1
|
Zaslansky R, Baumbach P, Edry R, Chetty S, Min LS, Schaub I, Cruz JJ, Meissner W, Stamer UM. Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020676. [PMID: 36675605 PMCID: PMC9864952 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by guidelines for postoperative pain management and pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women after CS. The analysis relied on an anonymized dataset of women undergoing CS, retrieved from PAIN OUT. PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provides clinicians with treatment assessment methodology and tools for patients to assess multi-dimensional pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. We examined whether the care included [i] regional anesthesia with a neuraxial opioid OR general anesthesia with wound infiltration or a Transvesus Abdominis Plane block; [ii] at least one non-opioid analgesic at the full daily dose; and [iii] pain assessment and recording. Credit for care was given only if all three elements were administered (= “full”); otherwise, it was “incomplete”. A “Pain Composite Score-total” (PCStotal), evaluating outcomes of pain intensity, pain-related interference with function, and side-effects, was the primary endpoint in the total cohort (women receiving GA and/or RA) or a sub-group of women with RA only. Data from 5182 women was analyzed. “Full” care was administered to 20% of women in the total cohort and to 21% in the RA sub-group. In both groups, the PCStotal was significantly lower compared to “incomplete” care (p < 0.001); this was a small-to-moderate effect size. Administering all three elements of care was associated with better pain-related outcomes after CS. These should be straightforward and inexpensive for integration into routine care after CS. However, even in this group, a high proportion of women reported poor outcomes, indicating that additional work needs to be carried out to close the evidence-practice gap so that women who have undergone CS can be comfortable when caring for themselves and their newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Zaslansky
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Correspondence: (R.Z.); (U.M.S.)
| | - Philipp Baumbach
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Ruth Edry
- Acute Pain Service, Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| | - Sean Chetty
- Department of Anaesthesiology& Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7500, South Africa
| | - Lim Siu Min
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Isabelle Schaub
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Clinic, Clinique St Jean, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jorge Jimenez Cruz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bonn University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Winfried Meissner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Ulrike M. Stamer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Correspondence: (R.Z.); (U.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazzeffi MA, Patel PA, Bolliger D, Erdoes G, Tanaka K. The Year in Coagulation: Selected Highlights From 2019. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:1745-1754. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
3
|
Raphael J, Mazer CD, Subramani S, Schroeder A, Abdalla M, Ferreira R, Roman PE, Patel N, Welsby I, Greilich PE, Harvey R, Ranucci M, Heller LB, Boer C, Wilkey A, Hill SE, Nuttall GA, Palvadi RR, Patel PA, Wilkey B, Gaitan B, Hill SS, Kwak J, Klick J, Bollen BA, Shore-Lesserson L, Abernathy J, Schwann N, Lau WT. Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Improvement Advisory for Management of Perioperative Bleeding and Hemostasis in Cardiac Surgery Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:2887-2899. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|