The Effects of Low-Flow Sevoflurane and Isoflurane Anesthesia on Renal Function in Patients with Stable Moderate Renal Insufficiency

A Round Trip: The Japanese Contribution to the Development of Sevoflurane

Sevoflurane was first synthesized independently by Richard Wallin and Bernard Regan at Travenol Laboratories Incorporated and Ross Terrell and Louise Croix at Airco, Inc in the late 1960s, and subsequent animal studies and a phase-1 human trial of the agent published in 1981 showed promising results. Further research in the United States was halted, however, because of concerns regarding potential nephrotoxicity and the introduction of less degradable alternatives. Interest in sevoflurane resumed in Japan when Maruishi Pharmaceutical Company, Limited (Ltd) (Maruishi) decided to continue its development in 1982. They secured approval by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare for its clinical use in January 1990. Because of its low blood:gas partition coefficient and resulting rapid action, sevoflurane quickly became the anesthetic of choice of Japanese anesthesiologists. In 1992 Abbott Laboratories, now AbbVie, Inc (Abbott, North Chicago, IL) finalized a licensing agreement with Maruishi to seek the US Food and Drug Administration approval for sevoflurane sales in the United States. Approved in June 1995, sevoflurane is now marketed by Abbott in 120 countries and has been administered >120 million times. This report details the Japanese contribution to the development of sevoflurane.

Evaluation of Renal Function at 24, 48, and 72 Hours and 3 Months After Transplant: Comparison of 3 Anesthetic Techniques

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia is the conventional management of renal transplant, and its evolution has revolved around the development of new drugs; however, a group of patients meet conditions for neuraxial anesthesia, because of their comorbidities, who are at greater risk of complications with general anesthesia and are not favorable to grafting.

METHODS

We conducted a controlled clinical trial of 109 renal transplant recipients where renal function was evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 hours and 3 months after transplant, and we compared regional, general anesthesia with inhaled anesthetic and total intravenous anesthesia. It was performed for 1 year, and serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, and electrolytes were evaluated. During the intraoperative period central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, vasopressors, fluid therapy, diuretics, surgical time, anesthesia, hot and cold ischemia, immunosuppressants, and antihypertensives were evaluated. They were analyzed with χ² independence and 1-way and 2-way repeated measures.

RESULTS

The type of anesthesia was associated with hemodynamic stability (P = .018), the use of vasopressor (P = .005), and fluid therapy (P = .011). A value of P = .005 was found for central venous pressure at discharge from the operating room, and preincisional mean arterial pressure (P = .015) was among the types of anesthesia. Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, sodium, and potassium were statistically significant over time (P < .001) but showed no difference between types of anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

There is no difference between anesthetic techniques and clinical results over time. The personalized anesthetic technique will improve the neuroendocrine response and surgical stress, decrease the need for vasopressors and analgesics, and reduce complications.

Anesthesia for Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

Kidney transplants are the most common solid organ abdominal transplant and are occasionally performed simultaneously with pancreas transplants in diabetic patients. Preoperative evaluation of potential transplant recipients should focus on the potential for occult cardiovascular disease while also screening for other signs of end-organ dysfunction. Intraoperatively, it is of utmost importance to ensure adequate graft perfusion to limit the risk of postoperative graft dysfunction or rejection. Postoperative care of the kidney or pancreas transplant patient should focus on ensuring normalization of volume status, electrolyte concentrations, and glycemic control.

Case report: proximal tubule impairment following volatile anesthetic exposure

The safety of contemporary volatile anesthetic agents with respect to kidney function is well established, and growing evidence suggests that volatile anesthetics even protect against ischemic nephropathy. However, studies examining effects of volatile anesthetics on kidney function frequently demonstrate transient proteinuria and glycosuria following exposure to these agents, although the cause of these findings has not been thoroughly examined. We describe the case of a patient who underwent a neurosurgical procedure, then experienced glycosuria without hyperglycemia that resolved within days. Following a second neurosurgical procedure, the patient again developed glycosuria, now associated with ketonuria. Further examination demonstrated nonalbuminuric proteinuria in conjunction with urinary wasting of phosphate and potassium, indicative of proximal tubule impairment. We suggest that transient proximal tubule impairment may play a role in the proteinuria and glycosuria described following volatile anesthetic exposure and discuss the relationship between these observations and the ability of these agents to protect against ischemic nephropathy.

Hemodynamic parameters of low-flow isoflurane and low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia during controlled ventilation with laryngeal mask airway

Background:

Nowadays laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is popular as one of the best choices for airway management. Low-flow anesthesia has some advantages like lower pollution, hemodynamic stability and cost effectiveness. Volatile anesthetics are widely used for anesthesia maintenance during operations. Sevoflurane has more hemodynamic stability compared to isoflurane, but there are few studies comparing the hemodynamic stabilities of these two anesthetics during controlled low flow anesthesia with LMA.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane on hemodynamic parameters of patients through LMA.

Patients and Methods:

Eighty patients, scheduled for elective ophthalmic surgery, were randomly divided into two groups. After induction, an LMA with an appropriate size was inserted in all the patients and they were randomly allocated to two groups of low-flow sevoflurane (n = 40) and low-flow isoflurane (n = 40). Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) were recorded at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after the anesthesia induction.

Results:

The mean heart rate values were significantly less in the sevoflurane group (P value < 0.05) at 25 minutes after the surgery. The mean Blood Pressure in the isoflurane group was significantly higher compared with the sevoflurane group in 10, 20 and 30 minutes after the surgery (P values = 0.0131, 0.0373 and 0.0028, respectively). These differences were clinically unimportant because heart rate and mean blood pressure were on normal ranges.

Conclusions:

Seemingly, low-flow sevoflurane with LMA did not have any significant hemodynamic effect on clinical practice. Therefore, low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia with LMA might be considered in patients with short operations who need rapid recovery from anesthesia.

Long-term isoflurane therapy for refractory bronchospasm associated with herpes simplex pneumonia in a heart transplant patient

A 47-year-old man with a history of heart transplant was admitted after severe traumatic brain injury and seizures. During mechanical ventilation, the patient developed bronchospasm that severely compromised respiratory function that led to cardiac arrest. After resuscitation, application of isoflurane through the Anaesthetic Conserving Device (AnaConDa) in the ICU successfully treated bronchospasm, provided adequate sedation, and enabled appropriate ventilation and diagnostic bronchoscopy. A subsequent bronchoalveolar lavage revealed a high amount of Herpes simplex DNA. Herpes simplex pneumonia was diagnosed and treated with acyclovir. Isoflurane treatment was applied for twelve days total without side effects on renal and cerebral function. The patient recovered quickly after the termination of sedation. At discharge, he was fully awake without focal neurological deficiency and his long-term outcome was excellent. This case demonstrates that isoflurane is a treatment option in life-threatening cases of bronchospasm and a safe option for long-term sedation.

Closed system anaesthesia in dogs using liquid sevoflurane injection; evaluation of the square-root-of-time model and the influence of CO 2 absorbent

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether predictable alveolar concentrations of sevoflurane are reliably produced in dogs when liquid sevoflurane is injected into closed circuit breathing systems, as calculated by Lowe's square-root-of-time anaesthetic uptake model, and to confirm the validity of the model using soda lime and calcium hydroxide lime.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

ANIMALS

Eleven healthy dogs with a mean body mass of 34 +/- 9 kg scheduled for pelvic limb orthopaedic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following pre-anaesthetic medication, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane in a closed circle system. Epidural anaesthesia was performed with morphine and bupivacaine. Liquid sevoflurane was injected into the circuit by syringe, using dosages and time intervals derived from Lowe's square-root-of-time anaesthetic uptake model. The target alveolar concentration chosen was 1.1 x MAC (2.6% end-tidal sevoflurane). Either soda lime (group S; n = 6) or calcium hydroxide lime (Amsorb; group A; n = 5) were used for CO(2) absorption. Sevoflurane concentration and the respiratory gas composition were measured with an infrared gas analyser.

RESULTS

End-tidal sevoflurane concentrations were close to the predicted value of 2.6% at 9 minutes (2.53 +/- 0.1% group S; 2.60 +/- 0.26% group A) and 16 minutes (2.55 +/- 0.30 group S; 2.52 +/- 0.28% group A) but declined thereafter to reach 50% (group S) and 64% (group A) of the predicted value at 121 minutes. There was a constant trend towards higher end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations in group A but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The square-root-of-time model leads to significantly lower alveolar concentrations than expected, suggesting that the rate of sevoflurane uptake in dogs declines less rapidly than predicted. The use of Amsorb tends to reduce the deviation from predicted concentrations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The model used in this study provided only an approximate guide to the volume of liquid sevoflurane required. Consequently, the definitive dose schedule must be based on measured anaesthetic concentrations and clinical monitoring.

Kidney transplantation: recent developments and recommendations for anesthetic management

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. After receiving a transplant, survival rates are higher and comorbidities may resolve. As a consequence, more patients with significant comorbidities such as advanced cardiovascular disease will present for transplantation. This review highlights commonly encountered issues in patients undergoing kidney transplantation and recommendations are made for their anesthetic management.

Acute toxic renal failure

Acute renal failure (ARF) is a common problem in intensive care medicine. Even modest degrees of ARF not requiring dialysis treatment increase the risk of death approximately fivefold. Despite the widespread appreciation of the role of nephrotoxic drugs in their contribution to ARF, these drugs continue to have an ongoing aetiological role. Potentially nephrotoxic drugs include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, radiocontrast agents, antimicrobial and anaesthetic agents. Endogenous compounds such as myoglobin and haemoglobin may furthermore cause toxic nephropathy. Tubular injury initiated by toxins often results from a combination of acute renal vasoconstriction and direct cellular toxicity due to intracellular accumulation of the toxin, or, alternatively, may be mediated immunologically in case of interstitial nephritis. Patients with reduced renal functional reserve, cardiovascular co-morbidity, diabetes mellitus, and advanced age are at increased risk. Awareness of the range of toxins on the one hand and simple measures such as adequate pre-hydration of the patient and drug monitoring on the other hand may be sufficient to avoid drug-induced ARF or minimize its clinical severity in susceptible patients.

Sevoflurane: an ideal agent for adult day-case anesthesia?

Sevoflurane has several properties which make it potentially useful as a day case anaesthetic. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol, awakening from sevoflurane is faster compared to isoflurane, faster or similar compared to propofol and comparable (in the majority of studies) to desflurane. Subsequent recovery and discharge is generally similar following all agents. Sevoflurane may also be used to induce anaesthesia, which is generally well-received and causes less hypotension and apnoea compared to propofol. When used as a maintenance anaesthetic, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after sevoflurane is comparable to other inhaled anaesthetics, but this complication appears more common after inhaled inductions. The tolerability and low solubility of sevoflurane facilitate titration of anaesthesia and may reduce the need for opioid analgesia, which in turn may limit the occurrence of nausea and vomiting.

Renal toxicity with sevoflurane: a storm in a teacup?

The inhaled anaesthetic sevoflurane is metabolised into two products that have the potential to produce renal injury. Fluoride ions are produced by oxidative defluorination of sevoflurane by the cytochrome P450 system in the liver. Until recently, inorganic fluoride has been thought to be the aetiological agent responsible for fluorinated anaesthetic nephrotoxicity, with a toxic concentration threshold of 50 micromol/L in serum. However, studies of sevoflurane administration in animals and humans have not shown evidence of fluoride-induced nephrotoxicity, despite serum fluoride concentrations in this range. Compound A (fluoromethyl-2,2-difluoro-1-[trifluoromethyl] vinyl ether) is a breakdown product of sevoflurane produced by its interaction with carbon dioxide absorbents in the anaesthesia machine. The patient then inhales compound A. Compound A produces evidence of transient renal injury in rats. The mechanism of compound A renal toxicity is controversial, with the debate focused on the role of the renal cysteine conjugate beta-lyase pathway in the biotransformation of compound A. The significance of this debate centres on the fact that the beta-lyase pathway is 10- to 30-fold less active in humans than in rats. Therefore, if biotransformation by this pathway is responsible for the production of nephrotoxic metabolites of compound A, humans may be less susceptible to compound A renal toxicity than are rats. In three studies in human volunteers and one in surgical patients, prolonged (8-hour) sevoflurane exposures and low fresh gas flow rates resulted in significant exposures to compound A. Transient abnormalities were found in biochemical markers of renal injury measured in urine. These studies suggested that sevoflurane can result in renal toxicity, mediated by compound A, under specific circumstances. However, other studies using prolonged sevoflurane administration at low flow rates did not find evidence of renal injury. Finally, there are substantial data to document the safety of sevoflurane administered for shorter durations or at higher fresh gas flow rates. Therefore, the United States Food and Drug Administration recommends the use of sevoflurane with fresh gas flow rates at least 1 L/min for exposures up to 1 hour and at least 2 L/min for exposures greater than 1 hour. We believe this is a rational, cautious approach based on available data. However, it is important to note that other countries have not recommended such limitations on the clinical use of sevoflurane and problems have not been noted.