Outcomes of patients with stroke treated with thrombolysis according to prestroke Rankin Scale scores

Utilization, Workflow, and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With vs Without Premorbid Disability in a National Registry

Background and Objectives

Given the paucity of high-quality safety/efficacy data on acute stroke therapies in patients with premorbid disability, they risk being routinely excluded from such therapies. We examined utilization of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), associated workflow, and poststroke outcomes among patients with vs without premorbid disability.

Methods

We used national registry data on thrombolysis/EVT for the Czech Republic from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Premorbid disability was defined as prestroke modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) ≥3. We compared proportions of patients with vs without premorbid disability who received EVT and examined workflow times. We compared ΔmRS-change in mRS from prestroke to 3 months-in patients with vs without premorbid disability, in addition to intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), mortality, and discharge NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), adjusting for age, sex, baseline NIHSS, and comorbidities, and verified using propensity score weighting (PSW) and matching for differences in treatment assignment. We stratified by age group (<65, 65-74, 75-84, ≥85 years) to explore outcome heterogeneity with vs without premorbid disability.

Results

Among 22,405 patients with ischemic stroke who received thrombolysis/EVT/both, 1,712 (7.6%) had prestroke mRS ≥ 3. Patients with prestroke disability were less likely to receive EVT vs those without (10.1% vs 20.7%, aOR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.24-0.36). When treated, they had longer door-to-arterial puncture times (median: 75 minutes, IQR: 58-100 vs 54, IQR: 27-77, adjusted difference: 12.5, 95% CI 2.68-22.3). Patients with prestroke disability receiving thrombolysis/EVT/both had worse ΔmRS (adjusted rate ratio, aIRR on PSW: 1.57, 95% CI 1.43-1.72), rates of 3-month mRS 5-6, discharge NIHSS, and mortality (aOR-PSW [mortality]: 2.54, 95% CI 1.92-3.34), while ICH did not significantly differ. 32.1% of patients with prestroke disability receiving thrombolysis/EVT/both successfully returned to prestroke state, but this proportion ranged from 19.6% for those older than 85 years to 66.0% for those younger than 65 years. Regardless of premorbid disability, EVT was associated with better outcomes including lower ΔmRS (aIRR-PSW: 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91) and mortality, with no interaction of treatment effect by premorbid disability status (e.g., mortality pinteraction = 0.73). EVT recipients with premorbid disability did not differ significantly for several outcomes including ΔmRS (aIRR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.17) but were more likely to have 3-month mRS 5-6 (70.1% vs 39.5% without premorbid disability, aOR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.04).

Discussion

Patients with premorbid disability were less likely to receive EVT, had slower treatment times, and had worse outcomes compared with patients without premorbid disability. However, regardless of premorbid disability, patients fared better with EVT vs medical management and one-third with prestroke disability returned to their prestroke status.

Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy in association with premorbid Rankin Scale scores

Background

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) reduces disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, its efficacy in patients aged >80 years remains unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the impact of premorbid modified Rankin Scale (pmRS) scores and age on patients with AIS undergoing EVT and the effect of EVT on functional outcome and mortality.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study and screened the Heidelberg Recanalization Registry (HeiReKa) database for patients with AIS between 1999 and 2021. Outcomes were stratified by age (<80, 80-89, and ≥90 years) and pmRS score (0-2 vs. 3-5). Adjusted odds ratios for outcomes and mortality at 3 months after treatment were examined.

Results

Finally, 2,591 patients were included [including those aged ≥90 years (n = 158)]. Poor functional outcomes were associated with advanced age, vascular risk factors, stroke severity, and vessel status. Conversely, lower prestroke disability and younger age were associated with better outcomes and reduced mortality. A pmRS of 3-5 was associated with an increased risk of mortality and worse functional outcomes regardless of age. Notably, patients aged ≥90 years with a pmRS of 0-2 had significantly better outcomes than those aged <80 years with a pmRS of 3-5.

Conclusion

Both age and pmRS are important in assessing the benefits of EVT. However, prestroke functional status might be more crucial than biological age in determining outcomes following EVT.

Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System for Predicting Poor Outcome After Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke in China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Guidelines for posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS) treatment are lacking and outcome prediction is crucial for patients and clinicians. We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic score to predict the poor outcome for patients with PCIS.

METHODS

The score was developed from a prospective derivation cohort named the Third China National Stroke Registry (August 2015-March 2018) and validated in a spatiotemporal independent validation cohort (December 2017-March 2023) in China. Patients with PCIS with acute infarctions defined as hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging were included in this study. The poor outcome was measured as modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 3-6 at 3 months after PCIS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for poor outcome. The prognostic score, namely PCIS Outcome Score (PCISOS), was developed by assigning points to variables based on their relative β-coefficients in the logistic model.

RESULTS

The PCISOS was derived from 3,294 patients (median age 62 [interquartile range (IQR) 55-70] years; 2,250 [68.3%] men) and validated in 501 patients (median age 61 [IQR 53-68] years; 404 [80.6%] men). Among them, 384 (11.7%) and 64 (12.8%) had poor outcome 3 months after stroke in respective cohorts. Age, mRS before admission, NIH Stroke Scale on admission, ischemic stroke history, infarction distribution, basilar artery, and posterior cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion were identified as independent predictors for poor outcome and included in PCISOS. This easy-to-use integer scoring system identified a marked risk gradient between 4 risk groups. PCISOS performed better than previous scores, with an excellent discrimination (C statistic) of 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.83) in the derivation cohort and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) in the validation cohort. Calibration test showed high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes in both cohorts.

DISCUSSION

PCISOS can be applied for patients with PCIS with acute infarctions to predict functional outcome at 3 months post-PCIS. This simple tool helps clinicians to identify patients with PCIS with higher risk of poor outcome and provides reliable outcome expectations for patients. This information might be used for personalized rehabilitation plan and patient selection for future clinical trials to reduce disability and mortality.

Early neurological changes following endovascular therapy for acute stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) reduces functional disability in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the early neurological change after EVT may be limited in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD).

METHODS

We analyzed the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4 which was a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter registry of patients with LVO between 2015 and 2019. We compared the early neurological change, efficacy and safety of EVT for acute LVO in ICAD and other etiologies. The primary outcome was NIHSS improvement ≥10 points, and secondary outcome were NIHSS worsening ≥4 points 7 days after EVT, effective reperfusion rate, 30-day functional outcomes, and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 6710 enrolled patients, 610 (9.1%) had ICAD. The ICAD group was younger (mean 72.0 vs. 75.8 years) and predominantly male (63.4% vs. 56.0%), had lower NIHSS scores before EVT (median 16 vs. 18), and underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting more frequently (43.0% vs. 4.4%, 12.3% vs. 4.4%). In the ICAD group, NIHSS improvement was significantly lower (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95% confidence interval (95%CI)] 0.52 [0.41-0.65]), NIHSS worsening was significantly higher (aOR [95%CI] 1.76 [1.31-2.34]), and effective reperfusion was significantly lower (aOR [95%CI] 0.47 [0.36-0.60]). Fewer patients with ICAD had modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 30 days (aOR [95%CI] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]). The risk of acute reocclusion was more prominent in the ICAD group (aOR [95%CI] 4.03 [1.98-8.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in neurological severity after EVT was lower in patients with LVO and ICAD.

Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with pre-stroke disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), which is safe and effective, is the first-line therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its benefit for AIS patients with pre-stroke disability (PSD) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We determined the association of PSD with the safety and efficacy of IVT among patients with AIS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 23, 2022. The articles focusing on outcomes of AIS patients with PSD receiving IVT were retrieved. We used the random-effects model to pool outcomes including mortality, 24 h NIHSS improvement, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), favorable functional outcome (FFO), the favorable outcome, and mortality prevalence.

RESULTS

Ten studies (including 245,773 participants) that reported the outcomes of AIS patients with PSD undergoing IVT were included. In unadjusted analyses, PSD was associated with mortality (10 studies; odds ratio [OR] 1.739, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.336-2.407), FFO (7 studies; OR 1.057, 95% CI, 1.015-1.100), 24 h NIHSS improvement (5 studies; OR .840, 95% CI, .819-.917, p = .000), and sICH (9 studies; OR .773, 95% CI, .481-1.243). In adjusted analyses, PSD was associated with mortality (seven studies; ORadj 1.789, 95% CI, 1.413-2.264), FFO (five studies; ORadj 1.087, 95% CI, 1.002-1.179), 24 h NIHSS improvement (five studies; ORadj .837, 95% CI, .799-.876), and sICH (five studies; ORadj .857, 95% CI, .725-1.012). The prevalence of FFO and mortality in patients with pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale scores of 2-5 were 49% (0.42-0.56) and 37% (0.21-0.53), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PSD undergoing IVT had a higher mortality rate than those without PSD. Meanwhile, PSD was associated with FFO, and there was no significant difference in sICH and 24 h NIHSS improvement. High-quality data are needed to clarify the benefits of administering IVT in these patients.

Outcomes of patients with pre-existing disability managed by mobile stroke units: A sub-analysis of the BEST-MSU study

BACKGROUND

Few data exist on acute stroke treatment in patients with pre-existing disability (PD) since they are usually excluded from clinical trials. A recent trial of mobile stroke units (MSUs) demonstrated faster treatment and improved outcomes, and included PD patients.

AIM

To determine outcomes with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and benefit of MSU versus management by emergency medical services (EMS), for PD patients.

METHODS

Primary outcomes were utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS). Linear and logistic regression models compared outcomes in patients with versus without PD, and PD patients treated by MSU versus standard management by EMS. Time metrics, safety, quality of life, and health-care utilization were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 1047 tPA-eligible ischemic stroke patients, 254 were with PD (baseline mRS 2-5) and 793 were without PD (baseline mRS 0-1). Although PD patients had worse 90-day uw-mRS, higher mortality, more health-care utilization, and worse quality of life than non-disabled patients, 53% returned to at least their baseline mRS, those treated faster had better outcome, and there was no increased bleeding risk. Comparing PD patients treated by MSU versus EMS, 90-day uw-mRS was 0.42 versus 0.36 (p = 0.07) and 57% versus 46% returned to at least their baseline mRS. There was no interaction between disability status and MSU versus EMS group assignment (p = 0.67) for 90-day uw-mRS.

CONCLUSION

PD did not prevent the benefit of faster treatment with tPA in the BEST-MSU study. Our data support inclusion of PD patients in the MSU management paradigm.

Imperfect Patients: Disparities in Treatment of Stroke Patients with Premorbid Disability

BACKGROUND

Despite the high proportion of stroke patients with a pre-existing impairment, patients with disabilities are often excluded from stroke treatment trials. Trials are designed for "perfect patients": patients who are functionally independent and thus generally younger with fewer comorbidities; ironically, such patients are less likely to experience stroke than those with premorbid disability. Exclusionary practices in trials may translate into disparities in stroke care in practice. Through a review of literature, our purpose is to illuminate how people with disabilities are treated across the care continuum following a stroke.

METHODS

We completed a qualitative systematized review of articles pertaining to the care of patients with premorbid disability and stroke and their outcomes. Using a critical disability studies' theoretical lens, we analyzed inequity across the stroke care continuum.

FINDINGS

Among 24 included studies, we found evidence that people with disabilities did not receive equitable access to treatment ranging from being admitted to stroke units to receiving post-stroke rehabilitation. However, observational studies suggest that stroke therapies may be beneficial in selected patients with disabilities when measures of success are framed more achievable (e.g. return to pre-stroke status). This leaves us concerned about how people with pre-existing impairments might be structurally disabled within current systems of stroke care.

CONCLUSION

We use our critical disability studies' theoretical lens to argue that an intersectional approach to stroke treatment is much needed if we are to remedy structural inequities embedded throughout the care continuum.

Efficacy and safety of short-term high dosage dual antiplatelet therapy after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-term high-dose of dual antiplatelet therapy after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

All 208 patients with AIS were randomized into group 1 (103 cases, after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA, 300 mg of oral aspirin(ASP) q.d. and 225 mg of oral clopidogrel (CLO) q.d. for for 5 days, then 100 mg of oral ASP q.d. for the next 85 days and 75 mg of oral CLO q.d. for the next 16 days) and group 2 (105 cases, after 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA, 100 mg of oral ASP q.d. for 90 days and 75 mg of oral CLO q.d. for 21 days).The efficacy index was the mRS score, NIHSS score and recurrence risk of stroke, while the safety index was the incidence of bleeding events and mortality. All parameters were evaluated at 30 and 90 days after thrombolysis. Patients whose characteristics may provide the best treatment benefit were further analyzed using the logistic regression model in group 1.

RESULTS

The proportion of mRS scores between 0 and 1 in group 1 was higher than that in group 2 at both 30 days (44.7% vs 32.4%, P < .05) and 90 days (50.5% vs 35.2%, P < .05). Compared to group 2, the proportion of NIHSS scores less than 4 was significantly higher in group 1 at both 30 days (37.9% vs 25.7%, P < .05) and 90 days (46.6% vs 30.5%, P < .05). At 90 days, Group 1 had a lower stroke recurrence risk than Group 2 (3.9% vs 10.5%, P < .05). The incidence of SICH was significantly different between the 2 groups at both 30 days (2.9% vs 9.5%, P < .05) and 90 days (2.9% vs 10.5%, P < .05). However, other bleeding events and mortality rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The lower the baseline NIHSS score and the shorter the OTT, the more favorable the outcomes obtained at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to standard doses, short term high-dose dual antiplatelet therapy after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis may be a good choice for AIS patients.

Thrombolysis Outcomes in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients with Pre-Existing Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis treatment for ischaemic stroke in patients with pre-existing disabilities, including cognitive impairment, remains controversial. Previous studies have suggested functional outcomes post-thrombolysis are worse in patients with cognitive impairment. This study aimed to compare and explore factors contributing to thrombolysis outcomes, including haemorrhagic complications, in cognitively and non-cognitively impaired patients with ischaemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 428 ischaemic stroke patients who were thrombolysed between January 2016 and February 2021 was performed. Cognitive impairment was defined as a diagnosis of dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or clinical evidence of the condition. The outcome measures included morbidity (using NIHSS and mRS), haemorrhagic complications, and mortality, and were analysed using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The analysis of the cohort revealed that 62 patients were cognitively impaired. When compared to those without cognitive impairment, this group showed worse functional status at discharge (mRS 4 vs. 3, p < 0.001) and a higher probability of dying within 90 days (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.85-6.01, p < 0.001). A higher risk of a fatal ICH post-thrombolysis was observed in the cognitively impaired patients, and, after controlling for covariates, cognitive impairment remained a significant predictor of a fatal haemorrhage (OR 4.79, 95% CI 1.24-18.45, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitively impaired ischaemic stroke patients experience increased morbidity, mortality, and haemorrhagic complications following thrombolytic therapy. However cognitive status is not independently predictive of most outcome measures. Further work is required to elucidate contributing factors to the poor outcomes observed in these patients and help guide thrombolysis decision-making in clinical practice.

Real-time monitoring of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke using rotational thromboelastometry: a feasibility pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) records whole blood coagulation in vitro. Data on dynamic changes of clot patterns during intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke is scarce. We investigated the feasibility of ROTEM as a potential point-of-care assessment tool for IVT.

METHODS

In this prospective pilot study, patients with acute stroke symptoms received IVT. Whole blood coagulation was tracked on the ROTEM analyzer. Blood samples were analyzed before, and then 2, 15, 30 and 60 min after beginning IVT. In vitro clots (iCLs) were described by their maximum clot firmness (MCF), the time needed to reach MCF (MCF-t), as well as the area under the curve (AR10). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used as early clinical outcome parameter.

RESULTS

We analyzed 288 iCLs from 12 patients undergoing IVT. In all iCLs, an early fibrinolysis (91% within the first 10 min) was detected during IVT. Three different curve progression patterns were observed: a low-responder pattern with a continuous clot increase, a high-responder pattern with a sustained clot decrease or total clotting suppression and an intermediate-responder pattern with alternating clot characteristics. There was a difference among these groups in early clinical outcome (AR10 and MCF each p = 0.01, MCF-t p = 0.02, Kruskal-Wallis Test).

CONCLUSION

The fibrinolysis patterns determined using ROTEM allow for the monitoring of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This pilot study found a correlation between the in vitro fibrinolysis patterns and early clinical outcomes. These findings support a potential for individualization of IVT in the future.

Endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with prestroke disability (mRS ≥2): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The effect of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients with prestroke disability (modified Rankin Scale score, mRS) ≥2) has not been well-studied. This study aimed to assess the safety and benefit of EVT in patients with prestroke disability.

Methods

According to PRISMA guidelines, literature searching was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, for a series of acute ischemic stroke patients with prestroke mRS ≥2 treated by EVT. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the rate of return to prestroke mRS and mortality at 3-month follow-up.

Results

In total, 13 observational studies, with 2,625 patients, were analyzed. The rates of return to prestroke mRS in patients with prestroke mRS of 2–4 were 20% (120/588), 27% (218/827), and 31% (34/108), respectively. Patients with prestroke disability treated by EVT had a higher likelihood of return to prestroke mRS (relative risk, RR, 1.86; 95% CI 1.28–2.70) and a lower likelihood of mortality (RR 0.75; 95%CI 0.58–0.97) compared with patients with standard medical treatment. Successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b-3) after EVT gave a higher likelihood of return to prestroke mRS (RR 2.04; 95% CI 1.17–3.55) and lower mortality (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.62–0.84) compared with unsuccessful reperfusion.

Conclusions

Acute ischemic stroke patients with prestroke disability may benefit from EVT. Withholding EVT on the sole ground of prestroke disabilities may not be justified.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Premorbid Disability: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials for the use of alteplase in acute ischemic stroke have excluded or had little representation of patients with prestroke disability, and the benefit of alteplase in this population remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the outcomes of thrombolysis in patients with premorbid disability.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in accordance with the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and retrieved studies reporting intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with prestroke disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 3-5) with acute ischemic stroke, either compared with untreated patients or treated patients without premorbid disability. The primary outcome was the return to premorbid disability at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included rate and odds ratio of favorable functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 or return to premorbid modified Rankin Scale), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Eight articles were included involving 103 988 patients. Patients with disability treated with IVT had better odds of returning to baseline function compared with those who did not receive IVT (odds ratio, 7.26 [95% CI, 2.51-21.02]). Mortality and rates of sICH were not significantly different between patients with disability treated with IVT and those not treated, although there were numerically more sICHs in the IVT group. Return to baseline function was not significantly different between patients with and without prestroke disability (odds ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.75-2.83]). The rates of sICH were not significantly different in patients with and without premorbid disability. However, mortality was 3× higher in patients with premorbid disability than in those without premorbid disability (38.2% versus 12.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IVT in patients with disability was associated with better outcomes compared with patients who did not receive IVT without statistically significant added risks of sICH or mortality. When compared with those without disability, there was no significant difference in the return to baseline function or sICH. High-quality data comparing treated versus untreated patients with premorbid disability are needed to clarify this issue.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42021240499.

Endovascular Treatment and Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Premorbid Disability or Dementia: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

Patients with premorbid disability or dementia have generally been excluded from randomized controlled trials of reperfusion therapies such as thrombolysis and endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Consequently, stroke physicians face treatment dilemmas in caring for such patients. In this scientific statement, we review the literature on acute ischemic stroke in patients with premorbid disability or dementia and propose principles to guide clinicians, clinician-scientists, and policymakers on the use of acute stroke therapies in these populations. Recent clinical-epidemiological studies have demonstrated challenges in our concept and measurement of premorbid disability or dementia while highlighting the significant proportion of the general stroke population that falls under this umbrella, risking exclusion from therapies. Such studies have also helped clarify the adverse long-term clinical and health economic consequences with each increment of additional poststroke disability in these patients, underscoring the importance of finding strategies to mitigate such additional disability. Several observational studies, both case series and registry-based studies, have helped demonstrate the comparable safety of endovascular therapy in patients with premorbid disability or dementia and in those without, complementing similar data on thrombolysis. These data also suggest that such patients have a substantial potential to retain their prestroke level of disability when treated, despite their generally worse prognosis overall, although this remains to be validated in higher-quality registries and clinical trials. By pairing pragmatic and transparent decision-making in clinical practice with an active pursuit of high-quality research, we can work toward a more inclusive paradigm of patient-centered care for this often-neglected patient population.

MRI as a first-line imaging modality in acute ischemic stroke: a sustainable concept

Background:

Computed tomography (CT) scans are the first-line imaging technique in acute stroke patients based on the argument of rapid feasibility. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the first-line imaging technique is the exception to the rule, although it provides much more diagnostic information and avoids exposure to radiation. We evaluated whether an MRI-based acute stroke concept is fast, suitable, and useful to improve recanalization rates and patient outcomes.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective observational cohort study comparing patients treated at a comprehensive stroke center (Ulm/Germany) applying an MRI-based acute stroke concept with patients recorded in a large comprehensive stroke registry in Baden-Württemberg (Germany). We analyzed the quality indicators of acute stroke treatment, patient’s outcome, and the rate of transient ischemic attack (TIA) at discharge.

Results:

A total of 2182 patients from Ulm and 82,760 patients from the Baden-Württemberg (BW) stroke registry (including 29,575 patients of comprehensive stroke centers (BWc)) were included. Intravenous thrombolysis rate was higher in Ulm than in BW or the BWc stroke centers (Ulm 27.4% versus BW 20.9% versus BWc 26.1; p < 0.01), while a door-to-needle time <30 min could be achieved more frequently (Ulm 73.6% versus BW 44.1% versus BWc 47.1%; p < 0.01). Thrombectomy rate in patients with a proximal vascular occlusion was higher (Ulm 69.2% versus BW 50.7% versus BWc 59.3; p < 0.01). The number of TIA diagnoses was lower (Ulm 16.2% versus BW 24.6% versus BWc 19.9%; p < 0.01). More patients showed a shift to a favorable outcome (Ulm 21.1% versus BW 16.9% versus BWc 15.3; p < 0.01). Complication rates were similar.

Conclusions:

The MRI-based acute stroke concept is suitable, fast and seems to be beneficial. The time-dependent quality indicators were better both in comparison to all stroke units and to the comprehensive stroke units in the area. Based on the MRI concept, high rates of recanalization procedures and fewer TIA diagnoses could be observed. In addition, there was a clear trend towards an improved clinical outcome. A clinical trial comparing the effects of CT and MRI as the primary imaging technique in otherwise identical stroke unit settings is warranted.

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Prestroke Disability

Background

Outcomes after stroke as a result of large‐vessel occlusion in patients with prestroke disability were compared between endovascular therapy (EVT) and medical management.

Methods and Results

Of 2420 patients with acute stroke with large‐vessel occlusion in a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry in Japan, patients with prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores 2 to 4 with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, or M1 of the middle cerebral artery were analyzed. The primary effectiveness outcome was the favorable outcome, defined as return to at least the prestroke modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 339 patients (237 women; median 85 [interquartile range (IQR), 79–89] years of age; median prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 3 [IQR, 2–4]) were analyzed. EVT was performed in 175 patients (51.6%; mechanical thrombectomy, n=139). The EVT group was younger (p<0.01) and had lower prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores (p<0.01) than the medical management group. The favorable outcome was seen in 28.0% of the EVT group and in 10.9% of the medical management group (p<0.01). EVT was associated with the favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.55–5.85; mixed effects multivariable model with inverse probability of treatment weighting). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were similar between the EVT (4.0%) and medical management (4.3%) groups (p=1.00).

Conclusions

Patients who underwent EVT showed better functional outcomes than those with medical management. Given proper patient selection, withholding EVT solely on the basis of prestroke disability might not offer the best chance of favorable outcome.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02419794.