Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guideline on Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Intravenous Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac for Perioperative Pain Control in Patients with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the perioperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included adult patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Participants were randomized to receive either ibuprofen or ketorolac intravenously every 8 h. All patients received paracetamol intravenously 1 gm/6 h. Inadequate intraoperative analgesia was managed by fentanyl boluses, while inadequate postoperative analgesia was managed by nalbuphine boluses. The primary outcome was static visual analogue scale (VAS) 0.5 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were postoperative static and dynamic VAS, intra- and postoperative opioids consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were analyzed in each group. The median VAS (quartiles) at 0.5 h postoperatively was lower in the ketorolac group (3 [3, 6]) than in the ibuprofen group (7 [4, 8]), P-value < 0.001. The static and dynamic VAS were lower in the ketorolac group than in the ibuprofen group up to 6 h postoperatively. The intra- and postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the ketorolac group than in the ibuprofen group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was also lower in the ketorolac group than in the ibuprofen group. Patients in the ketorolac group had higher level of satisfaction than patients in the ibuprofen group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, perioperative administration of ketorolac provided improved pain control, reduced opioid consumption, and lowered the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, compared to ibuprofen. Additionally, patients reported higher satisfaction with ketorolac.

There is No Increased Pulmonary Risk Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Obstructive Sleep Apnea Without Underlying Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a frequent comorbidity. The current study evaluated whether there is a difference in the perioperative outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who had a low to moderate risk for OSA and high risk for OSA, respectively.

METHODS

After excluding patients who had concomitant lung disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or lung fibrosis) and those missing a STOP-Bang Score, 1,141 THA patients who had OSA were included in this retrospective study. Patients at low to moderate risk for OSA (STOP-Bang Score 0 to 4) and patients at high risk for OSA (STOP-Bang Score 5 to 8) were compared, and SpO2 (oxygen saturation) drops < 90% as well as readmission rates were compared between patients who did and did not use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the risk of SpO2 drop below 90% (1 versus 0%, P = 0.398) and readmission rate (2 versus 2%, P = 0.662) between patients who had low to moderate OSA risk (327 THA) and high OSA risk (814 THAs). There was no difference in SpO2 (P > 0.999) and a decrease in oxygen flow rate from the postanesthesia care unit to the morning of the first postoperative day. A CPAP device was used by 41% (467 of 1,141) of patients. There were no differences in SpO2 drop < 90% (0 versus 0%, P = 0.731) and readmission rate (2 versus 2%, P = 0.612) between patients who did and did not use a CPAP machine.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed no difference in perioperative outcomes between OSA patients undergoing THA who had a low STOP-Bang Score and patients who had a high STOP-Bang Score, regardless of the use of a CPAP machine. These data suggest that an elevated Stop-Bang Score does not indicate an increased perioperative risk for OSA patients when deciding on outpatient discharge.

Bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation to prevent hypoxaemia during gastroscopy under sedation in patients at risk of hypoxaemia: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

During sedation for gastroscopy, hypoxaemia represents the most common adverse event. The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) for the prevention of hypoxaemia, in comparison with nasal cannula oxygen therapy, among patients predisposed to hypoxaemia during sedation for gastroscopy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will include 616 patients at risk of hypoxaemia when undergoing gastroscopy, including those with advanced age, frailty, American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III-IV, obesity, obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, cardiac disease, respiratory disease and diabetes. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the BPAP or nasal cannula group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary analysis for this study will use the modified intention-to-treat analysis set. The primary outcome is defined as the incidence of hypoxaemia (SpO275%-90%, duration 5-60 s). Outcomes data will be compared using the χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Effect sizes will be used to assess the clinical effects of the intervention using absolute risk differences and 95% CIs. To assess the efficacy of BPAP in different patient subgroups, analyses will be performed based on clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with hypoxaemia.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University reviewed and approved this RCT (Scientific Research Ethics Review: 2023-KY-0815-003). Subsequently, the outcome will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400084596.

Influence of Patient Gender and Race on Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Perioperative Medicine

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a disorder of upper airway collapse during sleep, has long been recognized as an important risk factor for patients undergoing anesthesia. This article explores gender and racial disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of OSA, and how these inequities may impact care in the perioperative period.

Opioid use in treated and untreated obstructive sleep apnoea: remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in adult volunteers

BACKGROUND

Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are considered more sensitive to opioids and at increased risk of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Nonetheless, whether OSA treatment (continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP; or bilevel positive airway pressure, BIPAP) modifies this risk remains unknown. Greater opioid sensitivity can arise from altered pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. This preplanned analysis of a previous cohort study of remifentanil clinical effects in OSA tested the null hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or both of remifentanil, a representative μ-opioid agonist, are not altered in adults with treated or untreated OSA.

METHODS

A single-centre, prospective, open-label, cohort study administered a stepped-dose, target-controlled remifentanil infusion (target effect-site concentrations 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 ng ml-1) to awake adult volunteers (median age 52 yr, range 23-70) without OSA (n=20), with untreated OSA (n=33), or with treated OSA (n=21). Type III (in-home) polysomnography verified OSA. Remifentanil plasma concentrations, end-expired CO2, thermal heat tolerance, and pupil diameter (miosis) were assessed. Population pharmacokinetic (clearance, volume of distribution) and pharmacodynamic (miosis, thermal heat tolerance, end-expired CO2) models were developed.

RESULTS

Remifentanil clearance (median) was 147, 143, and 155 L h-1 (P=0.472), and volume of distribution was 19.6, 15.5, and 17.7 L (P=0.473) for subjects without OSA, untreated OSA, or treated OSA, respectively. Total body weight was an influential covariate on both remifentanil clearance and central volume of distribution. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the three groups in miosis EC50 or Emax, or the slopes of thermal heat tolerance or end-expired CO2vs remifentanil concentration. At a plasma remifentanil concentration of 4 ng ml-1, in participants without OSA, with untreated OSA, or with treated OSA, respectively, model-estimated pupil area (12%, 13%, and 17% of baseline, P=0.086), thermal heat tolerance (50°C, 51°C, and 51°C, P=0.218), and end-expired CO2 (6.3 kPa, 6.4 kPa, and 6.7 kPa, P=0.257) were not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

OSA (untreated or treated) did not influence remifentanil pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics (miosis, analgesia, respiratory depression). Results support the null hypothesis that neither pharmacokinetics nor pharmacodynamics of remifentanil, a representative μ-opioid, are altered in adults with treated or untreated OSA. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the lack of influence of OSA or OSA treatment on the clinical miotic, sedative, analgesic, or respiratory depressant response to remifentanil in awake adults. The conventional notion that OSA alters sensitivity to the effects of opioids in awake adults is not supported by our findings, such that opioid dosing might not need adjustment for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic considerations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02898792, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02898792. First Posted: September 13, 2016.

Continuous vital sign monitoring with Biobeat® wearable devices for post-ambulatory surgery patients: a pilot feasibility study

Improvement in anesthesia and surgical practices has enabled more patients, including those undergoing higher-risk surgeries, to be treated in outpatient settings. This shift creates a need for reliable postoperative monitoring at home. Wearable devices like the Biobeat® offer continuous, real-time monitoring of vital signs have remained largely untested for home use in this context.A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) from February to August 2023. Fifty eligible patients underwent continuous monitoring with the Biobeat® device for five days post-surgery, with data transmitted to CHUM's telehealth service. Feasibility was assessed by the percentage of patients without data loss during consecutive 2-hour intervals.Of the 50 patients enrolled, 49 completed the study, but all experienced some level of data loss. While 39.6% of patients maintained connectivity without complete data loss for 6-8-hour intervals, challenges included device discomfort, Bluetooth disconnection, and connectivity issues. Thirteen patients removed the device early due to discomfort or technical issues. Of the 3 patients who experienced post-operative complications, no data was available within 24 h prior to the episodes. Continuous vital signs monitoring is feasible for high-risk outpatient surgery patients; however, significant improvements are required in device reliability and data accessibility. Further studies are needed to refine the technology and develop reliable protocols for postoperative monitoring in the home setting.

Research and clinical implications of emerging evidence regarding patterns of postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression

The wider availability of continuous respiratory monitors and advanced data abstraction techniques has led to a substantial increase in understanding of postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD), particularly regarding its incidence, presentation, temporal distribution, and risk factors. Self-limited episodes of OIRD are relatively common, typically presenting as repetitive apneas beginning in the postoperative period and continuing through the first night after surgery. In contrast, life-threatening episodes of OIRD are rare and usually occur on the day of surgery. Traditional monitoring of patient vital signs may be insensitive in detecting OIRD, while healthcare staff may be more adept at recognizing the concurrent development of somnolence. Although obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for OIRD, a more comprehensive phenotype is emerging-elderly patients with debility and substantial comorbidity. These advances have significant implications for managing postoperative OIRD. This review will focus on how these new insights into OIRD have highlighted knowledge gaps and created opportunities for future research and practice initiatives.

Perioperative Medicine for Ambulatory Surgery

Ambulatory anesthesia for same-day surgery is a fast-growing and ever-improving branch of modern anesthesia. This is primarily driven by the involvement of anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians working in multidisciplinary groups. These groups work together to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and overall efficiency of both in-patient and out-patient surgery. Appropriate patient selection and optimization are critical to maintain and improve the foundational entities of best ambulatory anesthesia practice. In this review article, a selection of considerations in the field of ambulatory anesthesia are featured, such as the aging population, sleep apnea, obesity, diabetes, cardiac disease, substance abuse, preoperative medication management, multimodal analgesia, social determinants of health, and surgical facility resources.

The knowledge profile, attitudes, and perioperative management of Chinese anesthesiologists towards patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUNDS

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is increasingly encountered by anesthesiologists in clinical practice. However, research on managing these patients among anesthesiologists in China is scarce. This study aims to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perioperative management strategies for OSA patients among Chinese anesthesiologists.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, anesthesiologists from various hospitals across China were invited to complete a thirty-eight-item online questionnaire survey between October 1 and November 1, 2022. The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitude (OSAKA) scale was utilized to measure their knowledge and attitudes.

RESULTS

A total of 470 valid participants were recruited for this research, resulting in a valid response rate of 73.3%. (1) While the majority of participants acknowledged the importance of identifying OSA during perioperative management, only 58.3% felt confident in managing OSA patients; (2) Anesthesiologists with higher professional titles and longer work experience exhibited greater confidence in managing OSA patients; (3) Just under half of the participants were familiar with the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires. Anesthesiologists with over 20 years of work experience were more likely to use the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires compared to those with less than 10 years of work experience (OR = 3.166, P < 0.001); (4) 71.1% of participants expressed approval regarding the preparation of sugammadex for muscle relaxation reversal, while only 32.8% approved the safety of opioid use for postoperative analgesia in OSA patients.

CONCLUSION

The study displayed that Chinese anesthesiologists have inadequate knowledge and perioperative management of OSA than expected. However, they have positive attitudes towards the assessment and management of OSA. The study highlights the need for high-quality training to identify and manage OSA among Chinese anesthesiologists.

Comparing oxygen therapies for hypoxemia prevention during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Hypoxemia is the most frequent adverse event observed during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation. An optimum oxygen therapy has still not been conclusively determined.

DESIGN

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

SETTING

Digestive Endoscopy Center.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥18 years old and of both sexes) during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation.

INTERVENTIONS

Pubmed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov. were searched until June 30, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing any oxygen therapy with another oxygen therapy or with placebo (nasal cannula, NC) were included.

MEASUREMENT

The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2). Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed. Data are reported as odds ratios (OR), prediction intervals (PrI) and 95% CI. Bias risk was evaluated following the guidelines outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration. The quality of evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 RCTs with a total of 7552 patients. Compared to the use of NC, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) demonstrated superior efficacy in mitigating hypoxemia (NIPPV vs. NC, OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08-0.31, 95% PrI: 0.06-0.41), followed by Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) (WNJT vs. NC, OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.10-0.30, 95% PrI: 0.07-0.42). The efficacy for preventing hypoxemia was ranked as follows: NIPPV > WNJT > oropharynx/nasopharyngeal catheter > high-flow nasal oxygenation > nasal mask > NC.

CONCLUSIONS

During gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation, all other advanced oxygen therapies were found to be more efficacious than nasal cannula. NIPPV and WNJT appear to be the most efficacious oxygen therapy for preventing hypoxemia. Additionally, clinicians should make a choice regarding the most suitable oxygen therapy based on the risk population, type of endoscopy and adverse events.

Evaluation and Management of Perioperative Pulmonary Complications

Pulmonary complications are very common after noncardiac surgery and can be easily overlooked. If not properly screened for or evaluated these can in many instances lead to postoperative respiratory failure or even death. Decisions regarding ambulatory versus inpatient surgery, modality of anesthesia, protective ventilation and method of weaning, type of analgesia, and postoperative monitoring can be crucial to avoid such complications.

Perioperative adverse events in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing ambulatory surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The suitability of ambulatory surgery for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the odds of perioperative adverse events in patients with OSA undergoing ambulatory surgery, compared to patients without OSA.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 2011 and July 11, 2023. The inclusion criteria were: adult patients with diagnosed or high-risk of OSA undergoing ambulatory surgery; perioperative adverse events; control group included; general and/or regional anesthesia; and publication on/after February 1, 2011. We calculated effect sizes as odds ratios using a random effects model, and additional sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (375,389 patients) were included. OSA was associated with an increased odds of same-day admission amongst all surgery types (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.46-2.59, I2:79%, P < 0.00001, 11 studies, n = 347,342), as well as when only orthopedic surgery was considered (OR 2.68, 95% CI 2.05-3.48, I2:41%, P < 0.00001, 6 studies, n = 132,473). Three studies reported that OSA was strongly associated with prolonged post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS), while one study reported that the association was not statistically significant. In addition, four studies reported that OSA was associated with postoperative respiratory depression/hypoxia, with one large study on shoulder arthroscopy reporting an almost 5-fold increased odds of pulmonary compromise, 5-fold of myocardial infarction, 3-fold of acute renal failure, and 5-fold of intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory surgical patients with OSA had almost two-fold higher odds of same-day admission compared to non-OSA patients. Multiple large studies also reported an association of OSA with prolonged PACU LOS, respiratory complications, and/or ICU admission. Clinicians should screen preoperatively for OSA, optimize comorbidities, adhere to clinical algorithm-based management perioperatively, and maintain a high degree of vigilance in the postoperative period.

Screening and Perioperative Management of Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) can often be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed and has been shown to pose significant risks in perioperative situations. Patients with OHS have a higher prevalence of baseline morbid conditions like hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary hypertension (PH), which contribute to adverse postoperative outcomes. The potential challenges include difficult intubation and loss of airway, postoperative respiratory failure, worsening heart failure, pulmonary hypertensive crisis, and opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). It is, therefore, important to screen all obese patients for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and OHS before elective surgical procedures. The aim of this review is to discuss the preoperative screening and evaluation and safe anesthetic and up-to-date ventilatory management of this complex group of patients. This review also intends to increase the awareness of OHS in the adult population among hospitalists, surgeons, and cardiologists who may find themselves taking care of these patients in complex multidisciplinary settings.

Impact of spinal versus general anaesthesia on perioperative obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Recommendations suggest favouring regional over general anaesthesia to reduce impact on postoperative sleep apnoea severity, but there is currently no evidence to support this. We compared the impact of general vs spinal anaesthesia on postoperative sleep apnoea severity and assessed the evolution of sleep apnoea severity up to the third postoperative night.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used pooled data from two previous randomised controlled trials in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general or spinal anaesthesia (n=96), without performing a preliminary power analysis. All participants underwent respiratory polygraphy before surgery and on the first and third postoperative nights. The primary outcomes were the supine apnoea-hypopnea index on the first postoperative night and the evolution of the supine apnoea-hypopnea index up to the third postoperative night. Secondary outcomes included the oxygen desaturation index on the first and third postoperative nights.

RESULTS

In the general and spinal anaesthesia groups, mean (95% confidence interval) values for the supine apnoea-hypopnoea index on the first postoperative night were 20 (16-25) and 21 (16-26) events h-1 (P=0.82), respectively; corresponding values on the third postoperative night were 34 (22-45) and 35 (20-49) events h-1 (P=0.91). The generalised estimating equations model showed a significant time effect. Secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia was not associated with a reduction in postoperative sleep apnoea severity, which was worse on the third postoperative night.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02717780 and NCT02566226.

Sleep Apnea is Not an Obstacle for Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Up to 25% of patients requiring hip or knee arthroplasty have sleep apnea (SA), and these patients have historically been excluded from outpatient programs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate same-day discharge failure as well as 30-day complications, readmissions, and unexpected visits.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study comparing patients who have and do not have SA matched for age, sex and arthroplasty type (total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, unicompartimental knee arthroplasty) who underwent primary outpatient surgery between February 2019 and December 2022 in 2 academic hospitals was conducted. Cases with mild SA, moderate SA with a body mass index (BMI) <35, and SA of all severity treated by continuous positive airway pressure machines were eligible. There were 156 patients included (78 cases). Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index. Continuous variables were evaluated by Student's T or Mann-Whitney tests, while categorical data were analyzed by Chi-square or Fisher tests. Univariate analyses were performed to determine discharge failure risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 6 cases (7.7%) and 5 controls (6.4%) who failed to be discharged on surgery day (P = .754), with postoperative hypoxemia (6, [3.8%]) and apnea periods (3, [1.9%]) being the most common causes. Higher BMI (odds ratio = 1.19, P = .013) and general anesthesia (odds ratio = 11.97, P = .004) were found to be risk factors for discharge failure. No difference was observed on 30-day readmissions (P = .497), unexpected visits (P = 1.000), and complications on the Clavien-Dindo Classification (P > .269) and Comprehensive Complication Index (P > .334) scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients who have SA can safely undergo outpatient hip or knee arthroplasty. Higher BMI and general anesthesia increased the odds of same-day discharge failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Case-control Study.

Positive Airway Pressure in Surgical Patients with Sleep Apnea: What is the Supporting Evidence?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent amongst surgical patients and associated with an increased incidence of perioperative complications. The gold standard treatment for moderate-to-severe OSA is positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. Practice guidelines by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine have recommended preoperative screening for OSA and consideration of initiation of PAP therapy for patients with severe OSA. These guidelines, developed mainly by the consensus of experts, highlight the adverse impact of OSA on postoperative outcomes and recommend the use of postoperative PAP in surgical patients with moderate to severe OSA. Since the development of these guidelines, there has been an increase in the number of publications regarding the efficacy of PAP therapy in surgical patients with OSA. Our review provides an update on the existing literature on the efficacy of PAP therapy in surgical patients with OSA. We focus on the postoperative complications associated with OSA, potential mechanisms leading to the increased risk of postoperative adverse events, and summarize the perioperative guidelines for the management of patients with OSA, evidence supporting perioperative PAP therapy, as well as limitations to PAP therapy and alternatives. An update on the existing literature of the efficacy of PAP therapy in surgical patients with OSA is critical to assess the impact of prior guidelines, determine when and how to effectively implement PAP therapy, and target barriers to PAP adherence in the perioperative setting.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation in patients susceptible to hypoxemia during procedural sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hypoxemia is one of the most common adverse events during colonoscopy, particularly among patients who are diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or are overweight. Consequently, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) ventilation for patients with high-risk hypoxemia during colonoscopy with sedation.

METHODS

In this trial, 127 patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to the BPAP oxygen group and nasal cannula (NC) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxemia.

RESULTS

Compared with the use of NC, BPAP ventilation exhibited a significant reduction in the incidence of hypoxemia, decreasing it from 23.8% to 6.3% (absolute risk difference, 17.5%; 95% confidence interval, 5.4-29.6; P = .006). Importantly, BPAP ventilation prevented the occurrence of severe hypoxemia (9.5% vs 0%; absolute risk difference, 9.5%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-16.7; P = .035). In addition, the BPAP group required fewer airway interventions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with OSA or overweight status, the use of BPAP ventilation during colonoscopy significantly reduced the incidence of hypoxemia. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2300073193.).

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for adult obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are crucial in standardizing the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults. However, there has been insufficient evaluation of the overall quality of CPGs for adult OSA. This review aimed to comprehensively assess the overall quality of CPGs in the field of adult OSA.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on various literature databases, guideline-related databases, and academic websites from January 2013 to December 2023 to select CPGs relevant to adult OSA. The methodological and reporting quality of the eligible CPGs were thoroughly appraised by three reviewers using the AGREE II instrument and RIGHT checklist, respectively.

RESULTS

This review included 44 CPGs, consisting of 42 CPGs in English and 2 CPGs in Chinese. The assessment of methodological quality revealed that four domains attained an average standardized score above 60%. Among the domains, "clarity of presentation" received the highest standardized score of 85.10%, while the lowest standardized score was observed in the "rigor of development" domain with the value of 56.77%. The evaluation of reporting quality indicated an overall reporting rate of 51.30% for the eligible CPGs, with only three domains achieving an average reporting rate higher than 50%. The domain with the highest reporting rate was "basic information" at 60.61%, while the domain with the lowest reporting rate was "review and quality assurance" at 15.91%. Furthermore, a significantly positive correlation was found between the AGREE II standardized scores and the RIGHT reporting rates (r = 0.808, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall quality of the currently available guidelines for adult OSA demonstrated considerable variability. Researchers should prioritize the utilization of evidence-based methods and adhere to the items listed in the RIGHT checklist when developing CPGs to enhance efficient clinical decision-making and promote the translation of evidence into practice.

Anesthesia for the Patient Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery

Modern anesthetic management for foot and ankle surgery includes a variety of anesthesia techniques including general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia, or MAC in combination with peripheral nerve blocks and/or multimodal analgesic agents. The choice of techniques should be tailored to the nature of the procedure, patient comorbidities, anesthesiologist skill level, intensity of anticipated postoperative pain, and surgeon preference.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Risk of Postoperative Complications after Non-Cardiac Surgery

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a common sleep disorder, poses significant challenges in perioperative management due to its complexity and multifactorial nature. With a global prevalence of approximately 22.6%, OSA often remains undiagnosed, and increases the risk of cardiac and respiratory postoperative complications. Preoperative screening has become essential in many institutions to identify patients at increased risk, and experts recommend proceeding with surgery in the absence of severe symptoms, albeit with heightened postoperative monitoring. Anesthetic and sedative agents exacerbate upper airway collapsibility and depress central respiratory activity, complicating intraoperative management, especially with neuromuscular blockade use. Additionally, OSA patients are particularly prone to opioid-induced respiratory depression, given their increased sensitivity to opioids and heightened pain perception. Thus, regional anesthesia and multimodal analgesia are strongly advocated to reduce perioperative complication risks. Postoperative care for OSA patients necessitates vigilant monitoring and tailored management strategies, such as supplemental oxygen and Positive Airway Pressure therapy, to minimize cardiorespiratory complications. Health care institutions are increasingly focusing on enhanced monitoring and resource allocation for patient safety. However, the rising prevalence of OSA, heterogeneity in disease severity, and lack of evidence for the efficacy of costly perioperative measures pose challenges. The development of effective screening and monitoring algorithms, alongside reliable risk predictors, is crucial for identifying OSA patients needing extended postoperative care. This review emphasizes a multidimensional approach in managing OSA patients throughout the perioperative period, aiming to optimize patient outcomes and minimize adverse outcomes.

Day-surgery adult patients with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea: Current controversies and concerns

Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea are considered independent risk factors that can adversely affect perioperative outcomes. A combination of these two conditions in the ambulatory surgery patient can pose significant challenges for the anesthesiologist. Nevertheless, these patients should not routinely be denied access to ambulatory surgery. Instead, patients should be appropriately optimized. Anesthesiologists and surgeons must work together to implement fast-track anesthetic and surgical techniques that will ensure successful ambulatory outcomes.

Obstructive sleep apnea in surgical patients and its relationship with difficult intubation: two years of experience from a single center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to determine the risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients undergoing elective surgery and its relationship with difficult intubation (DI).

METHODS

This prospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2018 and February 2020 in the anesthesiology and reanimation service of a training and research hospital. The study included patients who were ASA I...II, 18 years of age, and older who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia. A form regarding the baseline characteristics of the participants as well as STOP-Bang score, Mallampati, and Cormack-Lehane classification was used to collect the data.

RESULTS

The study included 307 patients. It was determined that 64.2% of patients had a high risk of OSA. The presence of DI (determined by repeated attempts at intubation) was 28.6% in the high-risk OSA group, while there was no DI in the low-risk OSA group. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of OSA risk according to the presence of DI according to repeated attempts, Cormack-Lehane classification, and Mallampati classification (p...<...0.001).

CONCLUSION

Due to the high rate of DI in patients with a high risk of OSA, the security of the airway in these patients is endangered. Early clinical recognition of OSA can help in designing a safer care plan.

Preoperative risk evaluation and perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a narrative review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-breathing disorder associated with significant comorbidities and perioperative complications. This narrative review is aimed at comprehensively overviewing preoperative risk evaluation and perioperative management strategies for patients with OSA. OSA is characterized by recurrent episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep leading to hypoxemia and arousal. Anatomical features, such as upper airway narrowing and obesity, contribute to the development of OSA. OSA can be diagnosed based on polysomnography findings, and positive airway pressure therapy is the mainstay of treatment. However, alternative therapies, such as oral appliances or upper airway surgery, can be considered for patients with intolerance. Patients with OSA face perioperative challenges due to difficult airway management, comorbidities, and effects of sedatives and analgesics. Anatomical changes, reduced upper airway muscle tone, and obesity increase the risks of airway obstruction, and difficulties in intubation and mask ventilation. OSA-related comorbidities, such as cardiovascular and respiratory disorders, further increase perioperative risks. Sedatives and opioids can exacerbate respiratory depression and compromise airway patency. Therefore, careful consideration of alternative pain management options is necessary. Although the association between OSA and postoperative mortality remains controversial, concerns exist regarding adverse outcomes in patients with OSA. Understanding the pathophysiology of OSA, implementing appropriate preoperative evaluations, and tailoring perioperative management strategies are vital to ensure patient safety and optimize surgical outcomes.

Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Guideline on the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy

The Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology tasked an expert group to review existing evidence and to generate recommendations on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea during pregnancy. These recommendations are based on a systematic review of the available scientific evidence and expert opinion when scientific evidence is lacking. This guideline may not be appropriate for all clinical situations and patients, and physicians must decide whether these recommendations are appropriate for their patients on an individual basis. We recognize that not all pregnant people may identify as women. However, data on non-cisgendered pregnant patients are lacking, and many published studies use gender-binary terms; therefore, depending on the study referenced, we may refer to pregnant individuals as women. This guideline may inform the creation of clinical protocols by individual institutions that consider the unique considerations of their patient populations and the available resources.

Clinical Issues - June 2023

Personal protective equipment in the decontamination area Key words: decontamination, personal protective equipment (PPE), barrier level, droplets, sterile processing. Administering opioids to patients with obstructive sleep apnea Key words: opioids, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), moderate sedation and analgesia, respiratory depression, positive-pressure ventilation. Surgical smoke evacuation during Mohs surgery Key words: Mohs, surgical smoke, evacuation, filtration, wall suction. Using built-in trocar filters for surgical smoke safety Key words: ultra-low particulate air filtration, activated carbon filtration, built-in trocar filter, volatile organic compound (VOC), minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Bilevel positive airway pressure for gastroscopy with sedation in patients at risk of hypoxemia: A prospective randomized controlled study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Hypoxemia is one of the most frequent adverse events during sedated gastroscopy, and there is still no effective means to prevent and cure it. Therefore, we conducted this randomized trial to confirm our hypothesis that, compared with the nasal cannula group, bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) would decrease the incidence of hypoxemia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or overweight status undergoing gastroscopy.

DESIGN

In a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, 80 patients aged 18-65 years and with OSA or overweight status who underwent gastroscopy with sedation were randomly assigned to two groups: the nasal cannula and BPAP groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (75% < peripheral oxygen saturation [SpO2] < 90% for >5 sand <60 s).

MAIN RESULTS

Compared to the nasal cannula group, BPAP therapy significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxemia from 40.0% to 2.5% (absolute risk difference [ARD], 37.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 21.6 to 53.4], p < 0.001), decreased subclinical respiratory depression from 52.5% to 22.5% (ARD, 30.0% [95% CI, 9.8 to 50.2], p = 0.006), and decreased severe hypoxemia from 17.5% to 0% (ARD, 17.5% [95% CI, 5.7 to 29.3], p = 0.006). The BPAP intervention also decreased the total propofol dosage and operation time and improved anesthesiologist's satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

BPAP therapy significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxemia in patients with OSA or overweight status who underwent gastroscopy.

A bibliometric analysis of obstructive sleep apnea and anesthesia

To conduct a bibliographic analysis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) which has reached epidemic proportions and is a frequent, unknown, and important cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality, by examining the internationally most cited articles. For OSA, the most cited articles in the field of anesthesiology and reanimation, appropriate access terms were compiled and combined, and related publications were searched using the Thompson Reuters Web of Science Citation Indexing search engine. A total of 79 journal publications were found on OSA and anesthesia, with an average of 14.86 citations per article. The most cited publication was the "Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Consensus Statement on Preoperative Selection of Adult Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Scheduled for Ambulatory Surgery" published in the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia and was conducted by Joshi et al. It was found that 38 of the 79 studies reached as a result of the search were articles, and the average number of citations was 21.13. The Hirsch index of these articles, which were cited 803 times in total, was 15. A total of 31 articles (81.57%) were cited at least once, while the remaining 7 articles (18.43%) were not cited at all. The majority of the articles obtained are from the research fields of anesthesiology (n = 20; 52.63%), followed by otorhinolaryngology (n = 5; 13.15%), pediatrics (n = 5; 13.15%), respiratory system (n = 5; 13.15%), internal medicine (n = 4; 10.52%), and the rest were in various fields. Publications on "Obstructive Sleep Apnea" and "Anesthesia" have increased rapidly in the last decade. Anesthesia management and airway safety, patient management, including pain control in the postoperative period, and noninvasive mechanical ventilation treatment methods, such as continuous positive airway pressure, are hot topics.

Sleep study measures on post-operative night one following expansion pharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

To examine the changes in measures of sleep apnea severity and hypoxemia on the first post-operative night (PON1) following expansion pharyngoplasty as a means to assess the safety of same day discharge after surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study of subjects with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea who underwent expansion pharyngoplasty at a single academic sleep surgical practice. A WatchPAT study was performed on the night immediately following surgery (PON1) and comparisons were made to baseline sleep testing.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects who had a mean age of 45.7 ± 10.8 years old and a mean body-mass index (BMI) of 31.4 ± 3.2 kg/m² were enrolled. Patients had baseline severe OSA with mean apnea hypopnea index (AHI) 39.4 ± 19.5/h, O2 nadir 80.8 ± 6.1 % and time with oxygen saturation below 88 % (T88) 12.3 ± 13.2 min. Measures of sleep apnea and nocturnal hypoxemia were not significantly different on PON1. AHI was increased by >20 % in 11 (55.0 %) patients. One patient demonstrated a >10 % worsening in O2 nadir, and 8 patients (45.0 %) demonstrated a >20 % worsening in T88. BMI over 32 was associated with elevated odds of worsening in T88, and anesthesia involving ketamine was associated with lower odds of a 20 % worsening in AHI or T88.

CONCLUSIONS

On PON1 following expansion pharyngoplasty, AHI and nocturnal hypoxemia are stable overall but variable on an individual basis. The decision for admission should therefore be made on a case-by-case basis. Further research is need to elucidate definitive predictors of worsening measures on PON1.

Peri-operative outcomes of bariatric surgery in obstructive sleep apnoea: a single-centre cohort study

Background

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is increasing worldwide. Bariatric surgery is an option where conventional measures to achieve weight loss fail. We compared peri-operative outcomes in patients living with obesity with and without OSA undergoing bariatric surgery.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral centre. Data were extracted from electronic patient records. Primary outcomes were the rate of peri-operative complications and level of respiratory support. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), and the highest level of care required.

Results

A total of 302 patients underwent surgery [age 47 (±11.6) years, 238 (78.8%) female, body mass index (BMI) 48.1 (±7.8) kg/m²]. A total of 101 (33.4%) patients had moderate or severe OSA, or mild OSA with significant sleepiness, and were prescribed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), whilst 201 (66.6%) had mild OSA without symptoms or no OSA and weren't. Patients requiring CPAP were more obese (BMI 50.2 vs. 47.0 kg/m², P=0.002). Complications were analysed individually and according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The incidence of each individual complication did not differ between groups. When grouped into Clavien-Dindo grades, only grade I complications differed: CPAP 9% vs. non-CPAP 2.6%, P=0.02). LOS was longer in the CPAP group [3 (1.5) vs. 2 (1.0) days, P=0.002].

Conclusions

The rate of peri-operative complications in patients with OSA undergoing bariatric surgery is low and can be addressed by the provision of CPAP therapy in most cases. However, a longer LOS and more frequent Grade I complications requires selection of appropriate post-operative monitoring.

Level of Evidence of Guidelines for Perioperative Management of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Evaluation Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Tool

Currently, the quality of guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is unknown, leaving anesthesiologists to make perioperative management decisions with some degree of uncertainty. This study evaluated the quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding the perioperative management of patients with OSA. This study was reported in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of the MedlineALL (Ovid) database was conducted from inception to February 26, 2021, for clinical practice guidelines in the English language. Quality appraisal of guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) framework. Descriptive statistical analysis of each of the 6 domains was expressed as a percentage using the formula: (obtained score - minimum possible score)/(maximum possible score - minimum possible score). Of 192 articles identified in the search, 41 full texts were assessed for eligibility, and 10 articles were included in this review. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the AGREE II scores across the 7 evaluators for each guideline were each >0.9, suggesting that the consistency of the scores among evaluators was high. Sixty percent of recommendations were based on evidence using validated methods to grade medical literature, while the remainder were consensus based. The median and range scores of each domain were: (1) scope and purpose, 88% (60%-95%); (2) stakeholder involvement, 52% (30%-82%); (3) rigor of development, 67% (40%-90%); (4) clarity of presentation, 74% (57%-88%); (5) applicability, 46% (20%-73%); and (6) editorial independence, 67% (19%-83%). Only 4 guidelines achieved an overall score of >70%. This critical appraisal showed that many clinical practice guidelines for perioperative management of patients with OSA used validated methods to grade medical literature, such as Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Oxford classification, with lower scores for stakeholder involvement due to lack of engagement of patient partners and applicability domain due to lack of focus on the complete perioperative period such as postdischarge counseling. Future efforts should be directed toward establishing higher focus on the quality of evidence, stakeholder involvement, and applicability to the wider perioperative patient experience.

Perioperative management of obstructive sleep apnea in lower extremity orthopedic procedures: A review of evidence to inform the development of a clinical pathway

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is unrecognized in as high as 80% of patients before surgery. When untreated, OSA increases a surgical patient's propensity for airway collapse and sleep deprivation lending to a higher risk for emergent re-intubation, prolonged recovery time, escalation of care, hospital readmission, and longer length of stay. We have reviewed the evidence regarding diagnostic performance of OSA screening methods and the impact of perioperative management strategies on postoperative complications among patients with diagnosed or suspected OSA who are undergoing orthopedic surgery. We then integrated the data and recommendations from professional society guidelines to develop an evidence-based clinical care pathway to optimize the perioperative management of this surgical population. Successful management of patients with diagnosed or suspected OSA encompass five facets of care: screening, education, airway management, medications, and monitoring. This narrative review revealed two gaps in the evidence to inform management of patients undergoing orthopedic surgery 1) during the perioperative setting to include evidence-based interventions that reduce postoperative complications and 2) after discharge to an unmonitored environment. The clinical care pathway as well as perspectives for future research are discussed.

Review of Postoperative Respiratory Depression: From Recovery Room to General Care Unit

Contemporary evidence suggests that episodes of respiratory depression during anesthesia recovery are associated with subsequent respiratory complications in general care units.

Postoperative outcomes and anesthesia type in total knee arthroplasty in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Aim: We investigated the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 30/90-day readmission rates and perioperative complications (postoperative cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infectious or intraoperative complications) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Materials & methods: We analyzed records of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty using State Inpatient Databases. Demographics, comorbidities, 30/90-day readmission rates and complications were compared by OSA status. For NY, USA we analyzed outcomes by anesthetic type (regional vs general). Results: OSA patients were mostly male, had more comorbidities and had increased 30/90-day readmission rates. There were no differences in complications. In NY, there were no differences in outcomes by anesthetic type. Conclusion: OSA was associated with increased 30/90-day readmission rates. Within NY, anesthetic type was not associated with any outcomes.

Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a preoperative screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder that is highly associated with postoperative complications. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a simple screening tool for OSA. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the validity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for screening OSA in the surgical population cohort.

METHODS

A systematic search of the following databases was performed from 2008 to May 2021: MEDLINE, Medline-in-process, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, Journals @ Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL. Continued literature surveillance was performed through October 2021.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified 4641 articles, from which 10 studies with 3247 surgical participants were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 57.3 ± 15.2 years, and the mean BMI was 32.5 ± 10.1 kg/m² with 47.4% male. The prevalence of all, moderate-to-severe, and severe OSA were 65.2, 37.7, and 17.0%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for all, moderate-to-severe, and severe OSA was 85, 88, and 90%, and the pooled specificities were 47, 29, and 27%, respectively. The area under the curve for all, moderate-to-severe, and severe OSA was 0.84, 0.67, and 0.63.

CONCLUSIONS

In the preoperative setting, the STOP-Bang questionnaire is a valid screening tool to detect OSA in patients undergoing surgery, with a high sensitivity and a high discriminative power to reasonably exclude severe OSA with a negative predictive value of 93.2%.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration  CRD42021260451 .

Sleep Disturbances and Disorders in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and Total Knee Arthroplasty

➤

There is increasing evidence that patient-reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with psychosocial factors and pain catastrophizing. Sleep disturbance, pain, and mental health have a complex interaction, which, if unrecognized, can be associated with impaired patient-reported outcomes and dissatisfaction following TKA.

➤

The gold standard of objective sleep assessment is polysomnography, which is not feasible to use routinely for TKA patients. Wearable devices are a validated and less costly alternative.

➤

Subjective sleep measures, such as the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive test sleep domains, are simple to administer and provide additional insight into sleep disturbance. Although objective and subjective measures do not correlate precisely, they can be informative together.

➤

Sleep disturbances in the elderly population are common and multifactorial in etiology, stemming from the interplay of sleep disorders, medication side effects, and pain. Commonly prescribed medications following TKA as well as postoperative pain can exacerbate underlying sleep disturbances.

➤

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients seeking TKA. In the setting of OSA, postoperative opioids can cause respiratory depression, resulting in consequences as severe as death. A standardized multimodal pain protocol including anti-inflammatories and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogues may allow for decreased reliance on opioids for pain control.

➤

Surgeons should reassure patients that postoperative sleep disturbance is common and transient, collaborate with the patient's primary care doctor to address sleep disturbance, and avoid prescription of pharmaceutical sleep aids.

Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients at Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Urology Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Benzodiazepines are the most commonly used sedatives for the reduction of patient anxiety. However, they have adverse intraoperative effects, especially in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. This study aimed to compare dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam (MDZ) sedation considering intraoperative complications during transurethral resections of the bladder and prostate regarding the risk for OSA. This study was a blinded randomized clinical trial, which included 115 adult patients with a mean age of 65 undergoing urological procedures. Patients were divided into four groups regarding OSA risk (low to medium and high) and choice of either MDZ or DEX. The doses were titrated to reach a Ramsay sedation scale score of 4/5. The intraoperative complications were recorded. Incidence rates of desaturations (44% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.0001), snoring (76% vs. 49%, p = 0.0008), restlessness (26.7% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0044), and coughing (42.1% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.0001) were higher in the MDZ group compared with DEX, independently of OSA risk. Having a high risk for OSA increased the incidence rates of desaturation (51.2% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.0001) and snoring (90% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.0001), regardless of the sedative choice. DEX produced fewer intraoperative complications over MDZ during sedation in both low to medium risk and high-risk OSA patients.

Opioid dose and postoperative respiratory adverse events after adenotonsillectomy in medically complex children

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing is commonly treated with adenotonsillectomy. Our study objective was to describe perioperative opioid dosing in children with a range of medical complexity evaluated for obstructive sleep-disordered breathing undergoing adenotonsillectomy and to investigate its association with postoperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of children who underwent adenotonsillectomy and had preoperative polysomnography performed was conducted. PRAEs included requiring oxygen, jaw thrust, positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine for associations between covariates and PRAEs.

RESULTS

The cohort included 374 children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing, median (interquartile range) age 6.1 (3.9, 9.3) years; 344 (92%) had obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > 1 events/h) while 30 (8%) had a normal polysomnogram (apnea-hypopnea index < 1 events/h). The median (interquartile range) postoperative morphine-equivalent dose administered was 0.17 (0.09, 0.25) mg/kg. Sixty-six (17.6%) experienced at least 1 PRAE. Multivariable modeling identified the following predictors of PRAE: younger age at surgery (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.83, 0.98), presence of cardiac comorbidity (odds ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.09, 3.89), and presence of airway anomaly (odds ratio 3.48, 95% confidence interval 1.30, 8.94). Higher total apnea-hypopnea index and morphine-equivalent dose were associated with PRAE risk, and an interaction between these variables was detected (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified opioid dose in morphine equivalents to be a strong predictor of PRAE. Additionally, severity of obstructive sleep apnea and postoperative morphine-equivalent dose contributed together and independently to the occurrence of PRAEs. Attention to opioid dosing, particularly among medically complex children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing, is required to mitigate risk of PRAEs.

CITATION

Tsampalieros A, Murto K, Barrowman N, et al. Opioid dose and postoperative respiratory adverse events after adenotonsillectomy in medically complex children. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(10):2405-2413.

Obstructive sleep apnoea and perioperative medicine: a growing concern

Obstructive sleep apnoea represents a sizable public health and economic burden. Owing to rising obesity rates, the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea is increasing, and it is a condition that is significantly underdiagnosed. Exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the backlog of elective surgeries is also sizable and growing. A combination of these factors means that many patients due to have surgery will have obstructive sleep apnoea, either diagnosed or otherwise.

Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea have a significantly increased risk of operative complications, but the evidence base for optimum perioperative management of these patients is limited. This article reviews sleep apnoea, its prevalence and its impact on operative management and perioperative outcomes for patients. The evidence base for screening and treating undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea is also comprehensively assessed. Finally, a pathway to manage patients with possible undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea is proposed, and areas for further research identified.

A Comparative Study on Sedation Efficacy Between General and Regional Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine in Patients Under Maxillofacial Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Securing the airway in the surgery of maxillofacial disorders and traumas is fundamental during the operation. The present study aims to investigate the beneficial sedative effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in patients who underwent maxillofacial surgery with regional anesthesia compared to general anesthesia.

METHODS

Fifty patients, aged 20-45 years old were randomly divided into two groups of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) (each n=25). The group RA received regional block with sedation (DEX: 1 μg/kg infused over 10 min followed by the maintenance dose of 0.5 μg/kg/h) and the group GA underwent general anesthesia (DEX: 0.1 μg/kg/min over 10 min followed by 0.4-0.7 μg/kg/h). Postoperative pain scores, anesthesia outcomes, hemodynamic parameters, the time of the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and intra and postoperative complications were comparatively assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the patients (age, gender, BMI, and ASA physical status) showed no differences between the two groups (P>0.05). Although the duration of surgery and recovery time showed no differences between the groups, the duration of anesthesia and extubation time was remarkably lower in the RA group than in the GA group (P<0.01). Administration of nerve blocks demonstrated less pain and longer sleep time in the postoperative phase as compared to the GA group. Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were significantly less in the RA group at the end of the loading dose of DEX and incision time (P<0.05). SpO2, respiration rate and Ramsay sedation scale did not exhibit any significant differences between the two groups at all-time points (P>0.05). No significant differences were observed with regard to the adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although our findings revealed that both methods are suitable and safe methods for maxillofacial surgery, the outcomes of anesthesia with regional block and sedation include less pain in the postoperative phase, shorter extubation time and earlier discharge from the PACU demonstrated that this method is more reliable for maxillofacial surgery. Further controlled studies are needed to compare the effectiveness and safety profiles of two RA and GA techniques and also to compare DEX with other anesthetic agents to achieve optimum outcomes in maxillofacial surgeries.

Patient Safety During Anesthesia: 100 Years of Progress Documented in Anesthesia & Analgesia

Anesthesiology has evolved to be a leader in addressing patient safety. Our specialty has overcome serious morbidities including explosions, fires, organ toxicity, fatal arrhythmias, and hypoxic brain damage. Anesthesia safety has been significantly improved due to modern drug development, technical advances, and a strong leadership willing to apply human factors and systems' research strategies, but patient safety concerns remain at the forefront as we strive to improve patient care even further. This year marks the centennial year since the publication of the first issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia. Today, the International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS) and Anesthesia & Analgesia continue to advance the boundaries of patient safety by disseminating practice standards, serving as a forum for novel ideas, and supporting research advancements. This review will discuss several topics published in Anesthesia & Analgesia that exemplify steady changes leading to the safe practices that we rely on currently as well as other IARS activities that have advocated and elevated patient safety within the specialty.

Preoperative screening of patients at high risk of obstructive sleep apnea and postoperative complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between postoperative complications and a high versus low risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as determined via screening tools.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to January 5, 2021.

SETTING

Operating room, postoperative recovery area, and ward.

PATIENTS

Adult patients scheduled for surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

We used Review Manager 5.4 to pool the data. The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of postoperative respiratory complications. The secondary outcomes were postoperative cardiac and neurological complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with 50,592 patients were included. A STOP-Bang score ≥ 3 (versus <3) was associated with higher incidences of postoperative respiratory (odds ratio [OR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-2.68) and neurological complications (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.56-8.31). A STOP-Bang score ≥ 5 (versus <5) was associated with higher incidences of postoperative respiratory (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.11-5.04) and cardiac complications (OR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.22-20.00) and higher in-hospital mortality (OR, 26.39; 95% CI, 2.89-241.30). A Berlin score ≥ 2 (versus <2) was not associated with the incidence of postoperative complications, ICU admission, or mortality. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low.

CONCLUSIONS

Very low-quality evidence suggested that a high risk of OSA, as assessed using the STOP-Bang questionnaire, was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative respiratory complications, and may also be associated with higher incidences of postoperative cardiac and neurological complications than a low risk of OSA. Since most of the included studies did not adjust for confounding factors, our findings need to be interpreted with caution. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021220236.

Perioperative considerations for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common, but often undiagnosed, sleep breathing disorder affecting approximately a third of adult surgical patients. OSA patients have increased sensitivity to anesthetic agents, sedatives, and opioid analgesics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer technologies (e.g., bedside capnography) have demonstrated that OSA patients have repetitive apneic spells, beginning in the immediate postoperative period and peaking in frequency during the first postoperative night. Compared to patients without OSA, OSA patients have double the risk for postoperative pulmonary as well as other complications, and OSA has been linked to critical postoperative respiratory events leading to anoxic brain injury or death. Patients with OSA who have respiratory depression during anesthesia recovery have been found to be high-risk for subsequent pulmonary complications. Gabapentinoids have been linked to respiratory depression in these patients.

SUMMARY

Surgical patients should be screened for OSA and patients with OSA should continue using positive airway pressure devices postoperatively. Use of shorter acting and less sedating agents and opioid sparing anesthetic techniques should be encouraged. In particular, OSA patients exhibiting signs of respiratory depression in postanesthesia recovery unit should receive enhancer respiratory monitoring following discharge to wards.

Periprocedural Management during Therapeutic Cardiac Catheterization in Patients with Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Report of Three Cases and Review of Literature

Most of the patients with sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) also known as sleep disordered breathing are not diagnosed before undergoing any cardiac interventional procedure. Many of them can safely undergo outpatient procedure under sedation or anesthesia. Few of them with moderate to severe grade of SAS, who are not optimized medically, may create problem and need special consideration. We managed three such cases in cardiac catheterization laboratory; two of them were not diagnosed before. The periprocedural problems we faced in these patients are narrated in this article along with review of literature. Some suggestions for management of such patients undergoing therapeutic cardiac catheterization are also highlighted.

Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women

The prevalence of OSA in the low-risk obstetric population is thought to be low; best estimates have been extrapolated from the one available large prospective study and likely range between 3–8%.1 OSA prevalence in high-risk pregnant women such as those with obesity and chronic hypertension is significantly higher as extrapolated from several smaller prospective studies which have reported a prevalence as high as 37% in obese women.2 –6 Despite the high prevalence of OSA in high-risk pregnant women, it remains underdiagnosed due to several factors.

An emerging body of literature suggests that OSA may also have serious implications for the health of mothers and fetuses during and beyond pregnancy, but there is still no data to determine if OSA treatment mitigates these adverse outcomes. In this review, we will examine this body of literature from the perspective of the anesthesiologist: the association between pregnancy and the development or worsening of OSA; OSA as it relates to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes; antepartum and screening considerations for OSA in pregnant women; and recommendations regarding the peripartum management of OSA.