A survey of risk tolerance to multiple sclerosis therapies

Disparities in DMT treatment: Demographic and neurocognitive differences between MS patients currently treated versus not treated with disease-modifying therapies

BACKGROUND

Current treatment guidelines recommend consideration of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for all multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, but barriers to access have begun to be identified. In particular, prior studies have found that people with higher education have better access to DMTs, perhaps explained by the association of higher education with higher income. And while the majority of people with MS are women, being male is also associated with higher income. These factors argue for the need to better understand whether there are differences in DMT uptake based on sex and education. Finally, in addition to well-documented benefits of DMTs for slowing disease progression, there is growing evidence to suggest benefits of DMTs for cognitive functioning.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether rates of DMT treatment differ based on education and sex. Secondarily, we investigate whether neurocognitive test performance differs in treated versus not treated groups.

METHODS

In cross-sectional data, mixed effects linear regression evaluated differences in education and sex of those treated versus not treated with DMTs. Models included the following predictors: age, disease duration, MS subtype, sex/education, disability, atrophy, and T2 lesion volume. Propensity score weights were extracted to obtain unbiased estimates of the relationship between DMT status and each outcome of interest. The same models evaluated performance differences between groups on an iPad-based processing speed test (PST) and manual dexterity test (MDT).

RESULTS

Controlling for covariates, individuals with less education (OR=1.09, 95 % CI=[1.03, 1.14], p = 0.003) and women (OR=0.80, 95 % CI=[0.72, 0.90], p < 0.001) were less likely to be currently treated with DMTs. Small effect size association was shown for DMT treatment with better performance on PST (beta=0.09, CI=[0.06, 0.13], p < 0.001) and MDT (beta=0.05, CI=[0.01,0.08], p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Women and people with lower education had a lower likelihood of being currently treated with DMTs. After controlling for all relevant variables, an independent (small) association of DMT treatment to better performance on tests of processing speed and fine motor dexterity was found. Reasons for disparities remain to be investigated in future work, and may include employment status, health insurance coverage, or sex differences in risk tolerance.

Nestorone (segesterone acetate) effects on neuroregeneration

Nestorone® (segesterone acetate) is a progestin with a chemical structure closely related to progesterone with high affinity and selectivity for the progesterone receptor without significant interaction with other steroid receptors. It has been developed for female and male contraception and is FDA-approved in a first long-acting contraceptive vaginal system for female contraception. Its safety has been extensively demonstrated in both preclinical and clinical studies for contraceptive indications. Nestorone was found to display neuroprotective and neuroregenerative activity in animal models of various central nervous system diseases, including multiple sclerosis, stroke, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Reviewed herein are neuroprotective and myelin- regenerating properties of Nestorone in various animal models and its translational potential as a therapeutic agent for debilitating neurological diseases for which limited therapeutic options are available (Table 1).

Era of COVID-19 in Multiple Sclerosis Care

The unprecedented scope of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in numerous disruptions to daily life, including for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). This article reviews how disruptions in multiple sclerosis (MS) care prompted innovations in delivery of care (eg, via telemedicine) and mobilized the global MS community to rapidly adopt safe and effective practices. We discuss how our understanding of the risks of COVID-19 in PwMS has evolved along with recommendations pertaining to disease-modifying therapies and vaccines. With lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examine potential questions for future research in this new era of MS care.

Influence of physicians' risk perception on switching treatments between high- efficacy and non-high-efficacy disease‑modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The decision of initiating treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) with a high-efficacy DMT (HE DMT) or non-high-efficacy DMT (non-HE DMT) is influenced by several factors, including risk perception of patients and physicians.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the influence of physicians' risk perception on decision-making when switching treatments for MS and the reasons for switching.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real-World MS Disease-Specific Program (a retrospective survey) and analysis included people with RMS identified between 2017- 2021.

RESULTS

Of 4129 patients with reasons for switch available, 3538 switched from non-HE DMT and 591 from HE DMT. Overall, 4.7% of patients were switched treatment by their physicians due to the risk of malignancies and infections including PML risk. The proportion of switches that were made due to the risk of PML were 23.9% in the HE DMT and 0.5% in the non-HE DMT groups. The top reasons for switching were relapse frequency (non-HE DMT vs HE-DMT: 26.8% vs 15.2%), lack of efficacy (20.9 vs 11.7) and increased number of MRI lesions (20.3% vs 12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' risk perception of malignancies and infection excluding PML was not a leading factor when switching treatment. The risk of PML was a key factor, especially for switching patients from HE DMTs. In both groups, lack of efficacy was the key contributing factor for switching. Initiating the treatment with HE DMTs may potentially reduce the number of switches due to sub-optimal efficacy. These findings might help physicians to engage more in discussions with patients about the benefit/risk profile of DMTs.

The relevance of fatigue to relapse rate in multiple sclerosis: Applying patient preference data to the OPTIMUM trial

BACKGROUND

In the OPTIMUM trial in patients with relapsing MS, treatment differences in annualized relapse rate (ARR, 0.088) and change in fatigue at week 108 (3.57 points, measured using the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, symptom domain (FSIQ-RMS-S)) favored ponesimod over teriflunomide. However, the importance of the fatigue outcome to patients was unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the importance of the OPTIMUM FSIQ-RMS-S results using data from an MS discrete choice experiment (DCE).

METHODS

The DCE included components to correlate levels of physical and cognitive fatigue with FSIQ-RMS-S scores. Changes in relapses/year and time to MS progression equivalent to the treatment difference in fatigue in OPTIMUM were determined for similar fatigue levels as mean baseline fatigue in OPTIMUM.

RESULTS

DCE participants would accept 0.06 more relapses/year or a 0.15-0.17 year decrease in time to MS progression for a 3.57-point difference in physical fatigue on the FSIQ-RMS-S. To improve cognitive fatigue by 3.57-points on the FSIQ-RMS-S, DCE participants would accept 0.09-0.10 more relapses/year or a 0.24-0.28 year decrease in time to MS progression.

CONCLUSION

MS patients would accept 0.06 more relapses/year to change their fatigue by a similar magnitude as the between-treatment difference observed in the OPTIMUM trial.

Editorial: risky business. What do sufferers' perceptions of risk from interventions for irritable bowel syndrome really mean?

This article is linked to Goodoory et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16816 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16917

Treatment Challenges in Multiple Sclerosis – A Continued Role for Glatiramer Acetate?

Earlier diagnosis, access to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and improved supportive care have favorably altered the disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS), leading to an improvement in long-term outcomes for people with MS (PwMS). This success has changed the medical characteristics of the population seen in MS clinics. Comorbidities and the accompanying polypharmacy, immune senescence, and the growing number of approved DMTs make selecting the optimal agent for an individual patient more challenging. Glatiramer acetate (GA), a moderately effective DMT, interacts only minimally with comorbidities, other medications, or immune senescence. We describe here several populations in which GA may represent a useful treatment option to overcome challenges due to advanced age or comorbidities (e.g., hepatic or renal disease, cancer). Further, we weigh GA's potential merits in other settings where PwMS and their neurologists must base treatment decisions on factors other than selecting the most effective DMT, e.g., family planning, conception and pregnancy, or the need for vaccination.

Patient Perceptions of FDA Approval: Gaps in Education or Variation in Values?

Objective

To assess perceptions and opinions about the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process for disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in people living with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

People living with MS were invited to complete a web-based survey of their perceptions of the FDA role and process for approval of MS medications. The survey asked about the role of the FDA, factors involved in the approval process, which voices should represent those with MS in deliberations about drug approval, and the level of comfort with uncertain safety of newly approved therapies.

Results

Three thousand thirty-three respondents met inclusion criteria for data analysis. Most respondents seemed to understand the role of the FDA, although only half understood a fundamental FDA role: balancing the risks and benefits when considering drug approval. Significant differences were observed in many areas between those who have and have not tried DMTs. Comfort with uncertainty was associated with several factors relating to side effects and benefits believed important for the FDA to consider. Most respondents reported that people who participated in the medication's clinical trial were particularly able to represent people living with MS.

Conclusion

Perceptions regarding the FDA and views of who should represent people living with MS varied between those who have and have not tried DMT. There is variability in personal values that should be recognized and taken into account when considering regulatory responsibilities. Interventions are needed to address educational gaps regarding the mission and trustworthiness of the FDA as an oversight body.

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Risk Perception in Patients Considering Natalizumab for Multiple Sclerosis

Background:

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) remains a concern when considering natalizumab for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. Extensive research has identified factors that increase PML risk, and it is important that providers and patients accurately understand risk to make appropriate benefit-risk decisions.

Methods:

One hundred adult US patient-candidates for natalizumab therapy were questioned about their PML risk perception, the maximum PML risk they deemed acceptable, and sources of information used to understand risk. Differences in group distributions were compared.

Results:

Patients estimated their potential PML risk from 0.1% to 87% (mean, 31.5%). Maximum PML risk deemed acceptable ranged from 0.1% to 45% (mean, 14.5%). Actual risk (mean, 0.01%), based on published risk estimates, was calculated as a function of time receiving therapy, anti–John Cunningham virus antibody index, and previous use of immunosuppressants. The sexes perceived their risks similarly and had similar risk acceptance. Patient perception of PML risk increased with age, whereas willingness to accept risk remained similar among all ages. Higher levels of education correlated with more accurate risk perception and lower risk tolerance. Neither risk perception nor tolerance was correlated with disability level. Sixty-three percent of patients indicated that their primary/referring physician’s concern level regarding potential risk of PML during the benefit-risk discussion was their main source of information about risk.

Conclusions:

Patients with MS substantially overestimated their PML risk, often by three orders of magnitude. Patients with MS could benefit from accurate risk education, and providers could play an essential role in presenting PML risk information in a manner understandable to each individual patient.

Manifestations and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in neuroinflammatory diseases

Objective

To report initial results of a planned multicenter year‐long prospective study examining the risk and impact of COVID‐19 among persons with neuroinflammatory disorders (NID), particularly multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

In April 2020, we deployed online questionnaires to individuals in their home environment to assess the prevalence and potential risk factors of suspected COVID‐19 in persons with NID (PwNID) and change in their neurological care.

Results

Our cohort included 1115 participants (630 NID, 98% MS; 485 reference) as of 30 April 2020. 202 (18%) participants, residing in areas with high COVID‐19 case prevalence, met the April 2020 CDC symptom criteria for suspected COVID‐19, but only 4% of all participants received testing given testing shortages. Among all participants, those with suspected COVID‐19 were younger, more racially diverse, and reported more depression and liver disease. PwNID had the same rate of suspected COVID‐19 as the reference group. Early changes in disease management included telemedicine visits in 21% and treatment changes in 9% of PwNID. After adjusting for potential confounders, increasing neurological disability was associated with a greater likelihood of suspected COVID‐19 (OR_adj = 1.45, 1.17–1.84).

Interpretations

Our study of real‐time, patient‐reported experience during the COVID‐19 pandemic complements physician‐reported MS case registries which capture an excess of severe cases. Overall, PwNID seem to have a risk of suspected COVID‐19 similar to the reference population.

Progress in progestin-based therapies for neurological disorders

Hormone therapy, primarily progesterone and progestins, for central nervous system (CNS) disorders represents an emerging field of regenerative medicine. Following a failed clinical trial of progesterone for traumatic brain injury treatment, attention has shifted to the progestin Nestorone for its ability to potently and selectively transactivate progesterone receptors at relatively low doses, resulting in robust neurogenetic, remyelinating, and anti-inflammatory effects. That CNS disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal cord injury (SCI), and stroke, develop via demyelinating, cell death, and/or inflammatory pathological pathways advances Nestorone as an auspicious candidate for these disorders. Here, we assess the scientific and clinical progress over decades of research into progesterone, progestins, and Nestorone as neuroprotective agents in MS, ALS, SCI, and stroke. We also offer recommendations for optimizing timing, dosage, and route of the drug regimen, and identifying candidate patient populations, in advancing Nestorone to the clinic.

High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Therapies in People with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Risk Attitude in Treatment Decisions

BACKGROUND

Risk attitude is defined as the willingness to tolerate risk to achieve a greater expected return. Limited information is available on how relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis people's perceptions about disease trajectory and risk attitude may influence treatment choices.

METHODS

A non-interventional study applying principles of behavioral economics was conducted to assess willingness to receive unwarranted high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) according to best-practice guidelines. People with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS) according to 2010 McDonald criteria completed a survey on symptom severity, risk preferences, and management of simulated case scenarios mimicking the current treatment landscape. PwRRMS's choice for high-efficacy agents was established as the participant's selection of monoclonal antibodies for case scenarios with at least 2 years of clinical and radiological stability.

RESULTS

A total of 211 PwRRMS were studied (mean age 39.1 ± 9.5 years, 70.1% female, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score 1.8 ± 1.1). Almost 50% (n = 96) opted for a high-efficacy DMT despite the lack of evidence of disease activity. Younger age and risk-seeking behavior were associated with an increased likelihood of selecting unwarranted high-efficacy DMT [odds ratio (OR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-3.93, p = 0.043, and OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.09-4.30, p = 0.027, respectively]. Clinical characteristics or subjective perception of symptom severity had no influence on participants' treatment choices.

CONCLUSION

Identifying PwRRMS with risk-seeking behavior would be crucial to implementing specific educational strategies to manage information on disease prognosis, treatment expectations, and safety risk knowledge.