Comparison of Monotherapy Versus Combination of Intravenous Ibuprofen and Propacetamol (Acetaminophen) for Reduction of Postoperative Opioid Administration in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Intravenously Administered Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review

Intravenously administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute a crucial component of multimodal analgesia strategies in surgical settings. This narrative review aims to provide an up-to-date evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and clinical use of intravenous (IV) NSAIDs for perioperative pain management in adults and children. The NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) approved in Europe for the short-term symptomatic treatment of acute, moderate perioperative pain via IV infusion in adults and/or children have been influenced by US and global guidelines and practice: the drugs primarily reviewed here are ibuprofen, ketorolac, ketoprofen, naproxen, paracetamol, and acetylsalicylic acid. Furthermore, intravenous ibuprofen is authorized for the short-term symptomatic treatment of fever. In contrast to intravenous ketoprofen, intravenous ibuprofen is authorized for administration to children over 6 years of age or weighing more than 20 kg. Overall, IV ibuprofen had a more favorable profile with regard to peri- and postoperative opioid sparing and pain relief. Oral ibuprofen and IV ibuprofen have similar levels of efficacy, although IV ibuprofen has a shorter onset of action and is required in patients who are unable to take oral medications. The frequency of significant adverse events appears to be similar for ibuprofen and paracetamol. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses report that intravenous NSAIDs reduce postoperative opioid consumption by approximately 20-60%, improving pain management with fewer opioid-related side effects. In indications in infants, the choice of medication is limited, and the oral route is not always feasible; IV formulations of ibuprofen are preferred in this setting. Topics for further research should include head-to-head trials of IV NSAIDs.

Updating Clinical Practice: Improving Perioperative Pain Management for Adeno-Tonsillectomy in Children

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Perioperative acute pain management in pediatric patients is essential to reduce complications. Adenoidectomy-Tonsillectomy are surgical procedures requiring pain control, and risk minimization for postoperative bleeding, nausea, and vomiting. Despite their known secondary effects, the use of opioid analgesics is still preponderant in pediatric perioperative management. We performed a comprehensive review on adeno-tonsillectomy perioperative pain management in children. We developed and implemented a multimodal analgesia protocol aimed to improve patients' pain management while consistently reducing opioids use.

METHODS/RESULTS

relevant Information was summarized, then compared to our clinical needs. Learnings were used to create and implement a multimodal analgesia protocol that we use in patients 3-9 years-old undergoing adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy. The full protocol is presented. Analgesic strategies have emerged to reduce or avoid the use of opioids. Among these strategies, combining different non-opioid analgesics (Ibuprofen, Paracetamol, Metamizole) has been shown to be an effective and safe pharmacological strategy when implemented as part of perioperative multimodal analgesia protocols. Considerable evidence associating the use of NSAIDs with a bigger risk of postoperative bleeding does not exist.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative management of adenotonsillectomy pain should include preventive and multimodal analgesia, which have shown to provide significantly more effective analgesia than some opioid regimens. Ibuprofen offers highly effective analgesia for postoperative pain, particularly when combined with acetaminophen.

Supplemental low-dose esketamine to propofol versus propofol alone on perioperative characteristics in children undergoing surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the use of the esketamine-propofol combination (esketofol) in pediatric surgery. This study aimed to investigate the effect of esketofol versus propofol alone on the perioperative characteristics of children undergoing minor surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-four children aged two to six years were randomly assigned to either the propofol group or the esketofol group. Intraoperative outcomes included bispectral index, dosage of anesthetics, and extubation time. Postoperative outcomes comprised oropharyngeal airway usage, time to orientation, time to eye-opening, length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit, the need for rescue opioids, pain rating using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale, Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Score, nausea and vomiting, and psychotomimetic symptoms. The FLACC pain score was the primary outcome, and the remaining parameters were considered secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The FLACC Score (2 [1, 3.3] vs. 4 [3, 5.3], P<0.001) and frequency of rescue opioids (14.3% vs. 33.3%, P=0.040) were significantly lower, while Bispectral Index (BIS) was higher (P<0.001) in the esketofol group compared with the propofol group. Moreover, the time to orientation and length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were significantly longer in the esketofol group compared with the propofol group (P=0.029 and P=0.025, respectively). The other outcomes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Esketofol reduces postoperative pain and the need for rescue opioids, but it extends recovery time in the PACU and increases BIS without affecting other outcomes.

Ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in children

BACKGROUND

Children often require pain management following surgery to avoid suffering. Effective pain management has consequences for healing time and quality of life. Ibuprofen, a frequently used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administered to children, is used to treat pain and inflammation in the postoperative period.

OBJECTIVES

1) To assess the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen (any dose) for acute postoperative pain management in children compared with placebo or other active comparators. 2) To compare ibuprofen administered at different doses, routes (e.g. oral, intravenous, etc.), or strategies (e.g. as needed versus as scheduled).

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard Cochrane search methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and trials registries in August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children aged 17 years and younger, treated for acute postoperative or postprocedural pain, that compared ibuprofen to placebo or any active comparator. We included RCTs that compared different administration routes, doses of ibuprofen and schedules.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We adhered to standard Cochrane methods for data collection and analysis. Our primary outcomes were pain relief reported by the child, pain intensity reported by the child, adverse events, and serious adverse events. We present results using risk ratios (RR) and standardised mean differences (SMD), with the associated confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 43 RCTs that enroled 4265 children (3935 children included in this review). We rated the overall risk of bias at the study level as high or unclear for 37 studies that had one or several unclear or high risk of bias judgements across the domains. We judged six studies as having a low risk of bias across all domains. Ibuprofen versus placebo (35 RCTs) No studies reported pain relief reported by the child or a third party, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen probably reduces child-reported pain intensity less than two hours postintervention compared to placebo (SMD -1.12, 95% CI -1.39 to -0.86; 3 studies, 259 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may reduce child-reported pain intensity, two hours to less than 24 hours postintervention (SMD -1.01, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.78; 5 studies, 345 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may result in little to no difference in adverse events compared to placebo (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.23; 5 studies, 384 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen versus paracetamol (21 RCTs) No studies reported pain relief reported by the child or a third party, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen likely reduces child-reported pain intensity less than two hours postintervention compared to paracetamol (SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.02; 2 studies, 100 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may slightly reduce child-reported pain intensity two hours to 24 hours postintervention (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.02; 6 studies, 422 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may result in little to no difference in adverse events (0 events in each group; 1 study, 44 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen versus morphine (1 RCT) No studies reported pain relief or pain intensity reported by the child or a third party, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen likely results in a reduction in adverse events compared to morphine (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83; risk difference (RD) -0.25, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.09; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4; 1 study, 154 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen versus ketorolac (1 RCT) No studies reported pain relief or pain intensity reported by the child, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen may result in a reduction in adverse events compared to ketorolac (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96; RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.04; NNTB 4; 1 study, 59 children; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite identifying 43 RCTs, we remain uncertain about the effect of ibuprofen compared to placebo or active comparators for some critical outcomes and in the comparisons between different doses, schedules and routes for ibuprofen administration. This is largely due to poor reporting on important outcomes such as serious adverse events, and poor study conduct or reporting that reduced our confidence in the results, along with small underpowered studies. Compared to placebo, ibuprofen likely results in pain reduction less than two hours postintervention, however, the efficacy might be lower at two hours to 24 hours. Compared to paracetamol, ibuprofen likely results in pain reduction up to 24 hours postintervention. We could not explore if there was a different effect in different kinds of surgeries or procedures. Ibuprofen likely results in a reduction in adverse events compared to morphine, and in little to no difference in bleeding when compared to paracetamol. We remain mostly uncertain about the safety of ibuprofen compared to other drugs.

The Analgesic Effects of the Addition of Intravenous Ibuprofen to a Multimodal Analgesia Regimen for Pain Management After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous ibuprofen is used to control fever and pain. This study aimed to assess the analgesic effects of the addition of intravenous ibuprofen to a multimodal analgesia regimen for pain management after pediatric cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled, double-blinded, superiority study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-eight pediatric patients who underwent open cardiac surgery using midline sternotomy incision were screened for eligibility; 10 patients were excluded, leaving 68 patients (34 patients in the ibuprofen group and 34 patients in the control group) for final data analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the ibuprofen group, in which the patient received intravenous ibuprofen infusion of 10 mg/kg/6 hours for 24 hours, or the control group, in which the patient received a placebo 0.9% saline.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the 24-hour postoperative fentanyl consumption, and the secondary endpoints were postoperative modified objective pain score and the incidence of ibuprofen-related side effects (eg, vomiting, epigastric pain, bleeding, and renal dysfunction). The mean total fentanyl consumption (μg/kg) during the first postoperative 24 hours after extubation was significantly lower (p<0.001) in the ibuprofen group (3.5 ± 1.3) than the control group (5.1 ± 1.4). The median postoperative modified objective pain score was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the ibuprofen group than the control group at 0 hours, 2 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 20 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. Ibuprofen did not cause significant increases in the incidences of bleeding, epigastric pain, and vomiting. Postoperative renal dysfunction was not reported in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of intravenous ibuprofen to a multimodal analgesia regimen for pain management after pediatric cardiac surgery improved postoperative analgesia in terms of reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores.

Comparison of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are often used as part of multimodal analgesia to control postoperative pain. This randomized, controlled, double-blinded, non-inferiority study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac in children undergoing open unilateral lower abdominal surgery. The authors hypothesized that postoperative analgesia produced by intravenous ibuprofen would be non-inferior to that of intravenous ketorolac.

METHODS

Sixty-six children aged 2 to 8 years who were scheduled to undergo unilateral lower abdominal surgery, were recruited. Patients in the ibuprofen group received 10mg/kg/6h intravenous ibuprofen. Patients in the ketorolac group were given 0.5mg/kg/6h intravenous ketorolac. The primary outcome measure was 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain score, the incidence of early postoperative fever and the incidence of ibuprofen and ketorolac adverse effects including pain during drug infusion, vomiting, epigastric pain and allergic reaction.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients completed the study (30 ibuprofen, 29 ketorolac). There was no significant difference (P=0.305) in the mean (SD) 24-h postoperative morphine consumption (μ/kg) between intravenous ibuprofen, 16.00 (5.31), and ketorolac, 14.65 (4.61). The reported pain scores were similar in both groups. The incidence of postoperative fever was significantly lower (p=0.039) in the ibuprofen group (3%) than the ketorolac group (20%). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both ibuprofen and ketorolac groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous ibuprofen can be used as an alternative to ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing unilateral lower abdominal surgery because both drugs similarly provide safe and effective postoperative analgesia.

Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation

BACKGROUND

Safe and effective analgesia strategy remains one of the priorities for pediatric inguinal hernia treatment.

AIM

To explore safety and efficacy of dexmededomidine monotherapy for postoperative analgesia in children who received laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation.

METHODS

This randomized single-center controlled trial included 390 children (aged 1-3 years, ASA grade I-II), randomly divided into a dexmededomidine group (D group), a dexmededomidine + sufentanil group (DS group), and a sufentanil group (S group). The primary endpoint was percentage of children with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score ≤ 3 points 2 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The comparisons of the FLACC scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). The sedative effects in the D group were significantly better than those in the S group (P > 0.05), but not significantly different from those in the DS group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the D group than in the S group and DS group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Analgesic effects of dexmededomidine monotherapy are comparable to those of sufentanil alone or in combination with dexmededomidine for children who underwent laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation, with better sedative effects and a lower incidence of adverse events.

Pain in children undergoing tonsillotomy with alternating ibuprofen and paracetamol - a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The optimal pain therapy for children undergoing tonsillotomy remains unknown. Our aim was to evaluate a standard pain therapy including the alternating application of ibuprofen and paracetamol.

METHODS

Pain intensity of 81 in-patients after tonsillotomy aged 2-12 years was evaluated three times daily (mean observation 3.85 days) using the Children's and Infants' Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) in children <5 years, or with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) in older children. Parents completed the Parents' Postoperative Pain Measure (PPPM-D) in addition. Exceeding the cut-off value in one of the scores implied the indication for an opioid rescue medication (RM). Endpoints were number of children with indication for the RM, course of pain, concordance between pain scales, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Overall, 45.7% of children needed the RM either in the recovery room or on the ward. The rate of children having an indication for RM on the ward was 30.9%. The highest proportion of affected children was identified on the day of surgery (32.1%). Most indications were detected with the PPPM-D only. A comparison with an earlier study showed less affected children compared to ibuprofen monotherapy on the day of surgery and the first postoperative day. Eleven children (13.6%) developed fever.

CONCLUSION

Although our pain therapy concept was effective from postoperative day 1 onwards, it needs improvement for the day of surgery. The overall concordance between the PPPM-D and CHIPPS or FPS-R was low. Fever might be a confounder for the pain intensity measurement with the PPPM-D.