Dexmedetomidine Pharmacokinetics and a New Dosing Paradigm in Infants Supported With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass can affect the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic agents.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine for infants and small children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass based on population pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 pediatric cardiac surgical patients in this study. After anesthetic induction with atropine (0.02 mg/kg), thiopental sodium (5 mg/kg), and fentanyl (2-3 μg/kg), we administered 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine for 10 min, followed by administration of 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine per hour during surgery. At the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was infused over 5 min. Arterial blood was obtained at predefined time points. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM. Theory-based allometric scaling with fixed exponents was applied. Weight, age, post-menstrual age, fat-free mass, whether to implement cardiopulmonary bypass and temperature were explored as covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 376 blood samples were obtained from 29 children (age: 20.3 ± 19.3 months, weight: 9.7 ± 4.1 kg). A two-compartment mammillary model with third compartment associated cardiopulmonary bypass procedure best explained the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine. The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (95% CI) standardized to a 70-kg person were as follows: V₁ (L) = 31.6 (17.9-39.5), V₂ (L) = 90.1 (44.0-330), Cl (L/min) = 1.08 (0.70-1.25), Q (L/min) = 2.0 (1.05-3.46). Volume for third compartment associated cardiopulmonary bypass procedure (L) = 39.4 (19.3-50.9). Clearance was not influenced by the presence of cardiopulmonary bypass in this model.

CONCLUSION

When cardiopulmonary bypass is applied, the plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine decreases due to an increase in the volume of distribution, so a loading dose is required to maintain the previous concentration.

Dexmedetomidine: An Alternative to Pain Treatment in Neonatology

Infants might be exposed to pain during their admissions in the neonatal intensive care unit [NICU], both from their underlying conditions and several invasive procedures required during their stay. Considering the particularities of this population, recognition and adequate management of pain continues to be a challenge for neonatologists and investigators. Diverse therapies are available for treatment, including non-pharmacological pain management measures and pharmacological agents (sucrose, opioids, midazolam, acetaminophen, topical agents…) and research continues. In recent years one of the most promising drugs for analgesia has been dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist. It has shown a promising efficacy and safety profile as it produces anxiolysis, sedation and analgesia without respiratory depression. Moreover, studies have shown a neuroprotective role in animal models which could be beneficial to neonatal population, especially in preterm newborns. Side effects of this therapy are mainly cardiovascular, but in most studies published, those were not severe and did not require specific therapeutic measures for their resolution. The main objective of this article is to summarize the existing literature on neonatal pain management strategies available and review the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as a new therapy with increasing use in the NICU.

The influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on pediatric pharmacokinetics

INTRODUCTION

Every year thousands of children undergo surgery for congenital heart disease. Cardiac surgery requires the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, which can have unexpected consequences for pharmacokinetic parameters.

AREAS COVERED

We describe the pathophysiological properties of cardiopulmonary bypass that may influence pharmacokinetic parameters, with a focus on literature published in the last 10 years. We performed a PubMed database search with the keywords 'Cardiopulmonary bypass' AND 'Pediatric' AND 'Pharmacokinetics'. We searched related articles on PubMed and checked the references of articles for relevant studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Interest in the influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on pharmacokinetics has increased over the last 10 years, especially due to the use of population pharmacokinetic modeling. Unfortunately, study design usually limits the amount of information that can be obtained with sufficient power and the best way to model cardiopulmonary bypass is yet unknown. More information is needed on the pathophysiology of pediatric heart disease and cardiopulmonary bypass. Once adequately validated, PK models should be integrated in the patient electronic database integrating covariates and biomarkers influencing PK, making it possible to predict real-time drug concentrations and guide further clinical management for the individual patient at the bedside.

Influence of Dexmedetomidine on Myocardial Injury in Patients with Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Background

Diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by diabetes is the most serious long-term complication. The main cause of death in patients with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is cardiovascular disease. Although dexmedetomidine (Dex) has unique advantages in heart protection against ischaemic/reperfusion injury, few clinical studies have been conducted on its cardioprotective effect in SPKT. This study aimed to explore the influence of Dex on myocardial injury in patients undergoing SPKT and to analyze its possible mechanism.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2020. Eighty patients, regardless of gender, scheduled for SPKT were randomly allocated into a Dex group (D group) receiving Dex at a rate of 1 µg/kg for 10 minutes before anaesthesia induction and then continuous infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/hour until the end of surgery and control group (C group) receiving equivalent capacity of saline. Serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were recorded at 5 minutes after anaesthesia induction (baseline,T0), 5 minutes before renal arteriovenous opening (T1), 30 minutes after renal arteriovenous opening (T2), 30 minutes after pancreatic related arteriovenous opening (T3), immediately after surgery (T4), 4 hours after surgery (T5), and 24 hours after surgery (T6). Adverse cardiovascular events were recorded during the perioperative period. Changes in ECG S-T segments and T waves were monitored at T0-T6. Myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention were recorded with an average follow-up of one year.

Results

Compared with T0, TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations significantly increased at T1-T6 in the C and D groups (P < 0.05). IL-6 concentration increased significantly after renal artery opening and reached the peak after the opening of pancreatic blood vessels. Compared with the C group, TNF-α, and IL-6 concentrations were significantly reduced in group D at T2-T6 (P < 0.05). Compared with T0, cTnI and CK-MB concentrations were significantly increased at T3-T6 in the C and D groups (P < 0.05). cTnI and CK-MB concentrations increased significantly after the opening of renal artery, and reached the peak after the opening of pancreatic blood vessels. Compared with the C group, cTnI and CK-MB concentrations were significantly reduced in the D group at T3-T6 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in patient characteristics amongst groups, including the proportion of intraoperative vasoactive drug use and adverse cardiovascular events during the follow-up period. Heart rate, mean blood pressure, central venous pressure, and cardiac output were not remarkably different between the two groups at any time point.

Conclusions

Perioperative reperfusion could aggravate myocardial injury in SPKT. Dex may be considered a way to reduce myocardial injury caused by inflammatory action by decreasing the release of inflammatory factors. Trial Registration Number: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ID: ChiCTR2200060084.

Dexmedetomidine - An emerging option for sedation in neonatal patients

Dexmedetomidine is a sedative agent with limited dosing, safety, and efficacy information in the neonatal population. This comprehensive review describes the available evidence summarizing the use of dexmedetomidine in various neonatal populations. We identified 21 studies and 1 case report supporting the efficacy and short-term safety of DEX in neonates. Reported dosing ranges from 0.5-1.5 mcg/kg/h with or without loading doses. Clinically relevant adverse effects include bradycardia and hypotension. Future studies are needed to determine long-term safety and facilitate clinical applicability.

The effect of dexmedetomidine on neuroprotection in pediatric cardiac surgery patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Infants undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass are vulnerable to postoperative neurodevelopmental delays. Dexmedetomidine has been shown to have protective effects on the heart, kidneys, and brain in animals and adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We hypothesized that dexmedetomidine would have a neuroprotective effect on infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and planned a prospective randomized controlled trial with postoperative neurodevelopment measurements.

Methods

This is a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. A cohort of 160 infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be enrolled. After induction, dexmedetomidine will be infused with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg and a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg/kg/h or the same amount of normal saline will be administered. Upon initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, an additional dose of dexmedetomidine (0.01 μg/cardiopulmonary priming volume) will be mixed with the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The primary outcome will be the proportion of infants who score lower than 85 in any of the cognitive, language, or motor Bayley scales of infant development-III tests 1 year after the surgery. Other feasible outcome measures will include differences in plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein, troponin I, interleukin-6, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and perioperative major adverse events. The results of the Bayley scales of infant development-III test from the study group and the control group will be compared using a chi-squared test under intention-to-treat analysis. A generalized estimating equation will be used to analyze repeated measurements over time.

Discussion

This study will enable us to assess whether the use of dexmedetomidine can alter the early neurodevelopmental outcome in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and also estimate effects of dexmedetomidine on other organs.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04484922. Registered on 24 July 2020

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06217-9.

Medication Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Changes from 2010 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

To provide up-to-date medication prescribing patterns in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to examine trends in prescribing patterns over time.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a cohort study of 799 016 infants treated in NICUs managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group from 2010 to 2018. We used 3 different methods to report counts of medication: exposure, courses, and days of use. We defined the change in frequency of medication administration by absolute change and relative change. We examined the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert for each medication to determine whether a medication was labeled for use in infants and used PubMed to search for pharmacokinetics (PK) studies.

RESULTS

The most frequently prescribed medications included ampicillin, gentamicin, caffeine citrate, poractant alfa, morphine, vancomycin, furosemide, fentanyl, midazolam, and acetaminophen. Of the top 50 medications used in infants with extremely low birth weight, only 20 (40%) are FDA-labeled for use in infants; of the 30 that are not labeled for use in infants, 13 (43%) had at least 2 published PK studies. The medications with the greatest relative increase in use from 2010 to 2018 included dexmedetomidine, clonidine, rocuronium, levetiracetam, atropine, and diazoxide. The medications with the greatest relative decrease in use included tromethamine acetate, pancuronium, chloral hydrate, imipenem + cilastatin, and amikacin.

CONCLUSION

Trends of medication use in the NICU change substantially over time. It is imperative to identify changes in medication use in the NICU to better inform further prospective studies.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dexmedetomidine in Children using Real World Data from Electronic Health Records and Remnant Specimens

AIM

Our objectives were to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis of dexmedetomidine in children using remnant specimens and electronic health records (EHRs) and explore the impact of patient's characteristics and pharmacogenetics on dexmedetomidine clearance.

METHODS

Dexmedetomidine dosing and patient data were gathered from EHRs and combined with opportunistically sampled remnant specimens. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Stage one developed a model without genotype variables; Stage two added pharmacogenetic effects.

RESULTS

Our final study population included 354 post-cardiac surgery patients age 0 to 22 years (median 16 months). The data were best described with a two-compartment model with allometric scaling for weight and Hill maturation function for age. Population parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals were 27.3 L/hr (24.0 - 31.1 L/hr) for total clearance (CL), 161 L (139 - 187 L) for central compartment volume of distribution (V₁ ), 26.0 L/hr (22.5 - 30.0 L/hr) for intercompartmental clearance (Q), and 7903 L (5617 - 11119 L) for peripheral compartment volume of distribution (V₂ ). The estimate for postmenstrual age when 50% of adult clearance is achieved was 42.0 weeks (41.5 - 42.5 weeks) and the Hill coefficient estimate was 7.04 (6.99 - 7.08). Genotype was not statistically or clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the use of real-world EHR data and remnant specimens to perform a population PK analysis and investigate covariate effects in a large pediatric population. Weight and age were important predictors of clearance. We did not find evidence for pharmacogenetic effects of UGT1A4 or UGT2B10 genotype or CYP2A6 risk score.

Dexmedetomidine attenuates propofol-induced apoptosis of neonatal hippocampal astrocytes by inhibiting the Bcl2l1 signalling pathway

Apoptosis shapes brain structure and function during early life. However, aberrant apoptosis, including that associated with the general anaesthetic propofol, is undesirable. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) provides potential neuroprotection against apoptosis, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. We exposed neonatal rodent hippocampal astrocytes to propofol alone and in combination with DEX and yohimbine (an α₂ -adrenergic receptor antagonist), then evaluated cell viability using the MTT assay. The underlying regulatory mechanism associated with apoptosis-related genes was detected using a combinational strategy including double immunofluorescent staining, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, and flow cytometry. Propofol reduced matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in cultured astrocytes, and activated the rno-miR-665/Bcl2-like 1 (Bcl2l1)/cleaved caspase 9 (CC9)/cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) pathway. Combinations incorporating propofol with A-1155463 (a selective Bcl2l1 inhibitor) or MMP9 antagomir reduced Bcl2l1 and promoted apoptosis. Co-culture of propofol with Bcl2l1 or with MMP9 agomir was sufficient to decrease the pro-apoptotic effects of propofol. Interestingly, DEX alone had no significant effect on apoptosis. When combined with propofol, however, the negative effects of propofol on the MMP9 and apoptosis-related genes (Bcl2l1, CC9, and CC3) were reduced. Furthermore, yohimbine pretreatment blocked the neuroprotective effects of DEX. Rno-miR-665 was also found to reduce MMP9 expression in propofol-treated hippocampal astrocytes. Taken together, the results indicate that DEX pretreatment reduces propofol-associated pro-apoptosis in developing astrocytes via downregulation of anti-apoptotic signalling mediated by Bcl2l1.

Dexmedetomidine Protects Human Cardiomyocytes Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Through α2-Adrenergic Receptor/AMPK-Dependent Autophagy

Background: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R) strongly affects the prognosis of children with complicated congenital heart diseases (CHDs) who undergo long-term cardiac surgical processes. Recently, the α2-adrenergic receptor agonist Dexmedetomidine (Dex) has been reported to protect cardiomyocytes (CMs) from I/R in cellular models and adult rodent models. However, whether and how Dex may protect human CMs in young children remains largely unknown. Methods and Results: Human ventricular tissue from tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients and CMs derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-CMs) were used to assess whether and how Dex protects human CMs from I/R. The results showed that when pretreated with Dex, the apoptosis marker-TUNEL and cleaved caspase 3 in the ventricular tissue were significantly reduced. In addition, the autophagy marker LC3II was significantly increased compared with that of the control group. When exposed to the hypoxia/reoxygenation process, iPSC-CMs pretreated with Dex also showed reduced TUNEL and cleaved caspase 3 and increased LC3II. When the autophagy inhibitor (3-methyladenine, 3-MA) was applied to the iPSC-CMs, the protective effect of Dex on the CMs was largely blocked. In addition, when the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes was blocked by Bafilomycin A1, the degradation of p62 induced by Dex during the autophagy process was suspended. Moreover, when pretreated with Dex, both the human ventricle and the iPSC-CMs expressed more AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and phospho AMPK (pAMPK) during the I/R process. After AMPK knockout or the use of an α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist-yohimbine, the protection of Dex and its enhancement of autophagy were inhibited. Conclusion: Dex protects young human CMs from I/R injury, and α2-adrenergic receptor/AMPK-dependent autophagy plays an important role during this process. Dex may have a therapeutic effect for children with CHD who undergo long-term cardiac surgical processes.

Off-label use of dexmedetomidine in paediatric anaesthesiology: an international survey of 791 (paediatric) anaesthesiologists

Purpose

The purpose of this international study was to investigate prescribing practices of dexmedetomidine by paediatric anaesthesiologists.

Methods

We performed an online survey on the prescription rate of dexmedetomidine, route of administration and dosage, adverse drug reactions, education on the drug and overall experience. Members of specialist paediatric anaesthesia societies of Europe (ESPA), New Zealand and Australia (SPANZA), Great Britain and Ireland (APAGBI) and the USA (SPA) were consulted. Responses were collected in July and August 2019.

Results

Data from 791 responders (17% of 5171 invitees) were included in the analyses. Dexmedetomidine was prescribed by 70% of the respondents (ESPA 53%; SPANZA 69%; APAGBI 34% and SPA 96%), mostly for procedural sedation (68%), premedication (46%) and/or ICU sedation (46%). Seventy-three percent had access to local or national protocols, although lack of education was the main reason cited by 26% of the respondents not to prescribe dexmedetomidine. The main difference in dexmedetomidine use concerned the age of patients (SPA primarily < 1 year, others primarily > 1 year). The dosage varied widely ranging from 0.2–5 μg kg⁻¹ for nasal premedication, 0.2–8 μg kg⁻¹ for nasal procedural sedation and 0–4 μg kg⁻¹ intravenously as adjuvant for anaesthesia. Only ESPA members (61%) had noted an adverse drug reaction, namely bradycardia.

Conclusion

The majority of anaesthesiologists use dexmedetomidine in paediatrics for premedication, procedural sedation, ICU sedation and anaesthesia, despite the off-label use and sparse evidence. The large intercontinental differences in prescribing dexmedetomidine call for consensus and worldwide education on the optimal use in paediatric practice.

Supplementry Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03028-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Results of a phase 1 multicentre investigation of dexmedetomidine bolus and infusion in corrective infant cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is increasingly used intraoperatively in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. This phase 1 multicentre study sought to: (i) determine the safety of DEX for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass; (ii) determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DEX; (iii) create a PK model and dosing for steady-state DEX plasma levels; and (iv) validate the PK model and dosing.

METHODS

We included 122 neonates and infants (0-180 days) with D-transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect, or tetralogy of Fallot. Dose escalation was used to generate NONMEM® PK modelling, and then validation was performed to achieve low (200-300 pg ml-1), medium (400-500 pg ml-1), and high (600-700 pg ml-1) DEX plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

Five of 122 subjects had adverse safety outcomes (4.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-9.2%). Two had junctional rhythm, two had second-/third-degree atrioventricular block, and one had hypotension. Clearance (CL) immediately postoperative and CL on CPB were reduced by approximately 50% and 95%, respectively, compared with pre-CPB CL. DEX clearance after CPB was 1240 ml min-1 70 kg-1. Age at 50% maximum clearance was approximately 2 days, and that at 90% maximum clearance was 18 days. Overall, 96.1% of measured DEX concentrations fell within the 5th-95th percentile prediction intervals in the PK model validation. Dosing strategies are recommended for steady-state DEX plasma levels ranging from 200 to 1000 pg ml-1.

CONCLUSIONS

When used with a careful dosing strategy, DEX results in low incidence and severity of adverse safety events in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. This validated PK model should assist clinicians in selecting appropriate dosing. The results of this phase 1 trial provide preliminary data for a phase 3 trial of DEX neuroprotection.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01915277.