Risk of Alzheimer's disease and duration of NSAID use

Insulin Resistance as a Common Link Between Current Alzheimer's Disease Hypotheses

Almost 115 years ago, Alois Alzheimer described Alzheimer's disease (AD) for the first time. Since then, many hypotheses have been proposed. However, AD remains a severe health public problem. The current medical approaches for AD are limited to symptomatic interventions and the complexity of this disease has led to a failure rate of approximately 99.6%in AD clinical trials. In fact, no new drug has been approved for AD treatment since 2003. These failures indicate that we are failing in mimicking this disease in experimental models. Although most studies have focused on the amyloid cascade hypothesis of AD, the literature has made clear that AD is rather a multifactorial disorder. Therefore, the persistence in a single theory has resulted in lost opportunities. In this review, we aim to present the striking points of the long scientific path followed since the description of the first AD case and the main AD hypotheses discussed over the last decades. We also propose insulin resistance as a common link between many other hypotheses.

Microglia and neuroprotection: from in vitro studies to therapeutic applications

Microglia are the main immune cells in the brain, playing a role in both physiological and pathological conditions. Microglial involvement in neurodegenerative diseases is well-established, being microglial activation and neuroinflammation common features of these neuropathologies. Microglial activation has been considered harmful for neurons, but inflammatory state is not only associated with neurotoxic consequences, but also with neuroprotective effects, such as phagocytosis of dead neurons and clearance of debris. This brought to the idea of protective autoimmunity in the brain and to devise immunomodulatory therapies, aimed to specifically increase neuroprotective aspects of microglia. During the last years, several data supported the intrinsic neuroprotective function of microglia through the release of neuroprotective molecules. These data led to change the traditional view of microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: from the idea that these cells play an detrimental role for neurons due to a gain of their inflammatory function, to the proposal of a loss of microglial neuroprotective function as a causing factor in neuropathologies. This "microglial dysfunction hypothesis" points at the importance of understanding the mechanisms of microglial-mediated neuroprotection to develop new therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. In vitro models are very important to clarify the basic mechanisms of microglial-mediated neuroprotection, mainly for the identification of potentially effective neuroprotective molecules, and to design new approaches in a gene therapy set-up. Microglia could act as both a target and a vehicle for CNS gene delivery of neuroprotective factors, endogenously produced by microglia in physiological conditions, thus strengthening the microglial neuroprotective phenotype, even in a pathological situation.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Alzheimer's disease, the most prevalent dementia, is a prominent source of chronic illness in the elderly. Laboratory evidence suggests that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might prevent the onset of Alzheimer's disease. Since the early 1990s numerous observational epidemiological studies have also investigated this possibility. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to summarize and evaluate available evidence regarding exposure to nonaspirin NSAIDs and risk of Alzheimer's disease using meta-analyses of published studies.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using Medline, Biological Abstracts, and the Cochrane Library for publications 1960 onwards. All cross-sectional, retrospective, or prospective observational studies of Alzheimer's disease in relation to NSAID exposure were included in the analysis. At least 2 of 4 independent reviewers characterized each study by source of data and design, including method of classifying exposure and outcome, and evaluated the studies for eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus of all 4 reviewers.

RESULTS

Of 38 publications, 11 met the qualitative criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. For the 3 case-control and 4 cross-sectional studies, the combined risk estimate for development of Alzheimer's disease was 0.51 (95% Cl=0.40-0.66) for NSAID exposure. In the prospective studies, the estimate was 0.74 (95% Cl=0.62-0.89) for 4 studies reporting lifetime NSAID exposure and it was 0.42 (95% Cl=0.26-0.66) for the 3 studies reporting a duration of use of 2 or more years.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on analysis of prospective and nonprospective studies, NSAID exposure was associated with decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease. An issue that requires further exploration in future trials or observational studies is the temporal relationship between NSAID exposure and protection against Alzheimer's disease.

Does aspirin or other NSAIDs reduce the risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons? Results from a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the protective effect of NSAIDs and aspirin separately on cognitive decline in elderly subjects, controlling for consistent use of these agents over a prolonged period of time.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 1007 subjects, drawn from a population-based random sample of elderly individuals, 62-85 years old, who participated in a 3-year follow-up study. From this sample subjects were selected, who did use NSAIDs and completed all cognitive tests at both measurements (n=137), and subjects who did not use NSAIDs and completed all cognitive tests (n=475). Cognitive tests included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), tests for episodic memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test) and information processing speed (coding task). Cognitive decline was computed using Edwards-Nunnally method. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between NSAID (with and without aspirin) and decline in cognitive performance. Besides, the interaction of NSAIDs with age on cognitive decline was determined.

RESULTS

The relative risk estimates of decline in episodic memory (immediate recall) adjusted for age, gender, education, baseline MMSE, vascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and (rheumatoid) arthritis for aspirin users only was more than three times reduced (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.82). The odds ratio for decline in memory of NSAID use without aspirin, adjusted for age, gender, education, baseline MMSE, vascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and (rheumatoid) arthritis was not significant (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.39-2.93). The effect of aspirin was significant only in persons of 75 years and over (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01-0.81), not in subjects younger than 75 years (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.14-1.96). NSAIDs did not have benefit on information processing speed. In 92% of aspirin users a low dose of 100mg daily or less was used.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose aspirin might be protective for decline in memory in individuals of 75 years and over. The benefit of a low-dose aspirin does not support an anti-inflammatory effect, but suggests an antiplatelet effect. Therefore, a possible protective effect of low-dose aspirin on cognitive decline is likely only in subjects with aspirin use over a prolonged period of time.