1
|
Dyer MW, Kor BT, Kor NT, Hanson AC, Kor JJ, Kor TM, Stewart TM, Sviggum HP. Improvement in Accuracy and Concordance of American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) Scoring Assignment over a 11 Year Time Period Using Patient BMI as a Comorbidity Finding. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2024; 2024:6989174. [PMID: 38813264 PMCID: PMC11136541 DOI: 10.1155/2024/6989174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anesthesia providers categorize patients utilizing the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification originally created by the ASA in 1941. There is published variability and discordance among providers when assigning patient ASA scores in part due to the subjectivity of scoring utilizing patient medical conditions, but variability is also found using objective findings like BMI. To date, there are few studies evaluating the accuracy of anesthesia providers' ASA assignment based on objective body mass index (BMI) alone. The aim of this retrospective chart review is to determine improvement in accuracy of anesthesia providers to correctly assign patient ASA scores, based on BMI criteria added to the ASA-PS in October of 2014, utilizing a multifaceted strategy including creation of an active finance committee in the fall of 2015, multiple e-mail communications about the updated definitions and recommendations for ASA-PS scoring in the fall of 2015 and spring of 2016, a department grand rounds presentation in February 2016, placement of laminated copies of the ASA definitions and recommendations in the anesthesia chartrooms, and the development of a tool embedded into our EMR providing a recommendation of ASA-PS based on patient comorbidity findings. Methods After attaining IRB approval, all eligible patients over the age of 18 who had surgical procedures under general anesthesia at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. A segmented logistic regression model was used to estimate the trends (per-year change in odds) of ASA under classification according to severity of obesity during 3 epochs: preimplementation (2010-2014), implementation (2015), and postimplementation (2016-2020). Results A total of 16,467 patients of the 200,423 (8.2%) patients with obesity (class 1, 2, and 3) were underscored based on BMI alone. Accuracy of ASA-PS classification, as it pertains to BMI alone, was found to show meaningful improvement year-to-year following the updated ASA-PS guidelines with examples released in October of 2014 (P < 0.001). Most of the improvement occurred in 2015-2017 with relatively little between-year variability in the rate of underscoring from 2017-2020. Conclusion Despite updated ASA-PS published guidelines, providers may still be unaware of the updated guidelines and inclusion of examples used within the ASA-PS classification system. Accuracy of scoring did improve annually following the release of the updated guidelines with examples as well as department-wide educational activities on the topic. Additional education and awareness should be offered to those responsible for preanesthesia evaluation and assignment of ASA-PS in patients to improve accuracy as it pertains to BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W. Dyer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Benjamin T. Kor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nathan T. Kor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew C. Hanson
- Department of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer J. Kor
- Kentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Pikeville, Pikeville, KY, USA
| | - Todd M. Kor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas M. Stewart
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hans P. Sviggum
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Apinyankul R, Hong C, Hwang KL, Burket Koltsov JC, Amanatullah DF, Huddleston JI, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB. The outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty for instability. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:105-111. [PMID: 38688516 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-0726.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Aims Instability is a common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, even after the initial revision, some patients continue to have recurrent dislocation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk for recurrent dislocation after revision THA for instability. Methods Between 2009 and 2019, 163 patients underwent revision THA for instability at Stanford University Medical Center. Of these, 33 (20.2%) required re-revision due to recurrent dislocation. Cox proportional hazard models, with death and re-revision surgery for periprosthetic infection as competing events, were used to analyze the risk factors, including the size and alignment of the components. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess the outcome using the Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical and VR-12 mental scores, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) pain and function, and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR). Results The median follow-up was 3.1 years (interquartile range 2.0 to 5.1). The one-year cumulative incidence of recurrent dislocation after revision was 8.7%, which increased to 18.8% at five years and 31.9% at ten years postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (hazard ratio (HR) 2.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 to 6.60)), BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2 (HR 4.31 (95% CI 1.52 to 12.27)), the use of specialized liners (HR 5.39 (95% CI 1.97 to 14.79) to 10.55 (95% CI 2.27 to 49.15)), lumbopelvic stiffness (HR 6.03 (95% CI 1.80 to 20.23)), and postoperative abductor weakness (HR 7.48 (95% CI 2.34 to 23.91)) were significant risk factors for recurrent dislocation. Increasing the size of the acetabular component by > 1 mm significantly decreased the risk of dislocation (HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.96)). The VR-12 physical and HHS (pain and function) scores improved significantly at mid term. Conclusion Patients requiring revision THA for instability are at risk of recurrent dislocation. Higher ASA grades, being overweight, a previous lumbopelvic fusion, the use of specialized liners, and postoperative abductor weakness are significant risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rit Apinyankul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Cierra Hong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Katherine L Hwang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jayme C Burket Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Derek F Amanatullah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - James I Huddleston
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - William J Maloney
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Stuart B Goodman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kane AD, Soar J, Armstrong RA, Kursumovic E, Davies MT, Oglesby FC, Cortes L, Taylor C, Moppett IK, Agarwal S, Cordingley J, Dorey J, Finney SJ, Kunst G, Lucas DN, Nickols G, Mouton R, Nolan JP, Patel B, Pappachan VJ, Plaat F, Scholefield BR, Smith JH, Varney L, Cook TM. Patient characteristics, anaesthetic workload and techniques in the UK: an analysis from the 7th National Audit Project (NAP7) activity survey. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:701-711. [PMID: 36857758 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Detailed contemporary knowledge of the characteristics of the surgical population, national anaesthetic workload, anaesthetic techniques and behaviours are essential to monitor productivity, inform policy and direct research themes. Every 3-4 years, the Royal College of Anaesthetists, as part of its National Audit Projects (NAP), performs a snapshot activity survey in all UK hospitals delivering anaesthesia, collecting patient-level encounter data from all cases under the care of an anaesthetist. During November 2021, as part of NAP7, anaesthetists recorded details of all cases undertaken over 4 days at their site through an online survey capturing anonymous patient characteristics and anaesthetic details. Of 416 hospital sites invited to participate, 352 (85%) completed the activity survey. From these, 24,177 reports were returned, of which 24,172 (99%) were included in the final dataset. The work patterns by day of the week, time of day and surgical specialty were similar to previous NAP activity surveys. However, in non-obstetric patients, between NAP5 (2013) and NAP7 (2021) activity surveys, the estimated median age of patients increased by 2.3 years from median (IQR) of 50.5 (28.4-69.1) to 52.8 (32.1-69.2) years. The median (IQR) BMI increased from 24.9 (21.5-29.5) to 26.7 (22.3-31.7) kg.m-2 . The proportion of patients who scored as ASA physical status 1 decreased from 37% in NAP5 to 24% in NAP7. The use of total intravenous anaesthesia increased from 8% of general anaesthesia cases to 26% between NAP5 and NAP7. Some changes may reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the anaesthetic population, though patients with confirmed COVID-19 accounted for only 149 (1%) cases. These data show a rising burden of age, obesity and comorbidity in patients requiring anaesthesia care, likely to impact UK peri-operative services significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Kane
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - J Soar
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - R A Armstrong
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, Severn Deanery, Bristol, UK
| | - E Kursumovic
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - M T Davies
- Department of Critical Care and Anaesthesia, North West Anglia NHS Trust, UK
| | - F C Oglesby
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - L Cortes
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK
| | - C Taylor
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK
| | - I K Moppett
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK.,University of Nottingham, UK
| | - S Agarwal
- Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Cordingley
- Department of Critical Care and Anaesthesia, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - J Dorey
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK
| | - S J Finney
- Department of Critical Care and Anaesthesia, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - G Kunst
- Department of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia, Kings College London, UK
| | - D N Lucas
- Department of Anaesthesia, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - G Nickols
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - R Mouton
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - J P Nolan
- Resuscitation Medicine, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - B Patel
- Royal College of Anaesthetists, Red Lion Square, UK
| | - V J Pappachan
- Southampton Children's Hospital, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - F Plaat
- Department of Anaesthesia, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B R Scholefield
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - J H Smith
- Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - L Varney
- Department of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.,University of Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajan N, Rosero EB, Joshi GP. Patient Selection for Adult Ambulatory Surgery: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:1415-1430. [PMID: 34784328 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
With migration of medically complex patients undergoing more extensive surgical procedures to the ambulatory setting, selecting the appropriate patient is vital. Patient selection can impact patient safety, efficiency, and reportable outcomes at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Identifying suitability for ambulatory surgery is a dynamic process that depends on a complex interplay between the surgical procedure, patient characteristics, and the expected anesthetic technique (eg, sedation/analgesia, local/regional anesthesia, or general anesthesia). In addition, the type of ambulatory setting (ie, short-stay facilities, hospital-based ambulatory center, freestanding ambulatory center, and office-based surgery) and social factors, such as availability of a responsible individual to take care of the patient at home, can also influence patient selection. The purpose of this review is to present current best evidence that would provide guidance to the ambulatory anesthesiologist in making an informed decision regarding patient selection for surgical procedures in freestanding ambulatory facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraja Rajan
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric B Rosero
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:904-919. [PMID: 34491303 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system celebrates its 80th anniversary in 2021. Its simplicity represents its greatest strength as well as a limitation in a world of comprehensive multisystem tools. It was developed for statistical purposes and not as a surgical risk predictor. However, since it correlates well with multiple outcomes, it is widely used-appropriately or not-for risk prediction and many other purposes. It is timely to review the history and development of the system. The authors describe the controversies surrounding the ASA Physical Status classification, including the problems of interrater reliability and its limitations as a risk predictor. Last, the authors reflect on the current status and potential future of the ASA Physical Status system.
Collapse
|