The Laryngeal Mask and High-Frequency Jet Ventilation for Resection of High Tracheal Stenosis

Laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube for airway management in tracheal surgery: a case-control matching analysis and review of the current literature

OBJECTIVES

The endotracheal tube (ETT) and the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) are possible strategies for airway management during tracheal resection and reconstruction for tracheal and laryngotracheal stenosis. The goal of the study was to analyse and compare outcomes in the LMA and ETT groups.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2020, a total of 184 patients affected by postintubation, post-tracheostomy and idiopathic stenosis who had tracheal or laryngotracheal resections and reconstructions via a cervicotomy were retrospectively enrolled in this single-centre study. In 29 patients, airway management was achieved through LMA during tracheal surgery, whereas in 155 patients, it was achieved through ETT. A case-control matching analysis was performed with a 1:1 ratio, according to age, gender, body mass index, aetiology and length of stenosis (1-4 cm), resulting in 22 patients managed through LMA (LMA group) matched with 22 patients managed through ETT (ETT group).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in the reintubation rate, 30-day mortality and postoperative length of stay. Operative time was shorter in patients with LMA (96.23 ± 34.72 min in the ETT group vs 76.14 ± 26.94 min in the LMA group; P = 0.043). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate and stay were lower in the LMA group [18 in the ETT group vs 8 in the LMA group, odds ratio = 10.17, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.79-57.79; P = 0. 009; 22.77 ± 16.68 h in ETT group vs 9.23 ± 13.51 h in LMA group; P = 0.005]. Dysphonia was more frequent in the ETT group than in the LMA group (20 in the ETT group vs 11 in the LMA group, odds ratio = 13.79, CI 95% 1.86-102; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

LMA is a feasible option for airway management in tracheal surgery, with lower operative time, ICU admission rate, ICU length of stay and postoperative dysphonia occurrence.

Airway management by i-gel for open tracheal resection and reconstruction via combined cervicotomy and sternotomy surgical approach: A case report

Surgical resection and tracheal reconstruction are the most effective treatment options for airway stenosis. Tracheal surgery is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach and a highly specialized team of anesthesiologists and thoracic surgeons that are "sharing the airways". Several airway management tools, different devices, and various approaches can be required to ensure ventilation and gas exchange. We describe the case of a patient affected by tight tracheal stenosis, submitted to tracheal resection and reconstruction via combined cervicotomy and sternotomy surgical approach. Airway management was successfully performed by i-gel® (Intersurgical, UK) supraglottic device.

Various Uses of Laryngeal Mask Airway during Tracheal Surgery

BACKGROUND

 The use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ventilation in surgeries to be performed in upper tracheal stenosis has been reported in the case series. However, there is no generally accepted standardized approach for the use of LMA. In this study, LMA usage areas and advantages of trachea surgery were examined.

METHODS

 The records of 21 patients who underwent tracheal surgery using LMA ventilation between March 2016 and May 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The patient data were analyzed according to age, gender, mean follow-up time, surgical indication, mean tracheal resection length, anastomosis duration, mean oxygen saturation, mean end-tidal CO₂ levels, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

 Four patients were female and 17 were male, their median age was 43 (11-72 range) and the mean follow-up time was 17.6 months. The most common surgical indication was postintubation tracheal stenosis. The mean tracheal resection length was 26.6 mm and the mean anastomosis duration was 11.3 minutes. The mean pulse oximetry and mean end-tidal CO₂ during laryngeal mask ventilation was 97.6% ± 2.1 and 38.1 ± 2.8 mm Hg, respectively. Postoperative complications were higher in patients with comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

 LMA-assisted tracheal surgery is a method that can be used safely as a standard technique in the surgery of benign and malignant diseases of both the upper and lower airway performed on pediatric patients, patients with tracheostomy, and suitable patients with tracheoesophageal fistula.

Anesthetic considerations for tracheobronchial resection in oncologic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anesthesia for the resection and reconstruction of the tracheobronchial tree for neoplastic disease is challenging, both from surgical as well as anesthetic points of view. There are no published recommendations or guidelines addressing anesthetic and airway management dilemmas that arise during these surgical interventions. This review presents key aspects of preoperative imaging evaluation, surgical planning, as well as anesthesia and airway management during these complex cases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newly published articles highlight both the surgical and anesthetic challenges encountered during tracheobronchial resections and emphasize the importance of creating specialized, high-volume centers for good patient outcomes. Of great importance is the development of a preoperative joint anesthetic-surgical plan which includes a patient-specific airway management strategy. This review presents newer and less commonly employed anesthetic management strategies which have been recently described in the literature to allow expansion of care to patients who were previously deemed too high risk for surgery.

SUMMARY

With advances in technology, the use of classical ventilation methods in conjunction with newer alternatives, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, creates the premise for a more individualized, safer and controlled approach to tracheobronchial resections for oncologic purposes.

Successful ventilation through a Rüsch intubation guide catheter in severe laryngotracheal stenosis

BACKGROUND

Providing adequate ventilation may remain complex in patients with severe proximal laryngotracheal stenosis, especially when the airway is shared with the surgeon during tracheal resection surgery. We describe an effective alternative to standard endotracheal intubation using a Rüsch flexible intubation guide catheter.

METHODS

In two patients undergoing tracheal repair surgery, we failed to insert a 5.0 inner diameter endotracheal tube (6.9 mm outer diameter) or a 6.0 mm outer diameter endoscope through the laryngotracheal stenosis. However, using indirect laryngoscopy, a 6.0 outer diameter Rüsch flexible intubation guide catheter was passed successfully through the vocal cords and then through the stenosis. Controlled ventilation was achieved by means of the Rüsch guide, provided with its two large Murphy's eyes. When the trachea was opened, the Rüsch guide was removed just enough for the surgeons to place a Montandon tracheal tube, at that point taking over ventilation. A 7.0 inner diameter endotracheal cuffed tube had been inserted onto the Rüsch guide and left pending upstream from the vocal cords. Once the posterior tracheal wall was sutured, this endotracheal cuffed tube was slid along the Rüsch guide through the vocal cords with the cuff placed beyond the tracheal sutures.

RESULTS

Controlled ventilation through the Rüsch flexible intubation guide catheter showed satisfying and stable ventilatory parameters in both patients. Inspiratory pressures of 25-30 mmHg were enough to reach adequate tidal volumes around 450 ml. End tidal CO₂ was kept between 35 and 40 mmHg (PaCO₂ showed similar values). Standard endotracheal intubation at the end of the tracheal resection was easy and safe thanks to the Rüsch guide still in place between the vocal cords.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest an effective and reliable method using a Rüsch flexible intubation guide catheter for airway management in patients suffering from laryngotracheal stenosis in the setting of tracheal repair surgery.

One-lung Ventilation for Thoracic Surgery: Current Perspectives

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is an anesthesiological technique that is increasingly being used beyond thoracic surgery. This requires specific skills and knowledge about airway management, maintenance of gas exchange and prevention of acute lung injury. Sometimes maintaining adequate gas exchange and minimizing acute lung injury may be opposing processes. Parameters validated for OLV titration still have not been found, but a multimodal approach based on low tidal volume, end-expiratory pressure application and alveolar recruitment maneuvers is considered the best way to ensure protective ventilation and reduce lung damage. The purpose of this review is to analyze all these factors using the latest scientific evidence and the opinions of the most influential authors.

New Approaches to Airway Management in Tracheal Resections-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Although endotracheal intubation, surgical crossfield intubation, and jet ventilation are standard techniques for airway management in tracheal resections, there are also reports of new approaches, ranging from regional anesthesia to extracorporeal support. The objective was to outline the entire spectrum of new airway techniques.

DESIGN

The literature databases PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for prospective and retrospective trials as well as case reports on tracheal resections.

SETTING

No restrictions applied to hospital types or settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing surgical resections of noncongenital tracheal stenoses with end-to-end anastomoses.

INTERVENTIONS

Airway management techniques were divided into conventional and new approaches and analyzed regarding their potential risks and benefits.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 59 publications (n = 797 patients) were included. The majority of publications (71.2%) describe conventional airway techniques. Endotracheal tube placement after induction of general anesthesia and surgical crossfield intubation after incision of the trachea were used most frequently without major complications. A total of 7 new approaches were identified, including 4 different regional anesthetic techniques (25 cases), supraglottic airways (4 cases), and new forms of extracorporeal support (25 cases). Overall failure rates of new techniques were low (1.8%). Details on patient selection and procedural specifics are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

New approaches have several theoretical benefits, yet further research is required to establish criteria for patient selection and evaluate procedural safety. Given the low level of evidence, it currently is impossible to compare methods of airway management regarding outcome-related risks and benefits.

The Veres adapter: clinical experience with a new device for jet ventilation via a laryngeal mask airway during flexible bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND

A new device was developed to deliver high-frequency jet ventilation via a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). We investigated its use during flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in anesthetized patients.

METHODS

Thirty adults were studied during interventional bronchoscopy. After facemask ventilation, the Veres adapter was connected to a size 4 or 5 LMA, and superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation was performed. Oxygen saturation, transcutaneous carbon dioxide, supraglottic airway pressure, and hemodynamic data were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Procedures were performed under stable hemodynamic conditions. Short procedure times and fast recovery were observed. Mild hypercapnia was the most common minor adverse effect (n = 16). One patient developed a pneumothorax after peripheral biopsy, 1 patient had a stiff chest during bronchoscopy, resulting in high airway pressures, and 1 patient required continuous positive airway pressure mask ventilation in the postoperative care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the clinical use of the Veres adapter in conjunction with an LMA to achieve rapid surgical access and adequate ventilation during flexible bronchoscopy. As an alternative to the use of an endotracheal tube, the new system may better maintain the airway during interventional and diagnostic bronchoscopy because of the larger diameter conduit.

Laryngeal mask airways in ear, nose, and throat procedures

The use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and its variants in ear, nose, and throat procedures have been extensively described in case reports, retrospective reviews, and randomized clinical trials. The LMA has developed a considerable following because of its lack of tracheal stimulation, which can be a considerable advantage in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures. The incidence of coughing on emergence has been shown to be lower with the LMA than with the endotracheal tube (ETT). Although other approaches to smooth emergence have been described, few would argue that it is as easy to achieve a smooth emergence with an ETT as with an LMA. Although patients certainly exist for whom the LMA is contraindicated, many will experience better results with the LMA because of the features delineated in this article.

Use of a ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway and a Ravussin cricothyroidotomy needle in the management of laryngeal and subglottic stenosis causing upper airway obstruction

We report the successful use of a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) as a dedicated airway to allow fibre-optic inspection and passage through a tightly stenosed glottic and subglottic lesion, before fibre-optic-guided transtracheal placement of a Ravussin needle and jet ventilation. The described technique avoided both tracheostomy and the potential of 'seeding' the tumour by passage of the needle through the mass. The PLMA may be a useful 'dedicated airway' and has several advantages over the classic LMA(double dagger) and intubating LMA when used for this purpose. These include improved airway seal and reduced risk of aspiration. Four other cases of use of the PLMA as a dedicated airway during management of difficult airways are discussed. double daggerLMA is the property of Intavent Ltd.

Anesthesia for patients with a mediastinal mass

Anesthesia for patients with mediastinal masses carries a significant risk for fatal or near-fatal cardiorespiratory events. Careful history taking and thorough preoperative investigation, including CT, identify most susceptible patients. Preoperative fiberoptic bronchoscopy performed by or involving the anesthesiologist is invaluable for determining the plan for intubation and ventilation. A coordinated approach involving anesthesiologists and surgeons is essential.

Anesthesia for airway surgery

Surgery of the upper airway requires diagnostic or therapeutic manipulation of the respiratory tree despite ongoing ventilation. Whether internal or external access to the conducting airway is required, anesthesiologist and surgeon, who must work together closely, share the airway. The anesthetic technique is influenced by the chosen mode of ventilation.

Reinforcement of an end-to-end Tracheal Resection Anastomosis with Fibrin Glue: A Case Report

Tracheal resection and primary anastomosis is the treatment of choice for a short-segment stenosis. However, the procedure does carry the risk of two potentially fatal complications: anastomosis breakdown and leak. We describe the case of a 67-year-old man who was treated for a 3-cm tracheal stenosis secondary to a prolonged intubation and multiple tracheostomies. The patient underwent a tracheal resection and primary anastomosis. The anastomosis was reinforced with fibrin sealant, which created an airtight seal. The patient was extubated postoperatively, and he healed without complication. Fibrin sealant is a convenient, safe, and effective material for reinforcing anastomotic suture lines.

Laryngeal mask airway and high-frequency jet ventilation for the resection of a high-grade upper tracheal stenosis

The surgical resection of a high-grade tracheal stenosis presents a special case of a difficult airway. A 20-year-old male was treated for a 45-mm long tracheal stenosis with 60% reduction of the patent airway area beginning 25 mm below the glottis. To avoid manipulations of the affected segment before surgical exposure of the trachea was established, strictly supraglottic ventilation via a laryngeal mask airway was performed. During removal of the stenosis and creation of the anastomosis, transglottic high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is a convenient technique that enables optimal access to the operation field. Changing from HFJV to conventional ventilation after completion of the anastomosis is not necessary, and the jet catheter can be left in place until the end of the anesthesia.

The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway

We conducted a randomized, cross-over study of 20 paralyzed anesthetized adult patients to test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position (assessed fiberoptically) vary with head and neck position for the flexible (FLMA) and standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Both devices were inserted into each patient in random order. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiberoptic position (including degree of rotation) were documented in four head and neck positions (neutral first, then flexion, then extension and rotation in random order) for each device. The size 5 was used for all patients, and the intracuff pressure was set at 60 cm H2O in the neutral position. All airway devices were inserted at the first attempt. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was similar for the FLMA and LMA in the neutral (22 vs 21 cm H2O), flexed (26 vs 26 cm H2O), and extended positions (19 vs 18 cm H2O) but was slightly higher for the LMA when the head was rotated (19 vs 22 cm H2O; P = 0.04). Compared with the neutral position, oropharyngeal leak pressure for the LMA was higher with flexion (26 vs 21 cm H2O; P = 0.0004) and lower with extension (18 vs 21 cm H2O; P = 0.03) but similar with rotation. Compared with the neutral position, oropharyngeal leak pressure for the FLMA was higher with flexion (26 vs 22 cm H2O; P = 0.0001) and lower with extension (19 vs 22 cm H2O; P = 0.03) and rotation (19 vs 22 cm H2O; P = 0.03). The difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure between flexion and extension was 7 and 8 cm H2O for the FLMA and LMA, respectively. Fiberoptic position was similar between devices and was unchanged by head and neck position. Rotation was not detected fiberoptically. We conclude that there are small changes in oropharyngeal leak pressure but no changes in cuff position in different head and neck positions for the FLMA and LMA. Oropharyngeal leak pressure may be improved by head and neck flexion and by avoiding extension.

IMPLICATIONS

There are small changes in oropharyngeal leak pressure but no changes in cuff position in different head and neck positions for the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways. Oropharyngeal leak pressure may be improved by head and neck flexion and by avoiding extension.