Medical Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention

mHealth impact on secondary stroke prevention: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials among stroke survivors between 2010-2020

Background

A fundamental gap between clinical prevention and self-management awareness heightens the risk for stroke recurrence in approximately one-fourth of the highest risk stroke survivors annually. Secondary stroke prevention has the potential to be promoted by mobile health (mHealth) applications for effective real-world adoption of vascular risk factor mitigation. This scoping review aims to evaluate the impact of mHealth interventions and their effectiveness to reduce recurrent stroke rates among stroke survivors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

Scoping review in Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus for RCT literature employing mHealth among stroke populations published in English from 2010 to November 19, 2020. Small or pilot studies that included randomized design were included.

Results

A total of 352 abstracts met inclusion criteria; 31 full-text articles were assessed and 18 unique RCTs involving 1,453 patients ultimately fulfilled criteria. Twelve of 18 met the pre-defined primary outcome measure, including 2 studies evaluating feasibility. Eight of 18 only addressed recovery from index stroke deficits. Most outcomes focused on self-reported functional status, mood, quality of life or compliance with intervention; primary outcome was an objective metric in 4/18 (blood pressure readings, step number, obstructive sleep apnea support compliance). Intervention duration 2-12 months, with a median 9 weeks.

Conclusions

No high-quality evidence supporting mHealth applications to reduce recurrent stroke was found in this scoping review. Overall, most studies were relatively small, heterogenous, and employed subjective primary outcome measures. mHealth's potential as an effective tool for stroke stakeholders to reduce recurrent stroke rates has not been sufficiently demonstrated in this review. Future randomized studies are needed that explicitly evaluate stroke recurrence rate.

High Plasma Concentration of Apolipoprotein C-III Confers an Increased Risk of Cerebral Ischemic Events on Cardiovascular Patients Anticoagulated With Warfarin

Introduction

Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) is a crucial regulator of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and influences the risk of cardiovascular diseases. High levels of Apo CIII have been also associated with cerebrovascular events and earlier works showed procoagulant effects of Apo CIII. The main aim was to assess whether the plasma concentration of Apo CIII could confer an increased risk of cerebral ischemic events in anticoagulated patients at high-risk of cardioembolism.

Methods

We systematically checked medical records and quantified cerebral ischemic events in a selected cohort of 118 subjects [median age 68 with interquartile range (IQR) 59–75 years, 66.9% males, 52.5% with coronary artery disease (CAD)], taking anticoagulant therapy with warfarin because of atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or mechanical prosthetic heart valves. All the subjects, enrolled between May 1999 and December 2006, were prospectively followed until death or July 31, 2018. Assessments of complete plasma lipid and apolipoprotein profiles, including Apo A-I, B, CIII, and E, were available for all subjects at enrollment.

Results

After a median follow-up of 109 months (IQR, 58–187), 24 subjects (20.3%) had cerebral ischemic events: stroke (n = 15) and TIA (n = 9). Subjects with plasma concentration of Apo CIII above the median value (10.3 mg/dL) had an about three-fold increased risk of stroke/TIA than those with lower levels of Apo C-III [hazard ratio 3.08 (95%CI, 1.22–7.77)]. This result was confirmed in multiple Cox regression models adjusted for gender, age, CAD, AF, diabetes, hypertension, plasma lipids, and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. By stratifying the sample on the basis of Apo CIII level and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, an additive effect was observed with the highest risk in subjects with both high Apo C-III concentration and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.

Conclusion

High Apo CIII plasma levels may be associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke/TIA in high-risk cardiovascular patients anticoagulated with warfarin.

Antithrombotic Therapy in the Prevention of Stroke

OVERVIEW

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of death and disability throughout the world. Antithrombotic therapy, which includes both antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, is a primary medication of choice for the secondary prevention of stroke. However, the choices vary with the need to incorporate evolving, newer information into the clinical scenario. There is also the need to factor in co-morbid medical conditions as well as the cost ramifications for a particular patient as well as compliance with the regimen. Pertinent Updates: In the acute setting, dual antiplatelet therapy from three weeks to up to three months has become recognized as a reasonable approach for patients with either minor stroke or transient ischemic attack or those with symptoms associated with higher-grade intracranial stenosis. This approach is favored for non-cardioembolic stroke as a cardiogenic mechanism tends to be best managed with attention to the cardiac condition as well as anticoagulant therapy. Risk stratification for recurrent stroke is important in weighing potential risk versus benefits. For example, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, with a combination such as aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin and ticagrelor, tends to have negation of the potential clinical benefit of stroke prevention, over time, by the enhanced bleeding risk. Anticoagulant choices are now impacted by newer agents, initially identified as novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which also became associated with "non-vitamin K" agents as they are no longer considered novel. Alternatively, they are now often identified as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). They tend to be viewed as superior or non-inferior to warfarin with the caveat that warfarin is still viewed as the agent of choice for stroke prevention in patients with mechanical heart valves.

CONCLUSION

Based upon cumulative information from multiple clinical trials of secondary prevention of stroke, there is an increasing array of approaches in an effort to provide optimal management. Antithrombotic therapy, including in combination with anticoagulant therapy, continues to evolve with the general caveat that "one size does not fit all". In view of this, we desire to provide an evidence-based approach for the prevention of stroke with antithrombotic agents.