Antinociceptive Interaction Between Spinal Clonidine and Lidocaine in the Rat Formalin Test: An Isobolographic Analysis

Dexmedetomidine Co-Administered with Lidocaine Decreases Nociceptive Responses and Trigeminal Fos Expression without Motor Dysfunction and Hypotension in a Murine Orofacial Formalin Model

Administration of dexmedetomidine significantly induces sedation and anti-nociception in several nociceptive models, but clinical trials are restricted due to adverse side effects, including lethargy, hypotension, and bradycardia. Herein, we investigated whether intraperitoneal inoculation of dexmedetomidine reduced the orofacial nociceptive response and affected motor coordination and blood pressure and examined whether a lower dose of dexmedetomidine in combination with 0.5% lidocaine produced an antinociceptive effect without any adverse side events in a murine model. To perform the experiment, 5% formalin (10 µL) was subcutaneously inoculated into the right upper lip, and the rubbing responses were counted for 45 min. Different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with 0.5% lidocaine were administered 10 and 30 min before formalin injection, respectively. Dexmedetomidine (10 μg/kg) significantly reduced orofacial nociceptive responses during the second phase of the formalin test and decreased the expression of Fos in trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). Besides, a high dose of dexmedetomidine (30 μg/kg) induced lessening physical ability and significantly reduced systolic pressure and heart rate. When 0.5% lidocaine was injected subcutaneously, nociceptive responses were reduced only in the first phase. Interestingly, although a low dose of dexmedetomidine (3 μg/kg) alone did not show an antinociceptive effect, its co-administration with lidocaine significantly reduced the nociceptive response in both phases and decreased TNC Fos expression without motor dysfunction and hypotension. This finding suggests that the combination of a low-dose of systemic dexmedetomidine with lidocaine may be a safe medicinal approach for acute inflammatory pain management in the orofacial region, particularly mucogingival pain.

Bayesian enhanced meta-analysis of post-operative analgesic efficacy of additives for caudal analgesia in children

BACKGROUND

The authors calculated the effect size for post-operative analgesia of three additives, clonidine, neostigmine, and tramadol to bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine used for single-dose caudal extradural blockade in children.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed for three end points of efficacy: the increase of time until administration of analgesic drugs, the proportion of patients requiring analgesic drugs during the initial 24 post-operative hours, and the amounts of post-operative analgesic drugs. A Bayesian inference supporting direct statements about the probability of the magnitude of an effect was used to compare the effects size.

RESULTS

Neostigmine increased the duration of analgesia by 9.96 h (95% confidence interval: 7.75 to 12.16), as compared with 3.68 h (2.65 to 4.7) with clonidine and 4.45 (2.84 to 6.07) with tramadol. There is a 95% probability that neostigmine increases the duration of post-operative analgesia by more than 8 h, clonidine by more than 2.8 h, and tramadol by more than 3.25 h, as compared with local anesthetics alone. The odds ratios for the proportion of patients requiring analgesic drugs were 0.22 [0.13 to 0.37] for clonidine and 0.28 [0.10 to 0.75] for neostigmine. With tramadol, there was no statistically significant difference. All three additives reduced the amounts of post-operative analgesic drugs. Neostigmine and tramadol increase the probability for post-operative nausea or vomiting (PONV).

CONCLUSIONS

Neostigmine provides the longest post-operative analgesia. With clonidine, the duration of analgesia is shorter and sedation is increased, but the probability for PONV could be decreased.

Potent suppression of stretch reflex activity after systemic or spinal delivery of tizanidine in rats with spinal ischemia-induced chronic spastic paraplegia

BACKGROUND

Spasticity and rigidity are serious complications associated with spinal traumatic or ischemic injury. Clinical studies show that tizanidine (Tiz) is an effective antispasticity agent; however, the mechanism of this effect is still not clear. Tiz binds not only to α2-adrenoreceptors (AR) but also to imidazoline (I) receptors. Both receptor systems (AR+I) are present in the spinal cord interneurons and α-motoneurons. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the therapeutic potency of systematically or spinally (intrathecally [IT]) delivered Tiz on stretch reflex activity (SRA) in animals with ischemic spasticity, and to delineate supraspinal or spinal sites of Tiz action.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals were exposed to 10 min of spinal ischemia to induce an increase in SRA. Increase in SRA was identified by simultaneous increase in recorded electromyography (EMG) activity and ankle resistance measured during computer-controlled ankle dorsiflexion (40°/3 s) in fully awake animals. Animals with increased SRA were divided into several experimental subgroups and treated as follows: (i) Tiz administered systemically at the dose of 1 mg kg(-1), or IT at 10 μg or 50 μg delivered as a single dose; (ii) treatment with systemic Tiz was followed by the systemic injection of vehicle, or by nonselective AR antagonist without affinity for I receptors; yohimbine (Yoh), α2A AR antagonist; BRL44408 (BRL), α2B AR antagonist; ARC239 (ARC), nonselective AR and I(1) receptor antagonist; efaroxan (Efa), or nonselective AR and I(2) receptor antagonist; idazoxan (Ida); (iii) treatment with IT Tiz was followed by the IT injection of selective α2A AR antagonist; atipamezole (Ati). In a separate group of spastic animals the effect of systemic Tiz treatment (1 mg/kg) or isoflurane anesthesia on H-reflex activity was also studied.

RESULTS

Systemic and/or IT treatment with Tiz significantly suppressed SRA. This Tiz-mediated anti-SRA effect was reversed by BRL (5 mg kg(-1)), Efa (1 mg kg(-1)), and Ida (1 mg kg(-1)). No reversal was seen after Yoh (3 mg kg(-1)) or ARC (5 mg kg(-1)) treatment. Anti-SRA induced by IT Tiz (50 μg) was reversed by IT injection of Ati (50 μg). Significant suppression of H-reflex was measured after systemic Tiz treatment (1 mg/kg) or isoflurane (2%) anesthesia, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining of spinal cord sections taken from animals with spasticity showed upregulation of α2A receptor in activated astrocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that α2A AR and I receptors, but not α2B AR, primarily mediate the Tiz-induced antispasticity effect. This effect involves spinal and potentially supraspinal sites and likely targets α2A receptor present on spinal neurons, primary afferents, and activated astrocytes. Further studies using highly selective antagonists are needed to elucidate the involvement of specific subtypes of the AR and I receptors in the antispasticity effect seen after Tiz treatment.

MD-354 selectively antagonizes the antinociceptive effects of (-)nicotine in the mouse tail-flick assay

RATIONALE

(-)Nicotine produces antinociceptive effects in rodents. meta-Chlorophenylguanidine (MD-354), an analgesia-enhancing agent, binds at 5-HT(3) and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and potentiates the antinociceptive effects of an "inactive" dose of clonidine. The present study examined the actions of MD-354 on (-)nicotine-induced antinociception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mouse tail-flick and other assays were employed.

RESULTS

In the tail-flick assay, (-)nicotine (ED(50) = 1.66 mg/kg) but not MD-354 produced dose-related antinociceptive effects. Administered in combination with (-)nicotine (2.5 mg/kg), MD-354 (AD(50) = 3.4 mg/kg) did not potentiate, but effectively antagonized the antinociceptive actions of (-)nicotine. In a mouse hot-plate assay, MD-354 failed to modify (-)nicotine responses. In combination with a locomotor activity-suppressing dose of (-)nicotine, MD-354 (up to 17 mg/kg) failed to antagonize (-)nicotine-induced hypolocomotion. In a rat drug discrimination paradigm using (-)nicotine as training drug, MD-354 produced saline-appropriate responding; in combination with the training dose of (-)nicotine, MD-354 failed to antagonize the nicotine cue.

CONCLUSIONS

MD-354 selectively antagonizes the antinociceptive actions of (-)nicotine in the tail-flick, but not in the hot-plate assay, or either the motor effects, or discriminative stimulus effects of (-)nicotine. The most parsimonious explanation is that MD-354 might act as a negative allosteric modulator of alpha 7 nACh receptors, and radioligand binding and functional data are provided to support this conclusion.

Effects of alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

When intrathecally or epidurally administered, alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists produce potent antinociception by affecting the activity of primary afferent fibres and spinal cord neurons. Recent reports have indicated that in dorsal root ganglion neurons, tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels play important roles in the conduction of nociceptive sensation. We therefore investigated the effects of alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents.

METHODS

Using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique, we recorded tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents from rat dorsal root ganglion neurons.

RESULTS

Both clonidine and dexmedetomidine reduced the peak amplitude of the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current concentration- and use-dependently. The concentration required for a half-maximal effect was significantly lower for dexmedetomidine (58.0 +/- 10.2 micromol) than for clonidine (257.2 +/- 30.9 micromol) at holding potential -70 mV. The current inhibitions induced by these agonists were not prevented by 1 micromol yohimbine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist. Both clonidine and dexmedetomidine shifted the inactivation curve for the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in the hyperpolarizing direction. The combinations clonidine with lidocaine and dexmedetomidine with lidocaine produced an additive blockade-type interaction on the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that a direct inhibition of tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels may contribute to the antinociceptive effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine when used as additives to regional anaesthesia.

On the mechanism of carbamazepine-induced antinociception in the formalin test

In the present study, the effect of lidocaine (a sodium channel blocker) on carbamazepine-induced antinociception, in formalin test was investigated. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of different doses of carbamazepine (3.5, 7, 15, and 30 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent antinociception in mice, in the first and second phases of the test. Different doses of lidocaine as a sodium channel blocker (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, i.p.) also induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test. It is noted that lidocaine could potentiate the response of carbamazepine in the first, but not in the second, phase of the formalin test. Meanwhile i.p. administration of different doses of Prazosin, alpha1 adrenoceptor antagonist (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg), Yohimbine, alpha2 adrenoceptor antagonist (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg), Bicuculline, GABAA receptor antagonist (1.5 and 3 mg/kg), and CGP 35348, GABAB receptor antagonist (100 and 200 mg/kg) exert dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in both phases of the formalin test. It should be noted that bicuculline 0.75 mg/kg by itself increased pain score in the second phase of the formalin test, indicating that blockade of GABAA receptor subtype may induce chronic pain. None of the aforementioned drugs could alter the antinociceptive response of carbamazepine in the formalin test. It is concluded that sodium channel mechanisms may be involved partly in the antinociceptive induced by carbamazepine.

Stability of clonidine in clonidine-hydromorphone mixture from implanted intrathecal infusion pumps in chronic pain patients

Clonidine is frequently added to opioids in implantable intrathecal pumps for the management of chronic pain. In such devices, a small non-retrievable volume is always present in the reservoir, and its effect on drug stability is unknown. Furthermore, stability of clonidine, when mixed with hydromorphone, has not been previously determined. This study examined the stability of clonidine when co-administered with hydromorphone in implanted intrathecal pumps. Samples of hydromorphone-clonidine before pump refill and from residual solution at subsequent refill were obtained from chronic pain patients. Clonidine concentration was measured using HPLC. Twenty paired samples from 3 patients were analyzed. All 3 patients had a SynchroMed pump implanted for 3-5 years. We found no loss in clonidine concentration during the time between refills (35 +/- 13 days), and no correlation between clonidine concentration and time interval between refills. In conclusion, clonidine, mixed with hydromorphone, is stable when delivered by implantable intrathecal pump for long-term use.