Perioperative Cardioprotection: General Mechanisms and Pharmacological Approaches

Pharmacological Preconditioning with Fenofibrate in Cardiomyocyte Cultures of Neonatal Rats Subjected to Hypoxia/Reoxygenation, High Glucose, and Their Combination

Pharmacological preconditioning is an alternative to protect the heart against the consequences of damage from ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). It is based on the administration of specific drugs that imitate the effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) can prevent apoptosis in pathologies such as I/R and heart failure. Therefore, our objective was to determine if the stimulation of PPARα with fenofibrate (feno) decreases the apoptotic process induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation (HR), high glucose (HG), and HR/HG. For that purpose, cardiomyocyte cultures were divided into the following groups: Group 1-control (Ctrl); Group 2-HR; Group 3-HR + 10 μM feno; Group 4-HG, (25 mM glucose); Group 5-HG + feno; Group 6-HR/HG, and Group 7-HR/HG + feno. Our results indicate that cell viability decreases in neonatal cardiomyocytes undergoing HR, HG, and their combination, while feno improved cell viability. Feno treatment decreased apoptosis compared with HG-, HR-, or HG/HR-vehicle-treated. Nuclear- and mitochondrial-apoptosis markers increased in neonatal cardiomyocytes from HR, HG, and HR/HG; while the cytotoxicity decreased in cells treated with feno. In addition, the expression of Bax, Bad, and caspase 9 decreased due to feno, while 14-3-3ɛ and Bcl2 were increased. Inner mitochondrial cytochrome C increased with feno in every condition, as well as mitochondrial activity. Feno treatment prevented injury in the ultrastructure and in the mitochondrial membranes. Thus, our results suggest that feno decreases apoptosis in neonatal cardiomyocytes, improving the ultrastructure of mitochondria in the pathological conditions studied.

Cardioprotection by Preconditioning with Intralipid Is Sustained in a Model of Endothelial Dysfunction for Isolated-Perfused Hearts

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is closely associated with most cardiovascular diseases. Experimental models are needed to analyze the potential impact of ED on cardioprotection in constant pressure Langendorff systems (CPLS). One cardioprotective strategy against ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/RI) is conditioning with the lipid emulsion Intralipid (IL). Whether ED modulates the cardioprotective effect of IL remains unknown. The aim of the study was to transfer a protocol using a constant flow Langendorff system for the induction of ED into a CPLS, without the loss of smooth muscle cell functionality, and to analyze the cardioprotective effect of IL against I/RI under ED. In isolated hearts of male Wistar rats, ED was induced by 10 min perfusion of a Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing 60 mM KCl (K+), and the vasodilatory response to the vasodilators histamine (endothelial-dependent) and sodium-nitroprusside (SNP, endothelial-independent) was measured. A CPLS was employed to determine cardioprotection of pre- or postconditioning with 1% IL against I/RI. The constant flow perfusion of K+ reduced endothelial response to histamine but not to SNP, indicating reduced vasodilatory functionality of endothelial cells but not smooth muscle cells. Preconditioning with IL reduced infarct size and improved cardiac function while postconditioning with IL had no effect. The induction of ED neither influenced infarct size nor affected the cardioprotective effect by preconditioning with IL. This protocol allows for studies of cardioprotective strategies under ED in CLPS. The protection by preconditioning with IL seems to be mediated independently of a functional endothelium.

Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: a comprehensive review of current therapies and future cardioprotective strategies

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass results in global myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, leading to significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although cardioplegia is the cornerstone of intraoperative cardioprotection, a number of additional strategies have been identified. The concept of preconditioning and postconditioning, despite its limited direct clinical application, provided an essential contribution to the understanding of myocardial injury and organ protection. Therefore, physicians can use different tools to limit perioperative myocardial injury. These include the choice of anesthetic agents, remote ischemic preconditioning, tight glycemic control, optimization of respiratory parameters during the aortic unclamping phase to limit reperfusion injury, appropriate choice of monitoring to optimize hemodynamic parameters and limit perioperative use of catecholamines, and early reintroduction of cardioprotective agents in the postoperative period. Appropriate management before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass will help to decrease myocardial damage. This review aimed to highlight the current advancements in cardioprotection and their potential applications during cardiac surgery.

Comparison between propofol and total inhalational anaesthesia on cardiovascular outcomes following on-pump cardiac surgery in higher-risk patients: a randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Myocardial revascularisation and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can cause ischaemia-reperfusion injury, leading to myocardial and other end-organ damage. Volatile anaesthetics protect the myocardium in experimental studies. However, there is uncertainty about whether this translates into clinical benefits because of the coadministration of propofol and its detrimental effects, restricting myocardial protective processes.

METHODS

In this single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled feasibility trial, higher-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with an additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation ≥5 were randomised to receive either propofol or total inhalational anaesthesia as single agents for maintenance of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruiting and randomising 50 patients across two cardiac surgical centres, and secondary outcomes included the feasibility of collecting the planned perioperative data, clinically relevant outcomes and assessments of effective patient identification, screening and recruitment.

RESULTS

All 50 patients were recruited within 11 months in two centres, allowing for a 13-month hiatus in recruitment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 50/108 (46%) of eligible patients were recruited. One patient withdrew before surgery and one patient did not undergo surgery. All but one completed in-hospital and 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to recruit and randomise higher-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery to a study comparing total inhalational and propofol anaesthesia in a timely manner and with high acceptance and completion rates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04039854.

Comparison of Volatile Anesthetics Versus Propofol on Postoperative Cognitive Function After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of volatile anesthetics and propofol on neurocognitive function after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials comparing volatile anesthetics and propofol in cardiac surgery were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

The standardized mean difference and risk ratio were calculated to estimate pooled effect sizes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the postoperative neurocognitive function score, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of delirium after cardiac surgery. The analysis did not show significant differences in postoperative neurocognitive function scores (standardized mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.81-0.69; p = 0.879). The incidences of delirium (risk ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.81-1.50) between the volatile anesthetics and propofol groups were not significant (p = 0.533).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike noncardiac surgery, there are no differences between volatile anesthetics and propofol regarding postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery.

A Multimodal Cardioprotection Strategy During Cardiac Surgery: The ProCCard Study

OBJECTIVE

The ProCCard study tested whether combining several cardioprotective interventions would reduce the myocardial and other biological and clinical damage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Multicenter tertiary care hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

210 patients scheduled to undergo aortic valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

A control group (standard of care) was compared to a treated group combining five perioperative cardioprotective techniques: anesthesia with sevoflurane, remote ischemic preconditioning, close intraoperative blood glucose control, moderate respiratory acidosis (pH 7.30) just before aortic unclamping (concept of the "pH paradox"), and gentle reperfusion just after aortic unclamping.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the postoperative 72-h area under the curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI). Secondary endpoints were biological markers and clinical events occurring during the 30 postoperative days and the prespecified subgroup analyses. The linear relationship between the 72-h AUC for hsTnI and aortic clamping time, significant in both groups (p < 0.0001), was not modified by the treatment (p = 0.57). The rate of adverse events at 30 days was identical. A non-significant reduction of the 72-h AUC for hsTnI (-24%, p = 0.15) was observed when sevoflurane was administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (46% of patients in the treated group). The incidence of postoperative renal failure was not reduced (p = 0.104).

CONCLUSION

This multimodal cardioprotection has not demonstrated any biological or clinical benefit during cardiac surgery. The cardio- and reno-protective effects of sevoflurane and remote ischemic preconditioning therefore remain to be demonstrated in this context.

Pharmacological Cardioprotection against Ischemia Reperfusion Injury-The Search for a Clinical Effective Therapy

Pharmacological conditioning aims to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Despite extensive research in this area, today, a significant gap remains between experimental findings and clinical practice. This review provides an update on recent developments in pharmacological conditioning in the experimental setting and summarizes the clinical evidence of these cardioprotective strategies in the perioperative setting. We start describing the crucial cellular processes during ischemia and reperfusion that drive acute IRI through changes in critical compounds (∆G_ATP, Na⁺, Ca²⁺, pH, glycogen, succinate, glucose-6-phosphate, mitoHKII, acylcarnitines, BH₄, and NAD⁺). These compounds all precipitate common end-effector mechanisms of IRI, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, Ca²⁺ overload, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening (mPTP). We further discuss novel promising interventions targeting these processes, with emphasis on cardiomyocytes and the endothelium. The limited translatability from basic research to clinical practice is likely due to the lack of comorbidities, comedications, and peri-operative treatments in preclinical animal models, employing only monotherapy/monointervention, and the use of no-flow (always in preclinical models) versus low-flow ischemia (often in humans). Future research should focus on improved matching between preclinical models and clinical reality, and on aligning multitarget therapy with optimized dosing and timing towards the human condition.

Interaction of Cardiovascular Nonmodifiable Risk Factors, Comorbidities and Comedications With Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection by Pharmacological Treatments and Ischemic Conditioning

Preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning of the myocardium enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and the potential to provide novel therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. While many signaling pathways leading to endogenous cardioprotection have been elucidated in experimental studies over the past 30 years, no cardioprotective drug is on the market yet for that indication. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic preclinical evaluation of promising cardioprotective therapies prior to their clinical evaluation, since ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by or associated with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. These risk factors and comorbidities induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these comorbidities may impact on cardioprotection by again modifying cellular signaling pathways. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their medications may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need for taking into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple comorbidities. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of mortality; however, there are still no cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most studies on cardioprotection have been undertaken in animal models of ischemia/reperfusion in the absence of comorbidities; however, ischemic heart disease develops with other systemic disorders (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atherosclerosis). Here we focus on the preclinical and clinical evidence showing how these comorbidities and their routine medications affect ischemia/reperfusion injury and interfere with cardioprotective strategies.

Volatile Anaesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Cardiac Surgery-A Narrative Review

Recent research has contested the previously accepted paradigm that volatile anaesthetics improve outcomes in cardiac surgery patients when compared to intravenous anaesthesia. In this review we summarise the mechanisms of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in cardiac surgery. In addition, we make a comprehensive analysis of evidence comparing outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under volatile or intravenous anaesthesia, in terms of mortality and morbidity (cardiac, neurological, renal, pulmonary).

Naltrexone-Induced Cardiac Function Improvement is Associated With an Attenuated Inflammatory Response and Lipid Perioxidation in Volume Overloaded Rats

In previous studies, upregulation of myocardial opioid receptors as well as the precursors of their endogenous ligands were detected in the failing heart due to chronic volume overload. Moreover, opioid receptor blockade by naltrexone improved left ventricular function. In parallel, inflammatory processes through cytokines have been confirmed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of different forms of heart failure. Thus, the present study examined the systemic and myocardial inflammatory response to chronic volume overload and its modulation by chronic naltrexone therapy. Chronic volume overload was induced in male Wistar rats by applying an infrarenal aortocaval fistula (ACF) for 28 days during which the selective opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone (n = 6) or vehicle (n = 6) were administered via a subcutaneously implanted Alzet minipump. The ultrastructural, morphometric and hemodynamic characterization of ACF animals were performed using an intraventricular conductance catheter in vivo and electron microscopy in vitro. Co-localization of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor subtypes (MOR, DOR, and KOR respectively) with the voltage gated L-type Ca2+ channel (Cav1.2), the ryanodine receptor (RyR), and mitochondria in cardiomyocytes as well as IL-6, IL-12, TNF-alpha, and Malondialdehyde (MDA) were determined using double immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, RT-PCR and ELISA, respectively. In rat left ventricular myocardium, three opioid receptor subtypes MOR, DOR, and KOR colocalized with Cav1.2, RyR and mitochondria suggesting a modulatory role of the excitation-contraction coupling. In rats with ACF-induced volume overload, signs of heart failure and myocardial ultrastructural damage, chronic naltrexone therapy improved cardiac function and reversed the systemic and myocardial inflammatory cytokine expression as well as lipid peroxidation. In conclusion, antagonism of the cardiodepressive effects of the myocardial opioid system does not only improve left ventricular function but also blunts the inflammatory response and lipid peroxidation.

Analysis of Volatile Anesthetic-Induced Organ Protection in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in surgical procedures and immunosuppressive regimes, early pancreatic graft dysfunction, mainly specified as ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI)-Remains a common cause of pancreas graft failure with potentially worse outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). Anesthetic conditioning is a widely described strategy to attenuate IRI and facilitate graft protection. Here, we investigate the effects of different volatile anesthetics (VAs) on early IRI-associated posttransplant clinical outcomes as well as graft function and outcome in SPKT recipients.

METHODS

Medical data of 105 patients undergoing SPKT between 1998-2018 were retrospectively analyzed and stratified according to the used VAs. The primary study endpoint was the association and effect of VAs on pancreas allograft failure following SPKT; secondary endpoint analyses included "IRI- associated posttransplant clinical outcome" as well as long-term graft function and outcome. Additionally, peak serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipase during the first 72 h after SPKT were determined and used as further markers for "pancreatic IRI" and graft injury. Typical clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative outcomes such as early graft outcome and long-term function were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 105 included patients in this study three VAs were used: isoflurane (n = 58 patients; 55%), sevoflurane (n = 22 patients; 21%), and desflurane (n = 25 patients, 24%). Donor and recipient characteristics were comparable between both groups. Early graft loss within 3 months (24% versus 5% versus 8%, p = 0.04) as well as IRI-associated postoperative clinical complications (pancreatitis: 21% versus 5% versus 5%, p = 0.04; vascular thrombosis: 13% versus 0% versus 5%; p = 0.09) occurred more frequently in the Isoflurane group compared with the sevoflurane and desflurane groups. Anesthesia with sevoflurane resulted in the lowest serum peak levels of lipase and CRP during the first 3 days after transplantation, followed by desflurane and isoflurane (p = 0.039 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no difference with regard to 10-year pancreas graft survival as well as endocrine/metabolic function among all three VA groups. Multivariate analysis revealed the choice of VAs as an independent prognostic factor for graft failure three months after SPKT (HR 0.38, 95%CI: 0.17-0.84; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, sevoflurane and desflurane were associated with significantly increased early graft survival as well as decreased IRI-associated post-transplant clinical outcomes when compared with the isoflurane group and should be the focus of future clinical studies evaluating the positive effects of different VA agents in patients receiving SPKT.

Challenges facing the clinical translation of cardioprotection: 35 years after the discovery of ischemic preconditioning

Since coronary reperfusion was introduced into clinical practice in the late 1970s, the further translation of several successful animal experiments on cardioprotection into clinical practice has been disappointing to date. Animal experiments are often performed on young, healthy animals lacking the risk factors, co-morbidities and co-medications characteristic of acute myocardial infarction patients. Many hopes were kindled in 1986 when ischemic preconditioning was discovered. However, it is not yet known how long ischemia can last and what is the best modality for additional cardioprotection through conditioning to obtain benefits. There is a lack of experimental studies on the long-term effects of additional cardioprotection, in addition to the reduction in infarct size; in particular, there is a lack of studies on vessel protection, repair, inflammation, remodeling, and mortality. The reproducibility and robustness of experimental studies are often limited by species differences, the role of co-morbidities, vascular damage, inflammatory processes, and co-medications, which are not adequately considered. In particular, inflammatory processes, including NLRP3 inflammasome, play an important role in the long-term effects. Future studies should focus on interventions/agents with robust preclinical data and should recruit patients who truly have the potential to benefit from further cardioprotection. Here we focus on the main mechanisms and targets of cardioprotection during remote conditioning and their alteration by one of the most common co-morbidities, namely diabetes, in which microvascular lesions and inflammatory processes play extremely important roles.

Cardioprotective Properties of Humoral Factors Released after Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in CABG Patients with Propofol-Free Anesthesia-A Translational Approach from Bedside to Bench

The cardioprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is well detectable in experimental studies but not in clinical trials. Propofol, a commonly used sedative, is discussed to negatively influence the release of humoral factors after RIPC. Further, results from experimental and clinical trials suggest various comorbidities interact with inducible cardioprotective properties of RIPC. In the present study, we went back from bedside to bench to investigate, in male patients undergoing CABG surgery, whether (1) humoral factors are released after RIPC during propofol-free anesthesia and/or (2) DM interacts with plasma factor release. Blood samples were taken from male patients with and without DM undergoing CABG surgery before (control) and after RIPC (RIPC). To investigate the release of cardioprotective humoral factors into the plasma, isolated perfused hearts of young rats (n = 5 per group) were used as a bioassay. The hearts were perfused with patients’ plasma without (Con) and with RIPC (RIPC) for 10 min (1% of coronary flow) before global ischemia and reperfusion. In additional groups, the plasma of patients with DM was administered (Con DM, RIPC DM). Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Propofol-free RIPC plasma of male patients without DM showed an infarct size of 59 ± 5% compared to 61 ± 13% with Con plasma (p = 0.973). Infarct sizes from patients with DM showed similar results (RIPC DM: 55 ± 3% vs. Con DM: 56 ± 4%; p = 0.995). The release of humoral factors into the blood after RIPC in patients receiving propofol-free anesthesia undergoing CABG surgery did not show any cardioprotective properties independent of a pre-existing diabetes mellitus.

CoenzymeQ10 and Ischemic Preconditioning Potentially Prevent Tourniquet-Induced Ischemia/Reperfusion in Knee Arthroplasty, but Combined Pretreatment Possibly Neutralizes Their Beneficial Effects

Tourniquet (TQ) use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) induces ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction. This study aims to determine the effects of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC), either alone or in combination, on I/R-induced mitochondrial respiration alteration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and pain following TKA. Forty-four patients were allocated into four groups: control, CoQ10, IPC, and CoQ10 + IPC. CoQ10 dose was 300 mg/day for 28 days. IPC protocol was three cycles of 5/5-min I/R time. Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) of PBMCs were measured seven times, at baseline and during ischemic/reperfusion phases, with XFe 96 extracellular flux analyzer. Postoperative pain was assessed for 48 h. CoQ10 improved baseline mitochondrial uncoupling state; however, changes in OCRs during the early phase of I/R were not significantly different from the placebo. Compared to ischemic data, IPC transiently increased basal OCR and ATP production at 2 h after reperfusion. Clinically, CoQ10 significantly decreased pain scores and morphine requirements at 24 h. CoQ10 + IPC abolished analgesic effect of CoQ10 and mitochondrial protection of IPC. In TKA with TQ, IPC enhanced mitochondrial function by a transient increase in basal and ATP-linked respiration, and CoQ10 provides postoperative analgesic effect. Surprisingly, CoQ10 + IPC interferes with beneficial effects of each intervention.

Cardioprotection with glucose insulin potassium (GIK) during non cardiac surgery in a patient with stress induced myocardial ischemia: A case report

The administration of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) has demonstrated cardioprotective effects in cardiac surgery. A 58-year-old male with severe disabling back pain due to posterolateral lumbar pseudarthrosis was scheduled for spine surgery. He previously experienced two episodes of acute coronary syndrome that required percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary angiogram showed intrastent occlusions and multiple coronary lesions that were not suitable for percutaneous or surgical revascularization. During pharmacological stress imaging, myocardial ischemia developed in 19% of the ventricular mass and was reduced to 7% when GIK was administered. After anesthesia induction, the GIK solution was also infused and surgery was uneventful, with no signs of postoperative myocardial injury. Four days later, the patient was successfully discharged to a rehabilitation center. This is the first clinical report of GIK pretreatment during non-cardiac surgery in a patient with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Mediation of the Cardioprotective Effects of Mannitol Discovered, with Refutation of Common Protein Kinases

The osmodiuretic agent Mannitol exerts cardioprotection against ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury when applied as a pre- and/or postconditioning stimulus. Previously, we demonstrated that these properties are mediated via the activation of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mK_ATP) channels. However, considering Mannitol remains in the extracellular compartment, the question arises as to which receptor and intracellular signaling cascades are involved in myocardial protection by the osmodiuretic substance. Protein kinase B (Akt) and G (PKG), as part of the reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) and/or endothelial nitric oxide (eNOS)/PKG pathway, are two well-investigated intracellular targets conferring myocardial protection upstream of mitochondrial potassium channels. Adenosine receptor subtypes have been shown to trigger different cardioprotective pathways, for example, the reperfusion injury. Further, Mannitol induces an increased activation of the adenosine 1 receptor (A1R) in renal cells conferring its nephroprotective properties. Therefore, we investigated whether (1) Akt and PKG are possible signaling targets involved in Mannitol-induced conditioning upstream of the mK_ATP channel and/or whether (2) cardioprotection by Mannitol is mediated via activation of the A1R. All experiments were performed on male Wistar rats in vitro employing the Langendorff isolated heart perfusion technique with infarct size determination as the primary endpoint. To unravel possible protein kinase activation, Mannitol was applied in combination with the Akt (MK2206) or PKG (KT5823) inhibitor. In further groups, an A1R blocker (DPCPX) was given with or without Mannitol. Preconditioning with Mannitol (Man) significantly reduced the infarct size compared to the control group. Co-administration of the A1R blocker DPXPC fully abolished myocardial protection of Mannitol. Interestingly and in contrast to the initial hypothesis, neither administration of the Akt nor the PKG blocker had any impact on the cardioprotective properties of Mannitol-induced preconditioning. These results are quite unexpected and show that the protein kinases Akt and PKG—as possible targets of known protective signaling cascades—are not involved in Mannitol-induced preconditioning. However, the cardioprotective effects of Mannitol are mediated via the A1R.

Propofol postconditioning ameliorates hypoxia/reoxygenation induced H9c2 cell apoptosis and autophagy via upregulating forkhead transcription factors under hyperglycemia

BACKGROUND

Administration of propofol, an intravenous anesthetic with antioxidant property, immediately at the onset of post-ischemic reperfusion (propofol postconditioning, P-PostC) has been shown to confer cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury, while the underlying mechanism remains incompletely understood. The FoxO transcription factors are reported to play critical roles in activating cardiomyocyte survival signaling throughout the process of cellular injuries induced by oxidative stress and are also involved in hypoxic postconditioning mediated neuroprotection, however, the role of FoxO in postconditioning mediated protection in the heart and in particular in high glucose condition is unknown.

METHODS

Rat heart-derived H9c2 cells were exposed to high glucose (HG) for 48 h (h), then subjected to hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R, composed of 8 h of hypoxia followed by 12 h of reoxygenation) in the absence or presence of postconditioning with various concentrations of propofol (P-PostC) at the onset of reoxygenation. After having identified the optical concentration of propofol, H9c2 cells were subjected to H/R and P-PostC in the absence or presence of FoxO1 or FoxO3a gene silencing to explore their roles in P-PostC mediated protection against apoptotic and autophagic cell deaths under hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

The results showed that HG with or without H/R decreased cell viability, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in H9c2 cells, all of which were significantly reversed by propofol (P-PostC), especially at the concentration of 25 µmol/L (P25) (all P < 0.05, NC vs. HG; HG vs. HG + HR; HG + HR + P12.5 or HG + HR + P25 or HG + HR + P50 vs. HG + HR). Moreover, we found that propofol (P25) decreased H9c2 cells apoptosis and autophagy that were concomitant with increased FoxO1 and FoxO3a expression (all P < 0.05, HG + HR + P25 vs. HG + HR). The protective effects of propofol (P25) against H/R injury were reversed by silencing FoxO1 or FoxO3a (all P < 0.05, HG + HR + P25 vs. HG + HR + P25 + siRNA-1 or HG + HR + P25 + siRNA-5).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that propofol postconditioning attenuated H9c2 cardiac cells apoptosis and autophagy induced by H/R injury through upregulating FoxO1 and FoxO3a under hyperglycemia.

Ischemic preconditioning protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury in chronic kidney disease in both males and females

BACKGROUND

Uremic cardiomyopathy is a common cardiovascular complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and fibrosis enhancing the susceptibility of the heart to acute myocardial infarction. In the early stages of CKD, approximately 60% of patients are women. We aimed to investigate the influence of sex on the severity of uremic cardiomyopathy and the infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPRE) in experimental CKD.

METHODS

CKD was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy in 9-week-old male and female Wistar rats. Two months later, serum and urine laboratory parameters were measured to verify the development of CKD. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to assess cardiac function and morphology. Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis were measured by histology. Left ventricular expression of A- and B-type natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP) were measured by qRT-PCR and circulating BNP level was measured by ELISA. In a subgroup of animals, hearts were perfused according to Langendorff and were subjected to 35 min global ischemia and 120 min reperfusion with or without IPRE (3 × 5 min I/R cycles applied before index ischemia). Then infarct size or phosphorylated and total forms of proteins related to the cardioprotective RISK (AKT, ERK1,2) and SAFE (STAT3) pathways were measured by Western blot.

RESULTS

The severity of CKD was similar in males and females. However, CKD males developed more severe LVH compared to females as assessed by echocardiography. Histology revealed cardiac fibrosis only in males in CKD. LV ANP expression was significantly increased due to CKD in both sexes, however, LV BNP and circulating BNP levels failed to significantly increase in CKD. In both sexes, IPRE significantly decreased the infarct size in both the sham-operated and CKD groups. IPRE significantly increased the phospho-STAT3/STAT3 ratio in sham-operated but not in CKD animals in both sexes. There were no significant differences in phospho-AKT/AKT and phospho-ERK1,2/ERK1,2 ratios between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The infarct size-limiting effect of IPRE was preserved in both sexes in CKD despite the more severe uremic cardiomyopathy in male CKD rats. Further research is needed to identify crucial molecular mechanisms in the cardioprotective effect of IPRE in CKD.

Influence of Hyperglycemia and Diabetes on Cardioprotection by Humoral Factors Released after Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC)

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects hearts from ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in experimental studies; however, clinical RIPC trials were unsatisfactory. This discrepancy could be caused by a loss of cardioprotection due to comorbidities in patients, including diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperglycemia (HG). RIPC is discussed to confer protective properties by release of different humoral factors activating cardioprotective signaling cascades. Therefore, we investigated whether DM type 1 and/or HG (1) inhibit the release of humoral factors after RIPC and/or (2) block the cardioprotective effect directly at the myocardium. Experiments were performed on male Wistar rats. Animals in part 1 of the study were either healthy normoglycemic (NG), type 1 diabetic (DM1), or hyperglycemic (HG). RIPC was implemented by four cycles of 5 min bilateral hind-limb ischemia/reperfusion. Control (Con) animals were not treated. Blood plasma taken in vivo was further investigated in isolated rat hearts in vitro. Plasma from diseased animals (DM1 or HG) was administered onto healthy (NG) hearts for 10 min before 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Part 2 of the study was performed vice versa-plasma taken in vivo, with or without RIPC, from healthy rats was transferred to DM1 and HG hearts in vitro. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Part 1: RIPC plasma from NG (NG Con: 49 ± 8% vs. NG RIPC 29 ± 6%; p < 0.05) and DM1 animals (DM1 Con: 47 ± 7% vs. DM1 RIPC: 38 ± 7%; p < 0.05) reduced infarct size. Interestingly, transfer of HG plasma showed comparable infarct sizes independent of prior treatment (HG Con: 34 ± 9% vs. HG RIPC 35 ± 9%; ns). Part 2: No infarct size reduction was detectable when transferring RIPC plasma from healthy rats to DM1 (DM1 Con: 54 ± 13% vs. DM1 RIPC 53 ± 10%; ns) or HG hearts (HG Con: 60 ± 16% vs. HG RIPC 53 ± 14%; ns). These results suggest that: (1) RIPC under NG and DM1 induces the release of humoral factors with cardioprotective impact, (2) HG plasma might own cardioprotective properties, and (3) RIPC does not confer cardioprotection in DM1 and HG myocardium.

Combination of Cyclosporine A and Levosimendan Induces Cardioprotection under Acute Hyperglycemia

Prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction is detrimentally affected by comorbidities like diabetes mellitus. In the experimental setting, not only diabetes mellitus but also acute hyperglycemia is shown to hamper cardioprotective properties by multiple pharmacological agents. For Levosimendan-induced postconditioning, a strong infarct size reducing effect is demonstrated in healthy myocardium. However, acute hyperglycemia is suggested to block this protective effect. In the present study, we investigated whether (1) Levosimendan-induced postconditioning exerts a concentration-dependent effect under hyperglycemic conditions and (2) whether a combination with the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) blocker cyclosporine A (CsA) restores the cardioprotective properties of Levosimendan under hyperglycemia. For this experimental investigation, hearts of male Wistar rats were randomized and mounted onto a Langendorff system, perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer with a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All isolated hearts were subjected to 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion under hyperglycemic conditions. (1) Hearts were perfused with various concentrations of Levosimendan (Lev) (0.3–10 μM) for 10 min at the onset of reperfusion, in order to investigate a concentration–response relationship. In the second set of experiments (2), 0.3 μM Levosimendan was administered in combination with the mPTP blocker CsA, to elucidate the underlying mechanism of blocked cardioprotection under hyperglycemia. Infarct size was determined by tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. (1) Control (Con) hearts showed an infarct size of 52 ± 12%. None of the administered Levosimendan concentrations reduced the infarct size (Lev0.3: 49 ± 9%; Lev1: 57 ± 9%; Lev3: 47 ± 11%; Lev10: 50 ± 7%; all ns vs. Con). (2) Infarct size of Con and Lev0.3 hearts were 53 ± 4% and 56 ± 2%, respectively. CsA alone had no effect on infarct size (CsA: 50 ± 10%; ns vs. Con). The combination of Lev0.3 and CsA (Lev0.3 ± CsA) induced a significant infarct size reduction compared to Lev0.3 (Lev0.3+CsA: 35 ± 4%; p < 0.05 vs. Lev0.3). We demonstrated that (1) hyperglycemia blocks the infarct size reducing effects of Levosimendan-induced postconditioning and cannot be overcome by an increased concentration. (2) Furthermore, cardioprotection under hyperglycemia can be restored by combining Levosimendan and the mPTP blocker CsA.

Pharmacological Conditioning of the Heart: An Update on Experimental Developments and Clinical Implications

The aim of pharmacological conditioning is to protect the heart against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and its consequences. There is extensive literature that reports a multitude of different cardioprotective signaling molecules and mechanisms in diverse experimental protocols. Several pharmacological agents have been evaluated in terms of myocardial I/R injury. While results from experimental studies are immensely encouraging, translation into the clinical setting remains unsatisfactory. This narrative review wants to focus on two aspects: (1) give a comprehensive update on new developments of pharmacological conditioning in the experimental setting concentrating on recent literature of the last two years and (2) briefly summarize clinical evidence of these cardioprotective substances in the perioperative setting highlighting their clinical implications. By directly opposing each pharmacological agent regarding its recent experimental knowledge and most important available clinical data, a clear overview is given demonstrating the remaining gap between basic research and clinical practice. Finally, future perspectives are given on how we might overcome the limited translatability in the field of pharmacological conditioning.

Cardioprotective Properties of Mannitol-Involvement of Mitochondrial Potassium Channels

Cardiac preconditioning (PC) and postconditioning (PoC) are powerful measures against the consequences of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury. Mannitol-a hyperosmolar solution-is clinically used for treatment of intracranial and intraocular pressure or promotion of diuresis in renal failure. Next to these clinical indications, different organ-protective properties-e.g., perioperative neuroprotection-are described. However, whether Mannitol also confers cardioprotection via a pre- and/or postconditioning stimulus, possibly reducing consequences of I/R injury, remains to be seen. Therefore, in the present study we investigated whether (1) Mannitol-induced pre- and/or postconditioning induces myocardial infarct size reduction and (2) activation of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mKATP) channels is involved in cardioprotection by Mannitol. Experiments were performed on isolated hearts of male Wistar rats via a pressure controlled Langendorff system, randomized into 7 groups. Each heart underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Control hearts (Con) received Krebs-Henseleit buffer as vehicle only. Pre- and postconditioning was achieved by administration of 11 mmol/L Mannitol for 10 min before ischemia (Man-PC) or immediately at the onset of reperfusion (Man-PoC), respectively. In further groups, the mKATP channel blocker 5HD, was applied with and without Mannitol, to determine the potential underlying cardioprotective mechanisms. Primary endpoint was infarct size, determined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Mannitol significantly reduced infarct size both as a pre- (Man-PC) and postconditioning (Man-PoC) stimulus compared to control hearts (Man-PC: 31 ± 4%; Man-PoC: 35 ± 6%, each p < 0.05 vs. Con: 57 ± 9%). The mKATP channel inhibitor completely abrogated the cardioprotective effect of Mannitol-induced pre- (5HD-PC-Man-PC: 59 ± 8%, p < 0.05 vs. Man-PC) and postconditioning (5HD-PoC-Man-PoC: 59 ± 10% vs. p < 0.05 Man-PoC). Infarct size was not influenced by 5HD itself (5HD-PC: 60 ± 14%; 5HD-PoC: 54 ± 14%, each ns vs. Con). This study demonstrates that Mannitol (1) induces myocardial pre- and postconditioning and (2) confers cardioprotection via activation of mKATP channels.

[Perioperative cardioprotection - From bench to bedside : Current experimental evidence and possible reasons for the limited translation into the clinical setting]

Hintergrund

Ziel der perioperativen Kardioprotektion ist es, die Auswirkungen eines Ischämie- und Reperfusionsschadens zu minimieren. Aus anästhesiologischer Sicht spielt dieser Aspekt insbesondere in der Herzchirurgie bei Patienten mit Einsatz der Herz-Lungen-Maschine, aber auch allgemein bei längerfristigen hypotensiven Phasen oder perioperativen ischämischen Ereignissen im nichtkardiochirurgischen Setting eine wichtige Rolle. Im Laufe der letzten Jahre konnten diverse pharmakologische sowie nichtpharmakologische Strategien der Kardioprotektion identifiziert werden. Die Ergebnisse von Studien an isoliertem Gewebe sowie von tierexperimentellen In-vivo-Studien sind vielversprechend. Eine Translation dieser kardioprotektiven Strategien in die klinische Praxis ist bislang jedoch nicht gelungen. Große klinische Studien konnten keine signifikante Verbesserung des Outcome der Patienten zeigen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Dieser Übersichtsartikel gibt einen Überblick über die aktuelle experimentelle Evidenz pharmakologischer und nichtpharmakologischer Kardioprotektion. Außerdem sollen mögliche Gründe für die limitierte Translation diskutiert werden. Schließlich werden Möglichkeiten aufgezeigt, wie der Schritt „from bench to bedside“ in Zukunft doch noch gelingen könnte.

Material und Methoden

Narrative Übersichtsarbeit.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Trotz der vielversprechenden präklinischen experimentellen Ansätze zum Thema Kardioprotektion besteht nach wie vor eine große Diskrepanz zu den Ergebnissen aus großen klinischen Studien in der perioperativen Phase. Mögliche Gründe für die limitierte Translation könnten insbesondere Komorbiditäten und Komedikationen, die Wahl des Anästhesieverfahrens, aber auch die Wahl des Studiendesigns sein. Eine sorgfältige Studienplanung mit Berücksichtigung der genannten Probleme sowie ein simultaner Einsatz mehrerer kardioprotektiver Strategien mit dem Ziel eines additiven bzw. synergistischen Effekts stellen mögliche Ansätze für die Zukunft dar.

Perioperative Cardioprotection: Clinical Implications

Perioperative cardioprotection aims to minimize the consequences of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. In isolated tissue and animal experiments, several treatments have been identified providing cardioprotection. Some of these strategies have been confirmed in clinical proof-of-concept studies. However, the final translation of cardioprotective strategies to really improve clinical outcome has been disappointing: large randomized controlled clinical trials mostly revealed inconclusive, neutral, or negative results. This review provides an overview of the currently available evidence regarding clinical implications of perioperative cardioprotective therapies from an anesthesiological perspective, highlighting nonpharmacological as well as pharmacological strategies. We discuss reasons why translation of promising experimental results into clinical practice and outcome improvement is hampered by potential confounders and suggest future perspectives to overcome these limitations.