Pure Motor Onset and IgM-Gammopathy Occurrence in Multifocal Acquired Demyelinating Sensory and Motor Neuropathy

Distinguishing Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy From Mimic Disorders: The Role of Statistical Modeling

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult to distinguish from mimicking disorders, with misdiagnosis resulting in IVIG overutilization. We evaluate a clinical-electrophysiological model to facilitate CIDP versus mimic neuropathy prediction.

METHODS

Using the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 CIDP guidelines we derived 26 clinical and 144 nerve conduction variables. The model was generated and validated utilizing total CIDP (n = 129) and mimics (n = 309); including (1) IgG4-nodopathies; (2) POEMS (polyneuropathy-organomegaly-endocrinopathy-monoclonal protein-skin changes); (3) anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein; (4) paraneoplastic; (5) Waldenström B-cell lymphoma; (6) diabetic neuropathies; (7) amyloidosis; (8) Charcot-Marie-Tooth; (9) motor neuropathies/neuronopathies; and (10) idiopathic-inflammatory-myopathies.

RESULTS

We analyzed 9282 clinical and 51 408 electrophysiological data points. Univariate analysis identified 11 of 26 clinical variables with significant odds ratios. A multivariate regression model using four clinical and two electrophysiologic variables achieved 93% area-under-curve (95% CI 91-95): progression over 8 weeks (OR 40.66, 95% CI 5.31-311.36), absent autonomic involvement (OR 17.82, 95% CI 2.93-108.24), absent muscle atrophy (OR 16.65, 95% CI 3.27-84.73), proximal weakness (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.58-8.33), ulnar motor conduction velocity slowing < 35.7 m/s (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13-12.76), and ulnar motor conduction block (OR 13.37, 95% CI 2.47-72.40). A web-based probability calculator (https://news.mayocliniclabs.com/cidp-calculator/) was developed, with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity at a 92% probability threshold. Specificity improved to 93% when considering "red flags," electrophysiologic criteria, and laboratory testing.

INTERPRETATION

A probability calculator using clinical electrophysiological variables assists CIDP differentiation from mimics, with scores below 92% unlikely to have CIDP. The highest specificity is achieved by considering clinical "red flags," electrophysiologic demyelination, and laboratory testing.

Optimizing Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein and IgM-Gammopathy Testing for Neuropathy Treatment Evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with typical anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy have IgM-gammopathy, mimic distal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and are treatment resistant. Anti-MAG patients go unrecognized when IgM-gammopathy is undetected or with atypical phenotypes. We investigated an optimal anti-MAG titration cutoff for excluding CIDP and the impact of IgM-gammopathy detection on neuropathy treatment evaluation without anti-MAG antibodies.

METHODS

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society 2021 guidelines were used to assess patients with neuropathy using anti-MAG Bühlmann titration units (BTU) and IgM-gammopathy with Mass-Fix (mass spectrophotometry) and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (SPIEP). The immunotherapy outcome was reviewed by inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) and summated compound muscle action potential (CMAP) nerve conduction changes.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and fifty-two patients (average age: 63.8 years, female: 31%) were identified over 30 months: (1) typical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 104); (2) atypical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 13); (3) distal or sensory-predominant CIDP (n = 25), including 7 without IgM-gammopathy; (4) typical CIDP (n = 47), including 36 without IgM-gammopathy; (5) axonal IgM-gammopathy-associated neuropathy (n = 104); and (6) IgM-gammopathy-negative, anti-MAG-negative axonal neuropathies (n = 426); and (7) without neuropathy (n = 33) anti-MAG negative. IgM-gammopathy was evaluated by Mass-Fix (n = 493), SPIEP (n = 355), or both (n = 96). Mass-Fix detected 4 additional IgM-gammopathies (3%, 4/117) among patients with anti-MAG antibodies and 7 additional patients (2%, 7/376) without anti-MAG not detected by SPIEP testing. Immunotherapy follow-up was available in 123 (mean: 23 months, range: 3-120 months) including 47 with CIDP (28 without IgM-gammopathy) and 76 non-CIDP (5 without IgM-gammopathy, 45 anti-MAG positive). Treatments included IVIG (n = 89), rituximab (n = 80), and ibrutinib or zanubrutinib (n = 24). An optimal anti-MAG-positive cutoff was identified at ≥1,500 BTU (78% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and at ≥10,000 BTU (74% sensitivity, 100% specificity) for typical anti-MAG neuropathy. Improvements in INCAT scores (p < 0.0001) and summated CMAP (p = 0.0028) were associated with negative anti-MAG (<1,500 BTU, n = 78) and absence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 34). Among 47 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed CIDP, all anti-MAG negative, the presence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 19) also correlated with a worse treatment response (INCAT scores p = 0.035, summated CMAP p = 0.049).

DISCUSSION

A cutoff of 10,000 BTU seems optimal for typical anti-MAG neuropathy while ≥1,500 BTU reduces the likelihood of immune-treatable CIDP. Mass-Fix improves IgM-gammopathy detection in anti-MAG and other IgM-gammopathy neuropathies. Patients with IgM-gammopathy lacking MAG antibodies show reduced treatment response.

[A borderline case between multifocal motor neuropathy and motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy revealed by the magnetic fatigue test]

A 26-year-old woman presented with a seven-month history of weakness in her left upper limb, progressing to difficulty lifting her arms within a few weeks. Her symptoms progressed with fluctuations. For the past three months, she has been unable to stand due to weakness in her proximal lower limbs. Nerve conduction studies did not show any definite conduction block or abnormal sensory conduction, but motor conduction studies showed a slight prolongation of the terminal latency and a decrease in the frequency of the F-wave. A magnetic fatigue test indicated a proximal conduction block. Her symptoms were rapidly resolved with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, leading to a diagnosis of chronic immune-mediated neuropathy, met both criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Our case highlights the utility of the magnetic fatigue test in detecting conduction blocks and its role in differentiating between MMN and motor CIDP.

Assessment of diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy in patients included in the Italian database

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria, ancillary investigations and treatment response using real-life data in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data were collected from 110 patients enrolled in the Italian MMN database through a structured questionnaire. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to the unavailability of nerve conduction studies or the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and electrodiagnostic abnormalities inconsistent with the MMN diagnosis. Analyses were conducted on 73 patients with a confirmed MMN diagnosis and 11 patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria were variably applied.

AUTHOR

When applying the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria, an additional 17% of patients fulfilled the criteria for probable/definite diagnosis whilst a further 9.5% missed the diagnosis. In 17% of the patients only compound muscle action potential amplitude, but not area, was measured and subsequently recorded in the database by the treating physician. Additional investigations, including anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, supported the diagnosis in 46%-83% of the patients. Anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies and nerve ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity. Additional tests were frequently performed outside the EFNS/PNS guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into the real-world diagnostic and management strategies for MMN, highlighting the challenges in applying diagnostic criteria.

Axillary and musculocutaneous neuropathies

This chapter covers axillary and musculocutaneous neuropathies, with a focus on clinically relevant anatomy, electrodiagnostic approaches, etiologic considerations, and management principles. Disorders of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, a derivative of the musculocutaneous nerve, are also reviewed. We emphasize the importance of objective findings, including the physical examination and electrodiagnostic evaluation in confirming the isolated involvement of each nerve which, along with the clinical history, informs etiologic considerations. Axillary and musculocutaneous neuropathies are both rare in isolation and most frequently occur in the setting of trauma. Less commonly encountered etiologies include external compression or entrapment, neoplastic involvement, or immune-mediated disorders including neuralgic amyotrophy, postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, vasculitic neuropathy, and multifocal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Nerve enlargement differs among chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy subtypes and multifocal motor neuropathy

Objective

We aimed to evaluate differences in ultrasonographic nerve enlargement sites among typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), distal CIDP, multifocal CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) in a Japanese population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records and selected 39 patients (14 with typical CIDP, 7 with multifocal CIDP, 4 with distal CIDP, and 14 with MMN) who underwent ultrasonography. Median and ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured at the wrist, forearm, elbow, and upper arm. CSA ratios for each nerve were calculated as: wrist-to-forearm index (WFI) = wrist CSA/forearm CSA; elbow-to-upper arm index (EUI) = elbow CSA/upper arm CSA; and intranerve CSA variability (INCV) = maximal CSA/minimal CSA.

Results

Significant differences were observed among typical CIDP, multifocal CIDP, distal CIDP, and MMN in CSA at the forearm and upper arm in the median nerves (p < 0.05). Patients with multifocal CIDP had lower WFI and EUI and higher INCV than the other groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Regardless of the untreated period, compared with other CIDP subtypes and MMN, multifocal CIDP showed a focal and marked nerve enlargement in the Japanese population.

Significance

Differences in nerve enlargement site may be an underlying feature of multifocal CIDP.

Hematologic Disorders and the Nervous System

OBJECTIVE

This article discusses the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of neurologic complications of red blood cell, platelet, and plasma cell disorders.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Cerebrovascular complications can occur in patients with blood cell and platelet disorders. Treatment strategies to prevent stroke are available for patients with sickle cell disease, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. A diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura should be considered in patients with neurologic symptoms, hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, mild renal insufficiency, and fever. Plasma cell disorders can be associated with peripheral neuropathy, and classification of the monoclonal protein type and neuropathy aid in diagnosis. Patients with POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal plasma cell disorder, and skin changes) syndrome can present with arterial and venous neurologic events.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

This article discusses the neurologic complications of blood cell disorders and the most recent advances in prevention and treatment.

Neuropathy, its Profile and Experimental Nerve Injury Neuropathic Pain Models: A Review

Neuropathy is a terrible disorder that has a wide range of etiologies. Drug-induced neuropathy, which happens whenever a chemical agent damages the peripheral nerve system, has been linked here to the iatrogenic creation of some drugs. It is potentially permanent and causes sensory impairments and paresthesia that typically affects the hands, feet, and stockings; motor participation is uncommon. It might appear suddenly or over time, and the long-term outlook varies. The wide range of chronic pain conditions experienced by people has been one of the main obstacles to developing new, more effective medications for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Animal models can be used to examine various neuropathic pain etiologies and symptoms. Several models investigate the peripheral processes of neuropathic pain, whereas some even investigate the central mechanisms, such as drug induce models like vincristine, cisplatin, bortezomib, or thalidomide, etc., and surgical models like sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI), sciatic nerve ligation through spinal nerve ligation (SNL), sciatic nerve damage caused by a laser, SNI (spared nerve injury), etc. The more popular animal models relying on peripheral nerve ligatures are explained. In contrast to chronic sciatic nerve contraction, which results in behavioral symptoms of less reliable stressful neuropathies, (SNI) spared nerve injury generates behavioral irregularities that are more feasible over a longer period. This review summarizes the latest methods models as well as clinical ideas concerning this mechanism. Every strongest current information on neuropathy is discussed, along with several popular laboratory models for causing neuropathy.

Plexus MRI helps distinguish the immune-mediated neuropathies MADSAM and MMN

BACKGROUND

Among immune-mediated neuropathies, clinical-electrophysiological overlap exists between multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Divergent immune pathogenesis, immunotherapy response, and prognosis exist between these two disorders. MRI reports have not shown distinction of these disorders, but biopsy confirmation is lacking in earlier reports. MADSAM nerves are hypertrophic with onion bulbs, inflammation, and edema, whereas MMN findings are limited to multifocal axonal atrophy.

OBJECTIVES

To understand if plexus MRI can distinguish MADSAM from MMN among pathologically (nerve biopsy) confirmed cases.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review and blinded plexus MRI review of biopsy-confirmed MADSAM and MMN cases at Mayo Clinic.

RESULTS

Nine brachial plexuses (MADSAM-5, MMN-4) and 6 lumbosacral plexuses (MADSAM-4, MMN-2) had fascicular biopsies of varied nerves. Median follow-up in MADSAM was 93 months (range: 7-180) and 27 (range: 12-109) in MMN (p = 0.34). MRI hypertrophy occurred solely in MADSAM (89%, 8/9) with T2-hyperintensity in both. There was no correlation between time to imaging for hypertrophy, symptom onset age, or motor neuropathy impairments (mNIS). At last follow-up, on diverse immunotherapies mNIS improved in MADSAM (median - 4, range: -22 to 0), whereas MMN worsened (median 3, range: 0 to 6, p = 0.03) on largely IVIG.

CONCLUSION

Nerve hypertrophy on plexus MRI helps distinguish MMN from MADSAM, where better immunotherapy treatment outcomes were observed. These findings are consistent with the immune pathogenesis seen on biopsies. Radiologic distinction is possible independent of time to imaging and extent of motor deficits, suggesting MRI is helpful in patients with uncertain clinical-electrophysiologic diagnosis, especially motor-onset MADSAM.