Lumbosacral Radiculoplexus Neuropathy: Neurologic Outcomes and Survival in a Population-Based Study

Focal inflammatory neuropathies

This chapter focuses on neuropathies that present with focal involvement of nerve roots, plexus, and/or peripheral nerves associated with autoimmune and inflammatory mechanisms that present with focal involvement of nerve roots, plexus and/or peripheral nerves. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of focal autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies, focal nonsystemic vasculitic disorders (diabetic and nondiabetic radiculoplexus neuropathies, postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy, and neuralgic amyotrophy), and focal neuropathies associated with sarcoidosis and bacterial and viral infections are reviewed.

Painless nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy with complete recovery: a case report

BACKGROUND

Lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, also known as amyotrophy, is an uncommon monophasic disorder characterized by inflammation of the lumbosacral nerve roots and plexuses. Lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy is usually associated with diabetes mellitus, is typically painful at presentation, and often associated with long-term residual neurologic deficits. We report a case of painless, nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy in a young Chinese woman, who made a full recovery after treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, adding an atypical case to the scarce literature on lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 35-year-old Chinese woman presented to our emergency department with 1-week history of painless left lower limb weakness and numbness. Examination revealed weakness confined to the left lower limb but spanning various nerves and myotomes, with abnormal sensation. Clinical localization to the lumbosacral plexus was supported by neurodiagnostic tests, and magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral plexus showed that the nerve roots were also involved. After treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin for nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, the patient had a full recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our patient's case highlights that lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, an already rare disorder, can occur in the absence of diabetes mellitus and pain, making it even harder to recognize. A systematic and meticulous clinical approach, supported by intelligent selection of adjunctive tests, is required for localization and diagnosis. With an accurate diagnosis, our case also demonstrates that appropriate and prompt treatment can lead to complete recovery, despite previous reports suggesting a high prevalence of long-term residual deficits after lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy.

Primary perineuritis, a rare but treatable neuropathy: Review of perineurial anatomy, clinicopathological features, and differential diagnosis

The perineurium surrounds each fascicle in peripheral nerves, forming part of the blood-nerve barrier. We describe its normal anatomy and function. "Perineuritis" refers to both a nonspecific histopathological finding and more specific clinicopathological entity, primary perineuritis (PP). Patients with PP are often assumed to have nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy until nerve biopsy is performed. We systematically reviewed the literature on PP and developed a differential diagnosis for histopathologically defined perineuritis. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for "perineuritis." We identified 20 cases (11 M/9F) of PP: progressive, unexplained neuropathy with biopsy showing perineuritis without vasculitis or other known predisposing condition. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 75 (mean 53.7) y and had symptoms 2-24 (median 4.5) mo before diagnosis. Neuropathy was usually sensory-motor (15/20), painful (18/19), multifocal (16/20), and distal-predominant (16/17) with legs more affected than arms. Truncal numbness occurred in 6/17; 10/18 had elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) demonstrated primarily axonal changes. Nerve biopsies showed T-cell-predominant inflammation, widening, and fibrosis of perineurium; infiltrates in epineurium in 10/20 and endoneurium in 7/20; and non-uniform axonal degeneration. Six had epithelioid cells. 19/20 received corticosteroids, 8 with additional immunomodulators; 18/19 improved. Two patients did not respond to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). At final follow-up, 13/16 patients had mild and 2/16 moderate disability; 1/16 died. Secondary causes of perineuritis include leprosy, vasculitis, neurosarcoidosis, neuroborreliosis, neurolymphomatosis, toxic oil syndrome, eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome, and rarer conditions. PP appears to be an immune-mediated, corticosteroid-responsive disorder. It mimics nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy. Cases with epithelioid cells might represent peripheral nervous system (PNS)-restricted forms of sarcoidosis.

Neurologic Complications of Endocrine Disorders

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the neurologic complications of the most prevalent endocrine disorders in adults with an emphasis on relevant neurologic symptoms, signs, and laboratory and neuroimaging findings.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Although the mechanisms of many of the neurologic complications discussed here remain unclear, our understanding of the impacts of diabetes and hypothyroidism on the nervous system and muscle, including complications of rapid correction of chronic hyperglycemia, has advanced in recent years. Recent large studies have not demonstrated a convincing association between subclinical or overt hypothyroidism and cognitive decline.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neurologists must become familiar with the neurologic complications of endocrine disorders not only because they are common and treatable (and often reversible) but also because they may be iatrogenic, as is the case with adrenal insufficiency in the setting of long-term corticosteroid therapy.

Central and Peripheral Nervous System Complications of Vasculitis Syndromes from Pathology to Bedside: Part 2-Peripheral Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral nervous system vasculitides (PNSV) are a heterogeneous group of disorders with a clinical subset that may differ in prognosis and therapy. We provide a comprehensive update on the clinical assessment, diagnosis, complications, treatment, and follow-up of PNSV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progress in neuroimaging, molecular testing, and peripheral nerve biopsy has improved clinical assessment and decision-making of PNSV, also providing novel insights on how to prevent misdiagnosis and increase diagnostic certainty. Advances in imaging techniques, allowing to clearly display the vessel walls, have also enhanced the possibility to differentiate inflammatory from non-inflammatory vascular lesions, while recent histopathology data have identified the main morphological criteria for more accurate diagnosis and differential diagnoses. Overall, the identification of peculiar morphological findings tends to improve diagnostic accuracy by defining a clearer boundary between systemic and non-systemic neuropathies. Therefore, the definition of epineurium vessel wall damage, type of vascular lesion, characterization of lymphocyte populations, antibodies, and inflammatory factors, as well as the identification of direct nerve damage or degeneration, are the common goals for pathologists and clinicians, who will both benefit for data integration and findings translation. Nevertheless, to date, treatment is still largely empiric and, in some cases, unsatisfactory, thus often precluding precise prognostic prediction. In this context, new diagnostic techniques and multidisciplinary management will be essential in the proper diagnosis and prompt management of PNSV, as highlighted in the present review. Thirty to fifty percent of all patients with vasculitis have signs of polyneuropathy. Neuropathies associated with systemic vasculitis are best managed according to the guidelines of the underlying disease because appropriate workup and initiation of treatment can reduce morbidity. Steroids, or in severe or progressive cases, cyclophosphamide pulse therapy is the standard therapy in non-systemic vasculitic neuropathies. Some patients need long-term immunosuppression. The use of novel technologies for high-throughput genotyping will permit to determine the genetic influence of related phenotypes in patients with PNSV.

Clinical score for early diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 2

INTRODUCTION

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a rare, multisystemic, autosomal dominant disease with highly variable clinical presentation. DM2 is considered to be highly underdiagnosed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine which symptoms, signs, and diagnostic findings in patients referred to neurological outpatient units are the most indicative to arouse suspicion of DM2. We tried to make a useful and easy-to-administer clinical scoring system for early diagnosis of DM2-DM2 early diagnosis score (DM2-EDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-one patients with a clinical suspicion of DM2 were included: 69 were genetically confirmed to have DM2, and 222 patients were DM2 negative. Relevant history, neurological, and paraclinical data were obtained from the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The following parameters appeared as significant predictors of DM2 diagnosis: cataracts (beta = 0.410, p < 0.001), myotonia on needle EMG (beta = 0.298, p < 0.001), hand tremor (beta = 0.211, p = 0.001), positive family history (beta = 0.171, p = 0.012), and calf hypertrophy (beta = 0.120, p = 0.043). In the final DM2-EDS, based on the beta values, symptoms were associated with the following values: cataracts (present 3.4, absent 0), myotonia (present 2.5, absent 0), tremor (present 1.7, absent 0), family history (positive 1.4, negative 0), and calf hypertrophy (present 1.0, absent 0). A cut-off value on DM2-EDS of 3.25 of maximum 10 points had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 81% to diagnose DM2.

CONCLUSION

Significant predictors of DM2 diagnosis in the neurology outpatient unit were identified. We made an easy-to-administer DM2-EDS score for early diagnosis of DM2.

Critical illness-associated weakness and related motor disorders

Weakness of limb and respiratory muscles that occurs in the course of critical illness has become an increasingly common and serious complication of adult and pediatric intensive care unit patients and a cause of prolonged ventilatory support, morbidity, and prolonged hospitalization. Two motor disorders that occur singly or together, namely critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy, cause weakness of limb and of breathing muscles, making it difficult to be weaned from ventilatory support, commencing rehabilitation, and extending the length of stay in the intensive care unit, with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Recovery can take weeks or months and in severe cases, and may be incomplete or absent. Recent findings suggest an improved prognosis of critical illness myopathy compared to polyneuropathy. Prevention and treatment are therefore very important. Its management requires an integrated team approach commencing with neurologic consultation, creatine kinase (CK) measurement, detailed electrodiagnostic, respiratory and neuroimaging studies, and potentially muscle biopsy to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of the weakness in the peripheral and/or central nervous system, for which there may be a variety of causes. These tenets of care are being applied to new cases and survivors of the coronavirus-2 disease pandemic of 2019. This chapter provides an update to the understanding and approach to critical illness motor disorders.

Autoimmune polyneuropathies

The autoimmune peripheral neuropathies with prominent motor manifestations are a diverse collection of unusual peripheral neuropathies that are appreciated in vast clinical settings. This chapter highlights the most common immune-mediated, motor predominant neuropathies excluding acute, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP and CIDP, respectively). Other acquired demyelinating neuropathies such as distal CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy will be covered. Additionally, the radiculoplexus neuropathies, resulting from microvasculitis-induced injury to nerve roots, plexuses, and nerves, including diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy and neuralgic amyotrophy (i.e., Parsonage-Turner syndrome), will be included. Finally, the motor predominant peripheral neuropathies encountered in association with rheumatological disease, particularly Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis, are covered. Early recognition of these distinct motor predominant autoimmune neuropathies and initiation of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressant treatment likely result in improved outcomes.

Adult and childhood vasculitis

Vasculitis refers to heterogeneous clinicopathologic disorders that share the histopathology of inflammation of blood vessels. Unrecognized and therefore untreated, vasculitis of the nervous system leads to pervasive injury and disability, making this a disorder of paramount importance to all clinicians. There has been remarkable progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of primary CNS and PNS vasculitides, predicated on achievement in primary systemic forms. Primary neurological vasculitides can be diagnosed with assurance after intensive evaluation that incudes tissue confirmation whenever possible. Clinicians must choose from among the available immune modulating, suppressive, and targeted immunotherapies to induce and maintain remission status and prevent relapse, unfortunately without the benefit of RCTs, and tempered by the recognition of anticipated medication side effects. It may be said that efforts to define a disease are attempts to understand the very concept of the disease. This has been especially evident in systemic and neurological disorders associated with vasculitis. For the past 100 years, since the first description of granulomatous angiitis of the brain, the CNS vasculitides have captured the attention of generations of clinical investigators around the globe to reach a better understanding of vasculitides involving the central and peripheral nervous system. Since that time it has become increasingly evident that this will necessitate an international collaborative effort.

Lumbosacral Radiculoplexus Neuropathy After COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Lumbosacral Radiculoplexus Neuropathy (LRPN) is a subacute, painful, paralytic, asymmetric immune-mediated lower-limb neuropathy associated with weight loss and diabetes mellitus (called DLRPN). Approximately one-third of LRPN cases have a trigger. Our purpose is to show that COVID-19 can trigger LRPN.

CASE REPORT

We describe the clinical, neurophysiological, radiologic, and pathologic findings of a 55-year-old man who developed DLRPN after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. Shortly after mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the patient developed severe neuropathic pain (allodynia), postural orthostasis, fatigue, weight loss, and weakness of bilateral lower extremities requiring wheelchair assistance. One month after COVID-19, he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Neurological examination showed bilateral severe proximal and distal lower extremity weakness, absent tendon reflexes, and pan-modality sensation loss. Electrophysiology demonstrated an asymmetric axonal lumbosacral and thoracic radiculoplexus neuropathies. Magnetic resonance imaging showed enlargement and T2 hyperintensity of the lumbosacral plexus. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) showed an elevated protein (138 mg/dL). Right sural nerve biopsy was diagnostic of nerve microvasculitis. He was diagnosed with DLRPN and treated with intravenous methylprednisolone 1 g weekly for 12 weeks. The patient had marked improvement in pain, weakness, and lightheadedness and at the 3-month follow-up was walking unassisted.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 can trigger postinfectious inflammatory neuropathies including LRPN.

Risk factors for Lumbosacral Radiculoplexus Neuropathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Recently, our group found an association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) in Olmsted County, Minnesota; we found a higher risk (OR: 7.91) for developing LRPN in diabetic compared to non-diabetic patients. However, the influence of other comorbidities and anthropomorphic variables was not studied.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data from 59 LRPN patients and 177 age-sex matched controls were extracted using the Rochester LRPN epidemiological study. Differences between groups were compared by Chi-square/Fisher's exact test or Wilcox sum rank. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Factors predictive of LRPN on univariate analysis were DM (OR 7.91; CI 4.11-15.21), dementia (OR 6.36; CI 1.13-35.67), stroke (OR 3.81; CI 1.32-11.01), dyslipidemia (OR 2.844; CI 1.53-5.27), comorbid autoimmune disorders (OR 2.72; CI 1.07-6.93), hypertension (OR 2.25; CI 1.2-4.13), obesity (OR 2.05; CI 1.11-3.8), BMI (OR 1.1; CI 1.04-1.15), and weight (OR 1.02; CI 1.009-1.037). On multivariate logistic regression analysis only DM (OR 8.03; CI 3.86-16.7), comorbid autoimmune disorders (OR 4.58; CI 1.45-14.7), stroke (OR 4.13; CI 1.2-14.25) and BMI (OR 1.07; CI 1.01-1.13) were risk factors for LRPN.

DISCUSSION

DM is the strongest risk factor for the development of LRPN, followed by comorbid auto-immune disorders, stroke and higher BMI. Altered metabolism and immune dysfunction seem to be the most influential factors in the development of LRPN. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.