Sabharwal S, Kinney CL, Raddatz MM, Driscoll SW, Francisco GE, Robinson LR, Geis C, Micheo W. Current status and trends in subspecialty certification in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
PM R 2023;
15:212-221. [PMID:
35038251 DOI:
10.1002/pmrj.12763]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
There is a need to better understand the overall state of sub-specialization in physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R).
OBJECTIVE
To examine the status and trends in subspecialty certification for each of the seven subspecialties approved for American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) diplomates.
DESIGN/SETTING
Retrospective analysis of deidentified information from the ABPMR database.
PARTICIPANTS
Physicians certified by ABPMR through 2019.
INTERVENTIONS
Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
For each subspecialty, we examined: (1) the number of certificates issued to ABPMR diplomates; (2) the recertification rate; (3) the yearly trends for total active, new, and expired certificates; and (4) for ABPMR-administered subspecialties, recertification rates for those entering the subspecialty through fellowship completion versus a "grandfathered" practice pathway.
RESULTS
Of 11,421 ABPMR diplomates in the United States in 2019, a total of 3560 (31.2%) had 3985 active subspecialty certificates. Pain Medicine (PM) was the most common subspecialty certification (15.5% of all ABPMR diplomates) followed by Sports Medicine (SM, 6.6%), Brain Injury Medicine (BIM, 4.8%), Spinal Cord Injury Medicine (SCIM, 4.2%), Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM, 2.5%), Neuromuscular Medicine (NMM, 0.7%), and Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM, 0.5%). For diplomates with more than one subspecialty certification, PM and SM was the most frequent combination. Both the recertification rate and the end of practice track eligibility influenced certification trends differently for individual subspecialties. The average number of new certificates added annually for every subspecialty was higher before than after the temporary practice track-based eligibility ended; the difference was statistically significant (p < .05) for SCIM, PM, SM, and NMM. The recertification rate for all subspecialties combined was 73.4%. For the subspecialties (SCIM, PRM) for which these data were available, fellowship candidates had higher recertification rates than those grandfathered through a practice track.
CONCLUSION
This report informs stakeholders about the state and evolution of subspecialty certification in PM&R over time.
Collapse