Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Statement: Monitoring Recommendations for Prevention and Detection of Respiratory Depression Associated With Administration of Neuraxial Morphine for Cesarean Delivery Analgesia

Consensus statement on pain management for pregnant patients with opioid use disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Pain management in pregnant and postpartum people with an opioid use disorder requires a balance among the risks associated with opioid tolerance, including withdrawal or return to opioid use, considerations around the social needs of the maternal-infant dyad, and the provision of adequate pain relief for the birth episode that is often characterized as the worst pain a person will experience in their lifetime. This multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine provides a framework for pain management in obstetrical patients with opioid use disorder. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and is targeted to healthcare providers in obstetrics and anesthesiology. The statement is focused on prenatal optimization of pain management, labor analgesia and postvaginal delivery pain management, and postcesarean delivery pain management. Topics include a discussion of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options for pain management, medication management for opioid use disorder (eg, buprenorphine, methadone), considerations regarding urine drug testing and other social aspects of care for maternal-infant dyads, and a review of current practices. The authors provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize pain management while reducing risks and the complications associated with opioid use disorder in the peripartum period. Ultimately, this multidisciplinary consensus statement provides practical and concise clinical guidance to optimize pain management for people with opioid use disorder in the context of pregnancy to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Evaluating the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) after elective Caesarean section in a South African public hospital: a prospective before-after study

Background

Caesarean section is a common surgical procedure, accounting for almost a third of all surgical procedures in low- middle-income countries. Enhanced recovery after Caesarean section (ERAC) programmes are rarely implemented in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated a tailored enhanced recovery programme's impact on quality of recovery after elective Caesarean section in a Johannesburg public hospital.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, before-after cohort study. Fifty-two patients (aged ≥18 yr) undergoing elective Caesarean section were analysed, comprising a pre-ERAC cohort (n=25), analysed from 8 to 22 April 2024 and a post-ERAC cohort (n=27), analysed from 3 to13 June 2024. The primary outcome was postpartum recovery measured by the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 score.

Results

There was a significant improvement in Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scores post-ERAC, with a difference in medians of 9 between cohorts (95% confidence interval: 6-14; P<0.001). There was also a significant reduction in opioid consumption with a median decrease of 10 mg oral morphine equivalent in the post-ERAC cohort in the first 24 h after operation (95% confidence interval: -26 to 6; P<0.001). Time to urinary catheter removal, time to first oral intake, time to first mobilisation, and preoperative fasting for liquids all showed significant improvement in the post-ERAC cohort. There was no difference in length of stay and other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that ERAC implementation in a resource-limited setting is feasible and can enhance maternal recovery after elective Caesarean section. These findings highlight the potential for ERAC programs to significantly improve patient-centred outcomes in low-middle income countries.

Transversus abdominis plane block combined with intrathecal fentanyl versus intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal morphine is the standard for post-cesarean analgesia but often causes pruritus and may be unavailable in resource-limited settings. This study assessed whether a combination of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and intrathecal fentanyl provides non-inferior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine following cesarean delivery within the multimodal analgesia context.

METHODS

Eighty mothers were randomized to receive either intrathecal fentanyl 10 µg with bilateral TAP block using 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side (TF group) or intrathecal morphine 75 µg with a saline sham block (M group). All patients received standard multimodal analgesia. Primary outcome was pain score with movement at 24 hours postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, time to first opioid, pruritus, nausea/vomiting, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean pain score with movement at 24 hours was 5.4 in the TF group and 4.8 in the M group (mean difference (95% CI), 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5), p=0.202), with the upper margin of 95% CI exceeding the non-inferior margin. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in the TF group (median (IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140 (55-405) µg; p<0.001). Pruritus was more frequent in the M group (60% vs 10%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl is not non-inferior to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. However, intrathecal morphine was associated with a higher incidence of pruritus, suggesting TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl as a suitable alternative when reducing pruritus is a priority.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04824274.

Different doses of epidural morphine combined with multimodal analgesia strategies for postpartum pain management: study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind randomised, pragmatic clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The neuraxial morphine has been regarded as the gold standard for postpartum analgesia. However, the recent advancements in patient-controlled analgesia and various regional nerve blocks have led to the implementation of multimodal analgesia strategies, which aim to reduce opioid usage and associated complications while ensuring satisfactory pain relief. The objective of this research is to investigate the optimal dosage of epidural morphine for alleviating moderate and severe pain after caesarean sections in healthy parturients, as well as reducing unnecessary burden of respiratory monitoring resources.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The present single-centre randomised controlled pragmatic clinical trial aims to enrol a total of 310 healthy parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II, who are scheduled for caesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia at West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. The recruitment process has not yet commenced and is anticipated to commence in March 2024, concluding in September 2024. Enrolled patients will be evenly distributed into five groups, namely morphine groups (M1-M4) and the control group (M0). The primary outcome measure is the incidence rate of postoperative use Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 points within 24 hours, which will be primarily assessed through bedside follow-up conducted by investigators and patient self-assessment at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes encompass the following: incidence of postoperative NRS score ≥4 within 48 hours, occurrence of SpO2 <90% (during air inhalation)/ SpO2 <95% (during nasal cannula oxygen inhalation) and respiratory rate (RR)＜10 breaths/min recorded on the bedside monitoring, Ramsay sedation score, administration of rescue analgesics and total usage of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump, time to first flatus and food intake, maternal and neonatal urinary morphine concentrations, and any other maternal adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and neonatal depression. The administration of local anaesthetics, surgical procedures and the timing for administering rescue analgesics will not be subject to any restrictions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (2022(269)).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400080350.

Medication errors and mitigation strategies in obstetric anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medication administration errors represent a significant yet preventable cause of patient harm in the peripartum period. Implementation of best practices contained in this manuscript can significantly reduce medication errors and associated patient harm.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cases of medication errors involving unintended intrathecal administration of tranexamic acid highlight the need to improve medication safety in peripartum patients and obstetric anesthesia.

SUMMARY

In obstetric anesthesia, medication errors can include wrong medication, dose, route, time, patient, or infusion setting. These errors are often underreported, have the potential to be catastrophic, and most can be prevented. Implementation of various types of best practice cost effective mitigation strategies include recommendations to improve drug labeling, optimize storage, determine correct medication prior to administration, use non-Luer epidural and intravenous connection ports, follow patient monitoring guidelines, use smart pumps and protocols for all infusions, disseminate medication safety educational material, and optimize staffing models. Vigilance in patient care and implementation of improved patient safety measures are urgently needed to decrease harm to mothers and newborns worldwide.

Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients with Opioid-Use Disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Pain management in pregnant and postpartum people with an opioid-use disorder (OUD) requires a balance between risks associated with opioid tolerance, including withdrawal or return to opioid use, considerations around social needs of the maternal-infant dyad, and the provision of adequate pain relief for the birth episode that is often characterized as the worst pain a person will experience in their lifetime. This multidisciplinary consensus statement between the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) provides a framework for pain management in obstetric patients with OUD. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and is targeted to health care providers in obstetrics and anesthesiology. The statement is focused on prenatal optimization of pain management, labor analgesia, and postvaginal delivery pain management, and postcesarean delivery pain management. Topics include a discussion of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options for pain management, medication management for OUD (eg, buprenorphine, methadone), considerations regarding urine drug testing, and other social aspects of care for maternal-infant dyads, as well as a review of current practices. The authors provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize pain management while reducing risks and complications associated with OUD in the peripartum period. Ultimately, this multidisciplinary consensus statement provides practical and concise clinical guidance to optimize pain management for people with OUD in the context of pregnancy to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

P6 acupressure versus sham acupressure for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV and PONV) are common during cesarean delivery (CD) with neuraxial anesthesia. Limited information exists on the antiemetic benefit of combined P6 acupoint stimulation with acupressure (P6 acupressure) and pharmacologic antiemetics on preventing IONV and PONV after CD. This study assessed the antiemetic efficacy of P6 acupressure compared to a non-P6 acupoint stimulation with acupressure (sham acupressure) in preventing IONV during CD.

METHODS

We performed a randomized double-blinded trial comparing the efficacy of intraprocedural P6 acupressure versus sham acupressure in preventing IONV during CD after following the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology enhanced recovery recommendations. Subjects were instructed to apply additional pressure at the acupressure sites when they perceived nausea. The primary outcome was the incidence of IONV, and the secondary outcome was the need for rescue antiemetic treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine P6 acupressure and 100 sham acupressure subjects were studied. There was no difference in the incidence of intraoperative nausea (67%), vomiting (17%), emesis episodes, or the need for rescue antiemetics intraoperatively. There were also no differences in the incidence of PONV and antiemetic treatment from PACU to discharge. At discharge, 70% of respondents reported experiencing nausea, but only 10% reported it affected self-care. Approximately 50% of the patients in both groups were satisfied with acupressure therapy.

CONCLUSION

P6 acupressure did not reduce the incidence of IONV or PONV when combined with antiemetic therapy per enhanced recovery recommendations. There does not appear to be sufficient evidence to support using P6 acupressure for IONV prevention.

Effect of a lower dose of intrathecal morphine on postoperative opioid consumption following cesarean delivery at a Texas level IV maternal care center

Background

We hypothesized that patients who received a lower dose of intrathecal morphine (ITM) would have higher postoperative opioid consumption following cesarean delivery.

Methods

Patients who had cesarean deliveries from February 15, 2022, through February 14, 2024 at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple with single injection spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia who did not have labor epidural anesthesia were included. Morphine milligram equivalent (MME) opioid consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours was recorded along with patient demographic, physical, and clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 535 and 502 patients received 0.2 and 0.15 mg ITM, respectively. Patients who received 0.15 mg ITM had higher rates of depression, scheduled cesarean deliveries, and acetaminophen administration compared to patients who received 0.2 mg ITM. Patients who received 0.2 mg ITM and 0.15 mg ITM had median (interquartile range) 24-hour MME consumption of 10.0 mg (0-30.0 mg) and 10.0 mg (0-40.0 mg), respectively (P = 0.97).

Discussion

MME consumption for 24 hours following cesarean delivery was similar between patients who received 0.2 and 0.15 mg ITM.

Effect of psychological nursing intervention combined with acupressure on postoperative recovery of women after cesarean section

BACKGROUND

Psychological intervention nursing (PIN) has been considered to have a curative effect on cesarean section (CS) postoperative recovery. However, the therapeutic mechanisms remain obscure.

AIM

To explore the effects of PIN combined with acupressure massage on CS postoperative recovery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 150 pregnant women admitted to an obstetrics department between January 2020 and January 2023. The control group (CG) received acupressure therapy (n = 73), and the intervention group (IG) received acupressure therapy and PIN therapy (n = 77). Postoperative recovery time was assessed by anal-exhausting, defecation, bed activity, breastfeeding, and hospital stay times. Adverse effects, including infection, bleeding, limb numbness, intrauterine hematoma, urinary retention, and venous thromboembolism, were recorded. the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain. Anxiety and depression status were qualitatively assessed using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and Edinburgh postpartum depression scale (EPDS). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) was used to compare sleep quality between the groups.

RESULTS

The baseline data and SAS, SDS, EPDS, and PSQI scores did not significantly differ before CS (P > 0.05) and neither did complication rates between the two groups after CS (P > 0.05). However, anal-exhausting, defecation, waking up, breastfeeding, and hospitalization times were significantly shorter for participants in the IG than those for participants in the CG (P < 0.05). The VAS, SAS, SDS, EPDS, and PSQI scores of the IG were significantly lower than those of the CG (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PIN, combined with acupressure massage, effectively promotes maternal recovery, reduces post-CS pain, and improves postoperative negative emotions and sleeping quality.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group

INTRODUCTION

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH.

METHODS

Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach.

RESULTS

Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.

Acute pain management after vaginal delivery with perineal tears or episiotomy

BACKGROUND

A vaginal delivery may be associated with acute postpartum pain, particularly after perineal trauma. However, pain management in this setting remains poorly explored.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature and to develop recommendations for pain management after a vaginal delivery with perineal trauma.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews assessing pain after a vaginal delivery with perineal tears or episiotomy until March 2023. Cochrane Covidence quality assessment generic tool and the RoB Vis 2 tool were used to grade the quality of evidence.

FINDINGS

Overall, 79 studies (69 RCTs and 10 systematic reviews and meta-analyses) of good quality of evidence were included. Acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as first-line treatment. Epidural morphine (≤2 mg) is recommended among women with labor epidural analgesia and severe perineal tears, with adequate respiratory monitoring. Local anesthetic infiltration, topical local anesthetic, ointment application, and pudendal nerve block are not recommended due to insufficient or lack of evidence. Ice or chemical cold packs are recommended for postpartum pain first-line treatment due to their simplicity of use. Transcutaneous nerve stimulation and acupuncture are recommended as adjuvants. When a perineal suture is indicated, a continuous suture compared with an interrupted suture for the repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears is recommended for the outcome of pain. For women with first-degree or second-degree perineal tears, no suturing or glue compared with suturing is recommended for the outcome of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Postpartum pain management after a vaginal delivery with perineal trauma should include acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and ice or chemical cold packs. Epidural morphine should be reserved for severe perineal tears. A surgical repair technique should depend on perineal tear severity.

Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements on obstetric anaesthesia: a systematic review using the AGREE II instrument

OBJECTIVES

Despite the publication of hundreds of trials on obstetric anaesthesia, the management of these conditions remains suboptimal. We aimed to assess the quality and consistency of guidance documents for obstetric anaesthesia.

DESIGN

This is a systematic review and quality assessment using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II methodology.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources include PubMed and Embase (8 June 2023), three Chinese academic databases, six guideline databases (7 June 2023) and Google and Google scholar (1 August 2023).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included the latest version of international and national/regional clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements for the anaesthetic management of pregnant patients during labour, non-operative delivery, operative delivery and selected aspects of perioperative monitoring, postpartum care and analgesia, published in English or Chinese.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened the searched items and extracted data. Four reviewers independently scored documents using AGREE II. Recommendations from all documents were tabulated and visualised in a coloured grid.

RESULTS

Twenty-two guidance documents (14 clinical practice guidelines and 8 consensus statements) were included. Included documents performed well in the domains of scope and purpose (median 76.4%, IQR 69.4%-79.2%) and clarity of presentation (median 72.2%, IQR 61.1%-80.6%), but were unsatisfactory in applicability (median 21.9%, IQR 13.5%-27.1%) and editorial independence (median 47.9%, IQR 6.3%-73.2%). The majority of obstetric anaesthesia guidelines or consensus centred on different topics. Less than 30% of them specifically addressed the management of obstetric anaesthesia perioperatively. Recommendations were concordant on the perioperative preparation, and on some indications for the choice of anaesthesia method. Substantially different recommendations were provided for some items, especially for preoperative blood type and screen, and for the types and doses of neuraxial administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality in guidance documents for obstetric anaesthesia necessitates enhancement. Despite numerous trials in this area, evidence gaps persist for specific clinical queries in this field. One potential approach to mitigate these challenges involves the endorsement of standardised guidance development methods and the synthesis of robust clinical evidence, aimed at diminishing difference in recommendations.

Ondansetron for the Prevention of Pruritus in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery With Intrathecal Opioid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pruritus is a frequently reported and unpleasant side effect following intrathecal opioid use with frequency further increased among parturients. We have performed a systematic review to assess the overall efficacy of ondansetron for the prevention of pruritus in patients receiving intrathecal opioid as part of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted from date of inception to September 2022. Studies that included patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia using intrathecal opioid were included. The primary outcome was the presence of pruritus, and the secondary outcome was time to onset of pruritus. Data from included studies were pooled for analysis using an appropriately determined random-effects model. Outcomes were presented using forest plots and 95% confidence intervals. Additional sensitivity and subgroup analysis were performed. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with a total of 2586 patients were included: 1219 received ondansetron, 1030 received a placebo, and a further 337 received a different study drug and were excluded from analysis. Opioids used in the included studies were morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil. Patients who received ondansetron showed a significant reduction in the incidence of pruritus compared to the control group (RR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.92; I 2 = 64%). There was no significant difference in pruritus onset between the groups (mean difference [MD], 17.54 minutes; 95% CI, -2.18 to 37.26; I 2 = 83%). The overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of quality of evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review has demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of pruritus following the use of ondansetron. This is in contrast to previously published meta-analyses. Studies included were of varying quality and some at high risk of bias with a high degree of statistical heterogeneity. Furthermore, high-quality and well-powered studies are required to confirm these findings.

Anesthetic management of parturients with achondroplasia: a case series

Background

Achondroplasia is the most common form of dwarfism, and cesarean delivery is often required in parturients with achondroplasia due to cephalopelvic disproportion. Given the challenges for both regional and general anesthetic techniques, there is no consensus on the optimal anesthetic management for cesarean delivery in these patients.

Method

A search of our electronic medical records for all female patients who had a diagnosis of achondroplasia and had a delivery in our health system from January 1, 2001 through June 16, 2023 was performed. Institutional review board exemption was obtained.

Results

We identified seven achondroplastic patients with 12 cesarean deliveries and described their anesthetic management during labor and delivery.

Conclusion

Despite the historical preference of general anesthesia in achondroplastic patients due to concerns of unpredictable spinal anatomy and unreliable local anesthetic spread, neuraxial anesthesia was successfully utilized in achondroplastic parturients and is a viable option in carefully selected patients. Reduction of intrathecal local anesthetic dose that minimizes the risk of high spinal and emergent intubation, as well as a titratable neuraxial technique, can be effective in this patient population.

The Dose Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Single Institute Retrospective Study

Background and purpose of the study Intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia. However, the ideal dose at which maximal analgesic effects can be delivered with minimal side effects is not clearly known. This retrospective study is aimed to compare two different doses of ITM with respect to analgesia benefits and side effects. Methods This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Three patient groups were selected: a control group receiving continuous adductor canal block (CCACB) under spinal anesthesia, and two experimental groups receiving single-dose adductor canal block (SSACB) under spinal anesthesia with either 100 mcg or 150 mcg of ITM. The sample size included 75 patients (25 per group) who were 18 years and older, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 1-3 who were undergoing primary TKA. Patients with chronic pain or opioid use exceeding 30 days and those undergoing surgeries other than primary TKA were excluded. Outcome data, including opioid use (from which post-operative oral morphine equivalents (OME) were calculated), antiemetic use, visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores, distance ambulated at 24 hours, and length of hospital stay, were extracted by chart review. Results In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), patients in both ITM groups experienced significantly lower opioid consumption and pain scores compared to the control group (p<.001). Furthermore, cumulative OME at 24 hours was significantly less in the ITM groups compared to the control, but there was no difference between ITM doses (p=0.004; mean cumulative OME for control was 77.2 OME vs 43.4 OME for 100 mcg ITM vs 42.6 OME for 150 mcg ITM). Antiemetic usage did not increase in the ITM groups. Although there was no statistically significant difference in ambulation at 24 hours, both ITM groups exhibited a trend toward greater average ambulation distance compared to the control group (p=0.095; mean distance walked for control was 67.6 feet, 76.6 feet for 100 mcg ITM vs 98.8 feet for 150 mcg ITM). Hospital length of stay did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion ITM doses of 100 mcg and 150 mcg provide effective analgesia for patients undergoing lower extremity total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Patients receiving ITM had better pain scores in the immediate post-operative period and had overall less oral morphine equivalent consumption when compared to control. In addition, the safety and side effect profile for ITM is similar for both doses as there was no incidence of respiratory depression and antiemetic usage did not differ between all study arms. Future studies should explore the use of higher ITM doses and consider a broader patient population to further understand the advantages and potential drawbacks of ITM in TKA surgery.

Assessments of perioperative respiratory pattern with non-contact vital sign monitor in children undergoing minor surgery: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Nurses routinely assess respiration of hospitalized children; however, respiratory rate measurements are technically difficult due to rapid and small chest wall movements. The aim of this study is to reveal the respiratory status of small children undergoing minor surgery with load cells placed under the bed legs, and to test the hypothesis that respiratory rate (primary variable) is slower immediately after arrival to the ward and recovers in 2 h.

METHODS

Continuous recordings of the load cell signals were performed and stable respiratory waves within the 10 discriminative perioperative timepoints were used for respiratory rate measurements. Apnea frequencies were calculated at pre and postoperative nights and 2 h immediately after returning to the ward after surgery.

RESULTS

Continuous recordings of the load cell signals were successfully performed in 18 children (13 to 119 months). Respiratory waves were appraisable for more than 70% of nighttime period and 40% of immediate postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences of respiratory rate in any timepoint comparisons (p = 0.448), thereby not supporting the study hypothesis. Respiratory rates changed more than 5 breaths per minute postoperatively in 5 out of 18 children (28%) while doses of fentanyl alone did not explain the changes. Apnea frequencies significantly decreased 2 h immediately after returning to the ward and during the operative night compared to the preoperative night.

CONCLUSION

Respiratory signal extracted from load cell sensors under the bed legs successfully revealed various postoperative respiratory pattern change in small children undergoing minor surgery.

CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION

UMIN (University Hospital Information Network) Clinical Registry: UMIN000045579 ( https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000052039 ).

Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Postdural Puncture Headache in Obstetric Anaesthesia

Objective

Intrathecal morphine is used as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in postoperative analgesia in cesarean section patients. We aimed to analyze the relationship between intrathecal morphine administration and postdural puncture headache (PDPH), pain score and analgesia consumption in the postoperative period, and maternal fetal effects.

Methods

One hundred four pregnant women aged ≥18 years (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I or II, >36 weeks gestation) who were scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anesthesia consisted of bupivacaine with or without morphine (Group M: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl + 100 mcg morphine; Group F: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl). The effect of intrathecal morphine on PDPH, postoperative pain score, analgesia consumption, and maternal and fetal effects were recorded for 5 days.

Results

PDPH developed in a total of 33 patients (Group M: 18 and Group F: 15, P=0.274). When we evaluated PDPH with the VAS, there was no significant difference between the groups. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower in the morphine group, and no statistically significant difference was found in the VAS 1st hr and VAS 2nd hr, whereas the VAS 6th hr and VAS 24th hr were found to be statistically significant. There was no difference in terms of PDPH, the first analgesic requirement and postoperative nausea-vomiting, but meperidine consumption was lower in the morphine group.

Conclusion

Low-dose intrathecal morphine did not affect the incidence of PDPH. It is an effective method that can be used in cesarean section patients without increasing the maternal and fetal side effects from postoperative analgesia.

Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Guideline on the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy

The Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology tasked an expert group to review existing evidence and to generate recommendations on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea during pregnancy. These recommendations are based on a systematic review of the available scientific evidence and expert opinion when scientific evidence is lacking. This guideline may not be appropriate for all clinical situations and patients, and physicians must decide whether these recommendations are appropriate for their patients on an individual basis. We recognize that not all pregnant people may identify as women. However, data on non-cisgendered pregnant patients are lacking, and many published studies use gender-binary terms; therefore, depending on the study referenced, we may refer to pregnant individuals as women. This guideline may inform the creation of clinical protocols by individual institutions that consider the unique considerations of their patient populations and the available resources.

Critical Care in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders-A Call to Action

The rising in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) incidence, highlights the need for critical care allotment for these patients. Due to risk for hemorrhage and possible hemorrhagic shock requiring blood product transfusion, hemodynamic instability and risk of end-organ damage, having an intensive care unit (ICU) with surgical expertise (surgical ICU or equivalent based on institutional resources) is highly recommended. Intensive care units physicians and nurses should be familiarized with intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques as well as obstetrics physiologic changes to provide postpartum management of PAS. Validated tools such of bedside point of care ultrasound and viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastogram/rotational thromboelastometry (TEG/ROTEM) are clinically useful in the assessment of hemodynamic status (shock diagnosis, assessment of both fluid responsiveness and tolerance) and transfusion guidance (in patients requiring massive transfusion as opposed to tranditional hemostatic resuscitation) respectively. The future of PAS management lies in the collaborative and multidisciplinary environment. We recommend that women with high suspicion or a confirmed PAS should have a preoperative plan in place and be managed in a tertiary center who is experienced in managing surgically complex cases. KEY POINTS: · The rising in placenta accreta spectrum incidence highlights the need for critical care expertise.. · Emerging tools such as point-of-care ultrasound and thromboelastography/rotational thromboelastometry represent new avenues for real time optimization of hemodynamic and hematological care of patients with PAS.. · Patients with PAS should be referred to a tertiary center having an intensive care unit (ICU) with surgical expertise (or equivalent based on institutional resources)..

Analgesia after cesarean section - what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cesarean section is the most frequent surgical intervention, and pain following cesarean delivery unfortunately remains a common issue. The purpose of this article is to highlight the most effective and efficient options for postcesarean analgesia and to summarize current guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most effective form of postoperative analgesia is through neuraxial morphine. With adequate dosing, clinically relevant respiratory depression is extremely rare. It is important to identify women with increased risk of respiratory depression, as they might require more intensive postoperative monitoring. If neuraxial morphine cannot be used, abdominal wall block or surgical wound infiltration are very valuable alternatives. A multimodal regimen with intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone, fixed doses of paracetamol/acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce postcesarean opioid use. As the use of postoperative lumbar epidural analgesia impairs mobilization, double epidural catheters with lower thoracic epidural analgesia are a possible alternative.

SUMMARY

Adequate analgesia following cesarean delivery is still underused. Simple measures, such as multimodal analgesia regimens should be standardized according to institutional circumstances and defined as part of a treatment plan. Neuraxial morphine should be used whenever possible. If it cannot be used, abdominal wall blocks or surgical wound infiltration are good alternatives.

Peri-operative anaesthetic management of women with obesity

Obesity in women is prevalent and growing at an alarming pace worldwide, resulting in significant healthcare and socioeconomic consequences. Obesity is a multisystemic disease that is associated with numerous comorbidities, particularly sleep-disordered breathing, hypertension, coronary artery disease, pulmonary hypertension, thromboembolism, and diabetes mellitus. Additionally, obesity poses several peri-operative challenges including difficulty with airway management and mechanical ventilation, challenges with intravenous access or regional blocks, the need for modified anaesthetic drug dosing, the requirement for correctly sized and rated equipment, and appropriate post-operative monitoring. Therefore, early multidisciplinary planning is crucial to identify and address important peri-operative and clinical issues. Parturients with obesity are especially at high risk due to the additional physiological changes and obstetric comorbidities associated with obesity. Antenatal anaesthetic consultation along with close communication and collaboration within the multidisciplinary team are important to improve maternal and neonatal safety.

Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Spinal infusions of either fentanyl or sufentanil have been reported in international reports, articles, and scientific events worldwide. This study aimed to determine whether intrathecal fentanyl or sufentanil offers safety in mortality and perioperative adverse events.

METHODS

MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane library databases), gray literature, hand-searching, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials with no language, data, or status restrictions were included, comparing the effectiveness and safety of adding spinal lipophilic opioid to local anesthetics (LAs). Data were pooled using the random-effects models or fixed-effect models based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 4469 records; 3241 records were eligible, and 3152 articles were excluded after reading titles and abstracts, with a high agreement rate (98.6%). After reading the full texts, 76 articles remained. Spinal fentanyl and sufentanil significantly reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption, increased analgesia and pruritus. Fentanyl, but not sufentanil, significantly reduced both postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative shivering; compared to LAs alone. The analyzed studies did not report any case of in-hospital mortality related to spinal lipophilic opioids. The rate of respiratory depression was 0.7% and 0.8% when spinal fentanyl or sufentanil was added and when it was not, respectively. Episodes of respiratory depression were rare, uneventful, occurred intraoperatively, and were easily manageable.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate to high quality certainty that there is evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of adding lipophilic opioids to LAs in spinal anesthesia.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Gravidas With Chronic Hypertension Compared to Matched Controls: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk in gravidas with chronic hypertension (cHTN) did not control for obesity as a risk factor for OSA. We therefore performed this study to evaluate whether OSA is more prevalent among gravidas with cHTN compared to normotensive gravidas matched for body mass index (BMI) and gestational age (primary outcome). We also assessed whether OSA is more severe when comorbid with cHTN in pregnancy (secondary outcome).

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Adult gravidas at 10-20 weeks of gestation, with and without cHTN, were enrolled and BMI matched. All subjects answered OSA screening questionnaires and underwent a home sleep test when they were between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. Pregnancy outcomes were followed for all subjects. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to model the relationship between cHTN status and OSA.

RESULTS

A total of 100 pregnant subjects (50 with cHTN and 50 normotensive) completed a home sleep test of 2 hours or more. There were no differences in demographic variables between the 2 groups, except that gravidas with cHTN were significantly older than normotensive subjects (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 34 ± 4 vs 30 ± 6 years; P < .001). OSA was more prevalent (64% vs 38%; P = .009; odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] 2.90 [1.30-6.65]; P = .01) and more severe in gravidas with cHTN (moderate or severe OSA 59% vs 21%; P = .009). After controlling for age, we found no overall association between cHTN on OSA risk (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] 2.22 [0.92-5.40]; P = .076). However, among gravidas older than 25 years of age, cHTN was associated with higher odds of OSA (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 2.64 [1.06-6.71], P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

cHTN and age are important risk factors for OSA in gravidas. Gravidas with cHTN should be screened for OSA in early pregnancy. Future studies may validate screening tools that include cHTN and age, and investigate the role of OSA therapy in blood pressure control.

Respiratory depression following cesarean section with single-shot spinal with 100 μg morphine

PURPOSE

Little evidence is available regarding bradypnea measured using continuous monitoring following cesarean section. We aimed to evaluate the rate of cumulative bradypnea time (total bradypnea time/total monitoring time) and its related factors in these parturients.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included women undergoing cesarean section under single-shot spinal anesthesia of 0.1 mg morphine. The Berlin Questionnaire was used to screen for sleep apnea syndrome preoperatively. Respiratory rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were monitored continuously using an adhesive acoustic respiration sensor and pulse oximeter, respectively, at least 6 h after cesarean section. Bradypnea was defined as a respiratory rate < 8 breaths/min lasting at least 25 s (sustained bradypnea) or at least 15 s (immediate bradypnea). Hypoxemia was defined as SpO₂ < 92% lasting at least 25 s (sustained hypoxemia) or at least 15 s (immediate hypoxemia). Multiple regression analysis was applied to assess factors related to the rate of cumulative sustained bradypnea.

RESULTS

Of 159 patients, the Berlin Questionnaire was positive in 16.3%, and 77 (48.4%) experienced sustained bradypnea. The median rate of cumulative sustained bradypnea time was 0.70% (interquartile range 0.35-1.45%) without any related factors. The incidence of immediate bradypnea and sustained and immediate hypoxemia were 58.5%, 24.5%, and 37.7%, respectively. However, none of the factors were significant.

CONCLUSION

After cesarean section was performed with 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine, respiratory depression events were commonly observed. However, the rate of cumulative bradypnea time was very low and there were no related factors.

Glucose-insulin-potassium alleviates uterine cramping pain following cesarean delivery: A randomized, controlled trial

Objectives

To explore the effect of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) therapy on uterine cramping pain (UCP) following cesarean delivery (CD).

Design

Single-center, randomized controlled study.

Setting

Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Participants

A total of 140 women, aged 20-40 years, who underwent CD with a transverse incision were randomly assigned to the GIK (P) or control (C) groups in a 1:1 ratio.

Interventions

GIK was intravenously administered to patients in Group P. Patients in Group C received normal saline (NS). After umbilical cord clamping, oxytocin was administered intravenously. The same GIK and NS regimens were administered on postoperative days 1 and 2, followed by oxytocin 10 min later.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Following oxytocin administration, UCP was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and the maximum VAS score (primary outcome) was recorded.

Results

Patients in Group P had significantly lower maximum VAS scores than those in Group C on postoperative days 1 (38.4 ± 21.1 vs. 52.3 ± 20.8, p < 0.001) and 2 (10 [0,30] vs. 30.5 [8.75,50], p < 0.001). Group P patients also had shorter pain duration on postoperative day 1 (39.6 ± 19.5 min vs. 50.6 ± 18.2 min, p = 0.001). Group P patients had a lower incidence of inadequate analgesia of UCP than Group C on days 1 (45.5% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.001) and 2 (10.6% vs. 47.0%, p < 0.001); the RRs for experiencing inadequate analgesia for UCP postpartum in Group P patients was 0.612 (95% CI: 0.454-0.826, p < 0.001) on day 1 and 0.226 (95% CI: 0.107-0.476, p < 0.001) on day 2. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 28.7%; thus number needed to treat (NNT) was 3 after rounding up. A subgroup analysis demonstrated that Group P patients undergoing repeat CD had lower maximum VAS scores for UCP on both postoperative days 1 and 2.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that GIK can relieve UCP and shorten its duration. Our results provide information to facilitate the development of novel approaches for managing UCP.Clinical Trial Registration: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (2020-109-01, 19/11/2020) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100041607,01/01/2021).

Analgesic outcomes of tramadol alone and in combination with Butorphanol or Flurbiprofen Axetil after cesarean section: a retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology recommends a multimodal analgesia regimen for cesarean delivery analgesia. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of tramadol alone and combined with butorphanol or flurbiprofen axetil after a cesarean section.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis based on the electronic medical records of a teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to January 2020. We collected data on demographic characteristics, anesthesia, analgesia strategy, and pain intensity postoperatively during the first 48 hours. Inadequate postoperative analgesia during this period was defined as an NRS score ≥ 4. We also collected data regarding off-bed activity and intestinal function recovery. Participants were classified into three groups according to analgesia regimens. Groups T, TF, and TB received tramadol, a mixture of tramadol and flurbiprofen axetil, and a combination of tramadol and butorphanol, respectively. Analgesic outcomes were compared using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 2323 cases of caesarean section were included in the analysis, and 521 pairs were matched in each group according to their propensity score. Compared with group T, The inadequate analgesia on pain at rest and pain at movement was lower in group TF (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36-0.49, P = 0.001 and RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69, P < 0.001, respectively),and the incidence of inadequate control of pain at movement was higher in group TB (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22-1.55, P < 0.001). Additionally, the percentage of off-bed activity at 2 days postoperatively was higher in group TB than in groups TF and T (78.7% vs. 68.5 and 78.7% vs. 64.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). The incidence of intestinal function recovery 2 days after cesarean delivery in group TB was higher than that in group TF (73.3% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining tramadol and flurbiprofen axetil could enhance the analgesic effect and be safely used for analgesia after a cesarean section. However, combining tramadol and butorphanol may produce an antagonistic effect.

Cesarean delivery using an ERAS-CD process for nonopioid anesthesia and analgesia drug/medication management

Cesarean delivery (CD) is a surgical delivery of a neonate with surgical access through the maternal abdominal and uterine structures. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a standardized perioperative care program and surgery quality improvement process that has had global spread across numerous surgical disciplines. The medical and surgical use of opioids for pain management and the nonmedical opioid use, over the last three decades, have significantly increased the prevalence of abuse and addiction to opioids. This review summarizes pain, pregnancy substance use, and ERAS-directed analgesia and anesthesia for opioid use reduction or elimination in the operative and postoperative periods. Enhanced recovery (quality and safety) in the surgical CD context requires collaboration, consensus, and appropriate clinical prioritization to allow for the identification of 'the right patient, in the right clinical situation, with the right informed consent, and the right clinical care team and health system'.

Accuracy of Spinal Anesthesia Drug Concentrations in Mixtures Prepared by Anesthetists

OBJECTIVE

Medication errors include the indirect dosing of drugs. For spinal anesthesia mixtures of local anesthetics, opioids are drawn from ampoules and combined in a syringe, according to clinical practice. We set out to determine the accuracy of the drug mixtures.

METHODS

Physicians of our department were invited to prepare the mixture used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, consisting of 10-mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (2-mL volume), 20-μg fentanyl (0.4-mL volume), and 100-μg morphine (0.1-mL volume). Concentrations of these drugs were determined by means of high performance liquid chromatography. Interindividual and intraindividual variations were assessed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 96 samples from 31 physicians. Fifty-one percent of the measured bupivacaine concentrations were in ±10% deviation range of the intended concentration; 17% of the fentanyl and 24% of the morphine concentrations were in this range. A total of 2.1% of the samples had a bupivacaine concentration corresponding to a dose of 8 mg or less, and 11.5% of the samples had a morphine concentration corresponding to a dose of 150 μg or greater. Intraindividual variations were 10.9% for bupivacaine, 24.7% for fentanyl, and 38.9% for morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a high deviation of the obtained from the intended concentrations. Two percent of the samples had bupivacaine concentrations that probably resulted into an insufficient analgesia, and 11% of the samples had morphine concentrations that, according to guidelines, would require a longer monitoring period than with the intended dose.

Trend in neuraxial morphine use and postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery in Japan from 2005 to 2020

The increasing rate of cesarean deliveries warrants obstetric anesthesiologists to deliver high-quality post-cesarean delivery analgesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal trends in the use of neuraxial morphine for cesarean deliveries and to describe the current postoperative analgesia practices. A retrospective cohort study using nationwide health insurance claims databases was conducted from 2005 to 2020 in Japan. Pregnant women who had undergone cesarean deliveries were included. The annual rate of neuraxial morphine use was extracted and analyzed. Additionally, we explored the patient- and facility-level factors associated with neuraxial morphine use through a multilevel logistic regression analysis. The cohort included 65,208 cesarean delivery cases from 2275 institutions. The prevalence of neuraxial morphine use was 16.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.8-16.3) in the overall cohort. Intrathecal morphine was used in 20.6% (95% CI, 20.2-21.0) of spinal anesthesia cases. The trend in neuraxial morphine use steadily increased from 2005 to 2020. The significant predictors of neuraxial morphine use included spinal anesthesia, recent surgery, large medical facilities, and academic hospitals. Variations in the utilization of postoperative analgesia were observed. Our study described the current trend of neuraxial morphine use and the variation in postoperative analgesia practice in Japan.

Use of Scheduled Nonopioid Analgesia to Decrease Inpatient Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To compare opioid use and pain scores in women who had scheduled cesarean birth before and after implementing a scheduled nonopioid analgesia practice guideline.

DESIGN

Quality improvement project with a comparison of pre-/postintervention.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

A 170-bed community hospital where the administration of postcesarean pain medications was unstandardized.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of 175 individuals who were scheduled for cesarean birth (106 in preintervention group and 69 in postimplementation group).

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

All participants had received a dose of 150 mcg of intrathecal morphine intraoperatively. Care of participants in the postimplementation group included a new practice guideline using preoperative oral acetaminophen 1 g and postoperative intravenous ketorolac 30 mg that transitioned to ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 6 hours until discharge. Acetaminophen 1 g every 6 hours also continued until discharge. For breakthrough pain, oxycodone 5 mg to 10 mg was available.

RESULTS

Results were analyzed using the chi-square and t test. There was a statistical difference in the mean milligram morphine equivalent consumed after scheduled cesarean birth (preintervention = 21.15 vs. postintervention = 3.91, p < .001). Postimplementation, 84.1% of participants did not consume any opioids beyond the intrathecal dose compared to 47.2% of participants preintervention. Mean pain scores decreased from 2.49 to 1.62 (p < .001), and there was an observed decrease of the highest reported pain score from 5.39 to 4.03 (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this project support the current literature indicating that the administration of a scheduled nonopioid multimodal analgesia regimen to individuals with scheduled cesarean birth is an effective postoperative pain management strategy. This approach to managing surgical birth pain can decrease subjective reports of pain and overall opioid consumption during the hospital stay.

The Successful Anesthetic Management of a Cesarean Delivery in a Patient with Fanconi-Bickel Syndrome

Introduction

Fanconi–Bickel syndrome (FBS) is a rare genetic condition characterized by extremely short stature, renal tubular dysfunction, osteoporosis, and rickets. The literature is scant regarding the successful reproduction of women with FBS. Cesarean delivery is indicated due to the risk of pelvic fracture from vaginal delivery in a patient with FBS and rickets, yet no case describing the anesthetic has been reported. Clinical Findings. We present a 39-inch-tall, 46.47 kg/m² BMI woman with FBS who was scheduled for cesarean delivery and requesting neuraxial anesthesia. A low-dose, combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) was employed to account for her extreme short stature yet allow for additional dosing if needed. The cesarean delivery, hospital course, and follow-up were all uneventful.

Conclusion

A single case of an FBS patient's successful pregnancy was previously reported in the literature without describing the anesthetic technique. Our case is unique in that it is the first case in the literature that we are aware of describing the anesthetic technique. This case may provide a template for clinicians treating FBS patients and patients with extremely short stature.

Neuraxial and general anaesthesia for caesarean section

Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most performed operations worldwide. In many parts of the world, there has been a reduction in anaesthetic associated obstetric mortality, and this has been attributed to the increased use of neuraxial anaesthesia and improved safety of general anaesthesia, alongside improved training and organisational changes. In resource-limited countries, anaesthesia contributes disproportionately to maternal mortality, with one in seven deaths being due to anaesthesia. A major contributory factor to this is the severe shortage of trained anaesthetic providers. Goals for anaesthesia for CS include the woman's comfort and foetal well-being, focusing on strategies to minimise morbidity and mortality for both. Anaesthetic options for CS include neuraxial techniques (spinal or combined-spinal epidural or epidural extension of labour analgesia) and general anaesthesia. There is increasing evidence of the benefit of neuraxial techniques over general anaesthesia in terms of maternal and foetal outcomes. For elective CS, spinal and combined-spinal anaesthesia predominate. General anaesthesia is mainly reserved for Category 1 CS where there is an immediate threat to the life of the mother or the baby. This review discusses the practical aspects of neuraxial and general anaesthesia for CS.

Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women

The prevalence of OSA in the low-risk obstetric population is thought to be low; best estimates have been extrapolated from the one available large prospective study and likely range between 3–8%.1 OSA prevalence in high-risk pregnant women such as those with obesity and chronic hypertension is significantly higher as extrapolated from several smaller prospective studies which have reported a prevalence as high as 37% in obese women.2 –6 Despite the high prevalence of OSA in high-risk pregnant women, it remains underdiagnosed due to several factors.

An emerging body of literature suggests that OSA may also have serious implications for the health of mothers and fetuses during and beyond pregnancy, but there is still no data to determine if OSA treatment mitigates these adverse outcomes. In this review, we will examine this body of literature from the perspective of the anesthesiologist: the association between pregnancy and the development or worsening of OSA; OSA as it relates to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes; antepartum and screening considerations for OSA in pregnant women; and recommendations regarding the peripartum management of OSA.

A comparison of acute pain management strategies after cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 1.2 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States alone. While traditional postoperative pain management strategies previously relied heavily on opioids, practitioners are now moving toward opioid-sparing protocols using multiple classes of nonnarcotic analgesics. Multimodal pain management systems have been adopted by other surgical specialties including gynecology, although the data regarding their use for postoperative cesarean delivery pain management remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a multimodal pain management regimen after cesarean delivery reduces the required number of morphine milligram equivalents (a unit of measurement for opioids) compared with traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia while adequately controlling postoperative pain.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study of postoperative pain management for women undergoing cesarean delivery at a large county hospital. It was conducted during a transition from a traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia regimen to a multimodal regimen that included scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, with opioids used as needed. The data were collected for a 6-week period before and after the transition. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid use defined as morphine milligram equivalents in the first 48 hours. The secondary outcomes included serial pain scores, time to discharge, and exclusive breastfeeding rates. Women who required general anesthesia or had a history of substance abuse disorder were excluded. The statistical analyses included the Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Hodges-Lehman shift, with a P value <.05 being considered significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 877 women underwent cesarean delivery and 778 met the inclusion criteria-378 received the traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia and 400 received the multimodal regimen. The implementation of a multimodal regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the morphine milligram equivalent use in the first 48 hours (28 [14-41] morphine milligram equivalents vs 128 [86-174] morphine milligram equivalents; P<.001). Compared with the traditional group, more women in the multimodal group reported a pain score ≤4 by 48 hours (88% vs 77%; P<.001). There was no difference in the time to discharge (P=.32). Of the women who exclusively planned to breastfeed, fewer used formula before discharge in the multimodal group than in the traditional group (9% vs 12%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Transition to a multimodal pain management regimen for women undergoing cesarean delivery resulted in a decrease in opioid use while adequately controlling postoperative pain. A multimodal regimen was associated with early successful exclusive breastfeeding.

Postoperative Respiratory Compromise following Cesarean Birth: The Impact of Obesity and Systemic Opioids

Objective  The aim of this study was to measure the effect of obesity and systemic opioids on respiratory events within the first 24 hours following cesarean. Methods  Opioid-naive women undergoing cesarean between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was the proportion of women experiencing at least one composite respiratory outcome (oxygen saturation less than 95% lasting 30+ seconds or need for respiratory support) within 24 hours of cesarean. The impact of obesity and total systemic opioid dose in 24 hours (measured in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) on the composite respiratory compromise outcome were evaluated. Results  Of 2,230 cesarean births, 790 women had at least one composite respiratory event. Predictors of the composite respiratory outcome included body mass index (BMI) as a continuous variable (odds ratio = 1.063 for every one unit increase in BMI [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.021-1.108], p  = 0.003), and MME (odds ratio = 1.005 [95% CI: 1.002-1.008], p  = 0.003), adjusting for magnesium sulfate use. The interaction between obesity and opioid dose demonstrated an odds ratio of 1.000 (95% CI: 0.999-1.000, p  = 0.030). Conclusion  The proportion of women experiencing respiratory events following cesarean birth increases with the degree of obesity and opioid dose. Key Points Respiratory events increase with obesity.Respiratory events increase with systemic opioid use.Odds ratio of respiratory events is 1.063/unit BMI increase.