Direct determination of oil/saline partition coefficients

Distinctive recruitment of endogenous sleep-promoting neurons by volatile anesthetics and a nonimmobilizer

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies demonstrate that anesthetic-induced unconsciousness is accompanied by activation of hypothalamic sleep-promoting neurons, which occurs through both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms. However, the correlation between drug exposure, neuronal activation, and onset of hypnosis remains incompletely understood. Moreover, the degree to which anesthetics activate both endogenous populations of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic sleep-promoting neurons within the ventrolateral preoptic (VLPO) and median preoptic nuclei remains unknown.

METHODS

Mice were exposed to oxygen, hypnotic doses of isoflurane or halothane, or 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6), a nonimmobilizer. Hypothalamic brain slices prepared from anesthetic-naive mice were also exposed to oxygen, volatile anesthetics, or F6 ex vivo, both in the presence and absence of tetrodotoxin. Double-label immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify the number of c-Fos-immunoreactive nuclei in the GABAergic subpopulation of neurons in the VLPO and the median preoptic areas to test the hypothesis that volatile anesthetics, but not nonimmobilizers, activate sleep-promoting neurons in both nuclei.

RESULTS

In vivo exposure to isoflurane and halothane doubled the fraction of active, c-Fos-expressing GABAergic neurons in the VLPO, whereas F6 failed to affect VLPO c-Fos expression. Both in the presence and absence of tetrodotoxin, isoflurane dose-dependently increased c-Fos expression in GABAergic neurons ex vivo, whereas F6 failed to alter expression. In GABAergic neurons of the median preoptic area, c-Fos expression increased with isoflurane and F6, but not with halothane exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Anesthetic unconsciousness is not accompanied by global activation of all putative sleep-promoting neurons. However, within the VLPO hypnotic doses of volatile anesthetics, but not nonimmobilizers, activate putative sleep-promoting neurons, correlating with the appearance of the hypnotic state.

Inhaled anesthetics and immobility: mechanisms, mysteries, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration

Studies using molecular modeling, genetic engineering, neurophysiology/pharmacology, and whole animals have advanced our understanding of where and how inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration; MAC) by actions on the spinal cord. Numerous ligand- and voltage-gated channels might plausibly mediate MAC, and specific amino acid sites in certain receptors present likely candidates for mediation. However, in vivo studies to date suggest that several channels or receptors may not be mediators (e.g., gamma-aminobutyric acid A, acetylcholine, potassium, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3, opioids, and alpha(2)-adrenergic), whereas other receptors/channels (e.g., glycine, N-methyl-D-aspartate, and sodium) remain credible candidates.

The convulsant and anesthetic properties of cis-trans isomers of 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 1,2-dichloroethylene

The differences in potencies of optical isomers of anesthetics support the hypothesis that anesthetics act by specific receptor interactions. Diastereoisomerism and geometrical isomerism offer further tests of this hypothesis but have not been explored. They are the subject of this report. We quantified the nonimmobilizing and convulsant properties of the cis and trans diastereomers of the nonimmobilizer 2N (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane). Although the lipophilicity of the diastereomers predicts complete anesthesia at the partial pressures applied, neither diastereomer had anesthetic activity alone, and the cis form may have a small (10%) capacity to antagonize anesthesia, as defined by additive effects on the MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration required to suppress movement to a noxious stimulus in 50% of rats) of desflurane. Both diastereomers produced convulsions, the cis form being nearly twice as potent as the trans form: convulsant 50% effective dose (mean +/- SD) was 0.039 +/- 0.009 atmospheres (atm) for the purified cis and 0.064 +/- 0.009 atm for the purified trans isomer. The MAC value for cis-1,2-dichloroethylene equaled 0.0071 +/- 0.0006 atm, and MAC for trans-1,2-dichloroethylene equaled 0.0183 +/- 0.0031 atm. In qualitative accord with the Meyer-Overton hypothesis, the greater cis potency was associated with a greater lipophilicity. However, the product of MAC x solubility differed between the cis and trans isomers by 40%-50%. We conclude that neither the cis nor trans isomers of 2N have anesthetic properties, but isomerism does influence 2N's convulsant properties and the anesthetic properties of dichloroethylene. These isomeric effects may be as useful in defining receptor-anesthetic interactions as those found with optical isomers.

IMPLICATIONS

Cis-trans isomerism can influence the convulsant properties of the nonimmobilizer 2N (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane) and the anesthetic properties of dichloroethylene. Such isomeric effects may be as useful as those found with optical isomers in defining receptor-anesthetic interactions.

Distinctly different interactions of anesthetic and nonimmobilizer with transmembrane channel peptides

Although it plays no clinical role in general anesthesia, gramicidin A, a transmembrane channel peptide, provides an excellent model for studying the specific interaction between volatile anesthetics and membrane proteins at the molecular level. We show here that a pair of structurally similar volatile anesthetic and nonimmobilizer (nonanesthetic), 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane (F3) and 1, 2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6), respectively, interacts differently with the transmembrane peptide. With 400 microM gramicidin A in a vesicle suspension of 60 mM phosphatidylcholine-phosphatidylglycerol (PC/PG), the intermolecular cross-relaxation rate constants between (19)F of F3 and (1)H in the chemical shift regions for the indole and backbone amide protons were 0.0106 +/- 0.0007 (n = 12) and 0.0105 +/- 0.0014 (n = 8) s(-1), respectively. No cross-relaxation was measurable between (19)F of F6 and protons in these regions. Sodium transport study showed that with 75 microM gramicidin A in a vesicle suspension of 66 mM PC/PG, F3 increased the (23)Na apparent efflux rate constant from 149.7 +/- 7.2 of control (n = 3) to 191.7 +/- 12.2 s(-1) (n = 3), and the apparent influx rate constant from 182.1 +/- 15.4 to 222.8 +/- 21.7 s(-1) (n = 3). In contrast, F6 had no effects on either influx or efflux rate. It is concluded that the ability of general anesthetics to interact with amphipathic residues near the peptide-lipid-water interface and the inability of nonimmobilizer to do the same may represent some characteristics of anesthetic-protein interaction that are of importance to general anesthesia.