Systemic Hypotension Following Intravenous Administration of Nonionic Contrast Medium During Computed Tomography: Iopromide Versus Iodixanol

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous bolus injection of iopromide 370 twice in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and coronary CTA dual-site sequential examinations

Little information is available about how intravenous bolus injection of iopromide 370 twice in a short time will affect hemodynamics and whether the changes reach clinically relevant levels. In the present study, 31 healthy adult volunteers received abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and coronary CTA sequential examinations. The same dose and rate of normal saline was injected 30 min in advance as self-control. Hemodynamic data were noninvasively collected at selected time points from 1 min prior to injection to 30 min post-injection. The results showed that after iopromide 370 injection, except for stroke volume, all other indicators changed immediately during the first injection, changed most significantly during the second injection (P < 0.05), and returned to baseline within 10 min. Heart rate and cardiac output exhibited the most pronounced changes, with an increasing rate of 33.5% and 33.8%, respectively. For indicators with a change range of > 15% during the second injection, except for mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance, the proportions of subjects for the other indicators between the two groups were statistically different (P < 0.05). In conclusion, intravenous bolus injection of iopromide 370 twice in dual-site sequential examinations induced dose-cumulative and time-dependent hemodynamic effects, which all fluctuated within the normal ranges.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of different dosages of iodixanol in computed tomography angiography and perfusion of overweight patients with coronary artery stenosis: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Iodixanol contrast media with different doses using computed tomography angiography (CTA) and perfusion (CTP) to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) in overweight patients lacks assessment. Our study compared iodixanol 320 mg I/ml and 270 mg I/ml on image quality and accuracy of CTA combined CTP (CTA-CTP) to diagnose CAD.

METHODS

Overweight patients with suspected of CAD were randomized into iodixanol 270 group (received iodixanol 270 mg I/ml) and iodixanol 320 group (received iodixanol 320 mg I/ml). Based on these characteristics data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and corresponding area under the curve (AUC) were plotted to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the two administrations.

RESULTS

The subjective definition score, signal to noise ratio, and CT value of aorta in iodixanol 320 group were higher than iodixanol 270 group. In iodixanol 270 group: the image exhibited a normal state of both vessels and myocardial perfusion; and the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity were 0.376, 66.67, and 80.46, respectively. In iodixanol 320 group: the image exhibited a diameter stenosis in right coronary artery and myocardial infarction of inferior wall and proximal inferior wall septum, as well as myocardial perfusion defects; and the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity in iodixanol 320 group were 0.824, 75.00, and 89.87, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Accuracy and image quality of iodixanol 320 mg I/ml in the diagnosis of CAD with CTA-CTP was higher than using iodixanol 270 mg I/ml.

Three-Dimensional Kidney-on-a-Chip Assessment of Contrast-Induced Kidney Injury: Osmolality and Viscosity

Increased viscosity of concentrated contrast media (CM) in the renal tubules can perturb renal hemodynamics and have a detrimental effect on tubular epithelial cells. However, the effects of viscosity on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remain poorly understood. Conventional in vitro culture studies do not reflect the rheological properties of CM. Therefore, we investigated the effects of CM viscosity on renal tubules using a kidney-on-a-chip and two different types of CM. Renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC) were cultured in a three-dimensional microfluidic culture platform under bidirectional fluid shear stress. We treated the RPTEC with two types of CM: low- (LOCM, iopromide) and iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM, iodixanol). Renal tubular cell injury induced by LOCM and IOCM was examined under different iodine concentrations (50–250 mgI/mL) and shear-stress conditions. LOCM showed a significant dose-dependent cytotoxic effect, which was significantly higher than that of IOCM under static and low-to-moderate shear stress conditions. However, high shear-stress resulted in reduced cell viability in IOCM; no difference between IOCM and LOCM was found under high shear-stress conditions. The cytotoxic effects were pronounced at a mean shear stress of 1 dyn/cm2 or higher. The high viscosity of IOCM slowed the fluid flow rate and augmented fluid shear-stress. We suggest an alternative in vitro model of CIN using the three-dimensional kidney-on-a-chip. Our results indicate a vital role of viscosity-induced nephrotoxicity under high shear-stress conditions, contrary to the findings of conventional in vitro studies.

Hemorrhagic Transformation Rates following Contrast Media Administration in Patients Hospitalized with Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hemorrhagic transformation is a critical complication associated with ischemic stroke and has been associated with contrast media administration. The objective of our study was to use real-world in-hospital data to evaluate the correlation between contrast media type and transformation from ischemic to hemorrhagic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained data on inpatient admissions with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke and a record of either iso-osmolar or low-osmolar iodinated contrast media for a stroke-related diagnostic test and a treatment procedure (thrombectomy, thrombolysis, or angioplasty). We performed multivariable regression analysis to assess the relationship between contrast media type and the development of hemorrhagic transformation during hospitalization, adjusting for patient characteristics, comorbid conditions, procedure type, a threshold for contrast media volume, and differences across hospitals.

RESULTS

Inpatient visits with exclusive use of either low-osmolar (n = 38,130) or iso-osmolar contrast media (n = 4042) were included. We observed an overall risk reduction in hemorrhagic transformation among patients who received iso-osmolar compared with low-osmolar contrast media, with an absolute risk reduction of 1.4% (P = .032), relative risk reduction of 12.5%, and number needed to prevent harm of 70. This outcome was driven primarily by patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (n = 9211), in which iso-osmolar contrast media was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 4.6% (P = .028), a relative risk reduction of 20.8%, and number needed to prevent harm of 22, compared with low-osmolar contrast media.

CONCLUSIONS

Iso-osmolar contrast media was associated with a lower rate of hemorrhagic transformation compared with low-osmolar contrast media in patients with ischemic stroke.

Effect of bolus administration of non-ionic radiopaque contrast media on blood pressure variation

INTRODUCTION

Haemodynamic changes may occur with the rapid intravenous injection of contrast media due to the osmolality of such pharmaceuticals. This study sought to evaluate the effect of bolus administration of intravenous contrast media on blood pressure variation during the Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) of the abdomen.

METHODS

The study included 74 patients who underwent abdominal CECT and they were placed in the first group receiving a maximum of 80 ml of iodinated contrast via pressure injector (4 ml/s). A further 74 patients, who underwent non-contrast enhanced abdominal CT, were placed in the second group in which 80 ml of normal saline was administered via the same manner. Patients with hypertension and who were on anti-hypertensive drugs were excluded from the study. Non-invasive blood pressure was monitored before the injection of contrast media/saline and immediately after the portal venous phase for the CECT scan and after 45 s following the administration of normal saline in the non-contrast CT group. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures from both groups were compared to find out the effect of contrast bolus administration on blood pressure variation.

RESULTS

Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased with the injection of contrast media among CECT scan group. No significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were found before and after the scan in the non-contrast group.

CONCLUSION

Bolus administration of 80 ml saline has no effect on blood pressure. The increased blood pressure in contrast enhanced studies was induced by the iodinated contrast media and not by the bolus effect.

Differences in Adverse Reactions Among Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the KAERS Database

BACKGROUND

The various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) arise from different types of iodinated contrast media (ICM).

OBJECTIVE

Thus, we investigated the occurrence rate and types of ADRs according to the total usage cases of the 7 most common ICM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 74,242 causal ADRs caused by ICM from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database between January 2014 and December 2016. The 11,712,796 total usage cases that represent all administrations of ICM reported from individual medical institutions were received from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. A proportionality test was used to examine the differences in the frequency ratio of causal ADRs to total usage cases.

RESULTS

Immediate hypersensitivity (44,467 cases, 88.56%) occurred more frequently than delayed hypersensitivity (5,725 cases, 11.4%; P < .001). The overall occurrence rate of causal ADRs and serious ADRs considering total usage cases was 0.37% and 0.02%, respectively (P < .001). The ICM most commonly resulting in ADRs were iomeprol (0.7%) and iopromide (0.59%). The serious ADRs were most common for iomeprol (0.05%). When ADRs were classified according to the system organ class, "skin and appendages disorders" (47,065 cases, 63.4%) occurred most common. Iodixanol resulted in the highest frequency of "urinary system disorders."

CONCLUSIONS

By comparison of the ADRs considering total usage cases, the incidence and classification of ADRs were different for each contrast medium. A prospective study is needed because the differences in these 7 major contrast media may assist in the selection of ICM tailored for each patient.