Dexmedetomidine decreases perioperative myocardial lactate release in dogs

Multiple uses of dexmedetomidine in small animals: a mini review

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, which use had an exponential increase in human and veterinary medicine in the last 10 years. The aim of this mini review is to summarize the various uses of dexmedetomidine underlining its new applications and capabilities in the small animals' clinical activity. While this drug was born as sedative in veterinary medicine, some studies demonstrated to be effective as an analgesic both in single administration and in continuous infusion. Recent studies have also shown the role of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant during locoregional anesthesia, increasing the duration of the sensitive block and consequently decreasing the demand for systemic analgesics. The various analgesic properties make dexmedetomidine an interesting drug for opioid-free analgesia. Some studies highlighted a potential neuroprotective, cardioprotective and vasculoprotective role of dexmedetomidine, thus conferring it a place in critical care medicine, such as trauma and septic patients. Dexmedetomidine has demonstrated to be a multitasking molecule and it is ready to face new challenges.

The Role of Dexmedetomidine in Tumor-Progressive Factors in the Perioperative Period and Cancer Recurrence: A Narrative Review

Dexmedetomidine, a specific α2 adrenergic receptor agonist, is highly frequently used in the perioperatively for its favorable pharmacology, such as mitigating postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Increasing attention has been recently focused on the effect of whether dexmedetomidine influences cancer recurrence, which urges the discussion of the role of dexmedetomidine in tumor-progressive factors. The pharmacologic characteristics of dexmedetomidine, the tumor-progressive factors in the perioperative period, and the relationships between dexmedetomidine and tumor-progressive factors were described in this review. Available evidence suggests that dexmedetomidine could reduce the degree of immune function suppression, such as keeping the number of CD3+ cells, NK cells, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and Th1/Th2 ratio stable and decreasing the level of proinflammatory cytokine (interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) during cancer operations. However, dexmedetomidine exhibits different roles in cell biological behavior depending on cancer cell types. The conclusions on whether dexmedetomidine would influence cancer recurrence could not be currently drawn for the lack of strong clinical evidence. Therefore, this is still a new area that needs further exploration.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Perioperative Hemodynamics and Myocardial Protection in Thoracoscopic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND This study aimed to clarify the protective role of dexmedetomidine in thoracoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery (TATS), including control of the intraoperative heart rate, blood pressure, and myocardial injury markers. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patients who underwent TATS were divided into 2 equal groups: the dexmedetomidine group (dexmedetomidine pumped at 0.5 µg/kg for >10 min before the administration of anesthesia and at 0.5 µg/kg in the maintenance period) and the control group (pumped normal saline for >10 min before the administration of anesthesia). The data recorded for each patient were heart rate (preoperative, maximum intraoperative, and minimum intraoperative), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, intraoperative hemodynamic data, and intraoperative cardiovascular drugs administered. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to assess the postoperative levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase isoenzyme, myoglobin, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). RESULTS There were no significant differences in the age, sex, body height, body weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification grade, resection mode, operation time, ejection fraction, basal heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the 2 groups. In the dexmedetomidine group, the patients' maximum intraoperative heart rate and diastolic pressure decreased, and the postoperative hospital stay period was shorter. The postoperative peripheral blood test for the dexmedetomidine group showed higher NT-proBNP levels and lower cTnI levels. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative administration of dexmedetomidine can benefit hemodynamic stability, protect the cardiovascular system in the intraoperative and postoperative periods, and shorten postoperative hospitalization.

The use of dexmedetomidine during pulmonic balloon valvuloplasty in dogs

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the anaesthetic management for pulmonic balloon valvuloplasty (PBV) in dogs is scarce. We present data from dogs receiving dexmedetomidine combined with inhalational anaesthesia during PBV.

METHODS

Anaesthetic records from dogs receiving dexmedetomidine (n = 11) and a control group (n = 29) anaesthetised for PBV between 2012 and 2020 were analysed. Intraoperative variables potentially affected by dexmedetomidine administration were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristic and anaesthetic agents administered were similar between groups. The incidence of hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mm Hg) was 25% for dexmedetomidine and 29% for control (p = 0.8); however, dexmedetomidine group received vasopressors for a shorter time (p = 0.02). The incidence of bradycardia was 100% and 96% for dexmedetomidine and control (p = 0.5), but antimuscarinic agents were administered more frequently to the latter (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine may be a useful adjuvant to general anaesthesia during PBV in dogs and reduced the use of vasopressors and antimuscarinics.

Dexmedetomidine Improves Cardiovascular and Ventilatory Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: Basic and Clinical Approaches

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties, with minimal respiratory effects. It is used as a sedative in the intensive care unit and the operating room. The opioid-sparing effect and the absence of respiratory effects make dexmedetomidine an attractive adjuvant drug for anesthesia in obese patients who are at an increased risk for postoperative respiratory complications. The pharmacodynamic effects on the cardiovascular system are known; however the mechanisms that induce cardioprotection are still under study. Regarding the pharmacokinetics properties, this drug is extensively metabolized in the liver by the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases. It has a relatively high hepatic extraction ratio, and therefore, its metabolism is dependent on liver blood flow. This review shows, from a basic clinical approach, the evidence supporting the use of dexmedetomidine in different settings, from its use in animal models of ischemia-reperfusion, and cardioprotective signaling pathways. In addition, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies in obese subjects and the management of patients subjected to mechanical ventilation are described. Moreover, the clinical efficacy of delirium incidence in patients with indication of non-invasive ventilation is shown. Finally, the available evidence from DEX is described by a group of Chilean pharmacologists and clinicians who have worked for more than 10 years on DEX.

An α2-adrenoceptor agonist: Dexmedetomidine induces protective cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through mitochondrial-AMPK pathway

Aims: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) as a highly selective α₂-adrenoceptor agonist, was widely used anesthetic in perioperative settings, whether Dex induces cardiac hypertrophy during perioperative administration is unknown. Methods: The effects of Dex on cardiac hypertrophy were explored using the transverse aortic constriction model and neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Results: We reported that Dex induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy with activated ERK, AKT, PKC and inactivated AMPK in both wild-type mice and primary cultured rat cardiomyocytes. Additionally, pre-administration of Dex protects against transverse aortic constriction induced-heart failure in mice. We found that Dex up-regulates the activation of ERK, AKT, and PKC via suppression of AMPK activation in rat cardiomyocytes. However, suppression of mitochondrial coupling efficiency and membrane potential by FCCP blocks Dex induced AMPK inactivation as well as ERK, AKT, and PKC activation. All of these effects are blocked by the α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates Dex preconditioning induces cardiac hypertrophy that protects against heart failure through mitochondria-AMPK pathway in perioperative settings.

Dexmedetomidine enhances tolerance to bupivacaine cardiotoxicity in the isolated rat hearts: alpha 2 adrenoceptors were not involved

Background

Dexmedetomidine was proved to mitigate bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity but mechanism of this ability is still unclear. This study was designed to investigate the direct effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiotoxicity induced by bupivacaine on Langendorff rat heart preparation and the role of alpha 2 adrenoceptors in this process was explored.

Methods

Hearts of rat were isolated, mounted on a Langendorff system. Five experimental groups were assessed after 10 min Krebs-Henseleit buffer (KHB) infusions as follow: (1) Group Con, only KHB was perfused; (2) Group Dex, KHB was perfused for 5 min, then dexmedetomidine (10 nmol/L) was added; (3) Group Bupi, KHB was perfused for 25 min, then bupivacaine (50 μmol/L) was added; (4) Group Bupi + Dex, KHB was perfused for 5 min, then the dexmedetomidine (10 nmol/L) was added for 20 min, at last a mixture of KHB + dexmedetomidine + bupivacaine were perfused; (5) Group Bupi + Dex + Yoh, a combination of KHB + yohimbine (alpha 2 adrenoceptor antagonists, 1 μmol/L) was perfusion for 5 min, then dexmedetomidine (10 nmol/L) was added for 20 min, at last a mixture of KHB + yohimbine + dexmedetomidine + bupivacaine was perfused. The experimental perfusion was maintained for 35 min in group Con and group Dex, and the experimental perfusion was sustained until asystole in the other three groups.

Results

Compared with group Bupi, dexmedetomidine significantly increased the time to first arrhythmia (P <  0.001) and time to asystole (P <  0.001) in group Bupi + Dex. In addition, dexmedetomidine also significantly increased the time to 25, 50 and 75% reductions in heart rate (P <  0.001) and the time to 25, 50 and 75% reductions in rate-pressure product (P <  0.001) in group Bupi + Dex. Dexmedetomidine increased the cardiac tissue bupivacaine content when asystole (Bupi + Dex vs. Bupi, 58.5 ± 6.3 vs. 46.8 ± 5.6 nmol/g, P = 0.003). The benefit of dexmedetomidine on bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity were not eliminated by yohimbine.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine could delay the occurrence of bupivacaine-induced arrhythmia and asystole in the isolated rat hearts, but the alpha 2 adrenoceptors were not involved in this process.

The administration of dexmedetomidine changes microRNA expression profiling of rat hearts

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is widely used for perioperative and ICU patients. microRNAs (miRNAs) function as regulators of gene expression. The aim of the study was to assay expression profiling of microRNA in rat hearts following administration of dexmedetomidine.

METHODS

In this study 6 rats were randomly divided into two groups (n = 3): dexmedetomidine group and control group. The rats of dexmedetomidine group were intraperitoneally given dexmedetomidine in a dose of 100 μg/kg whereas the rats in control group were administered normal saline intraperitoneally. The hearts were excised 30 min after the administration of dexmedetomidine or normal saline under anesthesia. The samples were analyzed for differentially expressed microRNAs with Exiqon miRNA Array. The differentially expressed microRNAs were confirmed by using qRT-PCR. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were performed to find the target genes and signaling pathways of the aberrantly expressed miRNAs.

RESULTS

Six microRNAs were identified to be significantly expressed, among of which, five microRNAs (miRNA-434-3p, miRNA-3596d, miRNA-496-5p, miRNA-7a-2-3p and miRNA-702-3p) were up-regulated and 1 microRNA (miRNA-208b-3p) down-regulated compared to those of control group. The aberrantly expressed microRNAs were further validated by Quantitative Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). GO and KEGG analyses were used to identify target genes and the signaling pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dexmedetomidine is associated with differentially expressed microRNAs which may be involved in cardioprotection following administration of dexmedetomidine.

Involvement of miR-665 in protection effect of dexmedetomidine against Oxidative Stress Injury in myocardial cells via CB2 and CK1

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) can confer cardioprotective effects against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. While there are no studies addressing cardioprotection of Dex via regulation of microRNAs. The purpose of this study was to examine the roles and mechanisms of microRNA in cardioprotection of dexmedetomidine.

METHODS

Rat heart Langendorff preparation was established. We assayed expression profiling of miRNAs in perfused rat hearts and predicted Target genes using MiRanda, MiRDB, and TargetScan. Oxide stress (H₂O₂) was employed to simulate I/R injury. miR-665 mimic, inhibitor, and siRNA of AK1 and Cnr2 were transfected to H9C2. The real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify miR-665 and Ak1 and Cnr2 mRNA. The apoptosis of the cells was examined. The expression levels of cleaved caspase-3, Bcl-2, Bax, AK1, and Cnr2 were detected by Western blot. The combination between miR-665 and the 3'-untranslated region of AK1 and Cnr2 was validated by a luciferase reporter assay.

RESULTS

Dex precondition down-regulated miR-665 expression in hearts compared to I/R group. Dex reduced miR-665 expression and apoptosis increased by oxide stress. However, up-regulation of miR-665 exacerbated the changes caused by oxide stress and inhibited the effects of Dex. Down-regulation of miR-665 also reduced apoptosis, but inhibition of AK1 and Cnr2 aggravated apoptosis. The luciferase reporter assay indicated that miR-665 could down-regulate expression levels of AK1 and Cnr2.

CONCLUSIONS

Dex precondition confers hearts protective effect against I/R injury by down-regulating expression of miR-665 and up-regulating expression of AK1 and Cnr2.

The cardioprotective effect of dexmedetomidine on regional ischemia/reperfusion injury in type 2 diabetic rat hearts

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an α₂-adrenergic receptor agonist commonly used during perioperative periods due to its sedation and analgesia effect. It is confirmed that DEX has cardioprotective effects against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. We investigated whether DEX administration is beneficial to type 2 diabetic rats subjected to I/R injury.

METHODS

The diabetes model was established by providing a high-fat diet for 2 weeks followed by injecting 35 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ). The myocardial I/R model consisted of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion for 30 min followed by reperfusion for two-hours. DEX was administered before ischemia; alternatively, yohimbine was administered with or without DEX before ischemia. At the end of reperfusion, the rats were sacrificed, and hearts were isolated for histology. The levels of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) and phosphorylated GSK-3β (p-GSK-3β) were quantitatively analyzed. The infarct size was measured via Evans Blue and 2,3,5‑triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Plasma samples were collected to measure the levels of cardiac Troponin T (cTnT). Arrhythmia scores were recorded during the first few minutes of reperfusion.

RESULTS

DEX preconditioning significantly reduced myocardial infarct size, arrhythmia scores and the plasma cTnT levels, and increased the p-GSK-3β levels. All of these protective effects of DEX were reversed by co-administration of yohimbine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that DEX preconditioning exerted a cardioprotective effect against regional I/R injury in diabetic rats.

Reduced mitochondrial response sensitivity is involved in the anti‑apoptotic effect of dexmedetomidine pretreatment in cardiomyocytes

Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used α2-adreno-ceptor agonist, which affects various organs, including providing beneficial effects on the heart. However, the mechanism underlying the cardiac benefit remains to be fully elucidated. In the present study, it was demonstrated that dexmedetomidine pretreatment on primary cultured rat cardiomyocytes protected against reactive oxygen species (ROS)‑induced apoptosis. In terms of the potential mechanism, it was demonstrated that dexmedetomidine inhibited mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial respiratory complexes, but with increased coupling efficiency. However, dexmedetomidine upregulated mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) and resisted against the loss of Δψm induced by carbonilcyanide p‑triflouromethoxyphenylhydrazone. Due to the importance of mitochondria affecting ROS, the present study investigated the dexmedetomidine‑suppressed mitochondrial response to H2O2 stimulation, which was explained by suppressed ROS levels and the suppression of the increased oxygen consumption rate. Results demonstrated for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, a novel protective mechanism for dexmedetomidine on cardiomyocytes through the attenuated response of mitochondria towards H2O2, which had a protective effect against ROS‑induced apoptosis.

Comparison of the cardioprotective effects of dexmedetomidineand remifentanil in cardiac surgery

Background/aim: Myocardial protection is an important factor of open heart surgery and biological biomarkers (lactate, CKMB, cardiac troponin I, and pyruvate) are used to assess myocardial damage. This study compares the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Materials and methods: Patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery (n = 60) were included in this study. Anesthesia induction was introduced with propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium bromide. Anesthesia was maintained with remifentanil infusion and sevoflurane in the remifentanil group (Group R) and with dexmedetomidine infusion and sevoflurane in the dexmedetomidine group (Group D). Blood samples for biochemical markers were taken from the coronary sinus catheter before cardiopulmonary bypass (T1), 20 min after aortic cross-clamping (T2), 20 min after removal of the aortic cross-clamping (T3), and 10 min after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (T4).Results: Demographic data were similar between the groups. Lactate level at the T2 period and CKMB levels during the study period were lower in Group D than in Group R. In both groups, all values except pyruvate significantly increased over time. Conclusion: The dexmedetomidine-sevoflurane combination may improve the cardioprotective effect in comparison with remifentanil-sevoflurane in CABG surgery.

Dexmedetomidine attenuates hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes

Systemic administration of dexmedetomidine provides cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury; however, the direct effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiomyocytes have not been clarified. The present study investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes under hypoxic/reoxygenation (H/R) conditions. In order to simulate in vivo I/R injury, primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were cultured under hypoxic conditions for 1 h and subsequently reoxygenated for 24 h. The effects of preconditioning with dexmedetomidine 2 h before hypoxia and postconditioning during reoxygenation were also examined. Cellular viability and activity were analyzed by monitoring the dynamic response profile of living cells using a real-time cell analyzer system. A special scaled index, defined as the normalized cell index (NCI), was used to minimize the influence of inter-experimental variations. The dose-effect curve was generated from the area under the time-course curve values of NCI. H/R exposure markedly decreased cell viability and activity. Furthermore, no cytotoxicity was associated with a clinically relevant concentration of dexmedetomidine. Preconditioning with dexmedetomidine concentration-dependently ameliorated the reductions in NCI in cardiomyocytes following H/R injury. Additionally, postconditioning with dexmedetomidine improved the reductions in NCI at concentrations between 3 and 200 nM. Finally, the effect of 3–40 nM dexmedetomidine postconditioning was greater than preconditioning. These results indicated that preconditioning and postconditioning with dexmedetomidine attenuated H/R injury in primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes at the cellular level.

The myocardial protective effect of dexmedetomidine in high-risk patients undergoing aortic vascular surgery

Objective:

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine in high-risk patients undergoing aortic vascular surgery.

Design:

A randomized prospective study.

Setting:

Cairo University, Egypt.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 150 patients undergoing aortic vascular surgery.

Intervention:

The patients were classified into two groups (n = 75). Group D: The patients received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 15 min before induction and maintained as an infusion of 0.3 μg/kg/h to the end of the procedure. Group C: The patients received an equal volume of normal saline. The medication was prepared by the nursing staff and given to anesthetist blindly.

Measurements:

The monitors included the heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, electrocardiogram (ECG), serum troponin I level, end-tidal sevoflurane, and total dose of morphine in addition transthoracic echocardiography to the postoperative in cases with elevated serum troponin I level.

Main Results:

The dexmedetomidine decreased heart rate and minimized the changes in blood pressure compared to control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, it decreased the incidence of myocardial ischemia reflected by troponin I level, ECG changes, and the development of new regional wall motion abnormalities (P < 0.05). Dexmedetomidine decreased the requirement for nitroglycerin and norepinephrine compared to control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was significantly higher with dexmedetomidine (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The dexmedetomidine is safe and effective in patients undergoing aortic vascular surgery. It decreases the changes in heart rate and blood pressure during the procedures. It provides cardiac protection in high-risk patients reflected by decreasing the incidence of myocardial ischemia and serum level of troponin. The main side effects of dexmedetomidine were hypotension and bradycardia.

Dexmedetomidine preconditioning may attenuate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by down-regulating the HMGB1-TLR4-MyD88-NF-кB signaling pathway

Aims

To investigate whether dexmedetomidine (DEX) preconditioning could alleviate the inflammation caused by myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury by reducing HMGB1-TLR4-MyD88-NF-кB signaling.

Methods

Seventy rats were randomly assigned into five groups: sham group, myocardial I/R group (I/R), DEX+I/R group (DEX), DEX+yohimbine+I/R group (DEX/YOH), and yohimbine+I/R group (YOH). Animals were subjected to 30 min of ischemia induced by occluding the left anterior descending artery followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size and histological scores were evaluated. The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in serum and myocardium were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and expression of HMGB1, TLR4, MyD88, IκB and NF-κB in the myocardial I/R area were determined with Western blot and immunocytochemistry.

Results

Myocardial infarct sizes, histological scores, levels of circulating and myocardial IL-6 and TNF-α, the expression of HMGB1, TLR4, MyD88 and NF-κB, and the degradation of IκB were significantly increased in the I/R group compared with the sham group (P<0.01). DEX preconditioning significantly reduced the myocardial infarct size and histological scores (P<0.01 vs. I/R group). Similarly, the serum and myocardial levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, the expression of HMGB1, TLR4, MyD88 and NF-κB, and the degradation of IκB were significantly reduced in the DEX group (P<0.01 vs. I/R group). These effects were partly reversed by yohimbine, a selective α₂-adrenergic receptor antagonist, while yohimbine alone had no significant effect on any of the above indicators.

Conclusion

DEX preconditioning reduces myocardial I/R injury in part by attenuating inflammation, which may be attributed to the downregulation of the HMGB1-TLR4-MyD88-NF-кB signaling pathway mediated by the α₂-adrenergic receptor activation.

Effect of dexmedetomidine priming on convulsion reaction induced by lidocaine

To study the effect of dexmedetomidine priming on convulsion reaction induced by lidocaine.The New Zealand white rabbits were applied for the mechanism study of dexmedetomidine priming for preventing convulsion reaction induced by lidocaine. The influence of dexmedetomidine priming with different doses on the time for convulsion occurrence and the duration time of convulsion induced by lidocaine, as well as contents of excitatory amino acids (aspartate [Asp], glutamate [Glu]) and inhibitory amino acids (glycine [Gly], γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) in the brain tissue were investigated.With 3 and 5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine priming, the occurrence times of convulsion were prolonged from 196 seconds to 349 and 414 seconds, respectively. With dexmedetomidine priming, the contents of excitatory amino acids (Asp, Glu) were much reduced at occurrence time of convulsion comparing with that without dexmedetomidine priming, while content of inhibitory amino acids Gly was much enhanced.The application of dexmedetomidine before local anesthetics can improve intoxication dose threshold of the lidocaine, delay occurrence of the convulsion, and helped for the recovery of convulsion induced by lidocaine. The positive effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing convulsion would owe to not only the inhibition of excitatory amino acids (Asp, Glu), but also the promotion of inhibitory amino acids Gly secretion.

Comparison of the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Hemodynamics and Oxygen Balance in Children with Complex Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of anesthesia by dexmedetomidine and propofol on the hemodynamics and oxygen balance in children with complex congenital heart disease who were undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Fifty-seven children were randomized to receive either a continuous infusion of propofol (6-8 mg/kg/h) or dexmedetomidine (0.5-0.7 μg/kg/h) after anesthesia induction. Hemodynamic data were recorded. Oxygen balance parameters were assessed at baseline after midazolam sedation, before and immediately after skin incisions were made, after sternotomy, 5 minutes after protamine administration, and at the end of surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with the dexmedetomidine group, the propofol group exhibited decreases in blood pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index before skin incision (P < .05) and increases in blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and cardiac index after sternotomy (P < .01). However, very similar trends in oxygen dynamics were obtained in both groups (P > .05), and the cardiac index was not correlated with total oxygen consumption (r = -0.109, P = .066) or the oxygen extraction ratio (r = -0.107, P = .072).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine infusion may be superior to propofol anesthesia in children with complex congenital heart disease who are undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass because dexmedetomidine was associated with less variability in heart rate or blood pressure during surgery. However, the oxygen balance was similar when either agent was used.

Molecular targets and mechanism of action of dexmedetomidine in treatment of ischemia/reperfusion injury

Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly specific α2-adrenergic agonist, which exhibits anaesthetic-sparing, analgesia and sympatholytic properties. DEX modulates gene expression, channel activation, transmitter release, inflammatory processes and apoptotic and necrotic cell death. It has also been demonstrated to have protective effects in a variety of animal models of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, including the intestine, myocardial, renal, lung, cerebral and liver. The broad spectrum of biological activities associated with DEX continues to expand, and its diverse effects suggest that it may offer a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of human diseases with I/R involvement.

Dexmedetomidine preconditioning ameliorates kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury

Kidney ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a common cause of acute kidney injury. We tested whether dexmedetomidine (Dex), an alpha2 adrenoceptor (α2-AR) agonist, protects against kidney I/R injury. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: (1) Sham-operated group; (2) I/R group (40 min ischemia followed by 24 h reperfusion); (3) I/R group + Dex (1 μg/kg i.v. 60 min before the surgery), (4) I/R group + Dex (10 μg/kg). The effects of Dex postconditiong (Dex 1 or 10 μg/kg i.v. after reperfusion) as well as the effects of peripheral α2-AR agonism with fadolmidine were also examined. Hemodynamic effects were monitored, renal function measured, and acute tubular damage along with monocyte/macrophage infiltration scored. Kidney protein kinase B, toll like receptor 4, light chain 3B, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK), sirtuin 1, adenosine monophosphate kinase (AMPK), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expressions were measured, and kidney transciptome profiles analyzed. Dex preconditioning, but not postconditioning, attenuated I/R injury-induced renal dysfunction, acute tubular necrosis and inflammatory response. Neither pre- nor postconditioning with fadolmidine protected kidneys. Dex decreased blood pressure more than fadolmidine, ameliorated I/R-induced impairment of autophagy and increased renal p38 and eNOS expressions. Dex downregulated 245 and upregulated 61 genes representing 17 enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, in particular, integrin pathway and CD44. Ingenuity analysis revealed inhibition of Rac and nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 pathways, whereas aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway was activated. Dex preconditioning ameliorates kidney I/R injury and inflammatory response, at least in part, through p38-CD44-pathway and possibly also through ischemic preconditioning.

Preconditionin effects of dexmedetomidine on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

BACKGROUND

Preconditioning might protect the myocardium against ischemia/ reperfusion injury by reducing infarct size and preventing arrhythmias. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α2-agonist used for sedoanalgesia in daily anesthetic practice. The cardioprotective effects of DEX on infarct size and on the incidence of arrhythmias observed after regional ischemia/reperfusion injury in vivo have not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether DEX exhibits a preconditioning effect and reduces infarct size and the incidence and duration of arrhythmias in a regional cardiac ischemia/reperfusion model in rats.

METHODS

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with sodium thiopental and mechanically ventilated (0.9 mL/100 g at 60 strokes/min) through a cannula inserted into the trachea after tracheotomy. Cardiac ischemia was then produced by ligating the left main coronary artery for 30 minutes, followed by a reperfusion period of 120 minutes. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored and echocardiograms (ECGs) were performed. Arrhythmia was scored based on incidence and duration. The animals were randomly divided into 3 groups. The ischemic preconditioning (IPC) group underwent 5 minutes of ischemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion before the 30-minute ischemia/120-minute reperfusion period. In the DEX group, intraperitoneal (IP) DEX 1 mL (100 μg/kg) was administered 30 minutes before the ischemia/ reperfusion period. In the control group, IP saline 1 mL was administered 30 minutes before the ischemia/reperfusion period. After reperfusion, the heart was excised, demarcated with saline and ethanol to identify the occluded and nonoccluded myocardium, and cut into slices ~2 mm thick, that were then stained and placed between 2 glass plates. The risk zone and the infarct zone were compared between groups. The investigator assessing the infarcts was blinded to the study group.

RESULTS

Twenty-one adult (aged 4-6 months) male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 280 to 360 g were included in the study; 7 rats were assigned to each group. BP, HR, and ECG readings were not significantly different between groups and did not change during the study. Arrythmias occurred during ischemia and reperfusion in all groups. The duration of the arrhythmias was significantly shorter and the arrhythmia score was significantly lower in the IPC group (all, P<0.05), compared with the control group; however, they were not significantly different in the DEX group. During the ischemic period, duration of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular premature contractions (VPC) in the DEX group was significantly longer than that observed in the IPC group (all, P<0.05). The duration of VPC was also significantly shorter than that observed in the control group (both, P<0.05). Duration of VT during the reperfusion period in the DEX group was significantly longer than that observed in both IPC and control groups (both, P<0.05). The mean (SD) percentage of damage was significantly lower in the IPC group (44.1% [2.0%]) and the DEX group (26.7% [2.0%]) compared with the control group (69.0% [3.0%]; both, P<0.05). The percentage of damage in the DEX group was also significantly lower compared with the IPC group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This small, experimental in vivo study found that DEX was associated with reduced infarct size in ischemia/reperfusion injury in regional ischemia in this rat model but had no effect on the incidence of arrhythmias. Future studies are needed to clarify these findings.

Atrial supply-demand balance in healthy adult pigs: coronary blood flow, oxygen extraction, and lactate production during acute atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Little is known about how atrial oxygen supply responds to increased demand, and under which conditions it falls short (supply-demand mismatch). Here, we have investigated the vasodilator response, oxygen extraction, and lactate production of the left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV) in response to atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Series A (n = 9 Dutch landrace pigs) was instrumented to measure LA and LV vascular conductance in branches of the circumflex artery. Coronary conductance reserve (CCR) was calculated as the ratio between conductance during adenosine infusion and baseline. Series B (n = 7) was instrumented with sampling catheters in LA and LV veins for determination of blood gases and lactate levels. LA CCR (1.76 ± 0.14) was significantly lower than LV CCR (3.16 ± 0.27, P = 0.002). However, basal oxygen extraction was lower in LA (27 ± 3%) than that in the LV (58 ± 6%, P = 0.0006), indicating a larger extraction reserve in the LA than that in the LV (4.68 ± 0.84 vs. 1.88 ± 0.26, P = 0.01). Atrial pacing caused an increase in LA conductance (Series A) and oxygen extraction (Series B). AF increased LA vascular conductance to 177 ± 14% at 1 min, 168 ± 14 at 5 min, and 164 ± 31% at 10 min of AF (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). Atrial oxygen extraction also increased from 26 ± 3% at baseline to 63 ± 5% (P < 0.01) at 5 min and 60 ± 11% (P < 0.01) at 10 min of AF. Arterio-venous lactate difference increased significantly (P = 0.02) during AF.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy pigs, the LA has a lower CCR, but a higher extraction reserve compared with the LV. Although both reserves were recruited during AF, atrial lactate production increased significantly.

The effects of dexmedetomidine on mesenteric arterial occlusion-associated gut ischemia and reperfusion-induced gut and kidney injury in rabbits

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the antioxidant activity of dexmedetomidine (Dex) administered during the ischemic period in a rabbit model of mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury using biochemical and histopathological methods.

METHODS

A total of 24 male New Zealand white rabbits weighing between 2.5 and 3.0 kg were randomly divided into three groups: the sham group (Group S, n = 8), the I/R group (Group I/R, n = 8), and the I/R plus Dex treatment group (Group Dex, n = 8). In the I/R group, ischemia was achieved with 60 min of mesenteric occlusion. The sham group provided normal basal values. The rabbits in Group I/R were operated to achieve I/R. Group Dex received intravenous Dex 30 min after the commencement of reperfusion (10 μg/kg Dex was infused within 10 min, and then a maintenance dose of 10 μg/kg/h Dex was infused intravenously). For the measurement of tissue malondialdehyde, total antioxidant status, total oxidant status, lipid hydroperoxide levels, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and myeloperoxidase activity levels in the renal tissue samples of animals, the rabbits in each group were sacrificed 3 h after reperfusion. The histopathological examination scores were determined using the intestinal and renal tissues.

RESULTS

The mean malondialdehyde, total oxidant status, myeloperoxidase, and lipid hydroperoxide levels were significantly higher in Group I/R than in Groups S and Dex (P < 0.05). There also were significant decreases in the mean total antioxidant status, catalase, and superoxide dismutase activities in Group I/R compared with Groups S and Dex (P < 0.05). The histopathological examination scores of the intestinal and renal tissues were significantly higher in Group I/R compared with Groups S and Dex (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dex treatment may have biochemical and histopathological benefits by preventing I/R-related cellular damage of intestinal and renal tissues as shown in an experimental mesenteric ischemia model. The preference to use Dex for anesthesia during the mesenteric ischemia procedure may attenuate I/R injury in intestinal and renal tissues.

Dexmedetomidine preconditioning activates pro-survival kinases and attenuates regional ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat heart

Pharmacological preconditioning limits myocardial infarct size after ischemia/reperfusion. Dexmedetomidine is an α(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist used in anesthesia that may have cardioprotective properties against ischemia/reperfusion injury. We investigate whether dexmedetomidine administration activates cardiac survival kinases and induces cardioprotection against regional ischemia/reperfusion injury. In in vivo and ex vivo models, rat hearts were subjected to 30 min of regional ischemia followed by 120 min of reperfusion with dexmedetomidine before ischemia. The α(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine was also given before ischemia, alone or with dexmedetomidine. Erk1/2, Akt and eNOS phosphorylations were determined before ischemia/reperfusion. Cardioprotection after regional ischemia/reperfusion was assessed from infarct size measurement and ventricular function recovery. Localization of α(2)-adrenergic receptors in cardiac tissue was also assessed. Dexmedetomidine preconditioning increased levels of phosphorylated Erk1/2, Akt and eNOS forms before ischemia/reperfusion; being significantly reversed by yohimbine in both models. Dexmedetomidine preconditioning (in vivo model) and peri-insult protection (ex vivo model) significantly reduced myocardial infarction size, improved functional recovery and yohimbine abolished dexmedetomidine-induced cardioprotection in both models. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY-294002 reversed myocardial infarction size reduction induced by dexmedetomidine preconditioning. The three isotypes of α(2)-adrenergic receptors were detected in the whole cardiac tissue whereas only the subtypes 2A and 2C were observed in isolated rat adult cardiomyocytes. These results show that dexmedetomidine preconditioning and dexmedetomidine peri-insult administration produce cardioprotection against regional ischemia/reperfusion injury, which is mediated by the activation of pro-survival kinases after cardiac α(2)-adrenergic receptor stimulation.

Dexmedetomidine: applications for the pediatric patient with congenital heart disease

This study aimed to provide a general description of the cardiovascular and hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine and an evidence-based review of the literature regarding its use in infants and children with congenital heart disease (CHD). A computerized bibliographic search of the literature on dexmedetomidine use in infants and children with CHD was performed. The cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine have been well studied in animal and adult human models. Adverse cardiovascular effects include occasional episodes of bradycardia, with rare reports of sinus pause or cardiac arrest. Both hypotension and hypertension also have been reported. The latter is related to peripheral α(2B) agonism leading to vasoconstriction. No adverse effects on the pulmonary vasculature have been noted even in patients with preexisting pulmonary hypertension. Although there are no direct effects on myocardial function, decreased cardiac output may result from changes in heart rate or increases in afterload. Although not currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the pediatric population, findings have shown dexmedetomidine to be effective in various clinical scenarios of patients with CHD including sedation during mechanical ventilation, prevention of procedure-related anxiety, prevention of emergence delirium and shivering after anesthesia, and treatment of withdrawal. Although dexmedetomidine may have limited utility for painful or invasive procedures, preliminary data suggest that the addition of ketamine to the regimen may offer benefits. When used during the perioperative period, additional benefits include blunting of the sympathetic stress response with a reduction of endogenous catecholamine release, a decrease in intraoperative anesthetic requirements, and a limitation of postoperative opioid requirements.

Effects of dexmedetomidine pretreatment on bupivacaine cardiotoxicity in rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effects of dexmedetomidine pretreatment on bupivacaine cardiotoxicity in anesthetized rats.

METHODS

Sixteen Wistar-Albino male rats (300-400 g) were anesthetized with ketamine. Electrocardiographic and invasive blood pressure monitoring were performed, and the results were continuously recorded. The rats were randomized into 2 groups. In group D, rats were pretreated with intravenous dexmedetomidine at a dose of 10 Kg/kg (n = 8), whereas in group S, rats were pretreated with intravenous saline (n = 8). Fifteen minutes later, bupivacaine was infused at a rate of 3 mg/kg per minute until cardiac asystole occurred. The timing of specific cardiotoxic events (a 25%, 50%, and 75% reductions of mean arterial pressure and heart rate as well as occurrence of the first arrhythmia and asystole) was recorded.

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine pretreatment reduced the heart rates and mean arterial pressures of the rats who received it (P G 0.05). Dexmedetomidine pretreatment before bupivacaine administration also significantly increased the time to the 25%, 50%, and 75% reductions in mean arterial pressure and the time to the 25% and 50% reductions in heart rate (P G 0.05). In addition, dexmedetomidine significantly increased the time to first arrhythmia and time to asystole (P G 0.05) in the rats who received it before receiving bupivacaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine pretreatment delays the effects of bupivacaine cardiotoxicity.

Sympathetic overstimulation during critical illness: adverse effects of adrenergic stress

The term ''adrenergic'' originates from ''adrenaline'' and describes hormones or drugs whose effects are similar to those of epinephrine. Adrenergic stress is mediated by stimulation of adrenergic receptors and activation of post-receptor pathways. Critical illness is a potent stimulus of the sympathetic nervous system. It is undisputable that the adrenergic-driven ''fight-flight response'' is a physiologically meaningful reaction allowing humans to survive during evolution. However, in critical illness an overshooting stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system may well exceed in time and scope its beneficial effects. Comparable to the overwhelming immune response during sepsis, adrenergic stress in critical illness may get out of control and cause adverse effects. Several organ systems may be affected. The heart seems to be most susceptible to sympathetic overstimulation. Detrimental effects include impaired diastolic function, tachycardia and tachyarrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, stunning, apoptosis and necrosis. Adverse catecholamine effects have been observed in other organs such as the lungs (pulmonary edema, elevated pulmonary arterial pressures), the coagulation (hypercoagulability, thrombus formation), gastrointestinal (hypoperfusion, inhibition of peristalsis), endocrinologic (decreased prolactin, thyroid and growth hormone secretion) and immune systems (immunomodulation, stimulation of bacterial growth), and metabolism (increase in cell energy expenditure, hyperglycemia, catabolism, lipolysis, hyperlactatemia, electrolyte changes), bone marrow (anemia), and skeletal muscles (apoptosis). Potential therapeutic options to reduce excessive adrenergic stress comprise temperature and heart rate control, adequate use of sedative/analgesic drugs, and aiming for reasonable cardiovascular targets, adequate fluid therapy, use of levosimendan, hydrocortisone or supplementary arginine vasopressin.

Prolonged use of dexmedetomidine in the paediatric cardiothoracic intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha2-adrenergic agonist that causes sleep-like sedation and mild analgesia without narcosis or respiratory depression, and has relative cardiovascular stability. Due to these properties, it may be an effective agent for prolonged use in the sedation of patients in the paediatric cardiothoracic intensive care unit. We reviewed our experience with the drug to detail its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who received dexmedetomidine over a six month period in a dedicated paediatric cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Patients were identified from pharmacy records showing administration of drugs. We collected demographic data, information relating to doses of dexmedetomidine, physiologic parameters, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 54 patients who received the drug. The median age of recipients was 6 months, with a range from 1 day to 16 years. The mean duration of administration was 37.3 hours, with a range from 2 to 177 hours. The mean duration of continuation of administration after extubation was 16.7 hours, with a range from zero to 112.5 hours. Physiologically, there were no clinically significant changes in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, or saturations of oxygen before, during, or after utilization of the drug. Use of dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the need to administer narcotics, and scores using the COMFORT system were not different between patients who received dexmedetomidine and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

In this limited and retrospective review, dexmedetomidine was found to be safe and efficacious. Its use as a sedative agent for extended periods of time in critically-ill children deserves investigation in a prospective and controlled manner.

Dexmedetomidine reduces the ischemia-reperfusion injury markers during upper extremity surgery with tourniquet

PURPOSE

We examined the effect of dexmedetomidine on ischemia-reperfusion injury due to tourniquet application during upper-extremity surgery by determining blood malondialdehyde and hypoxanthine levels. Alterations in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatine phosphokinase, lactate dehydrogenase, uric acid, and creatinine levels were also assessed.

METHODS

Forty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to II having hand and forearm surgery with tourniquet were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Brachial plexus anesthesia via axillary approach was performed for upper-limb block in all patients. In the dexmedetomidine group, a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg for 10 minutes, followed by 0.5 microg kg(-1) h(-1)) was used until the end of surgery, whereas the control group received an equivalent volume of saline. Venous blood samples were obtained before brachial plexus anesthesia, at 1 minute before tourniquet release, and 15 minutes after tourniquet release for biochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated plasma hypoxanthine production in the ischemia and plasma malondialdehyde production in the reperfusion periods. Blood creatine phosphokinase and uric acid levels were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared with those in the control group after reperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that dexmedetomidine may offer advantages by inhibiting lipid peroxidation in the case of anticipated ischemia-reperfusion injury, such as would occur in upper-extremity surgery requiring tourniquet application.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

The cardioprotective effect of dexmedetomidine on global ischaemia in isolated rat hearts

AIM

Dexmedetomidine is a highly specific and selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist that is now widely used in the intensive care setting. Many intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at risk of respiratory or cardiac arrest. This study was conducted to determine whether dexmedetomidine exhibits a cardioprotective effect on global ischaemia and subsequent myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Isolated rat hearts were subjected to 30 min of global ischaemia followed by 120 min reperfusion, with administration of 0, 1 and 10nM dexmedetomidine during the pre-ischaemic period (n=7 each group). Secondly, 1 microM yohimbine, an alpha-2 antagonist, was given during the pre-ischaemic period, alone or in combination with 10 nM dexmedetomidine (n=7 each group).

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine administration reduced coronary flow significantly (103.6+/-4.7%, 77.9+/-3.7, 63.7+/-6.1%, of the baseline values for 0, 1 and 10 nM dexmedetomidine, respectively), and yohimbine administration reversed this effect (88.0+/-2.2%). Dexmedetomidine improved the infarct size at each concentration (45.3+/-3.6, 30.2+/-3.3, and 21.2+/-2.3% of the total left ventricular mass for 0, 1, and 10nM dexmedetomidine, respectively), which was also reversed by yohimbine (43.6+/-1.4%).

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine exhibited a cardioprotective effect on global ischaemia in the isolated rat heart model, which was mediated by alpha-2 adrenergic stimulation.

Dexmedetomidine: applications in pediatric critical care and pediatric anesthesiology

OBJECTIVE

To provide a general descriptive account of the end-organ effects of dexmedetomidine and to provide an evidence-based review of the literature regarding its use in infants and children.

DATA SOURCE

A computerized bibliographic search of the literature regarding dexmedetomidine.

MAIN RESULTS

The end-organ effects of dexmedetomidine have been well studied in animal and adult human models. Adverse cardiovascular effects include occasional episodes of bradycardia with rare reports of sinus pause or cardiac arrest. Hypotension has also been reported as well as hypertension, the latter thought to be due to peripheral alpha2B agonism with peripheral vasoconstriction. Although dexmedetomidine has no direct effects on myocardial function, decreased cardiac output may result from changes in heart rate or increases in afterload. There are somewhat conflicting reports in the literature regarding its effects on ventilatory function, with some studies (both human and animal) suggesting a mild degree of respiratory depression, decreased minute ventilation, and decreased response to CO2 challenge whereas others demonstrate no effect. The central nervous system effects include sedation and analgesia with prevention of recall and memory at higher doses. Dexmedetomidine may also provide some neuroprotective activity during periods of ischemia. Applications in infants and children have included sedation during mechanical ventilation, prevention of emergence agitation following general anesthesia, provision of procedural sedation, and the prevention of withdrawal following the prolonged administration of opioids and benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature contains reports of the use of dexmedetomidine in approximately 800 pediatric patients. Given its favorable sedative and anxiolytic properties combined with its limited effects on hemodynamic and respiratory function, there is growing interest in and reports of its use in the pediatric population in various clinical scenarios.

The Effects of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine on Myocardial Oxygen Consumption During Sympathetic Stimulation in Dogs

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the potential of the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor blocker esmolol and the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist dexmedetomidine to suppress the cardiovascular and neuroendocrine response to a sympathetic stimulus.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

SETTING

Laboratory of university.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven anesthetized dogs.

INTERVENTIONS

Catheters for arterial and coronary venous blood sampling and calculation of myocardial oxygen consumption were inserted. Pressure sensors were placed in the aorta, left ventricle, and a carotid artery. Flow probes were placed around the aortic root and around the left anterior descending coronary artery. Esmolol was infused (loading dose of 1 mg/kg, infusion of 0.3 mg/kg/h), and the adequacy of beta-blockade was checked. Thirty minutes after stopping esmolol, dexmedetomidine infusion was started (loading dose of 1 microg/kg, infusion of 1.5 microg/kg/min). Occlusion of both carotid arteries was used as a sympathetic stimulus before and during infusion of esmolol and before and during infusion of dexmedetomidine.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The variables were measured just before and during sympathetic stimulation, and changes were calculated. Both drugs suppressed the increase in dPdT(max). Dexmedetomidine suppressed the increase in plasma norepinephrine and the increase in systemic vascular resistance (dexmedetomidine 4% +/- 4% and esmolol 25% +/- 19% increase, p = 0.02). Esmolol attenuated the heart rate response (esmolol 2% +/- 2% and dexmedetomidine 20% +/- 18% increase, p = 0.02). However, dexmedetomidine decreased baseline heart rate more than esmolol; therefore, the absolute maximal heart rate during sympathetic stimulation was lower in the presence of dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine 119 +/- 14 and esmolol 141 +/- 15 beats/min, p = 0.01). Neither drug suppressed the increase in myocardial oxygen consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Both esmolol and dexmedetomidine have the potential to suppress some of the cardiovascular and neuroendocrine changes to a sympathetic stimulus but neither drug abolished the increase in myocardial oxygen consumption.

Cardiopulmonary effects of fentanyl in conscious dogs and dogs sedated with a continuous rate infusion of medetomidine

OBJECTIVE

To determine the hemodynamic consequences of the coadministration of a continuous rate infusion (CRI) of medetomidine with a fentanyl bolus in dogs.

ANIMALS

12 healthy sexually intact male dogs weighing 30.3 -/+ 4.2 kg (mean +/- SD).

PROCEDURE

Dogs received either fentanyl alone (15.0 microg/kg, i.v. bolus) or the same dose of fentanyl during an 11-hour CRI of medetomidine (1.5 microg/kg/h, i.v.). Prior to drug administration, dogs were instrumented for measurement of cardiac output, left atrial pressure, and systemic arterial blood pressures. Additionally, blood samples were collected from the pulmonary artery and left atrium for blood gas analysis.

RESULTS

Medetomidine infusion reduced the cardiac index, heart rate, and O2, delivery while increasing left atrial pressure. Subsequent fentanyl administration further decreased the cardiac index. The Pao2 was not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups; however, fentanyl transiently decreased Pao2 from baseline values in dogs receiving a CRI of medetomidine.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Because of the prolonged hemodynamic changes associated with the CRI of medetomidine, its safety should be further evaluated before being clinically implemented in dogs.

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Left Ventricular Function During Hypoxia and Reoxygenation in Isolated Rat Hearts

Hypoxia resulting from apnea in patients with sleep apnea is an important factor in heart disease. We designed the present study to determine whether dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a direct protective effect against hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced left ventricular dysfunction without systemic hemodynamic and humoral effects. Isolated rat hearts were exposed to 60-min hypoxia followed by 30-min reoxygenation with 0, 10, or 100 nM DEX prehypoxia administration (n = 7 each group). In a second experiment (n = 7), 100 nM DEX was administered posthypoxia. In a third experiment (n = 7 each group), an alpha 2 antagonist, yohimbine was given with and without 100 nM DEX prehypoxia administration. DEX prehypoxia, but not posthypoxia, administration significantly improved the recovery of left ventricular developed pressure after reoxygenation (0, 10, 100 nM DEX prehypoxia or 100 nM DEX posthypoxia values were 53 +/- 6, 64 +/- 9, 78 +/- 13, or 62 +/- 12 mm Hg [mean +/- sd]) and reversed by yohimbine, 58 +/- 8 mm Hg, respectively. We conclude that DEX exerts the direct protective effect on the left ventricular dysfunction caused by hypoxia-reoxygenation through mainly alpha 2-adrenergic stimulation before and during the hypoxic period.

Dexmedetomidine for awake carotid endarterectomy: efficacy, hemodynamic profile, and side effects

: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study was designed to compare dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative agent with a commonly used drug combination in patients undergoing awake carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Sixty-six patients undergoing CEA (ASA II-IV) were randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine (total dose of 97.5 +/- 54.7 mcg) or normal saline (control). Supplemental doses of midazolam, fentanyl, and/or propofol were administered as deemed necessary by the anesthesiologist. An observer blinded to the study drug assessed sedation level (Observer's Assessment of Alertness-Sedation [OAA/S] scale). The primary outcomes were defined as the number of patients with an OAA/S score of 4 intraoperatively and an OAA/S score of 5 postoperatively. The authors also compared cardiorespiratory parameters, intra- and postoperative side effects, and complications. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the primary endpoints. All secondary parameters were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Three patients in the dexmedetomidine group (10%) had an OAA/S score of 4 at all four time points assessed intraoperatively, while no patient in the control group had a score of 4 at all the time points considered. Thirteen patients in the dexmedetomidine group had a score of 4 at three or more time points (42%) compared with six patients (19%) in the control group. Four patients in the control group (13%) and one patient in the dexmedetomidine group (3%) did not achieve a score of 4 at any of the four critical intraoperative time points (chi for association = 9.9, P < 0.05; chi for a trend = 8.6, P < 0.004, with the trend favoring dexmedetomidine). More patients in the control group required treatment with metoprolol (26% vs. 6%, P = 0.04) and labetalol (48% vs/ 6%, P < 0.01). Plasma levels of norepinephrine were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group during and after surgery compared with the control group. Six patients (19%) in the dexmedetomidine group required intra-arterial shunts, while only two patients (6%) required shunts in the control group (P = 0.16). These data show that the use of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing awake CEA resulted in fewer fluctuations from the desired sedation level. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine required less antihypertensive therapy compared with the midazolam/fentanyl/propofol combination. The effect of dexmedetomidine on cerebrovascular circulation in the study population needs further investigation.