Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large core: Does location matter?

Predictive value of ischemia location on multimodal CT in thrombectomy-treated patients

OBJECTIVE

Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) applied to CT-perfusion (CTP) and CT-angiography-source-images (CTA-SI) may improve outcome prediction in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke if compared to non-contrast CT (NCCT) alone. Besides, ischemia location may have enhanced capabilities, compared to ischemia volume alone, in predicting stroke outcomes. We aim to evaluate the association between ischemia location as measured by ASPECTS regions in NCCT, CTP maps and CTA-SI and 3 months outcome in patients with LVO treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with MT were recorded in a prospectively maintained database at a single center. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months >2 was considered a poor outcome. Association of patients' characteristics, NCCT, CTP, and CTA-SI parameters with outcome was evaluated using single-variable analysis and binary logistic regression multivariate analysis for each imaging technique.

RESULTS

177 patients were included. 115 (65%) patients reached a favorable outcome. The involvement of lenticular, caudate, M1, or M2 in all imaging techniques, insula in NCCT and CTA-SI and M5 in CBV maps and CTA-SI was related to functional outcome in bivariate analysis. However, in the multivariate analysis, none ischemia location was independently related to outcome, no matter the imaging technique studied. This finding remained unchanged when restricted to patients with good recanalization and when analyzing subpopulations according to hemisphere involvement or territories association.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests ischemia location shouldn't be used solely for decision-making in LVO stroke patients. Its predictive value may be taken in consideration together with other clinical and radiological variables.

Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Late Time Window Thrombectomy for Patients With Ischemic Stroke

Background: To compare the cost-effectiveness of providing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with ischemic stroke in the >4.5 h time window between patient groups who met and did not meet the perfusion imaging trial criteria.

Methods: A discrete event simulation (DES) model was developed to simulate the long-term outcome post EVT in patients meeting or not meeting the extended time window clinical trial perfusion imaging criteria at presentation, vs. medical treatment alone (including intravenous thrombolysis). The effectiveness of thrombectomy in patients meeting the landmark trial criteria (DEFUSE 3 and DAWN) was derived from a prospective cohort study of Australian patients who received EVT for ischemic stroke, between 2015 and 2019, in the extended time window (>4.5 h).

Results: Endovascular thrombectomy was shown to be a cost-effective treatment for patients satisfying the clinical trial criteria in our prospective cohort [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $11,608/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for DEFUSE 3-postive or $34,416/QALY for DAWN-positive]. However, offering EVT to patients outside of clinical trial criteria was associated with reduced benefit (−1.02 QALY for DEFUSE 3; −1.43 QALY for DAWN) and higher long-term patient costs ($8,955 for DEFUSE 3; $9,271 for DAWN), thereby making it unlikely to be cost-effective in Australia.

Conclusions: Treating patients not meeting the DAWN or DEFUSE 3 clinical trial criteria in the extended time window for EVT was associated with less gain in QALYs and higher cost. Caution should be exercised when considering this procedure for patients not satisfying the trial perfusion imaging criteria for EVT.