Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy With Portal Triad Clamping: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Remote ischaemic preconditioning and survival in noncardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) is an intervention involving brief periods of limb ischaemia to protect remote organs from subsequent ischaemic injury. Although evidence exists on the beneficial effects of RIPC on biomarkers, its effect on survival is unknown. We performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether RIPC improves survival in noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

We searched several electronic databases for randomised trials comparing RIPC vs a control group in adult noncardiac surgical settings. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bayesian statistics were used to estimate the probability of mortality benefit (RR <1).

RESULTS

We identified 72 RCTs, which included 7457 subjects. Mortality was reported in 28 RCTs and was lower in the RIPC group compared with the control group (88/2122 [4.1%] vs 102/1767 [5.8%]; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.98, P=0.03; I2=0%; moderate certainty; number needed to treat = 67), corresponding to a 97.0% probability of any reduction in mortality. RIPC was also associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative stroke (moderate certainty) and with a shorter duration of hospital stay (low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Remote ischaemic preconditioning was associated with improved survival and reduced postoperative stroke and hospital stay in noncardiac surgery. These findings warrant careful considerations of the benefits of RIPC and support the need for a large, multicentre RCT to confirm these promising results.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

CRD42024588358 (PROSPERO).

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Postoperative Recovery After Hepatectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has shown promise in preclinical and clinical studies, but its effectiveness in reducing hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries (HIRIs) and enhancing postoperative recovery after hepatectomy remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of perioperative RIC (PRIC) on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was performed. A total of 135 eligible patients were randomised to either a control group (sham RIC), a PRIC-1 group (RIC once daily for 3 days starting on the day of surgery) or a PRIC-2 group (RIC twice daily). The primary outcome was the time to 2 times the upper limit of normal (2ULN) alanine transaminase (ALT) levels post-hepatectomy. Secondary outcomes included time to reach 2ULN for aspartate transaminase (AST) levels, the area under the concentration-time curve on postoperative Day 7 (AUC-POD7) for ALT, AST, total bilirubin and lactic acid, as well as assessments of gastrointestinal function and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Median time to 2ULN ALT was shorter in the PRIC-1 and PRIC-2 groups than in the control group (PRIC-1: 5.0 [3.5, 6.0] vs. control: 7.0 [7.0, 10.0] days, p < 0.001; PRIC-2: 5.0 [4.0, 8.0] vs. control: 7.0 [7.0, 10.0] days, p < 0.001). The AUC-POD7 for ALT and AST, time to 2ULN AST, time to gastrointestinal tolerance and postoperative complications were significantly improved in the PRIC groups compared with thecontrols.

CONCLUSIONS

PRIC is safe and effective in reducing HIRIs and enhancing recovery post-hepatectomy. Once-daily PRIC offers similar benefits to twice-daily PRIC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06130436 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Animal experiments have confirmed that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can reduce hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries (HIRIs), significantly improving early tissue perfusion and oxygenation of the residual liver after resections, accelerating surgical prognoses, and improving survival rates. However, there is still controversy over the role of RIPC in relieving HIRI in clinical studies, which warrants clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects and applicability of RIPC in hepatectomy and to provide evidence-based information for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of RIPC interventions were collected, comparing RIPC to no preconditioning in patients undergoing hepatectomies. This search spanned from database inception to January 2024. Data were extracted independently by two researchers according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), and albumin (ALB) levels. The secondary outcomes assessed included duration of surgery and Pringle, length of postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, indocyanine green (ICG) clearance, hepatocyte apoptosis index, postoperative complications, and others.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 865 patients (428 in the RIPC group and 437 in the control group). ALT levels in the RIPC group were lower than those in the control group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (WMD = - 59.24, 95% CI: - 115.04 to - 3.45; P = 0.04) and POD 3 (WMD = - 27.47, 95% CI: - 52.26 to - 2.68; P = 0.03). However, heterogeneities were significant (I2 = 89% and I2 = 78%), and ALT levels on POD 3 were unstable based on a sensitivity analysis. AST levels on POD 1 in the RIPC group were lower than those in the control group (WMD = - 50.03, 95% CI: - 94.35 to - 5.71; P = 0.03), but heterogeneity was also significant (I2 = 81%). A subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in ALT and AST levels on POD 1 between groups, regardless of whether the Pringle maneuver or propofol was used for anesthesia (induction only or induction and maintenance, P > 0.05). The remaining outcome indicators were not statistically significant or could not be analyzed due to lack of sufficient data.

CONCLUSION

RIPC has some short-term liver protective effects on HIRIs during hepatectomies. However, there is still insufficient evidence to encourage its routine use to improve clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022333383).

Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Ischemic Conditioning on Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Although liver transplantation (LT) is one of the definitive treatments for patients with end-stage liver failure, it inevitably results in ischemic reperfusion injury. It is known that prognosis is improved when temporary ischemic conditioning (IC) is applied to patients with ischemic reperfusion injury. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the short-term and long-term effects of IC on the clinical outcomes of LT recipients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled studies on IC in patients with LTs were included. Patients were compared between an IC group and a sham group. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2.0. Mortality, graft function, and major complications were synthesized using RevMan 5.4.1.

RESULTS

Among 316 papers, 17 articles (1196 patients) were included. There was an insignificant increase in short-term mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 3.00, 95% CI: 0.32-28.14, P = .34). However, long-term mortality was lower in the IC group than in the sham group, but not significantly (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.47-1.20, P = .23). Short-term graft function (acute graft rejection and primary graft non-function) was not improved by IC. One-year graft loss tended to show better results in the IC group (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.26-1.07, P = .08).

CONCLUSION

Ischemic conditioning did not have a beneficial effect on LT. Although long-term outcomes appear to be better in the IC group than in the sham group, further randomized controlled trials are needed.

Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been investigated as a simple intervention to potentially mitigate the ischaemic effect of the surgical insult and reduce postoperative morbidity. This review systematically evaluates the effect of RIPC on morbidity, including duration of hospital stay and parameters reflective of cardiac, renal, respiratory, and hepatic dysfunction following non-cardiac non-vascular (NCNV) surgery.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from their inception date to November 2021. Studies investigating the effect of local preconditioning or postconditioning were excluded. Methodological quality and risk of bias were determined according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Calculation of the odds ratios and a random effects model was used for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardised mean differences as appropriate were used for continuous outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were cardiac and renal morbidity, and the secondary outcomes included other organ function parameters and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

A systematic review of the published literature identified 36 randomised controlled trials. There was no significant difference in postoperative troponin or acute kidney injury. RIPC was associated with lower postoperative serum creatinine (9 studies, 914 patients, mean difference (MD) - 3.81 µmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 6.79 to - 0.83, p = 0.01, I² = 5%) and lower renal stress biomarker (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), 5 studies, 379 patients, standardized mean difference (SMD) - 0.66, 95% CI - 1.27 to - 0.06, p = 0.03, I² = 86%). RIPC was also associated with improved oxygenation (higher P_aO₂/F_iO₂, 5 studies, 420 patients, MD 51.51 mmHg, 95% CI 27.32 to 75.69, p < 0.01, I² = 89%), lower biomarker of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde (MDA), 3 studies, 100 patients, MD - 1.24 µmol/L, 95% CI - 2.4 to - 0.07, p = 0.04, I² = 91%)) and shorter length of hospital stay (15 studies, 2110 patients, MD - 0.99 days, 95% CI - 1.75 to - 0.23, p = 0.01, I² = 88%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not show an improvement in the primary outcomes of interest with the use of RIPC. RIPC was associated with a small improvement in certain surrogate parameters of organ function and small reduction in hospital length of stay. Our results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies addressing individual outcomes and the considerable heterogeneity identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019129503.

Serum metabolic effects of corn oligopeptides with 7-day supplementation on early post-surgery primary liver cancer patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Liver cancer as the main leading cancer has caused heavy burdens globally. The prognosis of liver cancer is closely related with postoperative nutrition support. Corn oligopeptides (COPs) are protein hydrolysates produced by enzymatic treatments, which have shown potential bioactivities, such as inhibiting angiotensin I-converting enzyme, resisting lipid peroxidation and anti-oxidant. However, the correlation between COPs and liver cancer patients is still unknown and the potential mechanism of COPs on liver cancer is unclear as well. The aim of this study was to assess effects of 7-day intervention of COPs after surgery on liver function and serum metabolic profiles of liver cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients were assigned into COPs intervention group (n=50) and control group (n=91) for 7 days. Investigations were scheduled at 1st day and 7th day after liver resection surgery respectively, mainly including anthropometric, biochemical indexes and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analysis.

RESULTS

Seven-day supplementation of COPs on early post-surgery liver cancer patients down-regulated levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and up-regulated prothrombin time activity and prealbumin levels. LC/MS analysis revealed metabolic signatures including regulation of 16 metabolites, which was closely related with two metabolic pathways (nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, fatty acid metabolism).

CONCLUSIONS

COPs supplementation has displayed the potentials on alleviating the injury of liver function and it may be due to regulation of fatty acid metabolism, nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, lipid peroxidation and anti-inflammatory action. More researches are warranted in future to confirm the exact mechanisms.

Willingness, preferences, barriers, and facilitators of a multimodal supportive care intervention including exercise, nutritional and psychological approach in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Supportive care, including exercise, nutritional and psychological support, is becoming increasingly important in cancer given their impact on 'patients' quality and quantity of life. The purpose of this study was to explore willingness, preferences barriers and facilitators for a multimodal intervention in patients with cancer.

METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was proposed on randomly selected days to the patients visiting the cancer outpatients' facilities at the Oncology Unit of the University Hospital of Verona. The questionnaire investigated willingness, preferences, barriers, and facilitators associated with participation in a multimodal program designed for patients with cancer. Exercise level was estimated using two open questions, nutritional risk was identified using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, while distress was evaluated with the Distress Thermometer.

RESULTS

Based on 324 participants, 65% were interested in starting a multimodal intervention. Patients declared to prefer to receive instructions from dedicated experts, with a face-to-face approach, and during the anticancer treatment. Treatment-related side effects were the major obstacles for a multimodal program, while the availability of a specialized staff as exercise kinesiologists, dietitians, and psycho-oncologists was found to be an important facilitator for increasing 'patients' participation.

CONCLUSION

Patients patients with cancer are interested in participating in a multimodal supportive care program specifically designed for them. Information from this study may help to design a tailored multimodal intervention for patients with cancer.

The hepatoprotective effect from ischemia-reperfusion injury of remote ischemic preconditioning in the liver related surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the hepatoprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in the liver related surgery.

METHODS

Published articles in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane clinical trial databases were searched from the inception to May 2021. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the RIPC with control or other conditionings were included for analysis. The postoperative liver synthetic function was used as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs were included the present meta-analysis. There were 216 patients underwent RIPC and 212 patients in the control group. The RIPC group had a significantly lower level of postoperative alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase (p<0.001). The postoperative bilirubin level was also significant lower in the RIPC group than the control group (MD = -9.0, 95%CI, -13.94 to -4.03; p<0.001). ICG clearance was reduced in controls versus RIPC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the RIPC and control group in terms of the complication rate.

CONCLUSION

The RIPC was evaluated to have a strong hepatoprotective effect from ischemia-reperfusion injury in the liver related surgery.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Reduces Marathon-Induced Oxidative Stress and Decreases Liver and Heart Injury Markers in the Serum

Clinical studies continue to provide evidence of organ protection by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC). However, there is lack of insight into impact of RIPC on exercise-induce changes in human organs' function. We here aimed to elucidate the effects of 10-day RIPC training on marathon-induced changes in the levels of serum markers of oxidative stress, and liver and heart damage. The study involved 18 male amateur runners taking part in a marathon. RIPC training was performed in the course of four cycles, by inflating and deflating a blood pressure cuff at 5-min intervals (RIPC group, n=10); the control group underwent sham training (n=8). The effects of RIPC on levels of oxidative stress, and liver and heart damage markers were investigated at rest after 10 consecutive days of training and after the marathon run. The 10-day RIPC training decreased the serum resting levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), alanine transaminase (ALT), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and malondialdehyde (MDA). After the marathon run, creatinine kinase MB (CK-MB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), cardiac troponin level (cTn), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), ALT, total bilirubin (BIL-T), and MDA levels were increased and arterial ketone body ratio (AKBR) levels were decreased in all participants. The changes were significantly diminished in the RIPC group compared with the control group. The GGT activity remained constant in the RIPC group but significantly increased in the control group after the marathon run. In conclusion, the study provides evidence for a protective effect of RIPC against liver and heart damage induced by strenuous exercise, such as the marathon.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bleeding Complications in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is administered with an inflatable tourniquet by inducing brief, alternating cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion. RIC possibly impacts the hemostatic system, and the intervention has been tested as protective therapy against ischemia-reperfusion injury and thrombotic complications in cardiac surgery and other surgical procedures. In the present systematic review, we aimed to investigate the effect of RIC on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials including adult patients undergoing surgery. A systematic search was performed on November 7, 2020 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials comparing RIC versus no RIC in adult patients undergoing surgery that reported bleeding outcomes in English publications were included. Effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model for intraoperative and postoperative bleeding outcomes. Thirty-two randomized controlled trials with 3,804 patients were eligible for inclusion. RIC did not affect intraoperative bleeding volume (nine trials; 392 RIC patients, 399 controls) with the effect estimate -0.95 [-9.90; 7.99] mL (p = 0.83). RIC significantly reduced postoperative drainage volume (seven trials; 367 RIC patients, 365 controls) with mean difference -83.6 [-134.9; -32.4] mL (p = 0.001). The risk of re-operation for bleeding was reduced in the RIC group (16 trials; 838 RIC patients, 839 controls), albeit not significantly, with the relative risk 0.65 [0.39; 1.09] (p = 0.10). In conclusion, RIC reduced postoperative bleeding measured by postoperative drainage volume in this meta-analysis of adult patients undergoing surgery.

Impact of Three Methods of Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Pig Model of Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), either direct (DIPC) or remote (RIPC), is a procedure aimed at reducing the harmful effects of ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the local and systemic effects of DIPC, RIPC, and both combined, in the pig liver transplant model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four pigs underwent orthotopic liver transplantation and were divided into 4 groups: control, direct donor preconditioning, indirect preconditioning at the recipient, and direct donor with indirect recipient preconditioning. The recorded parameters were: donor and recipient weight, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), surgery time, warm and cold ischemia time, and intraoperative hemodynamic values. Blood samples were collected before native liver removal (BL) and at 0 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h post-reperfusion for the biochemical tests: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), creatinine, BUN (blood urea nitrogen), lactate, total and direct bilirubin. Histopathological examination of liver, gut, kidney, and lung fragments were performed, as well as molecular analyses for expression of the apoptosis-related BAX (pro-apoptotic) and Bcl-XL (anti-apoptotic) genes, eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase) gene, and IL-6 gene related to inflammatory ischemia-reperfusion injury, using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups regarding biochemical and histopathological parameters. We found a reduced ratio between the expression of the BAX gene and Bcl-XL in the livers of animals with IPC versus the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

DIPC, RIPC or a combination of both, produce beneficial effects at the molecular level without biochemical or histological changes.

Direct, remote and combined ischemic conditioning in liver surgery

Liver ischemia-reperfusion injury is a major cause of postoperative liver dysfunction, morbidity and mortality following liver resection and transplantation. Ischemic conditioning has been shown to ameliorate ischemia-reperfusion injury in small animal models. It can be applied directly or remotely when cycles of ischemia and reperfusion are applied to a distant site or organ. Considering timing of the procedure, different protocols are available. Ischemic preconditioning refers to that performed before the duration of ischemia of the target organ. Ischemic perconditioning is performed over the duration of ischemia of the target organ. Ischemic postconditioning applies brief episodes of ischemia at the onset of reperfusion following a prolonged ischemia. Animal studies pointed towards suppressing cytokine release, enhancing the production of hepatoprotective adenosine and reducing liver apoptotic response as the potential mechanisms responsible for the protective effect of direct tissue conditioning. Interactions between neural, humoral and systemic pathways all lead to the protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning. Despite promising animal studies, none of the aforementioned protocols proved to be clinically effective in liver surgery with the exception of morbidity reduction in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection. Further human clinical trials with application of novel conditioning protocols and combination of methods are warranted before implementation of ischemic conditioning in day-to-day clinical practice.

Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on mortality and morbidity after non-cardiac surgery: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to have a protective role on vital organs exposed to reperfusion injury. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of non-invasive RIPC on clinical and biochemical outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was carried out in February 2020. RCTs investigating the effect of non-invasive RIPC in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery were included. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (TSAs) were performed on cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, and short- and long-term mortality.

RESULTS

Some 43 RCTs including 3660 patients were included. The surgical areas comprised orthopaedic, vascular, abdominal, pulmonary, neurological, and urological surgery. Meta-analysis showed RIPC to be associated with fewer cardiovascular events in non-cardiac surgery (13 trials, 1968 patients, 421 events; odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95 per cent c.i. 0.47 to 0.96; P = 0.03). Meta-analyses of the effect of RIPC on acute kidney injury (12 trials, 1208 patients, 211 events; OR 1.14, 0.78 to 1.69; P = 0.50; I2 = 9 per cent), short-term mortality (7 trials, 1239 patients, 65 events; OR 0.65, 0.37 to 1.12; P = 0.12; I2 = 0 per cent), and long-term mortality (4 trials, 1167 patients, 9 events; OR 0.67, 0.18 to 2.55; P = 0.56; I2 = 0 per cent) showed no significant differences for RIPC compared with standard perioperative care in non-cardiac surgery. However, TSAs showed that the required information sizes have not yet been reached.

CONCLUSION

Application of RIPC to non-cardiac surgery might reduce cardiovascular events, but not acute kidney injury or all-cause mortality, but currently available data are inadequate to confirm or reject an assumed intervention effect.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on liver injury following hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

The protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) against liver ischemia-reperfusion injury caused by hepatectomy remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIPC strategies. PubMed, SinoMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness and safety of RIPC strategies. The primary outcomes were operation time, index of liver function on postoperative day (POD) 1, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. The pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences at 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. A total of 459 patients were included in seven RCTs. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alanine aminotransferase (AST) values on POD1 were significantly different between the RIPC group and the N-RIPC group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.02, respectively). However, the heterogeneity was significant (I² = 84% and I² = 86%), and the results of a sensitivity analysis were unstable. There was no significant difference in the total bilirubin levels (P = 0.25) between the two groups on POD1. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the AST and ALT levels on POD1 between the RIIPC group and the N-RIPC group, regardless of whether the vascular control technique was used (all P > 0.05). Based on current evidence, RIPC does not alleviate liver injury caused by IRI after hepatectomy.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Non-cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may mitigate physiological stress related to surgery. There is no clear consensus on conduct of RIPC studies, or whether it is effective. The aim of this study was to (i) assess delivery of RIPC, (ii) identify reported outcomes, (iii) measure effect on key clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD:42020180725). EMBASE and Medline databases were searched, and results screened by two reviewers. Full-texts were assessed for eligibility by two reviewers. Data extracted were methods of RIPC and outcomes reported. Meta-analysis of key clinical events was performed using a Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. The TIDieR framework was used to assess intervention reporting, and Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for all studies included.

RESULTS

Searches identified 25 studies; 25 were included in the narrative analysis and 18 in the meta-analysis. RIPC was frequently performed by occluding arm circulation (15/25), at 200 mmHg (9/25), with three cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion (16/25). No study fulfilled all 12 TIDieR items (mean score 7.68). Meta-analysis showed no benefit of RIPC on MI (OR 0.71 95% CI 0.48-1.04, I2 = 0%), mortality (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.01, I2 = 0%), or acute kidney injury (OR 0.72 95% CI 0.48-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

RIPC could be standardized as 200 mmHg pressure in 3 × 5 min on and off cycles. The signal of benefit should be explored in a larger well-designed randomized trial.