Effect of Intravenous Acetaminophen on Mean Arterial Blood Pressure: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EFfect of Intravenous ACetaminophen on PosToperative HypOxemia After Abdominal SurgeRy Trial

The hemodynamic effects of IV paracetamol in intensive care patients

Objective

This retrospective observational study conducted in a general ICU aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of IV paracetamol by monitoring blood pressure, urine output, and core temperature post-administration.

Design

The study was designed as a retrospective observational study in a general ICU setting.

Setting

The study was conducted in a general intensive care unit (ICU).

Patients

Data from 498 patients receiving IV paracetamol in various clinical contexts were analyzed.

Interventions

Patients received IV paracetamol for analgesia and fever reduction as part of their clinical care.

Measurements and main results

The study analyzed the hemodynamic effects of IV paracetamol by monitoring blood pressure, urine output, and core temperature post-administration. A significant decrease in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure values was observed across different patient subgroups, notably 45-60 min post-infusion. An increase in noradrenaline dosage and a decrease in urine output indicated a decline in end-organ perfusion following IV paracetamol administration. Multivariate analysis identified associations between clinical factors (such as general anesthesia and cardiac conditions) and changes in blood pressure.

Conclusions

While IV paracetamol remains a valuable therapeutic option for pain and fever management, especially in hypertensive patients with specific conditions like traumatic brain injury and cerebral vascular accident, careful monitoring, and individualized dosing strategies are recommended in critically ill patients to maintain hemodynamic stability and optimize clinical outcomes. These findings contribute to enhancing our understanding of IV paracetamol hemodynamic effects and inform evidence-based practices for its use in ICU settings.

Nonopioid analgesics for analgesia in critically ill patients: Friends, enemies, or collaborators

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) experience pain, which they describe as a significant cause of stress during treatment. It can progress to chronic pain and significantly affect the quality of life. Opioids have long been the backbone of ICU pain therapy. The consequences of their long-term use are known today, such as prolonged ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, resulting in increased treatment costs. Additionally, abstinence syndrome is a consequence of abrupt opioid withdrawal. Also, there is a risk of tolerance and hyperalgesia after prolonged opioid use. Globally, opioid dependence after hospital opioid treatment is alarming, although there is still a lack of data on its incidence after ICU. Multimodal analgesia enables comfort to the patient, opioid-sparing, and avoidance of side effects of non-opioid analgesics. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a broad group of drugs recommended with paracetamol to treat mild to moderate acute postoperative pain. Although often prescribed by intensivists, their use in treating painful conditions in ICU is controversial due to the possible consequences on the organs of critically ill patients. Due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenases, NSAIDs indirectly cause vasoconstriction of the renal arteries and arterioles, leading to kidney damage. NSAIDs inhibit platelet aggregation and may predispose to bleeding. Analgesia of a critically ill patient is a important part of their treatment, however it can be challenging in certain patients. Numerous combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches can be adapted to the patient's current characteristics.

Associations between intraoperative and post-anesthesia care unit hypotension and surgical ward hypotension

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To test whether patients who experience hypotension in the post-anesthesia care unit or during surgery are most likely to experience hypotension on surgical wards.

DESIGN

A prediction study using data from two randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Operating room, post-anesthesia care unit, and surgical ward.

PATIENTS

550 adult patients having abdominal surgery with ASA physical status I-IV.

INTERVENTIONS

Blood pressure measurement per routine intraoperatively, and with continuous non-invasive monitoring postoperatively.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary predictors were minimum mean arterial pressure (<60, <65, <70 and < 80 mmHg) and minimum systolic blood pressure (<70, <75, <80, <85 mmHg) in the post-anesthesia care unit. The secondary predictors were intraoperative minimum blood pressures with the same thresholds as the primary ones. Our outcome was ward hypotension defined as mean pressure < 70 mmHg or systolic pressure < 85 mmHg. A threshold was considered clinically useful if both sensitivity and specificity exceeded 0.75.

MAIN RESULTS

Minimum mean and systolic pressures in the post-anesthesia care unit similarly predicted ward mean or systolic hypotension, with the areas under the curves near 0.74. The best performing threshold was mean pressure < 80 mmHg in the post-anesthesia care unit which had a sensitivity of 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35, 0.47) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87, 0.94) for ward mean pressure < 70 mmHg and a sensitivity of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.37, 0.51) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84, 0.91) for ward systolic pressure < 85 mmHg. The areas under the curves using intraoperative hypotension to predict ward hypotension were roughly similar at about 0.60, with correspondingly low sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative hypotension poorly predicted ward hypotension. Pressures in the post-anesthesia care unit were more predictive, but the combination of sensitivity and specificity remained poor. Unless far better predictors are identified, all surgical inpatients should be considered at risk for postoperative hypotension.