The Cost-Effectiveness of Methohexital Versus Propofol for Sedation During Monitored Anesthesia Care

Thiopental Does Not Produce Hyperalgesia: A Laboratory Study Using Two Human Experimental Pain Models

Objective

Past investigations assessing the effects of thiopental on pain are conflicting. Although several studies demonstrate hyperalgesia as a result of barbiturate administration, others show analgesia. Our objective was to assess the effects of an infusion of the GABAA agonist thiopental, compared with placebo, in healthy participants on two subjective experimental pain paradigms: noxious electrical stimulation and intradermal capsaicin.

Methods

For electrical stimulation, the milliamps required to achieve pain threshold and tolerance were recorded, and the percent change from baseline was determined for each infusion condition. In the intradermal capsaicin condition, the area of hyperalgesia was determined by von Frey technique pre- and postinfusion, and the percent change in the area of hyperalgesia was calculated.

Results

Though thiopental infusion resulted in an increase in the electrical stimulation current required to elicit pain threshold or reach pain tolerance when compared with baseline, this finding was not statistically significant. In the intradermal capsaicin condition, there was a statistically significant difference in overall pre- and postinfusion pain interpretation, as measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in area of hyperalgesia.

Conclusions

In this human study of thiopental’s effects on two experimental pain models, our results show that thiopental does not induce hyperalgesia.

Methohexital in total intravenous anesthesia during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is usually recommended during spinal surgery when transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) are used to monitor. A shortage of propofol has prompted a search for an alternative sedative-hypnotic agent. We explored the use of methohexital as an alternative. TIVA was provided for two adult patients having spinal surgery using an infusion of methohexital. TcMEPs and somatosensory evoked potentials were acquired to monitor neurological function and electroencephalogram was used to titrate the methohexital dose. Two cases are presented in which the anesthesia and monitoring that was provided were successful. These cases indicate that methohexital can be a suitable alternative to propofol in some patients.

Regional anaesthesia with sedation protocol to safely debride sacral pressure ulcers

A treatment challenge for patients with sacral pressure ulcers is balancing the need for adequate surgical debridement with appropriate anaesthesia management. We are functioning under the hypothesis that regional anaesthesia has advantages over general anaesthesia. We describe our regional anaesthesia protocol for perioperative and postoperative management.

A cost comparison of methohexital and propofol for ambulatory anesthesia

Methohexital is eliminated more rapidly than thiopental, and early recovery compares favorably with propofol. We designed this study to evaluate the recovery profile when methohexital was used as an alternative to propofol for the induction of anesthesia before either sevoflurane or desflurane in combination with nitrous oxide. One hundred twenty patients were assigned randomly to one of four anesthetic groups: (I) methohexital-desflurane, (II) methohexital-sevoflurane, (III) propofol-desflurane, or (IV) propofol-sevoflurane. Recovery times after the anesthetic drugs, as well as the perioperative side effect profiles, were similar in all four groups. A cost-minimization analysis revealed that methohexital was less costly for the induction of anesthesia. At the fresh gas flow rates used during this study, the costs of the volatile anesthetics for maintenance of anesthesia did not differ among the four groups. However, at low flow rates (< or = 1 L/min), the methohexital-desflurane group would have been the least expensive anesthetic technique. In conclusion, methohexital is a cost-effective alternative to propofol for the induction of anesthesia in the ambulatory setting. At low fresh gas flow rates, the methohexital-desflurane combination was the most cost-effective for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS

Using methohexital as an alternative to propofol for the induction of anesthesia for ambulatory surgery seems to reduce drug costs. When fresh gas flow rates < or = 1 L/min are used, the combination of methohexital for the induction and desflurane for maintenance may be the most cost-effective general anesthetic technique for ambulatory surgery.