Epilepsy Treatment Complacency in Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals

Epilepsy medication management: Addressing common treatment barriers to adopting cenobamate and other new antiseizure medications

Seizure freedom is an important therapeutic goal for people with epilepsy and is associated with improved quality of life and reduced morbidity and mortality. Yet despite the use of multiple antiseizure medications (ASMs; either as monotherapy or in combination), seizures persist in approximately one third of patients. Third-generation ASMs, such as lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, and brivaracetam, have demonstrated good efficacy in terms of reductions in the frequency of focal seizures. The newest ASM, cenobamate, which is indicated for the treatment of focal seizures in adults, has demonstrated notable rates of seizure freedom for some patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. In long-term, open-label clinical studies of adjunctive cenobamate, between 18.4% and 36.3% of patients achieved seizure freedom for a consecutive ≥12-month duration, and 1-year retention rates ranged from 73% to 83%. This article reviews some of the potential treatment barriers encountered during the medication management of patients with epilepsy that may impede the use and optimization of newer ASMs like cenobamate. These include treatment complacency, inadequate trial of new adjunctive therapies ("last in, first out"), pitfalls of rational polytherapy, and restricting the use of newer drugs. Although treatment must always be tailored to the specific patient, clinicians should consider the potential benefits of newer therapies and continue to reassess and optimize ASM treatment to achieve the best outcomes for their patients.

Anticipatory anxiety of seizures in epilepsy: A common, complex, and underrecognized phenomenon?

The diagnosis of epilepsy is associated with loss of predictability, which invariably results in the fear of when and if future seizures will occur. For a subset of patients with epilepsy (PWE), there may be a pathological persistent fear of seizure occurrence, resulting in limitations to daily activities through avoidant behaviors. Paradoxically, the research of anticipatory anxiety of seizures (AAS; also referred to as seizure phobia) has been practically nonexistent and, not surprisingly, this condition remains underrecognized by clinicians. The available data are derived from three small case series of patients followed in tertiary epilepsy centers. In this study, we review the available data on the reported clinical manifestations of AAS in PWE, and of the potential role of variables associated with it, such as personal and family psychosocial and psychiatric history and epilepsy-related variables. In addition, we review the need for the creation of screening tools to identify patients at risk of AAS and discuss potential treatment strategies, which could be considered as part of the comprehensive management for PWE.

Greater need for treatment optimization in patients with epilepsy initiating adjunctive therapy: Results of a retrospective claims analysis of antiseizure medication drug load in the United States

BACKGROUND

This retrospective, observational study used US claims data to assess changes in antiseizure medication (ASM) drug load for a cohort of patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of epilepsy (ICD-10 code G40.xxx) who started new adjunctive ASM treatment with one of 4 branded (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel) or 4 unbranded (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate) ASMs between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were identified from IBM MarketScan® research databases (primary study population). Patients must have been continuously enrolled 360 days before the start of the new ASM (eligibility period). Follow-up was from the start of new ASM until Day 540 (∼18 months). The primary endpoint was concomitant ASM drug load, which included all ASMs except the new (comparator) ASM. A sensitivity analysis population included adults with epilepsy who were continuously enrolled for ≥ 180 days during at least one calendar year in the study period (2016-2020), whether or not the comparator ASM was new or existing during that period. Total ASM drug load, which included comparator ASM and concomitant ASMs, was assessed in the sensitivity analysis population.

RESULTS

In total, 21,332 patients were included in the primary study population, of which 5767 initiated branded ASMs and 15,565 initiated unbranded ASMs. A total of 392,426 patients were included in the sensitivity analysis population during at least one calendar year 2016-2020. Concomitant ASM drug load increased in the 360 days prior to new ASM start and slightly declined thereafter. Mean concomitant ASM drug load for the primary population was 1.6 (SD 1.8) at new ASM start. Concomitant drug load was higher among those starting branded ASM comparators compared to those starting unbranded comparators. Mean total ASM drug load for patients increased over time and was approximately double for patients exposed to branded ASMs (mean range 2.1 to 2.7) compared to that of patients exposed to any unbranded ASM (mean range 1.0 to 1.3).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant ASM drug load increased prior to addition of new ASM, with higher increases observed among patients starting branded vs unbranded ASMs, followed by slight decreases thereafter. Total drug load increased linearly among all patients. These findings underscore the need for ongoing ASM regimen evaluation and treatment optimization in patients with epilepsy.