive craniectomy is reserved for extreme cases of intracranial hypertension. An uncommon complication known as paradoxical herniation has been documented within weeks to months following surgery. Here we present a unique case within days of surgery. Since standard medical treatment for intracranial hypertension will exacerbate paradoxical herniation, any abrupt neurological changes following decompressive craniectomy should be carefully investigated. Immediate treatment for paradoxical herniation is placement of the patient in the supine position with adequate hydration. Cranioplasty is the ultimate treatment option.

Paradoxical Brain Herniation After Decompressive Craniectomy Provoked by Drainage of Subdural Hygroma

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical brain herniation (PBH) is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and results from the combined effects of brain gravity, atmospheric pressure and intracranial hypotension causing herniation in the direction opposite to the site of the DC with subsequent brainstem compression. To date, the cases of PBH reported in literature are spontaneous or provoked by a lumbar puncture, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt, or ventriculostomy.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present an uncommon case of PBH provoked by percutaneous drainage of a huge subdural hygroma (SH) ipsilateral to the decompressive craniectomy causing mass effect and neurologic deterioration. After percutaneous evacuation of SH, the patient became unresponsive with dilated and fixed left pupil. A brain computed tomography scan showed marked midline shift in the direction opposite to the craniectomy site with subfalcine herniation and effacement of the peripontine cisterns. Paradoxical brain herniation (PBH) was diagnosed. Conservative treatment failed, and the patient required an emergency cranioplasty for reverse PBH.

CONCLUSIONS

The present case highlights the possibility that all forms of CSF depletion, including percutaneous drainage of subdural CSF collection and not only CSF shunting and/or lumbar puncture, can be dangerous for patients with large craniotomies and result in PBH. Moreover, an emergency cranioplasty could represent a safe and effective procedure in patients not responding to conservative treatment.

Paradoxical Herniation After Unilateral Decompressive Craniectomy Predicts Better Patient Survival: A Retrospective Analysis of 429 Cases

Paradoxical herniation (PH) is a life-threatening emergency after decompressive craniectomy. In the current study, we examined patient survival in patients who developed PH after decompressive craniectomy versus those who did not. Risk factors for, and management of, PH were also analyzed. This retrospective analysis included 429 consecutive patients receiving decompressive craniectomy during a period from January 2007 to December 2012. Mortality rate and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were compared between those who developed PH (n = 13) versus those who did not (n = 416). A stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to examine the risk factors for PH. The overall mortality in the entire sample was 22.8%, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Oddly enough, all 13 patients who developed PH survived beyond 6 months. Glasgow Coma Scale did not differ between the 2 groups upon admission, but GOS was significantly higher in subjects who developed PH. Both the disease type and coma degree were comparable between the 13 PH patients and the remaining 416 patients. In all PH episodes, patients responded to emergency treatments that included intravenous hydration, cerebral spinal fluid drainage discontinuation, and Trendelenburg position. A regression analysis indicated the following independent risk factors for PH: external ventriculostomy, lumbar puncture, and continuous external lumbar drainage. The rate of PH is approximately 3% after decompressive craniectomy. The most intriguing findings of the current study were the 0% mortality in those who developed PH versus 23.6% mortality in those who did not develop PH and significant difference of GOS score at 6-month follow-up between the 2 groups, suggesting that PH after decompressive craniectomy should be managed aggressively. The risk factors for PH include external ventriculostomy, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, lumbar puncture, and continuous external lumbar drainage.

Paradoxical herniation after decompressive craniectomy provoked by lumbar puncture or ventriculoperitoneal shunting

OBJECT

Two patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy after head trauma deteriorated secondary to paradoxical herniation, one after lumbar puncture and the other after ventriculoperitoneal shunting. They motivated the authors to investigate further provoked paradoxical herniation.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the records of 205 patients who were treated at a single hospital with decompressive craniectomy for head trauma to identify those who had had lumbar puncture performed or a ventriculoperitoneal shunt placed after craniectomy but before cranioplasty. Among the patients who met these criteria, those with provoked paradoxical herniation were identified. The authors also sought to identify similar cases from the literature. Exact binomials were used to calculate 95% CIs.

RESULTS

None of 26 patients who underwent a lumbar puncture within 1 month of craniectomy deteriorated, whereas 2 of 10 who underwent a lumbar puncture 1 month afterward did so (20% [95% CI 2.4%-55.6%]). Similarly, after ventriculoperitoneal shunting, 3 of 10 patients deteriorated (30% [95% CI 6.7%-65.2%]). Timing of the procedure and the appearance of the skin flap were important factors in deterioration after lumbar puncture but not after ventriculoperitoneal shunting. A review of the literature identified 15 additional patients with paradoxical herniation provoked by lumbar puncture and 7 by ventriculoperitoneal shunting.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar puncture and ventriculoperitoneal shunting carry substantial risk when performed in a patient after decompressive craniectomy and before cranioplasty. When the condition that prompts decompression (such as brain swelling associated with stroke or trauma) requires time to resolve, risk is associated with lumbar puncture performed ≥ 1 month after decompressive craniectomy.

[Paradoxical transtentorial herniation, extreme trephined syndrome sign: A case report]

The current increasing use of decompressive craniectomy carries the implicit appearance of complications due to alterations in both intracranial pressure and in the hydrostatic-hemodynamic equilibrium. Paradoxical transtentorial herniation represents a rare manifestation, included in "trephine syndrome", extremely critical but with relatively simple treatment. We present the case of a 56-year-old woman with no interesting medical history, who, after an olfactory groove meningioma surgery, presented a haemorrhage located in the surgical area with an important oedema. The patient required a second emergency surgery without any chance of conserving the cranial vault. During the post-operational period, great neurological deterioration in orthostatic position was noticed, which resolved spontaneously in decubitus. This deficit was resolved with bone replacement afterwards. We discuss possible predisposing factors and aetiologies of this pathology.

Brain motion in patients with skull defects: B-mode ultrasound observations on respiration-induced movements

BACKGROUND

Since ancient times, brain motion has captured the attention of human beings. However, there are no reports about morphological changes that occur below the cortex or skin flap when a patient, with an open skull breathes, coughs, or engages effort. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterize brain motion caused by breathing movements in adults with an open skull.

METHODS

Twenty-five craniectomized patients were studied using B-mode ultrasonography during early and late postoperative periods. Twelve patients were analysed during surgery. Brain movements induced by breathing activity were assessed in this prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Taking as a reference the cranial base, an increase in intrathoracic pressure was accompanied by a rise of the brain due to the expansion of the basal cisterns. Greater increases in intrathoracic pressure (resulting from the Valsalva manoeuvre and coughing) propelled the brain in a block from the foramen magnum towards the craniectomy, mainly in structures near the tentorial incisure. Prolonging the Valsalva manoeuvre also resulted in thickening of the cortical mantle attributable to vascular congestion. The magnitude of these movements was directly related to breathing effort.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in intrathoracic pressure was immediately transmitted to the brain by the rise of cerebrospinal fluid, while brain swelling attributable to vascular congestion showed a brief delay. The Valsalva manoeuvre and coughing caused abrupt morphological changes in the tentorial hiatus neighbouring structures because of the distension of the basal cisterns. These movements could play a role in the pathophysiology of the syndrome of trephined.

Paradoxical transtentorial herniation caused by lumbar puncture after decompressive craniectomy

Although decompressive craniectomy is an effective treatment for various situations of increased intracranial pressure, it may be accompanied by several complications. Paradoxical herniation is known as a rare complication of lumbar puncture in patients with decompressive craniectomy. A 38-year-old man underwent decompressive craniectomy for severe brain swelling. He remained neurologically stable for five weeks, but then showed mental deterioration right after a lumbar puncture which was performed to rule out meningitis. A brain computed tomographic scan revealed a marked midline shift. The patient responded to the Trendelenburg position and intravenous fluids, and he achieved full neurologic recovery after successive cranioplasty. The authors discuss the possible mechanism of this rare case with a review of the literature.

Multimodal imaging of recovery of functional networks associated with reversal of paradoxical herniation after cranioplasty

Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is reported to result in improved blood flow, cerebral metabolism, and concomitant neurological recovery. We used multimodal functional imaging technology to study a patient with marked neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Resting-state networks and auditory responses obtained with functional MRI and cerebral metabolism obtained with PET before and after cranioplasty revealed significant functional changes that were correlated with the subject's neurological recovery. Our results suggest a link between recovery of behavior, cerebral metabolism, and resting-state networks following cranioplasty.

Use of confirmatory imaging studies to illustrate adequate treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leak in spontaneous intracranial hypotension

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a syndrome with serious neurological sequelae. As demonstrated by the following report, recurrent episodes of SIH can be difficult to diagnose when associated with other neurosurgical procedures, such as craniectomies. In this paper, the authors demonstrate SIH presenting as a subdural hematoma with recurrence of CSF leaks. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension was further complicated by paradoxical herniation following a craniectomy. Treatment of SIH necessitated multiple epidural blood patches for CSF leaks at different spinal levels and at different times. The efficacy of each epidural blood patch was confirmed with radionuclide imaging. Confirmation of effective blood patch placement may be useful for identifying patients at risk for a failed epidural blood patch or for patients whose neurological examination results have not fully improved.

Overt Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Is Not a Sine Qua Non for Paradoxical Herniation After Decompressive Craniectomy

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Paradoxical transtentorial herniation is a rare but well-documented complication of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in patients with large decompressive craniectomies. However, brain sagging in the absence of CSF hypovolemia has not been previously reported.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old woman suffered massive intracerebral hemorrhage from a small residual left frontal arteriovenous malformation 1 year following endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery. The patient initially presented in coma with left mydriasis and decorticate posturing and underwent emergent decompressive craniectomy, evacuation of the hematoma, and insertion of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor. Postoperatively, despite a depressed skin flap and low ICP readings, she continued to deteriorate neurologically, and CT revealed increasing midline shift, transtentorial herniation, and brainstem compression.

INTERVENTION OR TECHNIQUE

Although there was no history of CSF drainage, the diagnosis of brain sag was suspected, because herniation seemed to occur in the setting of intracranial hypotension. The patient was placed in a 15° Trendelenburg position and improved dramatically within hours. A few days later, she was fully awake and had purposeful movements with her left side, although she had persistent aphasia and right hemiplegia.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, paradoxical herniation in the setting of a large craniectomy defect may occur in the absence of CSF drainage. This entity should be suspected whenever transtentorial herniation occurs in conjunction with direct or indirect signs of intracranial hypotension. Placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position should be attempted, because this simple maneuver may turn out to be life-saving.

Imaging of the post-operative cranium

Imaging plays an essential role in the evaluation of patients after cranial surgery. It is important to be familiar with the normal anatomy of the cranium; the indications for different surgical techniques such as burr holes, craniotomy, craniectomy, and cranioplasty; their normal postoperative appearances; and complications such as tension pneumocephalus, infection, abscess, empyema, hemorrhage, hematoma, herniation, hygroma, and trephine syndrome. Postoperative infection and hemorrhage are common to all neurosurgical procedures, where-as other complications are peculiar to certain procedures (eg, drill "plunging" during burr hole creation and sinking skin flap after craniec-tomy). Recognizing life-threatening complications such as tension pneumocephalus and paradoxical herniation, which require urgent intervention, is important for a better clinical outcome. Computed tomography is fast, cost effective, and easily accessible for first-line imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging has higher sensitivity for detecting postoperative infection and ischemia, but diffusion-weighted imaging may be less reliable for detecting postoperative infections.

Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury

Decompressive craniectomy is widely used to treat intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Two randomized trials are currently underway to further evaluate the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy for TBI. Complications of this procedure have major ramifications on the risk-benefit balance in decision-making during evaluation of potential surgical candidates. To further evaluate the complications of decompressive craniectomy, a review of the literature was performed following a detailed search of PubMed between 1980 and 2009. The author restricted her study to literature pertaining to decompressive craniectomy for patients with TBI. An understanding of the pathophysiological events that accompany removal of a large piece of skull bone provides a foundation for understanding many of the complications associated with decompressive craniectomy. The author determined that decompressive craniectomy is not a simple, straightforward operation without adverse effects. Rather, numerous complications may arise, and they do so in a sequential fashion at specific time points following surgical decompression. Expansion of contusions, new subdural and epidural hematomas contralateral to the decompressed hemisphere, and external cerebral herniation typify the early perioperative complications of decompressive craniectomy for TBI. Within the 1st week following decompression, CSF circulation derangements manifest commonly as subdural hygromas. Paradoxical herniation following lumbar puncture in the setting of a large skull defect is a rare, potentially fatal complication that can be prevented and treated if recognized early. During the later phases of recovery, patients may develop a new cognitive, neurological, or psychological deficit termed syndrome of the trephined. In the longer term, a persistent vegetative state is the most devastating of outcomes of decompressive craniectomy. The risk of complications following decompressive craniectomy is weighed against the life-threatening circumstances under which this surgery is performed. Ongoing trials will define whether this balance supports surgical decompression as a first-line treatment for TBI.