1
|
Sultan E, Sarno D, Nelson ER. Simulation-Based Education in Acute and Chronic Pain Training. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:639-643. [PMID: 37715889 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01164-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of simulation-based education (SBE) in medical training has expanded greatly and has grown to include high fidelity and task simulation along with hybrid models using patient actors to enhance education and training of critical events as well as technical skills. RECENT FINDINGS In the field of anesthesiology, SBE has been particularly useful for crisis resource management and rare critical scenarios and new research into the use of SBE using task simulation for procedural skill development has been done highlighting the benefits to subspecialty procedural training. Medical simulation has become a common practice in medical training and research. SBE has demonstrated positive outcomes in improving technical skills, knowledge, comfort, and clinical performance. The widespread implementation of SBE in regional anesthesia and chronic pain training varies, with cost and availability being factors. Nonetheless, SBE has shown great potential in enhancing education and preparing physicians in subspecialties of anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellile Sultan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Danielle Sarno
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ehren R Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A modern roadmap for the use of simulation in regional anesthesiology training. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2022; 35:654-659. [PMID: 35942715 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A variety of educational modalities are used to teach regional anesthesia. Simulation is an educational tool that facilitates hands-on learning in a well tolerated, reproducible environment, eliminating potential harm to patients during the process of learning. Available literature and expert consensus statements support customizing simulation programs according to the level of training and experience of the learners. RECENT FINDINGS Simulation is useful for learners of all levels of expertise, though the application and frequency of simulation must be adapted to meet the learners' objectives. SUMMARY This review presents recommendations for the use of simulation for residents, fellows, practicing anesthesiologists without formal training in regional anesthesia, and practicing anesthesiologists with regional anesthesia expertise. Passports and portfolio programs that include simulation can be used to verify training. Virtual applications of simulation are growing, expanding the scope of regional anesthesia simulation and increasing access to lower resource areas.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sinz E, Banerjee A, Steadman R, Shotwell MS, Slagle J, McIvor WR, Torsher L, Burden A, Cooper JB, DeMaria S, Levine AI, Park C, Gaba DM, Weinger MB, Boulet JR. Reliability of simulation-based assessment for practicing physicians: performance is context-specific. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:207. [PMID: 33845837 PMCID: PMC8042680 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02617-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Even physicians who routinely work in complex, dynamic practices may be unprepared to optimally manage challenging critical events. High-fidelity simulation can realistically mimic critical clinically relevant events, however the reliability and validity of simulation-based assessment scores for practicing physicians has not been established. METHODS Standardised complex simulation scenarios were developed and administered to board-certified, practicing anesthesiologists who volunteered to participate in an assessment study during formative maintenance of certification activities. A subset of the study population agreed to participate as the primary responder in a second scenario for this study. The physicians were assessed independently by trained raters on both teamwork/behavioural and technical performance measures. Analysis using Generalisability and Decision studies were completed for the two scenarios with two raters. RESULTS The behavioural score was not more reliable than the technical score. With two raters > 20 scenarios would be required to achieve a reliability estimate of 0.7. Increasing the number of raters for a given scenario would have little effect on reliability. CONCLUSIONS The performance of practicing physicians on simulated critical events may be highly context-specific. Realistic simulation-based assessment for practicing physicians is resource-intensive and may be best-suited for individualized formative feedback. More importantly, aggregate data from a population of participants may have an even higher impact if used to identify skill or knowledge gaps to be addressed by training programs and inform continuing education improvements across the profession.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Sinz
- Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
| | - Arna Banerjee
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Jason Slagle
- Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - William R McIvor
- WISER Simulation Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Amanda Burden
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Cooper
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Senior Fellow, Center for Medical Simulation, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel DeMaria
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mt Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam I Levine
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mt Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine Park
- Department of Medical Education, Simulation and Integrative Learning Institute, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David M Gaba
- Stanford University and Staff Physician and Founder/Co-Director Simulation Center, VA Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Weinger
- Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety (CRISS), Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John R Boulet
- Foundation for the Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|