Amyloid-PET-Positive Patient With bvFTD: Wrong Diagnosis, False Positive Scan, or Copathology?

Frontotemporal dementia. How to deal with its diagnostic complexity?

INTRODUCTION

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses a group of heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders. Aside from genetic cases, its diagnosis is challenging, particularly in the early stages when symptoms are ambiguous, and structural neuroimaging does not reveal characteristic patterns.

AREAS COVERED

The authors performed a comprehensive literature search through MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to gather evidence to aid the diagnostic process for suspected FTD patients, particularly in early phases, even in sporadic cases, ranging from established to promising tools. Blood-based biomarkers might help identify very early neuropathological stages and guide further evaluations. Subsequently, neurophysiological measures reflecting functional changes in cortical excitatory/inhibitory circuits, along with functional neuroimaging assessing brain network, connectivity, metabolism, and perfusion alterations, could detect specific changes associated to FTD even decades before symptom onset. As the neuropathological process advances, cognitive-behavioral profiles and atrophy patterns emerge, distinguishing specific FTD subtypes.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging disease-modifying therapies require early patient enrollment. Therefore, a diagnostic paradigm shift is needed - from relying on typical cognitive and neuroimaging profiles of advanced cases to widely applicable biomarkers, primarily fluid biomarkers, and, subsequently, neurophysiological and functional neuroimaging biomarkers where appropriate. Additionally, exploring subjective complaints and behavioral changes detected by home-based technologies might be crucial for early diagnosis.

Imaging Clinical Subtypes and Associated Brain Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) does not present uniform symptoms or a uniform rate of progression in all cases. The classification of subtypes can be based on clinical symptoms or patterns of pathological brain alterations. Imaging techniques may allow for the identification of AD subtypes and their differentiation from other neurodegenerative diseases already at an early stage. In this review, the strengths and weaknesses of current clinical imaging methods are described. These include positron emission tomography (PET) to image cerebral glucose metabolism and pathological amyloid or tau deposits. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more widely available than PET. It provides information on structural or functional changes in brain networks and their relation to AD subtypes. Amyloid PET provides a very early marker of AD but does not distinguish between AD subtypes. Regional patterns of pathology related to AD subtypes are observed with tau and glucose PET, and eventually as atrophy patterns on MRI. Structural and functional network changes occur early in AD but have not yet provided diagnostic specificity.

Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Dementia: Heterogeneity and Relationships with Underlying Neuropathology

Frontotemporal dementia encompasses a group of clinical syndromes defined pathologically by degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes. Historically, these syndromes have been challenging to diagnose, with an average of about three years between the time of symptom onset and the initial evaluation and diagnosis. Research in the field of neuroimaging has revealed numerous biomarkers of the various frontotemporal dementia syndromes, which has provided clinicians with a method of narrowing the differential diagnosis and improving diagnostic accuracy. As such, neuroimaging is considered a core investigative tool in the evaluation of neurodegenerative disorders. Furthermore, patterns of neurodegeneration correlate with the underlying neuropathological substrates of the frontotemporal dementia syndromes, which can aid clinicians in determining the underlying etiology and improve prognostication. This review explores the advancements in neuroimaging and discusses the phenotypic and pathologic features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, and nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia, as seen on structural magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.