Stroke Center Designations, Neurointerventionalist Demand, and the Finances of Stroke Thrombectomy in the United States

Challenges to Widespread Implementation of Stroke Thrombectomy

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is one of the most efficacious and effective treatments in medicine, yet globally, its implementation remains limited. Patterns of EVT underutilization exist in virtually any health care system and range from a complete lack of access to selective undertreatment of certain patient subgroups. In this review, we outline different patterns of EVT underutilization and possible causes. We discuss common challenges and bottlenecks that are encountered by physicians, patients, and other stakeholders when trying to establish and expand EVT services in different scenarios and possible pathways to overcome these challenges. Lastly, we discuss the importance of implementation research studies, strategic partnerships, and advocacy efforts to mitigate EVT underutilization.

Perspectives on Remote Robotic-Assisted Stroke Treatment: A Commentary Paper

The proved feasibility of robotic-assisted endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms has stimulated the idea of a potential application of remote robotics for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The possibility of developing a more advanced remote-controlled robotic system capable of performing a complete mechanical thrombectomy procedure would help bridge the health care gap of lack of technical expertise in isolated areas. This possibility could allow a more equitable access to mechanical thrombectomy to a larger number of patients and be a breakthrough for acute ischemic stroke care worldwide. Many aspects around the technical, human, financial, and regulatory requirements should be discussed to implement remote robotic-assisted procedures. In this State of Practice article, we aimed to outline the major challenges that must be considered, as well as proposed solutions. However, different solutions may be applied in different health care systems on the basis of the availability of human and financial resources.

Variation in US acute ischemic stroke treatment by hospital regions: limited endovascular access despite evidence

BACKGROUND

Although national organizations recognize the importance of regionalized acute ischemic stroke (AIS) care, data informing expansion are sparse. We assessed real-world regional variation in emergent AIS treatment, including growth in revascularization therapies and stroke center certification. We hypothesized that we would observe overall growth in revascularization therapy utilization, but observed differences would vary greatly regionally.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was carried out of de-identified national inpatient Medicare Fee-for-Service datasets from 2016 to 2019. We identified AIS admissions and treatment with thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy (ET) with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We grouped hospitals in Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare Hospital Referral Regions (HRR) and calculated hospital, demographic, and acute stroke treatment characteristics for each HRR. We calculated the percent of hospitals with stroke certification and AIS cases treated with thrombolysis or ET per HRR.

RESULTS

There were 957 958 AIS admissions. Relative mean (SD) growth in percent of AIS admissions receiving revascularization therapy per HRR from 2016 to 2019 was 13.4 (31.7)% (IQR -6.1-31.7%) for thrombolysis and 28.0 (72.0)% (IQR 0-56.0%) for ET. The proportion of HRRs with decreased or no difference in ET utilization was 38.9% and the proportion of HRRs with decreased or no difference in thrombolysis utilization was 32.7%. Mean (SD) stroke center certification proportion across HRRs was 45.3 (31.5)% and this varied widely (IQR 18.3-73.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall growth in AIS treatment has been modest and, within HRRs, growth in AIS treatment and the proportion of centers with stroke certification varies dramatically.

Differential thrombectomy utilization across hospital classifications in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To determine hospital-level factors associated with thrombectomy uptake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was retrospectively queried to determine the total number of thrombectomies performed based on different hospital characteristics. Joint point analysis was used to determine which years were associated with significant increases in the number of high-volume thrombectomy centers (ostensibly defined as >50 thrombectomies/year), thrombectomy-capable centers (>15 thrombectomies/year), and total number of thrombectomies performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine hospital factors associated with having an increased odds of performing thrombectomies, and of being classified as a high-volume thrombectomy or a thrombectomy-capable center.

RESULTS

Between 2007-2020 there was a stepwise increase in the number of thrombectomy-capable and high-volume thrombectomy centers in the United States. In 2020, there were a total of 15,705 thrombectomies performed, with 89 high-volume thrombectomy centers, and 359 thrombectomy-capable centers. The number of thrombectomy-capable centers significantly increased after 2011. After 2013 and 2016 there was a significant change in the growth rate of high-volume thrombectomy centers. There was also a significant increase in the total number of thrombectomies performed after 2016. Hospital characteristics that were associated with an increased likelihood of being classified as thrombectomy-capable or high-volume included trauma level 1 and 2 hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2007 and 2020, there was a marked growth in thrombectomy utilization for acute ischemic stroke. This growth outpaced new diagnoses of ischemic stroke, and was driven largely by certain hospital types, with the greatest rises following seminal publications of positive randomized thrombectomy trials.

Clinical outcome, recanalization success, and time metrics in drip-and-ship vs. drive-the-doctor: A retrospective analysis of the HEI-LU-Stroke registry

Purpose

This study aimed at comparing clinical outcome, recanalization success and time metrics in the “drip and ship” (DS) vs. “drive the doctor” (DD) concept in a comparable setting.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of thrombectomy registries of a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and a thrombectomy-capable stroke center (TSC). Patients, who were transferred from the TSC to the CSC, were classified as DS. Patients treated at the TSC by an interventionalist transferred from the CSC were classified as DD. Good outcome was defined as mRS 0–2 or equivalent to premorbid mRS at discharge. Recanalization (TICI 2b-3 or equivalent) and time metrics were compared in both groups.

Results

In total, 295 patients were included, of which 116 (39.3%) were treated in the DS concept and 179 (60.7%) in the DD concept. Good clinical outcome was similarly achieved in DS and DD (DS 25.0% vs. DD 31.3%, P = 0.293). mRS on discharge (DS median 4, DD median 4, P = 0.686), NIHSS improvement (DS median 4, DD median 5, P = 0.582) and NIHSS on discharge (DS median 9, DD median 7, P = 0.231) were similar in both groups. Successful reperfusion was achieved similarly in DS (75.9%) and DD as well (81.0%, P = 0.375). Time from onset to reperfusion (median DS 379 vs. DD 286 min, P = 0.076) and time from initial imaging to reperfusion were longer in DS compared to DD (median DS 246 vs. DD 162 min, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The DD concept is time saving while achieving similar clinical outcome and recanalization results.

Anticoagulation under-utilization in atrial fibrillation patients is responsible for a large proportion of strokes requiring endovascular therapy

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is responsible for 30-50% of large strokes requiring endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Anticoagulation (AC) underutilization is a common source of AF-related stroke. We compared antithrombotic medications among stroke patients with AF that did or did not undergo EVT to determine if AC underutilization disproportionately results in strokes requiring EVT, while quantifying the proportion of likely preventable thrombectomies.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort included consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized based on the presence of AF, and pre-admission antithrombotic medications were compared between those who underwent EVT and those who didn't. The reason for not being on AC was abstracted from the medical record, and patients were categorized as either AC eligible or AC contraindicated.

RESULTS

Of 3092 acute ischemic stroke patients, 644 had a history of AF, 213 of whom underwent EVT. Patients who required EVT were more likely to not be taking any antithrombotics prior to admission (34% vs 24%, p=0.007) or have subtherapeutic INR on admission if taking warfarin (83% vs 63%; p = 0.046). Among the AF-EVT patients, 44% were taking AC, and only 31% were adequately anticoagulated. Only 8% of AF-EVT patients who were not on pre-admission AC had a clear contraindication, and 94% were ultimately discharged on AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of antithrombotic therapy in AF patients disproportionately contributes to strokes requiring EVT. A small minority of AF patients have contraindications to AC, so adequate anticoagulation can prevent a remarkable number of strokes requiring EVT.

Patterns in the number of interventionalists for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the US

BACKGROUND

Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) has become the standard of stroke care for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS) involving the anterior circulation. With continued eligibility expansion, the demand for neuro-intervention is growing. Current estimates indicate inadequate supply of interventionalists. However, there is limited data describing the number of interventionalists per hospital in the US, and correlations with outcomes.

METHODS

We used Medicare 100% sample datasets and included all AIS admissions from 2018 to 2019, using validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify AIS and comorbidities. We utilized National Provider Identifier codes to identify distinct interventionalists at the hospital. We examined outcomes at the hospital level, including percent of AIS treated with thrombolysis, percent of AIS with inpatient mortality, percent of AIS with discharge home, and percent of AIS with death within 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 471,427 AIS admissions, 16,253 received ET over the 2-year period of the study. Only 683 of 4576 AIS-treating institutions provided ET (14.9%). These ET centers most frequently only had one interventionalist performing ET and were clustered in large metropolitan areas with high AIS volumes. As AIS volumes, ET volumes, and mean NIHSS scores increased, so did the number of interventionalists. With each additional interventionalist, there was an increased likelihood of poor outcomes including inpatient mortality, discharge home, and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed a relative lack of neuro-interventionalists among US hospitals, with a concentration of interventionalists in urban, high-volume centers. The greater likelihood of poor outcomes associated with increasing number of interventionalists is likely due to increasing complexity and severity of cases at high-volume ET centers, but further study is needed.

Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centre-A Key to Acute Stroke Care System Improvement? Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment in Cardiac Cathlab

The optimal structure of the acute ischaemic stroke treatment network is unknown and eagerly sought. To make it most effective, different treatment and transportation strategies have been developed and investigated worldwide. Since only a fraction of acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion are treated, a new entity-thrombectomy-capable stroke centre (TCSC)-was introduced to respond to the growing demand for timely endovascular treatment. The purpose of this study was to present the early experience of the first 70 patients treated by mechanical means in a newly developed cardiac Cathlab-based TCSC. The essential safety and efficacy measures were recorded and compared with those reported in the invasive arm of the HERMES meta-analysis-the largest published dataset on the subject. We found no significant differences in terms of clinical and safety outcomes, such as early neurological recovery, level of functional independence at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, parenchymal haematoma type 2, and mortality. These encouraging results obtained in the small endovascular centre may be an argument for the introduction of the TCSC into operating stroke networks to increase patient access to timely treatment and to improve clinical outcomes.

Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery: position statement on pregnancy and parental leave for physicians practicing neurointerventional surgery

Background

The aim of this article is to outline a position statement on pregnancy and parental leave for physicians practicing neurointerventional surgery.

Methods

We performed a structured literature review regarding parental leave policies in neurointerventional surgery and related fields. The recommendations resulted from discussion among the authors, and additional input from the Women in NeuroIntervention Committee, the full Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) Standards and Guidelines Committee, and the SNIS Board of Directors.

Results

Some aspects of workplace safety during pregnancy are regulated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Other aspects of the workplace and reasonable job accommodations are legally governed by the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as well as rights and protections put forth by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration as part of the United States Department of Labor. Family friendly policies have been associated not only with improved job satisfaction but also with improved parental and infant outcomes. Secondary effects of such accommodations are to increase the number of women within the specialty.

Conclusions

SNIS supports a physician’s ambition to have a family as well as start, develop, and maintain a career in neurointerventional surgery. Legal and regulatory mandates and family friendly workplace policies should be considered when institutions and individual practitioners approach the issue of childbearing in the context of a career in neurointerventional surgery.

Modified Rankin scale assessment by telephone using a simple questionnaire

PURPOSE

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is widely used as a measure of post-stroke physical disability in clinical stroke trials; however, it is affected by inter-rater discrepancies. A Japanese version of the simplified mRS questionnaire (J-RASQ) has the potential to overcome the inter-rater discrepancies and might be feasible for clinical surveys. We aimed to determine the reliability of J-RASQ in a telephone survey administered by non-medical staff.

METHODS

We recruited 103 patients (age = 73 ± 11 years; 57% males) with a history of ischemic stroke who visited the outpatient clinic of the department of neurology at our hospital between March and May, 2021. After obtaining informed consent for participation in the study, a stroke neurologist assessed the mRS score during the visit using the Japanese version of mRS. On the same day, a clerk telephoned the patient or his/her family members to administer the J-RASQ. The percentage of agreement between mRS and J-RASQ scores was evaluated using the kappa coefficient and weighted kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The median time for the telephone survey was 85 s (interquartile range = 70-135 s). The mRS and J-RASQ scores had an agreement of 63.1%, with a kappa statistic of 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39-0.63). The weighted kappa statistic, which takes into account the extent of disagreement, was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.75-0.88).

CONCLUSION

J-RASQ is easy to administer and reliable for assessment in telephone-based surveys performed by non-medical staff.

Transferring neurointerventionalists saves time compared with interhospital transfer of stroke patients for endovascular thrombectomy: a collaborative pooled analysis of 1001 patients (EVEREST)

BACKGROUND

Interhospital transfer of stroke patients (drip and ship concept) is associated with longer treatment times compared with primary admission to a comprehensive stroke center (mothership concept). In recent years, studies on a novel concept of performing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) at external hospitals (EXT) by transferring neurointerventionalists, instead of patients, have been published. This collaborative study aimed at answering the question of whether EXT saves time in the workflow of acute stroke treatment across various geographical regions.

METHODS

This was a patient level pooled analysis of one prospective observational study and four retrospective cohort studies, the EVEREST collaboration (EndoVascular thrombEctomy at Referring and External STroke centers). Time from initial stroke imaging to EVT (vascular puncture) was compared in mothership, drip and ship, and EXT concepts.

RESULTS

In total, 1001 stroke patients from various geographical regions who underwent EVT due to large vessel occlusion were included. These were divided into mothership (n=162, 16.2%), drip and ship (n=458, 45.8%), and EXT (n=381, 38.1%) cohorts. The median time periods from onset to EVT (195 min vs 320 min, p<0.001) and from imaging to EVT (97 min vs 184 min, p<0.001) in EXT were significantly shorter than for drip and ship thrombectomy concept.

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis of the EVEREST collaboration adds evidence that performing EVT at external hospitals can save time compared with drip and ship across various geographical regions. We encourage conducting randomized controlled trials comparing both triage concepts.