The Effect of Remifentanil on Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during step-wise increases in blood pressure during anaesthesia: A nonrandomised interventional trial

BACKGROUND

Classically, cerebral autoregulation (CA) entails cerebral blood flow (CBF) remaining constant by cerebrovascular tone adapting to fluctuations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) between ∼60 and ∼150 mmHg. However, this is not an on-off mechanism; previous work has suggested that vasomotor tone is proportionally related to CA function. During propofol-based anaesthesia, there is cerebrovascular vasoconstriction, and static CA remains intact. Sevoflurane-based anaesthesia induces cerebral vasodilation and attenuates CA dose-dependently. It is unclear how this translates to dynamic CA across a range of blood pressures in the autoregulatory range.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of step-wise increases in MAP between 60 and 100 mmHg, using phenylephrine, on dynamic CA during propofol- and sevoflurane-based anaesthesia.

DESIGN

A nonrandomised interventional trial.

SETTING

Single centre enrolment started on 11 January 2019 and ended on 23 September 2019.

PATIENTS

We studied American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients undergoing noncardiothoracic, nonneurosurgical and nonlaparoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia.

INTERVENTION

In this study, cerebrovascular tone was manipulated in the autoregulatory range by increasing MAP step-wise using phenylephrine in patients receiving either propofol- or sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. MAP and mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA Vmean ) were measured in ASA I and II patients, anaesthetised with either propofol ( n  = 26) or sevoflurane ( n  = 28), during 10 mmHg step-wise increments of MAP between 60 and 100 mmHg. Static CA was determined by plotting 2-min averaged MCA Vmean versus MAP. Dynamic CA was determined using transfer function analysis and expressed as the phase lead (°) between MAP and MCA Vmean oscillations, created with positive pressure ventilation with a frequency of 6 min -1 .

MAIN OUTCOMES

The primary outcome of this study was the response of dynamic CA during step-wise increases in MAP during propofol- and sevoflurane-based anaesthesia.

RESULTS

MAP levels achieved per step-wise increments were comparable between anaesthesia regiment (63 ± 3, 72 ± 2, 80 ± 2, 90 ± 2, 100 ± 3 mmHg, and 61 ± 4, 71 ± 2, 80 ± 2, 89 ± 2, 98 ± 4 mmHg for propofol and sevoflurane, respectively). MCA Vmean increased more during step-wise MAP increments for sevoflurane compared to propofol ( P ≤0.001). Dynamic CA improved during propofol (0.73° mmHg -1 , 95% CI 0.51 to 0.95; P  ≤ 0.001)) and less pronounced during sevoflurane-based anaesthesia (0.21° mmHg -1 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.42, P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

During general anaesthesia, dynamic CA is dependent on MAP, also within the autoregulatory range. This phenomenon was more pronounced during propofol anaesthesia than during sevoflurane.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03816072 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03816072 ).

Propofol/Remifentanil Anesthesia Might Not Alter the Middle Cerebral Artery Diameter by Digital Subtraction Angiography

INTRODUCTION

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) enables the measurement of the mean blood velocity (MCA_Vm) and the estimation of the cerebral blood flow (CBF), provided that no significant changes occur in the MCA diameter (MCA_Diam). Previous studies described a decrease in the MCA_Vm associated with the induction of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) by propofol and remifentanil. This decrease in blood velocity might be interpreted as a decrease in the CBF only where the MCA_Diam is not modified across TCD examinations.

METHODS

In this observational study, we measured the MCA_Diam of 24 subjects (almost exclusively females) on digital subtraction angiography under awake and TIVA conditions.

RESULTS

Across the two phases, we observed a decrease in the mean arterial blood pressure (from 84 ± 9 to 71 ± 6 mmHg; p < 0.001) and heart rate (76 ± 10 vs. 65 ± 8 beats/min; p < 0.001), and a concomitant decrease in the MCA_Vm (61 vs. 42 cm/s; p < 0.001). In contrast, the MCA_Diam did not vary in association with TIVA (2.3 ± 0.2 vs. 2.3 ± 0.2 mm; p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Those results suggested that in this population, no significant changes in the MCA_Diam are associated with TIVA.

Reference values for cerebral blood flow velocities in critically ill, sedated children

OBJECTIVE

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is increasingly being used in the pediatric intensive care unit to assess cerebral hemodynamics during critical illness. However, no normative data in this patient population have been published to date. Therefore, we aimed to describe the anterior and posterior cerebral blood flow velocities in critically ill children undergoing mechanical ventilation and sedation.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational cohort study was performed. Children with known or suspected acute or chronic neurologic conditions were excluded. Participants underwent TCD measurement of middle cerebral and basilar artery flow velocities.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty children newborn to 17 years of age were enrolled. Measured values were lower in this cohort of children than the previously published cerebral flow velocities of normal, healthy children.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebral blood flow velocities of the basal cerebral arteries in critically ill, mechanically ventilated, sedated children are lower than in healthy children of the same age and gender published in previous studies. As such, the cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) values reported here may serve as a more accurate reference point when using TCD as a clinical tool to diagnose CBFV abnormalities and guide therapy in this patient population.

Remifentanil in children

Remifentanil has gained the confidence of anesthesiologists and has given a real opportunity to change the way anesthesia is given. It can be considered the ideal opioid despite many obstacles to pediatric use: the condition of 'off-label', the lack of wide randomized clinical trials, and the fear of adverse events because of its high potency. Experiences in the field with this opioid over the years encouraged its use. Use has been associated with N(2)0 and volatile agents for general anesthesia and with propofol for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). It seems very useful for sedation inside and outside the operating room and in intensive care for both short painful procedures and synchronization with mechanical ventilation. However, its unique pharmacokinetic characteristics causing rapid onset and offset of effect appear unchanged in small children and even in premature neonates and need to be really confirmed by further pharmacokinetic studies. Moreover, the real risks of tolerance and hyperalgesia should be evaluated in the pediatric population. In this review, we go through the newer aspects of this versatile drug that has been proposed as 'the pediatric anesthetist's opiate'.

Remifentanil and the brain

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Remifentanil is an ultra-short-acting opioid, increasingly used today in neuroanesthesia and neurointensive care. Its characteristics make remifentanil a potentially ideal agent, but previous data have cast a shadow on this opioid, supporting potentially toxic effects on the ischemic brain. The aim of the present concise review is to survey available up-to-date information on the effects of remifentanil on the central nervous system.

METHOD

A MEDLINE search within the past seven years for available up-to-date information on remifentanil and brain was performed.

RESULTS

Concise up-to-date information on the effects of remifentanil on the central nervous system was reported, with a particular emphasis on the following topics: cerebral metabolism, electroencephalogram, electrocorticography, motor-evoked potentials, regional cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood flow velocity, arterial hypotension and hypertension, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, cerebral autoregulation, cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity, cerebrospinal fluid, painful stimulation, analgesia and hyperalgesia, neuroprotection, neurotoxicity and hypothermia.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge of the influence of remifentanil on brain functions is crucial before routine use in neuroanesthesia to improve anesthesia performance and patient safety as well as outcome.

A randomized double-blinded multicenter comparison of remifentanil versus fentanyl when combined with isoflurane/propofol for early extubation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery

We compared a fentanyl/isoflurane/propofol regimen with a remifentanil/isoflurane/propofol regimen for fast-track cardiac anesthesia in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study on patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesia was induced with a 1-min infusion of 0.5 mg/kg propofol followed by 10-mg boluses of propofol every 30 s until loss of consciousness. After 0.2 mg/kg cisatracurium, a blinded continuous infusion of remifentanil at 1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) or the equivalent volume rate of normal saline was then started. In addition, a blinded bolus syringe of 1 microg/kg remifentanil or 10 microg/kg fentanyl, respectively, was given over 3 min. Blinded remifentanil, 1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) (or the equivalent volume rate of normal saline), together with 0.5% isoflurane, were used to maintain anesthesia. Significantly more patients (P < 0.01) in the fentanyl regimen experienced hypertension during skin incision and maximum sternal spread compared with patients in the remifentanil regimen. There were no differences between the groups in time until extubation, discharge from the surgical intensive care unit, ST segment and other electrocardiogram changes, catecholamine levels, or cardiac enzymes. The remifentanil-based anesthetic (consisting of a bolus followed by a continuous infusion) resulted in significantly less response to surgical stimulation and less need for anesthetic interventions compared with the fentanyl regimen (consisting of an initial bolus, and followed by subsequent boluses only to treat hemodynamic responses) with both drug regimens allowing early extubation.

IMPLICATIONS

Both fentanyl and the newer opioid remifentanil, when each is combined with isoflurane and propofol, allowed for fast-track cardiac anesthesia. The remifentanil regimen used in this study resulted in significantly less hemodynamic response to surgical stimulation.