Nonpharmacologic treatment of chronic headache: prediction of outcome

Psychiatric comorbidity and response to preventative therapy in the treatment of severe migraine trial

INTRODUCTION

Mood and anxiety disorders are comorbid with migraine and commonly assumed to portend a poor response to preventive migraine therapies. However, there is little evidence to support this assumption.

METHOD

We examined impact of a mood and/or anxiety disorder diagnosis using American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual criteria on response to the three preventative migraine therapies evaluated in the Treatment of Severe Migraine trial (n = 177): β-blocker, behavioral migraine management, or behavioral migraine management +β-blocker. Daily diaries assessed migraine activity for the 16 months of the trial. The Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire and Headache Disability Inventory assessed headache-related disability at regular intervals. Mixed models for repeated measures examined changes in these three outcomes with preventative migraine therapy in participants with and without a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis.

RESULTS

Participants with a comorbid mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis recorded larger reductions in migraine days (p < .05) and larger reductions in the Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (p < .001) and Headache Disability Inventory (p < .01) than did participants with neither diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

Significantly larger reductions in migraine activity and migraine-related disability were observed in participants with a mood and/or anxiety disorder diagnosis than in participants who did not receive either diagnosis.

Tension-type headache and psychiatric comorbidity

Much of the contemporary literature on headache disorders focuses on migraine headaches, despite the fact that tension-type headache (TTH) is highly prevalent and can be as debilitating as migraines. This article reviews the current literature on prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in TTH populations, psychologic factors associated with TTH, and psychiatric disorders and their relationships with treatment outcomes in TTH. Key conclusions of this review include 1) prevalence rates of TTH vary across clinical and population-based samples; 2) greater TTH chronicity is associated with increased affective distress; 3) Axis II personality disorders may play an important role in TTH prevalence rates and psychologic functioning but have been understudied to date; and 4) maladaptive coping is common in persons with TTH.

Allocation of patients to conditions in headache clinical trials: randomization, stratification, and treatment matching

Assuming control over the allocation of patients to treatment conditions is a fundamental element of any comparative clinical trial. There are three critical considerations investigators must balance in choosing an allocation scheme: reducing bias in patient allocation, producing balanced patient groups across treatment arms, and reducing the likelihood of errors attributable to chance variation. The authors review the principles of three key approaches to the allocation of patients to conditions within clinical trials, and their respective advantages with regard to these critical considerations. These allocation methods include randomization, stratification, and patient-treatment matching. Randomization is fundamental to most clinical trials. Stratification is an advanced step in a systematic program of research investigating the efficacy and effectiveness of an intervention. If the trial has less than 100 per arm and there is a known prognostic factor, stratification is the best choice to ensure equal allocation across groups. Treatment matching (tailoring) attempts to match the most appropriate treatment to a specific patient based on a priori hypotheses. Two techniques used for exploring treatment matching are: patient typologies (patient profiling), and aptitude-treatment interactions. Additional details pertaining to the rationale for selecting among these various approaches to patient allocation is provided, and their methodology is summarized with specific consideration for their application within clinical trials of headache treatment.

A pilot study of feasibility and efficacy of telemedicine-delivered psychophysiological treatment for vascular headache

Headache is a common complaint. Psychological treatment has been effective in managing the symptoms of vascular (migraine and combined migraine-tension) headache. Traditional office-based treatment may be inconvenient for many patients in terms of time and travel constraints, thereby limiting access. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising delivery medium to address these barriers to access. However, the efficacy of remotely delivered treatment for vascular headache remains untested. This case series is a preliminary evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility of an analogue telemedicine system for delivery of psychophysiological treatment for vascular headache. Three of four subjects showed improvement. These findings are encouraging for follow-up study of the clinical utility and broader viability of headache treatment via distance technology.

Cost-effectiveness of home relaxation training for tension headaches

Taped home relaxation training was evaluated in a single-case replication design across three patients suffering from tension headaches. Data from daily headache diaries indicated that headache frequency decreased substantially for two of the patients. For the third patient who reported almost continual headache pain, intensity was reduced by over 50%. When compared with results of our previous research taped home relaxation training appeared as effective as (and therefore, more cost-effective than) live clinic relaxation training.

Treatment integrity of relaxation training for tension headaches

Treatment integrity procedures, generally lacking in previous research, were employed for evaluation of relaxation training for tension headaches. Treatment integrity is the extent to which the therapist implements the relaxation procedure as described, and the degree to which the patients comply with the therapist's instructions. Objective compliance with the home practice of relaxation training was assessed using a microcomputer-based method which required the patient to squeeze a hand control when instructed to tense a muscle. A single-case replication design with three tension headache patients was used. The dependent variables were taken from patients' self-reported daily headache data. Results indicate that: (a) the therapist accurately adhered to the relaxation training protocol; (b) headache frequency decreased in all patients from baseline to 1-year follow-up (improvements ranged from 72.7% to 98.2%); and (c) improvement was greater with higher compliance.

A review and clinical perspective on the use of EMG and thermal biofeedback for chronic headaches

A comprehensive survey of EMG and thermal biofeedback for chronic muscle contraction and migraine headaches is presented. The studies done to date suggest a high degree of short-term efficacy of biofeedback, which has been maintained on long-term follow-ups. While comparisons of biofeedback with relaxation generally have shown approximately equivalent effectiveness, the two forms of therapy may be differentially effective with different subjects. Attempts to correlate EMG and/or thermal parameters with headache parameters generally have failed to produce significant results, particularly in more recent and better-controlled studies; however, numerous technical and procedural difficulties have obscured meaningful interpretation of physiological data. Results with pseudofeedback do suggest a likely specific contribution of frontalis EMG to muscle contraction headaches, at least for some subjects. Comparable evidence for a specific contribution of thermal parameters to migraines is almost totally lacking. Clinical outcome research suggests that biofeedback in general may be more effective in younger anxious subjects who show no chronic habituation to drugs, and that there is little apparent benefit from repeating biofeedback for more than about 12 sessions maximum. Three broad areas for subsequent research are suggested: longitudinal study of EMG and thermal parameters in a naturalistic setting, specification of processes critically involved in biofeedback, and clinically relevant comparative outcome research with biofeedback and alternative therapies.

Interpersonal stress and style as predictors of biofeedback/relaxation training outcome: preliminary findings

Although the data base describing clinical outcome following biofeedback/relaxation training is accumulating, there have been relatively few attempts to predict short-term outcome, and even fewer for long-term outcome. Significant short-term outcome predictors have been identified, and they often allude to the level of psychological distress as a major factor affecting outcome. To investigate further the role of psychological variables in outcome prediction, this project presents preliminary findings that demonstrate the relationship involving interpersonal psychological stress, interpersonal style of behavior, and outcome. With a very heterogeneous group of patients (N = 39), measures of interpersonal style of behavior were used to discriminate correctly 80% of cases by outcome at the 3-month postadmission evaluation. With a more homogeneous group having somatic disorders alone (headache, Raynaud's, etc.), the accuracy of prediction at 3 months was 90%. No measures were capable of predicting long-term outcome with accuracies even moderately greater than chance. The results indicate that style of interpersonal behavior (e.g., managerial, dependent) and, to a lesser extent, interpersonal stress is predictive of short-term outcome following biofeedback/relaxation training. Individuals who tend to like responsibility and who are more executive and independent generally benefited more than doubtful, obedient, and depressed individuals. While the resulting prediction rates were only slightly more accurate than MMPI D and Pt subscales alone, the procedures provide additional information regarding the personality characteristics of successful and unsuccessful biofeedback clients, and may also provide the clinician with information regarding treatment choice if biofeedback is provided as an adjunct to psychotherapy.

Chronic and recurrent headaches in children and adolescents

Headache is a common chronic and recurrent symptom in children and adolescents. The author discusses the prevalence of headache, its differential diagnosis, interpretation of symptoms, methods of assessment, and pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment approaches.

Behavioral approaches to the management of chronic pain in children

This article focuses on the basic premises underlying the behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic pain, particularly as they apply to the less distinct pain disorders of childhood, such as obscure headache and abdominal pain. Pain behavior management procedures, relaxation techniques, and biofeedback training are discussed in detail in reviewing recent research developments in this area.