Intravenous nifedipine to treat hypertension after coronary artery revascularization surgery. A comparison with sodium nitroprusside

Exploring the multiple effects of nifedipine and captopril administration in spontaneously hypertensive rats through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses

This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of two antihypertensive drugs, nifedipine and captopril, by exploring their main (blood pressure [BP]) and secondary effects (heart rate [HR] and QT interval [QT]) in spontaneously hypertensive rats. This study aimed to assess the relationship between PKs and PDs. Using these PD parameters, BP, HR, and QT during coadministration were estimated. The coadministration of nifedipine and captopril resulted in an increase in nifedipine's total body clearance (CLtot) and a reduction in its mean residence time (MRT) with an increase in the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) and volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) of captopril. However, no significant PK interactions were observed. During monotherapy, BP reduced rapidly following nifedipine infusion. Subsequently, despite the increase in nifedipine plasma concentration, BP recovered, likely because of homeostasis. Similar results were observed with coadministration. Subsequently, BP demonstrated a sustained reduction that was greater than or equal to the additive effect estimated from each PK. Captopril exhibited a minimal effect on HR, except for a transient increase observed immediately after starting infusion, consistent with observations during coadministration. Subsequently, the HR reduction was nearly equal to that calculated from the nifedipine PK. QT prolongation was more rapid with captopril than with nifedipine. Although QT prolongation during the initial 60 min of coadministration was approximately the sum of both effects, the recovery period to baseline QT was faster than that in the simulation.

Drug in Adhesive Transdermal Formulation of Valsartan and Nifedipine: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Rats

Background:

The increasing complications associated with hypertension often require a combination of two or more drugs acting through different routes to counter the elevated blood pressure.

Objective:

The present investigation envisaged at preparing and evaluating a transdermal formulation containing gelled microemulsion drug in adhesive (DIA) patch for simultaneous systemic delivery of valsartan and nifedipine aimed at effective management of hypertension.

Methods:

An optimized microemulsion was prepared by using Captex® 500 (7.34% w/w), Capmul® MCM (4.24% w/w), Acrysol EL 135 (24.43% w/w), Transcutol P® (5% w/w) and water (58.9% w/w). Gelling was contributed by polyvinylpyrrolidone K 90F and polyethyleneimine where the latter also conferred skin adhesion properties to the patch. DIA patches were evaluated for in vitro drug release as well as in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in rats.

Results:

In vitro permeation of nifedipine or valsartan from the selected DIA patch was 10.67-fold and 1.25-fold higher as compared to their aqueous dispersions. The relative bioavailability of nifedipine was 1.34 and that of valsartan was 2.18 from this DIA patch with respect to the oral administration of their aqueous suspension.

Conclusion:

Transdermal delivery of either drug alone was not effective in reducing methyl prednisolone acetate-induced hypertension, whereas, simultaneous transdermal delivery of both drugs from DIA patch effectively maintained systolic blood pressure at a normal level in these rats for 20 h.

Microemulsion Transdermal Formulation for Simultaneous Delivery of Valsartan and Nifedipine: Formulation by Design

The objective of the study was to optimize the proportion of different components for formulating oil in water microemulsion formulation meant for simultaneous transdermal delivery of two poorly soluble antihypertensive drugs. Surface response methodology of Box-Behnken design was utilized to evaluate the effect of two oils (Captex 500 - x1 and Capmul MCM - x2) and surfactant (Acrysol EL135 - x3) on response y1 (particle size), y2 (solubility of valsartan), and y3 (solubility of nifedipine). The important factors which significantly affected the responses were identified and validated using ANOVA. The model was diagnosed using normal plot of residuals and Box-Cox plot. The design revealed an inverse correlation between particle size and concentration of Capmul MCM and Acrysol EL 135. However, an increase in concentration of Captex 500 led to an increase in particle size of microemulsion. Solubility of valsartan decreased while that of nifedipine increased with increase in concentration of Captex 500. Capmul MCM played a significant role in increasing the solubility of valsartan. The effect of Acrysol EL 135 on solubility of both drugs, although significant, was only marginal as compared to that of Captex 500 and Capmul MCM. The optimized microemulsion was able to provide an enhancement ratio of 27.21 and 63.57-fold for valsartan and nifedipine, respectively, with respect to drug dispersion in aqueous surfactant system when evaluated for permeation studies. The current studies candidly suggest the scope of microemulsion systems for solubilizing as well as promoting the transport of both drugs across rat skin at an enhanced permeation rate.

Pressure induces intracellular calcium changes in juxtaglomerular cells in perfused afferent arterioles

Calcium (Ca(2+)) has an important role in nearly all types of cellular secretion, with a particularly novel role in the juxtaglomerular (JG) cells in the kidney. In JG cells, Ca(2+) inhibits renin secretion, which is a major regulator of blood pressure and renal hemodynamics. However, whether alterations in afferent arteriolar (Af-Art) pressure change intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in JG cells and whether [Ca(2+)](i) comes from extracellular or intracellular sources remains unknown. We hypothesize that increases in perfusion pressure in the Af-Art result in elevations in [Ca(2+)](i) in JG cells. We isolated and perfused Af-Art of C57BL6 mice and measured changes in [Ca(2+)](i) in JG cells in response to perfusion pressure changes. The JG cells' [Ca(2+)](i) was 93.3±2.2 nM at 60 mm Hg perfusion pressure and increased to 111.3±13.4, 119.6±7.3, 130.3±2.9 and 140.8±12.1 nM at 80, 100, 120 and 140 mm Hg, respectively. At 120 mm Hg, increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were reduced in mice receiving the following treatments: (1) the mechanosensitive cation channel blocker, gadolinium (94.6±7.5 nM); (2) L-type calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (105.8±7.5 nM); and (3) calcium-free solution plus ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (96.0±5.8 nM). Meanwhile, the phospholipase C inhibitor, inositol triphosphate receptor inhibitor, T-type calcium channel blocker, N-type calcium channel blocker and Ca(2+)-ATPase inhibitor did not influence changes in [Ca(2+)](i) in JG cells. In summary, JG cell [Ca(2+)](i) rise as perfusion pressure increases; furthermore, the calcium comes from extracellular sources, specifically mechanosensitive cation channels and L-type calcium channels.

Drugs for the perioperative control of hypertension: current issues and future directions

The management of hypertension continues to pose important challenges. Recent developments have established the importance of more rigorous blood pressure control in the community. In the perioperative setting, hypertension has long been recognised as undesirable, although the adverse impact of high blood pressure on the acute risks of elective surgery may have been previously overstated.A number of agents and techniques are available to control blood pressure perioperatively. These include principally general and regional anaesthetics, alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, peripheral alpha(1)- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists, dopamine D(1A)-receptor agonists (fenoldopam), and nitric oxide donors. Recent years have seen important developments in the receptor selectivity of new compounds and in pharmacokinetics, particularly esterase metabolism. The future study of genomics may enable us to identify patients at risk for hypertension-related adverse events and target therapies most effectively to these high-risk groups.

Comparison of clevidipine with sodium nitroprusside in the control of blood pressure after coronary artery surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We set out to compare the efficacy of clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside infusions in the control of blood pressure and the haemodynamic changes they produce in hypertensive patients after operation for elective coronary bypass grafting.

METHODS

Thirty patients were randomly allocated to receive either clevidipine or sodium nitroprusside after their mean arterial pressure (MAP) had reached > 90 mmHg for at least 10 min in the postoperative period. The MAP was continuously measured and related to time. Thus, the efficacy of the drugs in controlling arterial pressure could be inversely related to the total area under the MAP-time curve outside a target MAP range of 70-80 mmHg normalized per hour (AUC(MAP) mmHg min h(-1)). Haemodynamic variables and the number of dose-rate adjustments required to maintain MAP were also studied.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy (AUC(MAP) mmHg min h(-1)) of clevidipine (106 +/- 25 mmHg min h(-1)) compared with sodium nitroprusside (101 +/- 28 mmHg min h(-1)). Nor was any significant difference found in the total number of dose adjustments required to control MAP within the target range. The heart rate in patients receiving clevidipine increased less than in those given sodium nitroprusside. Stroke volume, central venous pressure and pulmonary artery pressure were significantly reduced upon administration of sodium nitroprusside but not of clevidipine.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside in their efficacy in controlling MAP. The haemodynamic changes, including tachycardia, were less pronounced with clevidipine than with sodium nitroprusside.

Calcium antagonists reduce cardiovascular complications after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the efficacy of calcium antagonists (CAs) in reducing death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND

Calcium antagonists may reduce complications after cardiac surgery-namely, death, MI, and renal failure. However, they are underused, possibly due to the results from previous observational studies.

METHODS

Both MEDLINE (1966 to December 2001) and EMBASE (1980 to December 2001) were searched, with supplementation by reference list searches. No language restrictions were applied. Included studies were randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative (first 48 h) CA use (intravenous or oral) during aortocoronary bypass or valve surgery. Studies were excluded if they exclusively recruited transplant recipients, individuals <18 years old, or patients with pre-existing SVT. Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality by using the Jadad score; a minimal score of 1/5 was required. Forty-one studies, encompassing 3,327 patients, were included. No studies assessed treatment exclusively with short-acting oral nifedipine. Treatment effects were calculated using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q test.

RESULTS

Calcium antagonists significantly reduced MI (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 to 0.91; p = 0.02) and ischemia (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.72; p < 0.001). Non-dihydropyridines significantly reduced SVT (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.93; p = 0.02). Calcium antagonists were associated with trends toward decreased mortality during aortocoronary bypass (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.70, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of CAs during cardiac surgery significantly reduced rates of MI, ischemia, and SVT. Further study using large RCTs is justified.

Coronary and systemic hemodynamic effects of clevidipine, an ultra-short-acting calcium antagonist, for treatment of hypertension after coronary artery surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate the use of clevidipine, a new vascular selective, ultra-short-acting calcium antagonist for blood pressure control after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

The effects of clevidipine on central hemodynamics, myocardial blood flow and metabolism were studied at two different phases after CABG. In phase 1 (n=13), the hypertensive phase, the effects of clevidipine were compared to those of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) when used to control postoperative hypertension. In phase 2 (n=9), the normotensive phase, a clevidipine dose-response relationship was established.

RESULTS

At a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 75 mmHg, systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and heart rate (HR) were lower, preload, stroke volume (SV) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were higher, while there were no differences in myocardial lactate metabolism or oxygen extraction with clevidipine compared to SNP. In the normotensive phase, clevidipine induced a dose-dependent decrease in MAP (-19%), SVR (-27%) and PVR (-15%), accompanied by an increase in SV (10%), but no reflex increase in HR or changes in cardiac preload. Clevidipine caused a direct coronary vasodilation, as indicated by a decrease in myocardial oxygen extraction from 54% to 45%. Myocardial lactate metabolism was unaffected by clevidipine. The blood clearance of clevidipine was 0.05 l x min(-1) x kg(-1), the volume of distribution at steady state was 0.08 l x kg(-1) and the initial and terminal half-lives were <1 min and 4 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clevidipine rapidly reduced MAP and induced a systemic, pulmonary and coronary vasodilation with no effect on venous capacitance vessels or HR. Clevidipine caused no adverse effects on myocardial lactate metabolism. Clevidipine thus appears suitable to control blood pressure after CABG.

Sodium nitroprusside: twenty years and counting

SNP remains an effective, reliable, and commonly used drug for the rapid reduction of significant arterial hypertension regardless of the etiology, for afterload reduction in the face of low CO when blood volume is normal or increased, and for intraoperative induced hypotension. After establishing indwelling arterial monitoring, an initial infusion rate of 0.3-0.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 is begun with titration as needed up to 2.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Higher rates for brief periods of time (10 min) are acceptable. The use of alternative drugs to reduce the dose or shorten the duration of infusion should be considered when the 2.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 range is exceeded (Table 1). SNP should not be used by individuals unfamiliar with its potency and metabolic pathways, as the many reports of adverse reactions testify. Careful attention to infusion rates, particularly in patients at risk for depleted thiosulfate stores, is mandatory, and the use of other drugs in conjunction with or instead of SNP should always be considered. As with many therapeutic interventions, SNP requires careful administration to appropriately selected patients by a clinician who knows its inherent hazards. Despite its toxicity, SNP is popular because it is often the most (in some cases, the only) effective drug in some difficult clinical circumstances.

Intravenous nifedipine for prevention of myocardial ischaemia after coronary revascularization

We sought to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of a continuous infusion of nifedipine given for prevention of myocardial ischaemia following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Patients scheduled for elective CABG, who had good left ventricular function, were included. Only normotensive patients who did not require treatment with vasoactive drugs and were bleeding less than 100 ml.hr-1 following surgery were included. The patients were randomly distributed into two groups: a control group not receiving any treatment and a treated group receiving a bolus (3 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 for 5 min) and maintenance (0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) infusion of nifedipine, starting upon arrival in the recovery room and continuing for four hours. Patients given nifedipine were compared with control patients in order to determine the effects of nifedipine on haemodynamic function and on the postoperative incidence of hypotension, hypertension, myocardial ischaemia and infarction. Continuous 2-lead Holter monitoring was used to detect myocardial ischaemia. Infarction was diagnosed by 12-lead ECGs and by assessment of the MB-isoenzyme creatine kinase. The infusion of nifedipine rapidly achieved and maintained plasma concentrations between 30 and 40 ng.ml-1. The pharmacokinetic studies revealed a systemic clearance of nifedipine of 0.371 +/- 0.101 L.hr-1.kg-1, an apparent volume of distribution of 0.764 +/- 0.288 L.kg-1 and an elimination half-life of 1.4 +/- 0.6 hr. No correlation was found between plasma concentration of nifedipine and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The incidence of postoperative hypotension (MAP < 70 mmHg) and hypertension (MAP > 100 mmHg) was comparable between the groups. All haemodynamic variables were similar in both groups during the study period. Of 23 patients who received nifedipine, none showed evidence of ischaemia within six hours of starting the infusion. During the same period, five of 24 patients in the control group had ST-segment deviation suggestive of myocardial ischaemia (P = 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Three patients in the control group and none in the nifedipine group suffered perioperative myocardial infarction (P = NS). In conclusion, the continuous infusion of nifedipine used in this study is safe and reduces the incidence of myocardial ischaemia in normotensive patients with good left ventricular function following CABG. Further studies of larger number of patients are required to determine the role of calcium entry blockers following coronary artery surgery.